'Dale12'..lol

Just a heads up but this stock is looking for a reason to start moving higher at this point in time..

We have seen a bottom and .005 price point hit days earlier..

.005 to .05 isn't all that bad of a return on investment..If you feel the same..

G/L

'slojab'..lol Not sure what thats all about..lol

Sorry to hear it..There isn't any sure way too contact aka.'Sunny' unless you call her then I guess..lol

'slojab'..Thx's for that ! lol

Maybe call or send aka. 'Sunny/Buzzalicious' ie.'Sutida Suwunnavid' an email..If you haven't tried already..1

CONTACT: Sutida Suwunnavid, Buzz Technologies, Inc Tel: +66 76 326 318 123 Tel: +66 76 326 318 129 e-mail: ir@12buzz.com

'hobogold'..Well said ! Thx's for that ! lol

Or this 'turkey' is due for "another" turn around..See you at .05..G/L 1

What ever happened to "have faith in your fearless leader"..lol

Got your message..Thx's 1

'Our-Street'..Besides what I wrote in post #14082..

There seems to be one thing you neglect to consider in your report and your sometimes commentaries..And of which you very well maybe able to relate to yourself..

That all things you find posted on the internet may not always represent factual information about someone or something etc..

And may also, at times, give a 'skewed or distorted' accounting of the truth or events outlined etc..

'meanmikeca'.."the links" ?

'Our-Street'..Well it looks like I will try and answer you once more..as my last post seems to have vanished ?

Since I seem to be treading a fine-line here_I will be brief..

I believe that the facts as presented in your post/report etc may need further 'scrutiny'..

'Credibility' factors are called into question on all sides here; As well as individuals motives etc..

Since those questions haven't been addressed satisfactorily..it leaves room for individual discretion of all parties concerned..1

'slojab'_Thanks for that !

It's obvious from your and others questions and concerns that until we all know exactly about/who this Aka. 'Sean Lee/Capt.Jack/12buzz'/and 'O'Keefe/ Heffernan' etc is..ie. if they are all the same person etc..

That this issue will not go away soon..

As the saying goes_'You can run..but you can not hide forever'..may apply here..

Sadly the challenge has been issued; the glove thrown at there feet_for 'Buzz Technologies Inc' and it's corporate officers to respond to this challenge_but have not..

Now I'm sure I'm not aware of all there reasons for delaying this needed and necessary response..It does question 'core values and credibility factors' in anything else coming from them now..

Also it's putting a 'black cloud' over the entire companys image on how the investment community will respond to them now..1

'slojab'_Good hearing from you again..

First let me comment on this "Shayne Heffernan" phenomenon..

Until I see it reported by a 'creditable source'_or reported by aka. 12buzz/Capt.Jack himself_that he is indeed "Shayne Heffernan"; It will remain a 'dominant issue' in influencing the 'credibility factors' needed to/involved in 'rehabilitating' this companys current 'image problems'..

Second_

A possible 'different future direction and business strategy' could also assist this effort_including 'Investor Relations'; Shareholder Value'; 'Public Relations'; 'Company Image'; 'Fiscal Responsibility to Investors'; 'Trustworthiness' etc..

Third_

This 'Shayne Heffernan/identity issue' can only be resolved quickly and effectively by aka Capt.Jack/12buzz successfully revealing himself in a/an 'expected professional business manner and background'..

Thanks again_1

Hey 'moonamongus'..

Don't know what happened between you and aka.'Jack' exactly..

I consider you a friend and very intelligent about a companys 'fiscal/financial responsibilities'..and of the business world at large etc..

I believe some form of related 'business pressures' may have been playing some role in 'Jacks' responses to you that day..But I'm only guessing at this point..

Anyway sorry to hear it..I'll see what I can do..

As for the doubts and concerns of not only you but all investors and shareholders relating to 'BZTG'..

I believe 'Buzz Technologies' management is currently "reviewing" their previous 'public relations/shareholder strategies and objectives' with, I hope, a possible 'different future direction' in mind for this company/officers/shareholders and the investment community at large etc

As well as more profitable and conducive future business strategies and practices, in general..1

'Our-Street'_Thx's again..

The 'jest' of my post was how you believe you've been..lied to ie. "lies"; not given_"honest financial statements"; and "disrespected" by this pinksheets/pennystock...

Then your 'contradictory' statement.."Still, no underestimating the depth of ignorance when it comes to penny stocks"..

So further stating.."Sorry, I just don't get it"..pretty much sumed it up for you..Thx's 1

Also you didn't seem to address my post #13912..?

Thx's 'Dale12'..lol

'Our-Street'..Thx's for that !

In post ( #13926 ) You mention.."lies"; "honest financial statements"; and "disrespects your interests in every single way"..

Then in post ( #13930 ) you say.."Still, no underestimating the depth of ignorance when it comes to penny stocks"..


"Sorry, I just don't get it"..'Our-Street'

Good quote..

'slojab'_Thx's !

Not sure..I heard that he never really was in that position specifically_from him..? But I'm unclear as to any/this current status/reasons given etc..

Thx's for that 'slojab'..

You describe a "pinksheets" traded company, yet expect answers because it has a "chatroom" in which the ( not the 'CEO' by the way ) "Majority shareholder" doesn't exactly answer questions about the companys businesses or plans etc ?

You futher state, "..if you don't expect any answers from a pinksheet stock, fine. The pinksheet company shouldn't have a forum where you should expect to GET them, imo."

Actually, and in essence, they (BZTG) doesn't/don't..1

Thxs 'Our-Street'..

Did view that 'report/news publication' previously..Thanks for that !

The point to my post was, in order for your "report" to be viewed as a 'legitimate investigation'_ie. with complete credibility and legitimacy by you etc; And with all respect; you should/must first of, established your "credentials and qualifications" as an 'legitimate investigator' on this topic/issue of 'BZTG' and it's company employees/shareholders/information etc..

Yet with all information that's been accumulated on the 'BZTG' site "ACTORVIST" about you..You seem to have brought none of that information here on 'IHUB'_or reported it..? And/or have declined to visit the 'ACTORVIST' site and answer any of those concerns and 'reports/news publications' etc about you..?

So I ask you..How's that for "credible parties"?

One further note to this post by you..This "Shayne Heffernan" 'report' that you've shown indeed may exist..But the fact still remains, that till it's proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" and by a "credible source"; Which in my opinion, hasn't been done; That 'Shayne Heffernan' is aka. Sean Lee/12buzz/Capt.Jack etc just hasn't been positively established or confirmed etc to this point..

Thx's again ! 1

'hobogold'..lol

"rhino spit" and "pinksheets" could just equal the same thing..lol

It's just the nature of this particular exchange/marketplace..

"Don't expect anything from it_and you won't be disappointed" !

G/L _1

'sandshark'..Yeah.."pinksheets makes misrepresentations acceptable and easy"..

Complete agreement..! lol

Thx's..1

'Our-Street'_The "truth"..lol

"are mad at me from revealing it"...Not exactly !

Maybe the truth about 'BZTG', and you, share something more in common than you've discussed here..The issue of "credibility" can haunt those who, at times, "accuse"..

I don't believe 'BZTG' or it's current "majority shareholder", who, to my knowledge, has publicly released any personal background information, should be assumed or accused being dishonest until such "facts" are undisputed by 'credible parties'_such as the "SEC" etc..Not by you_sorry ! 1

'sandshark'_lol ! Ya_not so much in "agreement", as simply answering your premise that "to receive the info which the company promises"..

..doesn't mean, 'they will oblige you'..i.e. on "pinksheets"..

When you stated, "Being a pinksheet is no good excuse for duping shareholders so frequently that way"..

My reply is again..

..this company trades on the "pinksheets" exchange, and is bound by only the most simplistic rules and regulations of/in the stock markets"..

"So, in my opinion, I wouldn't be waiting for to much information or financial "transparency" now"..

Thx's again_1

'sandshark'..Again thx's for that..

Whether you believe that, "being a pinksheet is no good excuse for duping shareholders"..

You state correctly..

"Do you see a trend? Such as big hype about an "audit", or big hype about an "IPO", and corresponding timelines? The PPS goes up, and then the info/event is NOT produced... and then the topic just kind of goes away? After that happense, so you tell the company"... "Thanks for that!" ? lol!

You have just described with some 'exactness and accuracy' the nature of the "pinksheets marketplace"..

Thx's ! 1

'sandshark'..long time_nice hearing from you again..

To your comment I'll only repeat what I said before..

"Either way, this company trades on the "pinksheets" exchange, and is bound by only the most simplistic rules and regulations of/in the stock markets"..

"So, in my opinion, I wouldn't be waiting for to much information or financial "transparency" now"..

That said, you, and anyone else here, can view a "pinksheets" companys stock and information/promises, anyway you want..That doesn't mean they will oblige you_lol

Thx's, 1

Thx's for that..'MRSMITH1' !

I'd say based on some recent posts from 'lowe6er' and 'mantis2007' that actually wouldn't be a "bad idea"_at this time..

Of course if your a 'fan' of the "wait and see crowd"..Or the "doubt if this company is even real" ie. 'disbelievers' crowd etc..
Then I'd say all you can do is wait and see..

Some here like to create an image of 'BZTG' based on their own idea's, thoughts and intentions_misguided or not..

And some others would like to wait till a "clearer vision and image" comes out of all that this company is "saying and eluding too"_before judging this companys performance and status etc..

Either way, this company trades on the "pinksheets" exchange, and is bound by only the most simplistic rules and regulations of/in the stock markets..

So, in my opinion, I wouldn't be waiting for to much information or financial "transparency" now..In other words, don't be "naive" about any 'credulous information or superstitions' you see posted here on IHUB..Thx's 1

And a big broom it was..lol Thx's for that Slojab !

'vtopa'..Nice to hear from you..

"Shayne Heffernan" is a topic I know about, but I believe "Our_Street" believes he has greater knowledge of_so I'll let him "fill you in"..Thx's 1

Thanks for that 'Our-Street'..

Apparently some play loose with facts about 'BZTG'..and it's corporate officers etc..

Hope 'BZTG' is generating massive revenue from those ad's also..

Don't know about any "con-man" though..?

Tried to answer you before 'MRSMITH1' but something happened to my post ?

I mentioned before that what you suggest is actual "good advice" to those inclined trading this stock..

Good Luck to you also ! 1

Hey 'hobogold'..Good hearing from you again..Sorry if 'BZTG' didn't work out for you..

'AEMC' maybe a better place to invest..

Our friend "Our-Street" can also be a little loose with the facts etc as he accuses 'BZTG' of being..1

Well said iblong2..

Yea the 'BZTG board' is in "shambles"..lol

If this current overall market can improve..maybe you'll see 'AEMC' start moving up also..

I got banned before for some confusion about referencing other Buzz sites? But 'Matt' let me back recently !

Hope you're ok and 'AEMC' catches fire again_soon ! G/L..1

Thanks for your input and help in this matter 'Slojab'..It certainly wasn't my wish to get deleted for any reason either..'End around' wasn't exactly the idea..
Got your messages also..Thx's_1

Thx's again "Our-Street"..

I believe post #13781 by 'lowe6er' pretty well, "specifically", sum's it up..

As for your and mine discussion of previous ( now deleted )posts..Apparently are not welcome here on 'IHUB' for "specific site policy reasons" ? But I feel, and I believe you also feel passionate about futher discussing. So if your ever interested discussing any of 'those issue's', you can always leave me any thoughts you have on the site links we both agreed pertain to, and mention previously in those post..Thx's ! 1

Our-Street..Apparently answering your post to me has become somewhat of an issue here on this board..

As for your thoughts and comments to me..

This "Shayne Heffernan" is your issue and not a concern of mine at this time ( for the reason you state )..

As for "whether this stock is a 'good investment' at this time"..I'd say yes, it's a "steal" at this price, at this time etc..

Thx's 1

Thx's for that "Our-Street"..Tried to write that last post of mine so it would be on topic and current to 'BZTG' and this board..

I see it got deleted anyway..Not sure if using BZTG business related web links caused that or some other reason..?

It seems strange that answering your direct/directed reference to this currently and long discussed issue here on this site's board, of one "Shayne Heffernan", or of 'Buzz Technologies' actual 'legitimacy' as a company is not on topic or should be deleted..So I'll hold my comments to you until I can receive some clarification on this subject/issue..

It wasn't mean't as any personal attack_Only a referencing of available information on the topic/subject and issue being discussed/referenced here etc..

Thank again ! 1

'iblong2'..Been awhile..Changed my user from '2B1' to 'IM1' now..

Few thoughts on any stock bashers here visiting your board..

One of 'Buzz Technologies Inc' sites called "Actorvist" (which I'm sure you and others here are aware of) which a forum exist, titled: "How to Recognize Stock Bashers"..Moderated by me actually_That describes in some detail how certain individuals claiming to be self 'anointed' and/or "self appointed" saviors of revealing pinksheets/otcbb scam artist etc aren't always what they say or appear to be..Interesting reading..

'AEMC' is a buy again..imo Had a good run -up before, but I believe another is coming !

Good Luck ! 1

Hey 'ggogg'..

Glad to hear your still leaning positive with the 'BZTG' register..

Anyway, hang in there as I believe, whether you subscribe to those who think and feel this whole company represents a scam_as some do here..Or that this Company is about to do something worth buying it's stock for now..

I'm sure all here want to welcome you as a 'newbie' (if thats the case)..So don't feel 'intimidated, bulldozed, or browbeat' by some of the more aggressive responses you may receive about 'BZTG' on this board etc..Good Luck ! 1

Slojab..Thx's Also just got your message..I don't have private messaging so I'll just thx's for that !

Of interest: http://www.bangkokpost.com/

'Sunny and Honey'..right hand side of page..'Ad's by Buzz'

Also of interest..

http://joesephheffernan.spaces.live.com/

Slojab..Your concerns like many other shareholders are legitimate questions that have gone or go unanswered..

This is an issue that may have/be contributing to this stocks poor performance over the last two years..As are other issue's that have been discussed and continually debated here and elsewhere to date..

All good questions..

Remember the "Pinksheets" motto_"Invest at your 'own' risk"..

Thx's, 1

Interesting hearing from you "Our-Street"..Thanks for that !

As for this post #13737 from you..

I believe my point wasn't clearly stated as it could have been..
That as "responsible investors", we must all be aware of the 'risk involved' in the markets were trading in..That sometimes companys need time (especially a new start-up company such as 'BZTG' was) to develop it's "marketing strategies" and "business aspirations" in a somewhat timely matter..And as with many "pinksheets" companys press releases can, at times, be "forward looking" statements that don't always come true etc
I believe some pr's may not be as "factual" or as complete as we would have liked to have seen etc

I agree with your statement..

"Seems to me a company worthy of investment should establish itself as credible by doing what it says and by providing transparency and truthfulness from the outset".
_____________________________________________________________

As for your post #13738..

Don't personally know that information your ascribing to as fact..
______________________________________________________________

As for post #13741

Your statement of those issue's aren't exactly what I would call legitimate, verified, or proven facts beyond contention just yet..

Thanks for that ! 1

I'm limited on my daily posts to 15..so I must be conscience of my post limit etc..

As for your post #13733

This below statement isn't exactly fact_imo

"Didn't he have his father, Joe, recant his statements from the KYC site"?

As for your corrected statement_and just to be clear..use aka.Sean Lee or aka.12buzz or aka.Capt.Jack et_imo..His actual name, for the record, is still unknown at this point in time..

aka.Sean Lee's actual "day to day operations" involvement isn't known..

also you asked..

"is there something in the law that states that without a contract of some sort between an individual and a company, a shareholder, of any size, can be directly involved in the company's operations"?

Good question imo Slojab..I suggest you ask aka.12buzz/Capt.Jack/Sean Lee

As for your post #13734

"They're not legally bound to release squat. That's true. So, why have a company blog? What is it's purpose"?

Another good question for aka.12buzz/Capt.Jack/Sean Lee

Thx again..1