Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I know. They drive me crazy too. snicker, now they all want to have dinner at the Plaza with SBG. If they go for it, can we find a local willing to shoot a video?
LOLOL!!
I've reported him so many times to the SEC, they now just call me derfie in their reply e-mails.
By: mquietstorm3
30 Apr 2004, 12:50 PM EDT
Msg. 1115610 of 1115914
I will give you one challenge and if you can find it I will let you know about the 4 for 1 split?
Show me where I ever wavered at any point since owning this stock no matter what price it was at?
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SRCI&read=1115610
I think it's crazy.
Either way, the idea of an open auction for shares is interesting, but I can't imagine the SEC would allow some IPO people to buy cheaper than others?
If they really do that, we could see absolutely insane excesses. Did you follow the Wedding Gown auction on Ebay? People were putting in crazy bids they didn't intend to honor; at one point it got up to $100 million. Ebay and the seller eventually sorted it out, but I don't think the SEC wants to deal with shit like that.
I think also that inexperienced investors could end up paying far more than they should at an auction. Of course that's basically their problem, but I don't think it would send the right message about the seriousness of the company.
If they want to give Average Joe a shot at owning IPO shares, they should just fix a price and conduct a drawing. If they do what they seem to be saying they'll do, the result will be chaos. But a chaos from which flippers who get shares in the syndication will benefit enormously. And that would be the opposite of what the Google owners say they want.
lol...
I guess I'll pass on Google. I already have tried owning a company which refuses to report earnings.
I don't think Google is saying it won't make quarterly reports; that's not optional if you're listed on a major exchange. They're just saying they aren't going to offer "guidance". My guess is that all they really mean is that they won't be doing conference calls and the like.
What's so funny about that? I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that quite a few of 'em are in institutions.
I can't believe those idiots are now in a discussion phase concerning INSTITUTIONAL holders of SRCI. LOLOLOLOLOLOL
I wonder when the cult is going to realize that this slowness in brokerage account updating and the lack of instruction on cert exchange is probably a deliberate act by the company to reduce the tradeable shares and allow someone time to dump more shares.
Much as I dislike the "company", I don't think so. Some people's shares were switched immediately, and others' weren't. It may just have to do with the back office procedures of their individual brokerages. I suppose it's also possible that it makes a difference whether the "investor" in question holds his shares in street name, or in cert form.
In any case, it's sloppy and shouldn't happen. Had any of these people wanted to sell, it would have been impossible to do so quickly. The company is at fault in one repect: the exchange might have gone more smoothly had the company announced it, say, a week in advance.
She really is the ultimate PCBM Poster Child. Just imagine her on an actual poster, can of Coors in hand.
Unbelievable. SBG defines stupidity:
By: silverbulletgirlny
29 Apr 2004, 04:28 PM EDT
Msg. 1115175 of 1115427
(This msg. is a reply to 1115116 by Golden1ce.)
G1,
DO YOU REALIZE TDW HAS BEEN CHARGING ME $48.00 COMMISSION ON EVERY TRADE @ .0001? DID I GIVE A FARK? HE11 YEAH! BUT DID I WANT THEM DARN SHARES ANYWAY? HE11 YEAH! TO ME THIS
WAS AND NEVER WILL BE ABOUT THE MIGHTY DOLLAR $ Hmmmm...
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SRCI&read=1115175
I understand they're holding out for the Pinks.
I hear SRCI/PCBM turned them down. Not classy enough.
I wonder how many different pending "deals" there'll be before the mullets finally Get It.
Oh?
SRCI spoke to Bruce again today and this can't be good he stated a rumour lawsuit maybe coming from shareholders and deal may not go though if lawsuit comes into effect.
These guys really have no shame.
Too funny!!!
I called the TA earlier today. He is not gagged...Jeff Mitchell stated the company simply has not released the numbers.
The guy should be writing comedy for TV. Alas, the listing is likely to be removed tomorrow: did you notice that people were screwing around with the bid?
Interesting. They're quite edgy on the Zoo Board tonight.
snicker, I still remember VVUS's "buckle test"....
George--
I follow your radio tube sales with devotion. Haven't bought yet; am waiting for that Perfect Tube...
Can't stop laughing. Be sure to read all the way to the bottom:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4146756343&category=6
No..same thing happened with CMKX. RB changed the name of the board, but didn't link it to the new ticker. Dumb.
Does all this have anything to do with tantric sex?
Good work, Neal!! Be sure to spam that all over the place. It'd be thoughtful to send it to Essary as well.
Not very much, apparently.
Looks good to me but what do I know.
They've tried that twice in the last few months...
What I smell coming up is a planned pump to make the suckers think there is SHORT cover going on. The hysteria will cause massive buying while those in the know dump massive quantities of stock.
...and they couldn't push it beyone 0.0009. Not even with the help of an extraordinarily stupid group of momo players. While the True Longs most certainly do live in their own little universe, it can't be entirely lost on them that we're not seeing short covers in any of FinancialWire's list of trash penny stocks. There's tacit recognition of this by FinancialWire itself, and by GetShorty leader Dave Patch: now they're trying to convince the world that the short cover hasn't happened because the Evil MMs listed all the stocks in question on German exchanges illegally. This ain't very plausible, and I don't think it'll convince many people.
Right now, I believe that the TLs are persuaded that Hall really does intend to do a reverse merger. They could be right. But if he does, he'll have to do a "stock consolidation" along with it, and they won't like that one bit.
Another great one, Paulie!!
LOLOLOLOLOLISSIMO!!
lol, I can't think of any circumstances in which it'd be attractive to a buyer either. But that won't stop Hall from trying to sell it, if only to keep the True Longs happy.
Yes, you would think that. I mean YOU would and I would. I guess Hall doesn't.
lol, why not?
Seriously, to make it more attractive to a buyer.
So.....tomorrow morning PCBM will open as SRCI. There's no mention of any reverse splot, but....
Odd that the company hasn't issued a press release about it.
Oh for God's sake. Chill.
Everyone knows her name, and knows that she lives in Boca. She was a lot more open about her identity a few years back. Many people have talked to her on the phone (including Slurp, lol) and one guy who was burned by BMII has made a serious effort to get the SEC after her.
Unfortunately I don't thing even he has her real name and address.
Yes.
You think I am wrong?
I agree. I have no problem with people who play loser stocks for a quick profit. But they shouldn't pump them.
Not to mention, he put out a ridiculous target price, which I will bet you a bunch that he doesn't come close to sticking to.
If I'd bought any (I didn't) I'd have said it was a POS and I was in it only for a short term play.
Don't look now, Chris, but you sound EXACTLY like All*n.
Pretty tame stuff, compared, say, to "All*n".
My God, this is disturbing. I find it very difficult even to talk about.....LAGGARDS.
Awwwww....