Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The report was published on March 28, 2017; it will have no effect on Tuesday.
Unlike him to post old news. Strange.
Follow the link. Publish date is literally March 28, 2017 (when made public). Link to the PDF is there, too. :)
It's old news that came out in March/April of this year.
http://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/report/blueprint-balance-federal-budget-fiscal-year-2018 (Date: March 28, 2017).
Don't sweat it.
Congress asks Mel Watt to do something about it. Mel Watt asks Congress to do something about it.
It's pretty ridiculous.
Watt's letter:
FHFA Director Watt says he's working with Treasury Secretary Mnuchin on options to address Fannie and Freddie's dwindling capital buffers pic.twitter.com/jtA3PlHy8B
— Joe Light (@joelight) September 29, 2017
FHFA STRATEGIC PLAN: FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022 (released on September 27, 2017)
https://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/StratPlan_PI_9272017.pdf
It's all hogwash.
The GSEs HAVE ALREADY undergone major reform. Mel Watt stated this. Timothy J. Mayopoulos stated this.
It is congress' job to work on housing reform.
There are two different arenas of reform and these swindlers continuously confuse everyone to throw them off!
That is a freaking fantastic analogy.
That's old, unfortunately. There was no meeting in Orlando at that time this year. Hate to say this, but you just surfaced an article from March 1998.
http://www.tju.edu/jeffnews/past/98/march/index.html
The SGO Annual Meeting is in March in Tampa this year:
https://www.sgo.org/education/annual-meeting-on-womens-cancer/
Turns out that it was uploaded on January 24, 2014. It's new!
http://www.avax-tech.com/about/pdfs/
http://www.avax-tech.com/about/pdfs/avaxfactsheet.pdf
Does anyone know how old (or new) this PDF is?
I wasn't referring to your article, so I apologize that my message somehow got misconstrued. There was a second article that came in a few days after yours that takes the exact opposite opinion of your own (which what I was calling out--how there can be two articles within days of each other on SA with completely polar fundamentals). I have actually purchased shares of the company largely because of your research, and so, again, I'm sorry that my annoyance somehow seemed to be applied to your work (definitely wasn't!).
I was able to get shares, but will the bid/ask ever work themselves out? Shouldn't they be displayed by now?
"Medical, commercial and patient interest in the new drugs is intense. “Research activity is just going through the roof,” Topalian says. While Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck and other companies rush to get their versions of the therapy approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of melanoma and lung and kidney cancers, the substances also are being tested in smaller trials against cancers of the blood, colon, stomach, breast, bladder, liver, head and neck and brain. “The field is just afire now,” says immunologist Gordon Freeman of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston."
Bingo.
A Tale of Two Pities
By David Berd
August 2012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3551891/
They may want to get on that prominent copyright symbol at the bottom of each page with the year 2011.
It's been so long, but I now remember David Berd leaving the company and that was terrible news:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1015441/000114420408062235/v131244_8k.htm
It is pretty big that he is back. This is his baby. Heck, I bet if they even released a PR stating "inventor of AVAX Technologies' AC Vaccine Technology has returned to AVAX Technologies as Chief Medical Officer" this stock would grow some bigger wings.
Ah, you're right. What the heck?! However, with that noted, it looks like it was before the share exchange with GDTK.
Lying? Where?
The last documented share count by KGET in SEC filings was 3 billion shares, after which 1 billion were returned to treasury.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1082176/000072174813000883/ex10_1shareexchangeagmnt.htm
You messed up on your own math there, haha.
As you provided, and which was the last documented share count for GDTK, there were 4 million outstanding shares. So only 68 million shares will be added to KGET.
Yeah, that's true--they do give a viewpoint and opinion for readers to analyze (whether it's true or not). I was actually thinking of using that same phrase--read the articles with a "grain of salt."
That SA bunch is the biggest group of manipulators around. I wish their articles weren't syndicated directly into mainstream news feeds. Their content is nothing different than articles that come out on pumpanddumps.com. They'll overly hype or bash any given stock at any given time if they find a way to manipulate data to their benefit regardless of truth. I've literally followed a stock where one day they said it's the greatest stock and then not but a few days later they say it's terrible.
Just so you know, the author of that article is this board's moderator. It looks like he knows his stuff. :)
Alright, I see that you did post it; I missed it the last time I looked at your posts. However, I'm not exactly sure what Bryan Kang could say positively whether KleanGas was legit or not--the guy got screwed and there's no denying that. He signed an agreement that was cancelled less than a week later. Who wouldn't be mad? Or feel wronged? I'm just not sure that Bryan Kang is the right source.
Everyone keeps saying watch out because there was never a deal with Bryan Kang and that Bryan Kang says it himself. Well, that's true, there never was a deal and that was stated by KleanGas itself, too. I have no idea what the issue is here--it's all getting blown way out of proportion.
You never did post that phone number.
Thanks for the info. I really appreciate it.
I have had shares transfer like that and I remember that number popping up before all of the dust settled.
How long have they been listed in your account like that?
That would be the best way to know for sure.
I don't know the law regarding whether a company does or does not need a filing stating "the stock exchange is now complete." It would seem redundant in my book when they already said it would be completed by the end of January.
Also keep in mind that Bo Linton was the CEO of Green Day Technologies and now he is the CEO of KleanGas Energy Technologies, so the merger is definitely finalized.
Source? Filings say it happened already.
If you owned GDKT, then you would have 17 KGET shares for each share you owned of GDKT.
I completely agree with you. I keep trying to tell everyone this and they get all huffy puffy with me when I'm simply trying to explain the lackluster price movement.
My research leaves KGET at around 2 billion outstanding shares.
What do you mean no? LOL!
You can't just say no to something that is truth.
"This SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT, dated as of November 25, 2013 (this “Agreement”), is between Kleangas Energy Technologies Inc.(KET) a Delaware Corporation and Green Day Technologies Inc. a Florida Corporation (GDT)."
That is a legal introduction to an abbreviation for the rest of the filing. It has nothing to do with the stock.
P.S. KET and KGET are the same. KET is just used for the sake of the filing as an abbreviation (has nothing to do with the stock).
Yeah, I've really racked my brain on this. I'm not trying to be a bad guy; I'm just trying to understand. I hope they just clarify it for everyone like you said. I truly believe this is the biggest piece holding back the PPS because the true value is such a darn cryptogram.
And the way I read it is that 17 shares of KGET will be issued for every 1 share of GDTK (so the opposite of the way you had it, but I believe there were somewhere around 4 million GDTK shares, so that would only be an additional 68 million added to outstanding shares).
Where did they file that? Please show me because no one has been able to yet.
I'm trying so hard to make all of this clear and help everyone understand why this hasn't gone up more...
If there were only 300 million shares outstanding, this thing would be at 10 cents already.
The filing on 12/4/2013 and on 12/19/2013 regarding the retiring of the 1.052 billion shares are the same filing. ONLY 1.052 billion shares were retired. It did not happen twice. The second filing is only an amendment of the first filing.
"If this doesn't clear it up I don't think I can be more specific. 1,052,000,000 shares previously returned."
PREVIOUSLY
There were 3 billion shares on 11/25/2013 and 1.052 billion were retired on 12/3/2013.
The other 1.052 were retired PREVIOUSLY, so that had already been factored before 11/25/2013.
I have POSTED links to the 8-Ks and you have not. I have quoted the 8-Ks and you have not. Show me where it says 2 billion shares were retired AFTER November 25, 2013 at which point there was 3 billion shares. Show me.
Sorry to be difficult, but I'm still not getting that. At the time of the Green Day Tech share exchange agreement on November 25, 2013, there were 3 billion shares outstanding. After that point, there was only the retiring of 1.052 billion shares.
"On December 3, 2013 the Board of Directors of Kleangas Energy Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), authorized the return to treasury of 1,052,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock (the "Common Stock")"
People keep doubling that for some reason, but only 1.052 billion shares were retired at that point.
Alright, so here is where I think there is confusion. I have read that 8-k many, many times. And I see that only 1.052 billion were returned to the treasury--it says it very definitively in the very first sentence. So if we're at 3 billion at that point, then how does it get down to 1 billion?
What I am saying is that at some point the other 1 billion shares were returned to the treasury, but that happened before the filing that said there were 3 billion shares.