Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lol, I and others would certainly like to know...
Would you like to know my diagnosis of your posts and private messages?
Could you please translate this into English for me, Linda?
By the way, SI has both email addresses, as does Investors Hub AND Raging Bull...in fact, in e-mail with both of them the past week, they forwarded mail to and from those addresses.
And as for this...
the tendency to distort fact and to speculate is out of control.
...you're absolutely right. You need to stop.
Wait a minute, aren't most of the companies getting bashed those that would be bidding on federal contracts?
No. I can't imagine what would give you that idea.
hmmmm... Too much SlurpAll*n not good?
Wow, Linda... you have lost all grounding in reality.
lol, nice PAL!!
Sorry, Linda. I was never involved in litigation prior to the April Fool's Day incident.
I am aware of the 1999 lawsuits against her, as well as those in years passed.
As for this:
I am also aware of the FBI intervention after setting up a fraudulent company in 1999, as well.
There was no company, and so no fraud. For an investigator, you're remarkably disingenuous. If you'd read all the articles about Webnode, you'd know that everyone was aware from the outset that it was an April Fool's joke. Are you aware of the one the SEC pulled last year? Do a Google search for "McWhortle".
Yes, the idiots at Bizwire called the FBI. An agent called Jeff Mitchell, who explained. The agent laughed and said "I don't have time for this kinda shit", and that was the last anyone heard from him.
You really need to get a better grip on facts, all round.
lol, no kidding, I don't think Linda could detect an elephant in her living room.
Awww, c'mon. She's fun. I can't tell you how hard I laughed when she accused Huck of blackmailing her.
lol, thanks, KK. But she'll NEVER Get It.
WHAT?? BLACKMAIL???
Now, is the following intended to be some form of blackmail...see, I have told you on numerous occasions, when you and the others were attempting to blackmail me, by backgrounding my family...that I was not related to those individuals in any way except for having the same surname.
You need professional help, Linda.
HUH??? What's SI Bob got to do with any of this??
Your response sounds so very much like SIBob...
Guess you haven't read any of the articles that have been written about me, Linda. I don't do it for money; I do it for fun.
I've answered the questions you and others demanded..
No you haven't. You haven't explained how it was that Wendy Gordon got in touch with you more than two months ago, long before you registered this alias.
And I think that's what most people here are interested in.
And a definite thinning of the ranks... The number of posts at RB is dropping daily.
....I tell ya', I smell panic.
Alas, she doesn't usually show up till late afternoon.
Where's linda with her 3 rants of the day?
Humph. Filet mignon doesn't look like South America at all.
Yup. And Linda claimed she hadn't used a different alias before she registered as lindabruzzone.
I agree. She now claims she came to the board in response to Guru's "Fung derf at Fidelity" post, but that's not true. She'd already left a number of messages, in which she encouraged longs to send her personal information about "bashers". Linda has a very selective memory, I'm afraid.
She then unwisely proceeded to accuse anyone critical of PCBM of "stock manipulation", which is a crime. She's made a great many threats, but seems to think it's okay when SHE does that.
I'm still quite interested in learning how and why Wendy communicated with her two months ago. Why'd she choose to post on the PCBM thread, outta all the OTCBB and Pink issues out there?
she deserved it.
Thanks!! Sounds great!
I believe it's a few blocks to the south of Park Place.
What? Didn't you get the new codebook from Beate?
No it doesn't.
Mallocio dela streta (Mallocio, in Italian slang, meaning "getting axed")
The correct spelling is "malocchio della strega", and it means "evil eye of the witch".
Sheesh. You can turn ANYTHING into a "threat", can't you?
It's "johndoes.org", Linda. And I suspect many of us know the founders far better than you do.
I suggest you review this or perhaps contact johndoe.org and ask them their opinion.
btw: what on earth gives you the idea that scion is a journalist?
Riddle: What if the dog is eating Eukanuba?
The dog is eating Alpo. I repeat, the dog is eating Alpo.
I certainly do.
you don't want to know that kind of dog she has?
They're nothing if not predictable.
Bet you're right. I'm sure they won't see any difference between currency trading and buying PCBM.
lol, Linda once again graced us with her presence.
lol, good question.
But what is her agenda? She shows up out of nowhere and starts accusing everyone but the people who stole her money.
There are, of course, so many like her: people intent on assigning blame anyplace except where it belongs. The difference in her case is that she's a P.I.
I don't understand why she doesn't Get It.
Would I be "disparaging" AlanC if I said I find it reprehensible when he and others hint about things they "know" but won't tell?
When your instincts cause you to refer to others in a disparaging way... yes, I guess I have a problem with that!
Actually it isn't.
That is the only place you can short them legally.
I'm told that Yamner will let you short pennies, though they probably want a king's ransom in margin if you want to go after sub-$1 issues.
And a few years back, when OTCBB issues were screaming, lots of people shorted HITT and other high-priced pennies through Schwab and DLJ.
Yes and yes.
Is shorting penny stocks legal? are off shore accounts legal? perhaps through loop holes they are...the question is... is it ethical?
And yes once again. Not only is it "ethical", it should be encouraged, and made far easier to do. That'd eliminate an enormous amount of volatility, and that would be a good thing for "real" companies. A bad thing for the pumpadumps, but who cares?
I see.
btw u have the hogs this week..
I have the anteaters.
I don't have a dog. But I do have two other pets, and I won't reveal their names anywhere on the web. What if Linda should find out, and post them here?
OH THE HORROR!!
And no I won't tell you the name of my dog.
Sheesh.
I realize you most likely felt irritated when you were sued numerous times before for the same exact actions...
Yes, I was indeed irritated. But it was no biggie. Both of the companies in question were outrageous scams, and have since been dealt with by the SEC. Currently, people associated with both are facing criminal prosecution. One is in jail.
...and in fact, you are probably feeling the same irration with your current lawsuit, which AGAIN addresses the SAME pattern of actions.
Actually it doesn't. As usual, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Why do you feel such a compelling need to answer for everyone?
You don't have much experience with message boards, do you, Linda? People frequently reply to posts not addressed to them. Just read back on this thread and you'll see.
How many investigations have you REALLY done?
Dozens. And nearly all of the companies in question ended up in trouble with the SEC, or worse. NONE has ever proved to be a good investment.
As well, I don't believe you have done any "scambusting" whatsoever and are even involved in that.
Then I suggest you read the articles that have been written about me, and dip into the more than 100,000 posts I've written over the last six years. I'm gettting the feeling that you don't "believe" anything that doesn't suit your agenda.
lol, I don't know if there was any shorting done by, um, friends of insiders, but that's one of the possibilities.
care to shed some light on the "not so ordinary" investors you think might have shorted the stock?
No one posted information from your credit report, Linda. Why do you keep lying about this?
I also consider posting information from one's credit report to be harassment and intimidation.
He certainly should be. I'll wager he's one of only a very few "ordinary" investors who actually shorted the stock.
Are you proud of this?
I mean this in the nicest possible way, Linda, but you're thick as a plank.
However, I was looking for an individual named Fung Derf WITH Fidelity...now, if you are NOT this person, then, I have no idea what your issue is. If you are this person, then why would you be upset that someone wished to speak with you for an unknown reason? I don't understand why someone would be so defensive over this, especially since you state you are not Fung Derf with Fidelity.
btw, do you have any idea how irritating you are?
Nope:
i can't get tos'd for the thought, can i?
I think you're right.
I think she was just attempting to get several TOS'd from posting here.
She doesn't seem to have any idea how message boards work.
I believe you don't understand much about SEC regs, Linda.
lol, this is unbelievable:
I believe what you did, coupled with your comments on the CYPT board, were stockholder manipulation. I believe what you have done is illegal, Janice.
I posted on the CYPT board exactly six times. In none of the posts in question did I offer any opinion of the company. (Though I hope you understand that Tony Cataldo is bigtime Bad News.)
And what, lol, is "stockholder manipulation"??
let's see the license or the name of the boss.
What ARE you talking about?