Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
YOu are completely wrong as the notes arent floorless.
And now you know.
I suggest you understand what toxic is. There aren't floorless convertibles.
Try again. Nphc takimg loans is not toxic. Just like taking loans from a bank except people can choose shares if they like.
You do realize their arent toxic note holders anymore, right? YOu have to read the filings to know that. If you dont read, you dont know.
And I don't like looking stupid so I actually read them.
Again, companies do NOT have to have an FDA clinical trial to do a trial.
Thats just common sense.
Im hoping NPHC comes out with a drug for Alzheimer's.
Here is what Deitsch the CEO has done for NPHC in 19 years:
Added Many patents and trademarks to Nutra's portfolio
Clinical Trials in Multiple Phases
1. Multiple Sclerosis Trials
2. Herpes Simplex Infections 1 & 2 Trials
3. Adrenomyeloneuropathy Trials
4. HIV Trials
5. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Trials
6. Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials
7. Pain Trials
Products launched and brought to Market
1. Cobroxin
2. Nyloxin
3. Pet Pain Away
4. Equine pain Away
5. Luxury Feet
Published Research
http://receptopharm.com/drug_development/published_research.php
https://www.nutrapharma.com/research
Increased Sales on Amazon and Walmart
RPI-78M has received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for the treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis
Huge personal loans from Deitsch to NPHC tells me the CEO knows and believes in NPHC
I just thought you knew something with the statement you made. That's all. I see it's a prediction now.
Can you provide proof of your updated time frame?
the problem is it still has this
"would require each CAT reporting firm to indicate where it is asserting use of the bona fide market making exception under Regulation SHO. "
Newsflash. The company nphc doesn't need to pr every step of the way. Hope that helps.
So which is it. First you said nphc must disclose the trial because it's a material event. Now you said nphc disclosed it in a pr.
Thats not a material event.
I disagree with your assessment. Because nphc hasn't updated you on ms trials doesnt mean they arent in progress.
I'm not sure what you don't understand again. As far as we all know nphc is working in Ms trials and talking to the govt. Because you don't here anything in your time frame doesn't mean it's not happening
Maybe you should contact someone over at dtra. i dont work for them. I never gave any time tables. The company says they had a call and have a lobbyist group in dc.
because it hasnt happened on your time table, doesnt mean its not happening or its dead. wont know until the company says something to everyone on it.
By law he had to charge some percent. He obviously believes in the company.
Only time and a jury will tell.
I dont believe that any amount of small shares purchased was manipulated as the stock went nowhere but down on those days.
the sec is going to have a hard time proving deitsch manipulated the share price with small buys as the stock went down on those days.
a jury is going to question that.
and saying buying shares in the market is manipulation is not true as it isn't illegal to buy your own companies shares.
The broker-dealer's representative told Deitsch the compliance department had flagged the trades as uneconomical and that they looked manipulative.
Thats why his account was closed. because they looked manipulatve.
Looked and were are 2 different things.
I think the sec is going to have a hard time proving that he was manipulating a stock with such small volume being bought.
Not as a gift. at a very low-interest rate. i believe it was 4%. Its in the financials. Better than any bank would give.
Those conversations don't go to him. Who ever told you that lied. CEO doesn't even take pay. His pay accumulates. It's in the financials.
So you are saying that if there was criminal activity that it's allowed to continue until the judge decides on the civil matter?
It's been more than 3 years. The doj wouldn't wait 3 years and allow more criminal activity to occur. Looks like no criminal activity at all. Just wild accusations.
That just makes most sense
CEO cares. He put in 250 plus thousand iof his own money into nphc in 2020.
Makes absolutely no sense to do that if he thought he or nphc was in any trouble.
It's a civil trial. Not criminal. If there was criminal activity the CEO would've been charged. Nphc would not be trading.
That's just common sense. Any agency that would bring criminal charges wouldn't go let's wait and see the CEO do more criminal activity. They would step in and do something asap.
It's like the police saying let some guy keep killing people until his civil trial is over.
See how that makes no sense.
Based on what, buying stock. CEO didn't sell any stock. 2 over reaching prs already dismissed from judge. That almost never ever happens. The India one will get dismissed too as anyone can check imports to countries. The sec through in charges to try and bully the company. What else is Bs from the sec????
Sec got their assed handed to them for over reaching in ripple xrp.
Ce already dropped the stock from .008 to where it is today. So the ce has been effective in dropping the stock and keeping it where it is.
Stock isn't crashing further cause there is no toxic dilution.
Absolutely no proof what so ever about doj being involved in nphc. The only thing they are looking at are board short scammers
Point proven. Nphc must've did what was asked.
Doesnt mean the trials won't get FDA approval.
Nothing is approved until its approved.
The FDA not once stepped in to stop NPHC from selling their products.
Just a marketing Warning letter.
That's not proof at all.
you Failed to show why, maybe you can point everyone to why you believe that opinion.
nphc says they are doing trials and talking to the government through lobbyists.
Where is your proof that they are not.
correct me if im wrong but according to nphc, they are still working on these. The company hasnt announced that they stopped pursuing them.
maybe you can point everyone to why you believe that opinion.
Who is annoyed about ms trials?? ms trials are a good thing.
wait just a minute. you are saying if someone actually reads the financials that they will be informed that said notes below are not toxic. Talk about a big clue there.
Thats like saying its nonsense for any company to take a loan with an interest rate. just nonsense.
Exactly proves the point about Deitsch putting his own outside money into nphc. irrefutable proof.
The independently audited financials says Deitsch does put his own money into nphc. Im not a moron. Thats why i read the nphc financials. just have to read the financials.
Lmao again. Show us where those notes were floorless to be called toxic.
lone wolf hahahahaha
Converting stock at .002 is obviously unequivocally not toxic. That's why nphc doesn't crash. Hardly any volume as people are holding. Toxic notes would be huge dumping volume. There isn't any huge dumping volume.
Lone wolf. Hahaha
Lmao. Yes failed to show a toxic note. I don't think someone understood the question.
Didn't check at all as the grant from 2010 is in the financials. So they got that money.
Just non sense as usual.