Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It really doesn't matter, does it? They will all provide the same environment and temperature.
True, all the PR stated was a letter of intent. This is all and therefore may not happen. IMO, it should not, but the decision is in the details, which we are not privy to at this time.
In other words, the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Never say 'never'. I guess that was just a figment of my mind that I responded to, eh?
You obviously like being called a 'fake' shareholder and then being sued. From the beginning, Megas needed to work with the 'fake' shareholders instead of alienating them. Now, he seems to be concerned that the 'fake' shareholders are not contributing to the fund. And still he refuses to have an open dialog with all 'fake' shareholders.
And you call what I said silly? What planet are you from? Typical name calling by the Megasites.
By the way, how many shares has Megas promised you for continuing to support his agenda?
I will not say that buying this stock was a bad decision in that I have made more than what I spent. Is that a bad decision? Not in my opinion. It is a matter of timing. If I had bought in at the high like most of the complainers on this board did because they bought on the hype, then shame on them. I am not a pumper as I have been falsely accused. Most of my statements on this board is that this stock requires patience and that was based on watching the trends of high and lows, or its peak intervals. I will admit the spikes are long time coming, but if you understand this and are patient then you will be fine with a stock like BGNN.
I will say this again, if one is looking for a quick hit with BGNN, you are playing the wrong stock. It does not happen here. So patience is the order of the day for BGNN.
As with the announcement today, I understand it as I have been teaching my children about recycling and encouraging that and they have made some spending money, specifically with aluminum cans. Unfortunately, the price of aluminum recycling has been reduced by over 50%. Overall, the concept is good, but I just put the plastic container in the recycling bin and don't worry about it or I just step on the plastic container and put it in the garbage bag. Not every body can afford a trash compacter as some on this board have scoffed today and those people would not be the target market for this product anyway. But as far as aluminum cans, it has merit which is where I see the most benefit for this product, but I have seen better devices for aluminum cans. I really do not think if I were JM that I would have spent my time and resources on this particular product and it would be nice to see the business plan for this product. I do not see this product becoming a big cash cow for BGNN, but it is in line with the direction and mission statement.
I have stocked up on garbage bags but am considering ordering BGNN trash bags for my personal use. I also have been talking to a military installation about using the BGNN disposable bags. However, government purchasing is a whole different game.
Doesn't matter, does it? Megas just isn't talking. IMO, he has something to hide. The whole truth has not been told yet as I have stated many times. Even the fund web site excludes important time line issues which we have discussed before.
The bottom line is that Megas doesn't care about 'fake' shareholders. Any evidence to the contrary please share.
Why would someone want to fund this when they do not have any clue of what real evidence Megas has? This is foolish at best. At least I know where the SEC and DTCC stand on this. Don't like it, but at least I know. I have no clue what Megas has IMO not been honest with the 'fake' shareholders to date. As a matter of fact excluded one from a board meeting a few years back. Megas has really not been inclusive with most of the 'fake' shareholders except for a few select individuals. Hmmmm, why is that?
Ditto from here also. I understand free speech, but this is abusive at best of that right by all those who fall into this category, and you know who I am referring to.
Is that all you can do is call people names and make false accusations of people. I can easily tell who is the joke and it is not me.
There is a law in the US, you may not of heard of it from reading your posts. It is simply a man is innocent until proven guilty. I am glad that you are not a judge as you get too wrapped up on emotions and not facts. I recommend being careful as not to endanger yourself with slander lawsuit.
But you, like Ivestor, have falsely accused me of doing things that I have not and will not do. As in my tag line, time and the Creator of it are my friends. I have time, and as I have rationally stated, this is a new business which like any new business, time is needed.
BGNN is not a place for people that want to get rich overnite. You seem to be one of those people that post here that are looking to get rich overnite. In other words you have no patience and think nothing of falsely accusing people of doing things that they aren't. Typically, when people are pointing their finger at others, they have three times as many fingers pointing right back at them.
Well encercler, good to see you are still showing your ignorance. You obviously do not know the definition of pumping. I will look it up for you. Here it is:
"Pump and dump" is a form of microcap stock fraud that involves artificially inflating the price of an owned stock through false and misleading positive statements, in order to sell the cheaply purchased stock at a higher price. Once the operators of the scheme "dump" their overvalued shares, the price falls and investors lose their money. Stocks that are the subject of pump-and-dump schemes are sometimes called "chop stocks".
Not only do you continue to show your ignorance, but you still falsely accuse me based on the above definition.
Keep trying encercler, maybe someday you may learn something if you are teachable, of which I extremely doubt.
IMO, I do not want the CEO spending time potentially defending insider trading violations rather than on focusing with BGNN business. That would really put a stop in BGNN trading activities. Where does one draw the line with providing information? I have been a stock holder here for almost two years, but to almost daily or consistently be pounding BGNN with negativity like Ivestor does is out of line.
The filings for BGNN will be published on time, maybe not to the liking of some here. PRs are being reported, also maybe not to the linking of some here, but nonetheless activity is in motion, unlike a lot of sub-penny stocks.
New markets require patience which BGNN is less than two years, but yet wisdom is required on exercising due diligence.
Patience is my plan, while I spend my time in other activities. Some people on this board act like they are watching water boil. It doesn't help things happen any faster.
Never say never, because you are wrong when you state Jerry 'never' answers anyone questions. Again Ivestor, your credibility has eroded here as you constantly bash and are most of the time just flat out 'wrong'.
Obviously, you have no patience and I stand with what I stated. Your negative attacks here is against every investor on this board, not just BGNN.
You are not the world's savior. New market's take time to grow to cash cow. Your cheerleadin for only when things go good is a disgrace. You probably have the same attitude in sports. You only root for the team when they are winning.
I am sorry that you only know how to cheer when times are good. That is sad and shows lack of any leadership ability at all. Why would I want to listen to someone like you?
How much are you paid to continue this negative bashing? You obviously have a vendetta against BGNN, and thus anybody that owns shares in this company.
Was it a mistake? Did you weigh short term capital gain tax rate to determine that. I have been here 2 years in November, 2010 before the name change. It ook over 3 years for Sirius satellite to make me "big" returns from cents to dollars. I have got time. I think same is going to happen here, but maybe not in the dollars yet like sirius did. I have another one that also did the same thing, but I am not here to promote other stocks. But just to let people know a new market can take minimum 2 to 3 years to develop. Since my initial investment in BGNN, I could have bought around .0011 low, did at .0014, and sold at .005 twice high if one had a crystal ball or had a time machine. I have sold enough to be at breakeven right now, and several million in hold. I can't lose in this stock right now.
November elections are critical to my decision on buy more, sell or hold. I am also gambling on tax rates to stay with a new Congress. IMO, this has to happen on all tax payers, not just middle class and anybody that disagrees with this has never started their own company that hires people to perform work. This is where DC is out of touch with the people. The only jobs government knows how to create are government jobs and that takes taxpayers money. We now have government employees making on average more than people in the private sector. Something is out of balance here. We need people in Congress that knows how to put America back to work by creating incentives for the private sector to create jobs that support the government programs everybody wants. If this happens, you will see BGNN go to the moon, IMO.
Major thing to remember: Green "IS" the wave of the future and BGNN is just at the beginning wave of this market. Amazing how people ignore this very important issue and think can make 1000% return overnight. Patience is advised here.
I understand, but does the consumer understand the difference between "Environmentally conscious product
30% post-consumer recycled plastic" and "100% DEGRADABLE\BIODEGRADABLE BAGS made from Post recyclable plastic".
GE states their bags are also environmentally friendly made with 50% recycled plastics. Sounds better than Whirlpool for the same price.
As to packaging IMO, BGreen wins hands down. Just not certain what will attract consumer, brand name or qaulity of product?
I am trusting JM used a marketing research company to know this.
Just a hunch, JM has not lost interest in BGNN.
Does whirlpool and GE distribute bgreen trash bags under their name?
If so great! If not, let me think this one thru, I have trash bags from GE, Whirlpool and BGreen at same price, correct? What product do you think I am going to buy, someone that is known, ie. GE or Whirlpool, or BGreen a virtual unknown?
Looks like you have been proven wrong per post 17117.
But you will not admit it though as you are too upset and have made BGNN your personal attack dog and whipping boy. Pride comes before the fall.
.0022 with almost 4 million shares in volume trading
Again, you talk down to people on the board as though they are dumb and ignorant. You just stated the obvious of any company. I understand there needs to be balance and control of ones zeal, but to state the obvious constantly in a derogatory way!
Every company in the free market economy needs sales to post profits and increased sales are dependent on a strategy to put good marketing/advertisement campaigns together to start branding BGNN, not Whirlpool. IMO, Jerry has realized this in the recent move to cancel branding BGNN products as Whirlpool.
I will repeat again, BGNN needs to post consistent profits. And with BGNN in the infant stage as a green technology producer, IMO Jerry realizes this, it is necessary to make an an effort to post consistent profits while the market transitions to a green technology budget. Why do you think the oil companies that continually post quarterly billion dollar profits while the demand is for greener environment?
This is not an overnight activity and I choose to applaud Jerry for recognizing the need to post profits consistently, but you choose to bash. While what you are saying may be true, there are better ways to state it without coming across as an arrogant
know-it-all and speaking down to people including the CEO.
Matter of opinion on profits and perspectives that I can talk to, especially for a company in start-up mode. I have started my own companies, yes that is plural, in the past and it is not easy.
As to your referral to oneeye, you are incorrect again. You need to read the post again as it states
"People like you go on for months"
I know of no other way to interpret "like you". So again you try to read in between the lines what other people say on this board. There is no reading in between the lines here. This is very clear what oneeye was referring to.
I have difficulty believing anything you say because of how you try to interpret what other people are trying to say. And it is typically interpretted incorrectly IMO.
yeah but sirius was a great ride as I got in cheap, below a dollar. Unfortunately, didn't ride it to $17, but made good money. All I am saying is I see BGNN riding the same trail but have no idea when it will bounce, but as long as it continues on posting continued profits and producing consumable products, this is good. I cannot project long but some money will be made here. I have said this before, BGNN is not a day trader stock, IMO. I am of the opinion most of the negative posters here are day traders trying to make a quick buck.
But I am continually being accused of hyping this stock. I am positive on it, but no hype here as it will take time to build a cash cow. Before, I stated Q2 will post profit, and stated 10 fold increase. Profits happened but not tenfold. So now I wait for Q3, profits will continue but not certain on 2 fold or ten fold as new product has not been in market long enough.
No hype here again as I have been falsely accused by those who have tried to read in between the lines.
One thing I know is different industries provide different trends. Therefore, it is wrong to base opinions on trends based on management former pattern. All things are subject to change.
All I stated was you are the most negative poster on this board, far different from the only negative poster. My position for providing positive is very clear, new company, new products, it will take time to post consistent profits. From this the pps will grow. this is based on factual supportive trending information over the last year. Your negative statement was not based on anything, but an opinion based on your opinion with no factual data to support it. Yes sales are slow, but I am not expecting to blow the door open yet, until the market sees a continued stream of positive profit growth, however it may come. Companies have played games for years on reporting profitability. Nothing new here either.
That is the difference between yours and my postings, I am positive, not hype, based on 1 year of positive trending information. Your negative statement of 20 years was based on your opinion only. No factual data to support it.
If you review my posts, I do not hype like you have falsely accused me of. What I have consistently stated is BGNN is a new company and it takes time to build a cash cow like people are trying to hype on. What I have also stated is this company needs consistent profit growth and directiontion with marketing image similar to what IBM did. Product branding and name recognition is avery costly and time consuming effort. BGNN may have recognized this, thus the cancellation of the Whirlpool contract, where how does one get recognition for a product under another company's brand.
I have referred to another stock like this that I have invested in that took years to take off, such as the Sirius satellite communications. I have likened BGNN to this and have not built on 'hype'. Do your homework before you criticize me, please, for hyping this stock.
You did not provide any support for your negative comment, so why should I provide you with any for my positive. Pretty simple don't you think.
definitely that is a classic and I too thought that was very funny.
As I have stated before, you are the most negative poster on this board. You contribute absolutely nothing but negativity.
IMO, people that have bought see value and are willing to hold and not sell. Too bad for prospect buyers trying to get in at lower price.
I know, but that is why I have stated before that people need patience and it will take awhile to build a cash cow.
I do not understand how you read in between the lines that I was excited. It appears you enjoy twisting what people say. My comments were rather reserved yet positive, unlike yours, negative and usually condescending.
For example "It takes time to build a cash cow name brand."
I fail to see where you get that I am excited with that or anything else in what I stated.
IMO, Q3 sales results. New products beginning(biobags) to enter into market.
Should continue to post profits, should expect increase, but slight.
As stated before, JM has to create a green market image awareness of BGNN like Big Blue(IBM). Takes money to do this. It takes time to build a cash cow name brand.
IMO, since the product was positioned with Whirlpool branding, it only makes sense that HD would remove from catalog
What can the government do? It is up to the free market to create product consumers want. Government has done all they can and IMO, should do. JM has to get a marketing machine together to become the IBM of the green market. This takes time and money to build. Right now it is image, and with Whirlpool while a plus, the branding the product with Whirlpool may have resulted in less exposure of BGNN.
Government does not have all the answers. They really haven't created new jobs, they can't even get a solar project going on government property. Very few people in the government know how and what it takes to run a business, like a BGNN. I would not count on government for much at this point, unless you want a handout and that will result in the government owning BGNN.
I don't think so.
Lars:
I trust JM has a reasonable explanation for this. Could it be that JMwas underselling Whirlpool?
I am really tired of a few select Europeans eagerness to leach off of US, but be first to bash it. They quickly forget they could have been German. Nothing wrong with Germany today, as I have been there and love it. But think of what it could have been.
And let's not forget the US just bailed out Greece thru the IMF 18%, as they bask in retirement at the age of 51.
Anyway, typical basher of BGNN that wants everybody else to fail, just because they interpet info about the company differently. It is okay to disagree, but to be destructive. I have better things to do than to trash and talk down to people. Nothing about trying to work together for all to benefit.
It is not my place to question the integrity of the master(CEO) of a company(ie. BGNN) and how one makes or do with what one makes. But it is rather to expose darkness to the person first, rather than to try to destory or slander a persons reputation. This is obvious, IMO, int the words of our current president a teachable moment.
You see, from my perspective, slander and character assassination is the same as murder or killing someone's reputation. I have been taught that murder is not right and can cause separation between the committing the act and the one that created the slanderer. This applies whether it is the physical or spiritual nature of man.
There are patterns and principles to ones in disagreement, and slandering a persons character and reputation is not one of them. Remember, if nothing else, that disagreement doesn't come from what you find in life, it comes from what you expect to find. So Ivestor, it seems you are disppointed in the CEO of BGNN. I suggest choosing to change your expectations, rather than slander.
IMO, Thomas Edison made over 1,000 mistakes before electricity was discovered. He used different methods til he found the right combination. I do not know hoe many people backed him financially, but I am sure if any did, they were truly disappointed until the day of discovery.
I liken that to BGNN. The CEO JM has chosen different methods and seems to now found the correct combination.
In the end great things resulted. But both had made many mistakes.
Great things are going to happen for BGNN because we have found a company that is in the right market at the right time.
I know several people who had opportunities to invest in McDonald in its early years. They talk about how rich they could have been. With being rich comes a lot of risk(we are experiencing that toady). But also much responsibility will be required. The rich will held accountable for what they did with what they gain.
What is it to gain the whole world, but lose your soul.
JM, just like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and others, will be held accountable and I am not the judge and jury of them as you are trying to be with JM.
This is hopefully a teachable moment for you, but then some people are not teachable.
Have a great day.
And there is no guarantee that Megas has to use it to resolve BCIT issue, thus we still have nothing.