Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And who buys all those shares do you think? Think about!
We must not posts, about other posters, but apparently we may offend the CEO's with gangster, Bandit, thief, etc..to frighten others.
That bid is there for several days / weeks. Past months there were almost only sells. But the pps stays at this level. In my opinion de Co is buying direct or indirectly shares out of the market at a cheap price. So when they have to settle they must pay less because the float will be reduced at that time. Don't give away your cheap shares. If I am right, let them pay for it.
I know only too well, that there are better than SGLN. But there is still a long way to go for those others. LMAO
There are people who do nothing else. LOL
Sure you can! Before the suspension. And you know it.
The SEC already knows everything they need to know. Thanks to RSPennystocks. It's wait and see now.
For every sell there is a buy, Rudy. Someone buys all the shares. Please sell and go somewhere else to complain.
Maybe you will understand better if I set: Suppose you lose 90% of your money, and that someone against your says, that was necessary to protect you. LMAO
I recognize this. The boss is always right.
Thanks for your reply Dan. It is now too late. If the message is restored it disappears in the history. But my point is, if you see which people are banned, those are 90% positive people. In regards to the deleted messages, that is harder to control, because they are erased. But I see an imbalance, and I think that is not good. It turns out that only the positive people risk to be banned. I am sure I am not the only one who notices this.
"You don't have to agree with them, but you have to follow them."
When a large number of people disagree with the rules, then there's something not right, then one can consider to adjust the rules.
If you assumes everything here is regulated correctly, then will never change anything. Say so right away, and then the discussion is done. I am trying to help only to get a better Ihub for everyone.
I have told that in my first message. Bashers walking on the edge of the permissible. They watch each error of the people that are positive to be able to throw them out. I would like, that all what would be fairer. A healthy balance, that there is not now.
By going to the request of the bashers, the admin takes a position. And that is not good.
I have my question addressed to admin Dan. So I will wait for his reply, if it is the same for you. Thanks
I know. but that makes no difference to me. Deleted is deleted, whoever does.
Not true. The message is deleted, supposedly because it is off-topic.
"Removed posts that do not have a Review option are not eligible for further review".
You see, that is the trick. And you know it.
Dan, some bashers are experts in let removing posts of people who see things positively. That way you let the board flip to a negative sentiment. That way you surely take a position.
Still there are impatient that drop their shares, but they are getting bought up. I have the impression that someone wants more shares.
Deny brings nothing on. There are just too many people who talk down the pps. That has its reason.
The 90% drop was orchestrated by shorts. Not even 1 schareholder would sell for a 90% loss when the market opens. Those who where short put the ask 90% lower with a few share they bought before the suspension. one of their friends bought those shares and what followed was of course panic selling.
You can not short on the greys, but those who where short before the suspension hoping for a revocation. At that time they make the biggest profit.
In my opinion, it's just shorts trading to each other. You can't know if there are any new buyers. If we are unable to substantiate our thoughts we place the prefix "In my opinion" So as I have done.
Volume is drying up. Great! Buyers must rise their bid or they get nothing. LOL
Guys, you must increase your bid. Nobody wants to sell at this price.
Oh, that was a fake wall @ 0.0085 :)
No he did not. I was just fine before the SEC took action.
And we got conned by the SEC. What's the difference?
Bulshit! The prospective investors are utopian. Those who should be protected are the people who have plugged their money in it. The SEC has no right to destroy our money with their action.
The timing was perfect for letting crash this stock. It benefits the shorters. That you can't deny. I am already convinced that someone here has played a dirty role. And not in the first place the CEO. Someone has tipped to the SEC in order to profit. IMO Congrats g4e for your opinion. This stinks.
Then you need a little more positive in your comments here on this board. That would be a start for success.
Suppose you're a shorter. And you're calling the SEC to say that they do not comply with the rules. That would produce a huge profit ...Incredible!
No, Jim took not my money. The SEC forced me to loose my money. What is so difficult to understand? If I sell for a 10, 20 or 30% profit or even for a 10% loss that's my descision. If I almost loose everything by an SEC decision, then the SEC is responsible. And now I stop this. My point is clear..
Correct. They claim to be the babysitter of the shareholders, by protecting them. But what do they do? They take your money.
By the fact that they have opened a OTC market. They give everyone the chance to put money in. They should protect the money that is in, by to warn a company on time, that they are doing poorly. And not when it is too late. IMO
"You don't want to give the principals time to dump or leave the country."
They prefer to damage to existing shareholders, to catch the big fish. As war criminals are found in other countries, it may not be so difficult to detect the principals.
I think they should give a public warning in advance. 1 or 2 months in advance. Companies of good will then get the chance to bring things in order. Shareholders who are mistrustful can get out, and others who have faith can continue. That is their own choice. But now they have no choice. Freedom of choice is diminished.
"They investigate before any action is taken because they are well aware of the damage to shareholders or the company if they make a mistake"
The SEC need to find a way to not damage the people who are in the suspended stocks. Even if they do not a mistake the damage for the existing shareholders is huge. With the hundreds of stocks they already have revoked. They have foisted a loss to many people. That is a fact. Who they would have protected in the future is only a guess. I prefer to not be helped by the SEC in this way.
We know all that! If there is a merger in place this will be a total new company. Everyone knows that this was previously a scam. It is now a shell, ready to be inherited. Capiche?
They gave us the impression that they were systematically paid off their debts. They gave us the impression that they went to launch Spider. They gave us the impression that they rid of Kazaa, to keep more cash on. They gave us the impression that they worked on a turnaround. If that is not pumping it is at least misleading information.
9M traded today and 9M yesterday. That's 18M from the 100M OS. So this say's to me that most of the people are holding their shares.
Are you serious? If you first give away everything of value, and then says, what do you want from me, look I have nothing. That is criminal. The way they have destroyed this company, that is criminal.