Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Creditors can sell as soon as the Effective Date hits. And it was 14 days, not 14 business days. Read the stuff for yourself, there are a whole lot of opinions floating around that are not so much based in truth.
When was it NASDAQ?
Talk about mistruths...
The amazing thing is making money from a stock. The crappy part is that you made that money from less sophisticated people who didn't know better.
Make sure you are on the right side of the trade.
Please, tell me again about the 4 part leak restriction that magically came about from the 3 part that was actually documented.
Got all night.
The 2015 one was the best, IMO. "Reverse split is just preparing for NASDAQ uplist" press release.
<looks at calendar>
Confirmed where?
Thank you for confirming that leak out opinions regarding absolutely nothing for the first 30 days were in fact totally bogus on all counts.
And also a nice thank you for confirming that the alleged tale of the CEO confirming no selling for 30 days was also fictional.
Thank you for providing those.
Have you got a screenshot of that section we can check out to confirm for ourselves?
But there are only three parts to the restrictions. There is no fourth part.
I totally agree.
You've got it exactly right. These opinions about nothing in first 30 days and including days 91 to 120 in the terms are total BS.
But that explicitly states no more than 33% in the first 30 days.
I have yet to see a document that says nothing in the first 30 days.
I keep seeing that claim of no selling for 30 days but no one seems to be able to provide a screenshot of the document that backs that up.
Where are you reading "no selling for 30 days"?
Sounds like BS. What exactly was the title that indicated that it was signed at the time?
I remember fanciful stories about imaginary whales that were coming in to buy custodianships. The buys never occurred.
"Honestly trying to share a lie" seems to be a bit of a conundrum for me.
Does not compute.
The lie of having seen the signed POR has not been clarified.
Trying to explain that filings get pulled if they don't have all the attachments with them does not negate that it was claimed that the signed POR was seen. Which is obviously a lie as it has not been signed yet.
I don't share the same fan adoration for known liars I guess.
There were multiple posts claiming that the signed POR was seen today. Yet after hours we find that it has not been signed and instead is due to be signed Friday.
I think we have differing definitions of credibility.
I hope that anyone who bought shares based on the lie that RVD was tied to Cadiz/Glasshouse through Justin remembers where they were told that.
Okay, well thanks for the potentially misleading "DD" post.
Awesome! But that's not UAPC, sadly.
Okay, and thanks for sharing the imaginary DD website.
The pump angle has changed from "oh man I didn't know he was broke" RVD to the "now this guy has money" Justin.
This is where things seem to stand at the moment. I've been fully aware of the court and SOS documents, thanks.
There's a website confirming UAPC DD? Please, show me the way to the promised land.
Should I hold my breath or just pretend like I am?
It could also get suspended and go to the grey sheets for illegal promotion, just like Eddie's last ticker.
Do you see any actual link so far between UAPC and this Justin and hemp farm stuff? No, it's just hearsay and rumor. The shiznit that gets a ticker suspended.
Good luck.
Or just buy if/when a catalyst hits.
No use sitting on dead money when it could be put to work elsewhere for the time being.
Does this Justin fellow actually have a verified direct connection with UAPC, the publicly traded ticker which is the subject of this discussion board? Or is that just a rumor trying to get started by underwater shareholders desperate to get out?
That one had a Caveat Emptor removed that had been in place for 8 years. Apples and oranges.
OTC Markets doesn't seem to share your confidence in the DD at this time. Unfortunately, it's their opinion that actually counts.
But there seems to be an issue with the title.
Eddie has been president since July 2. The court signing off on the custodianship discharge was merely a formality to get it off the books. It didn't magically grant Eddie powers that he didn't have before.
Why is OTC Markets seeking clarification? Does this mean they're uncertain of NVSOS changes / court documents?
Things that make you go hmmmmm.
I am anxious to see the filings as well. In the meantime, seriously call up a transfer agent and ask them what they do.
I'm not being a smartass. You genuinely do not understand their relationship to the company and you will be a more educated investor when you do.
I agree.
"It's part of the company's fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to ensure that all investor records, account balances, and transactions are safeguarded and accurately tracked. Transfer agents fulfill this vital role in maintaining records and providing investors with timely and reliable information.”
The transfer agent handles investor stuff, not company stuff.