Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ok, no truthfully his daughter means absolutely close to nothing in the realm of HDC and I say that with zero intent of attack or harm I say that based clearly on the fact she is holding a "POSSIBLE" spot in the company to just follow the CEO which in this case is her father.
Look closely at the directors under Barnhill what happen? What happen for years was clear what ever you say Mr. Barney boss man who really is daring enough to push the mouth that is feeding them away. It was so clear for years that Barney needed to be booted out...look at the embarassment dealings with Quirk, my GOD clearly BS!
It all comes back to this the fact as I see this is clear the Pennsylvania crew isn't but a good baby sitter and as long as we have close to nothing or nothing to really show the world no news is necessary is it?
Even with a possible block breaking happening involving HDC such as success with Intel and NeoGenomic corporations our management are the wrong fit to run this corporation. Great for baby sitting but will most likely need to lateral the ball to a bigger player that can make things happen in real time not many months after the fact. It seems clear they can't even capitalize on a well deserved and honest press release that they were sincerely entitled to under the events of recent.
So about his daughter think nothing of it except a vote for her father if she is even at that level to vote by being part of the board.
Time to eat...... you can delete this message and the one prior if you wish no big deal be back later........
I really seriously think it depends on how we look at everything. I going to post a few more thoughts other than this but read your message as I just walk in.
If George would have pumped this within a day or so of the last 8-K I would have looked at this as a typical penny scam but he didn't so I figure great we have a CEO that knows of a plan?
Next within that last 8-K we not that he (George) or HDC management are looking at their options in this matter? Well!!! it is clear to most that any CEO would say exactly as such even if HDC had no bullets chambered for Intel or even a gun. Next as you read in the thread that it could be a clear fact that yes that patent is ours but it doesn't mean that Intel has factually made use of it in some manner however, if HDC were to say they "believe" it to be true of possible usage that is NOT a liable pending matter that Intel could even think of using against HDC for believing as such.
Our CEO did not capitalize on a possible announcement to his shareholder at minimum about HDC and their "intent" or what they believe something forward looking. It isn't as if he were Barnhill making endless announcements and nothing happening.
They may not even be turned into these message boards and really doubt no matter what present HDC management says or thinks they don't understand coupled with having no clue as to the hunger of the market potential. When Georgie didn't jump on this, this week I just shook my head and was pretty much sure HDC is going NO where meaning we have no plan and what is worse the wrong people leading this so called corporation. They will babysit this until it is closing time and nothing more.
You can look at this way so we gain a few million from Intel and a few million from NeoGenomic then what? Patents are about all sucked up and HDC knows this. We have no product to speak of and anyone who has been around here long enough fully knows this. Are patents do what??? they enhance other corporate tools to make products.
If George really has something don't you think he would have announced some type or plan or action instead of we are looking at our options? OK, what are your option George...HELLO! anyone home today.
What is needed to see is how many shares are George &James are holding i mean George has been invested in HDC since 2008 and no his daughter doesn't need HDC as any kind of recognition since her business has been around or incorporated 8 or 11 years don't remember. I mean I could tell you were anyone is on this planet with the available, neighbor just called must see what's.............be back, han't edited anything so I don't know it it is clear enough to read, ......later
They can ask .07 all day long but it won't stick without a 8-K period!...........welcome .05 and see you at .04 then .03 and so forth as the company is located in Georgia and ole George just won't get out of his bed in Pennsylvania and of course his daughter is in Pennsylvania too and no doubt working overtime for HDC.
Come on King...would you not like your little girl working with daddy?. I think it is cool I mean HDC has plenty of money so be it now or later everyone gets paid except us longs.
You have it made...at least you won't turn into a pumpkin at 12 midnight...dang no 8-K
Wow! the month of May is almost here again, mid May will have served 16 years in HDC prison!
Our directors working hard for HDC...notice the date!
https://www.gastroendonews.com/Expert-Roundtable/Article/04-17/Advanced-Endoscopy/54352
Ms. Hutchinson, age 43, is founder and CEO of CMH Media, LLC, a full-service medical media company that provides turn-key publishing, writing, editing, and project management services, as well as overall communications strategies to medical associations, medical education companies, healthcare products companies, and medical institutions. Her work includes publication management, clinical reviews, educational enduring materials, meeting reports and summit guidelines/recommendations, consensus panel statements, and association strategic initiatives development. Ms. Hutchinson is the daughter of George McGovern.
I see your communication skills hard at work for HDC?
Her place of "business" as listed? 2616 Kirk Ave Broomall Delaware PA
Bus Entity# 4025633
What is the ask price? is that .17 cents? I'm from the state of Missouri the show me state...like show us something other than silence then maybe we can get to .17 cent today?
RE: Why hasn't the company to my knowledge not told us exactly if we are actually waiting on a decision from a Judge?
The statement above pertains to NeoGenomic corporation
re: She was a delightful person - it was fun looking at her picture albums.
I could feel the smile you had during your visit with her.
____________________________
The 4th which is tomorrow was my projected date when I thought our CEO would produce some type of release to hold a bit more interest involving this company. McGovern is 72 and his golf buddy Dendler is 77 so I figured a couple of cases of Geritol would get them moving a tad quicker, figured it was due time to make a "safe, soft but direct announcement." I was not expecting anything huge but the company does need to show a bit more life within the public venue, that is if it really has a direction? I would be incline to also start to wonder have they had any plan at all if successful such as the patent dealings with Intel. It is possible for our patent inventors and or our patent attorney's to know if Intel was indeed using that patent prior or need for future? Why hasn't the company to my knowledge not told us exactly if we are actually waiting on a decision from a Judge? If the corporations steps up the pace a bit investors might too.
It could be very true that both Intel and HDC were just defending intellectual property/patents and nothing more. That patent is only good for about 3 more years.
All in all I just can't help to think it is due time to show a bit of life within this company period, no if and or but about it.
[George get off your butt and look a live for a change]
_________________________________________
I do believe from reading the history of his father that he comes from a very good and caring family without doubt. He is NOT scamming HDC.
Come on George my skin is starting to turn a slightly orangous in color. We will not be able to keep the up-tick in share price without throwing an 8-k filing to the market traders, need volume badly!
Now I know how the Maytag man feels............
Sorry about that...McGovern & Dengler are the two that did the last promissory note for $300k
It appears that George McGovern and James Dengler live within 9 miles from each other kinda near to Waynesborough country club in Pennsylvania. I also doubt if they would sell their homes and move down south but maybe travel down south in the winters. I mean you also have a country club across...sort of .... from the HDC business office in Georgia.
So far it sure looks like I will be turning into a pumpkin after midnight of the 4th?
I thought George got the Geritol but perhaps he refused to drink it?
...there is hope since we are up ticking and thought we would not!
_____________________________
Nathanial....yes I'll be turning into a frickin pumpkin soon enough!
Ou71764 ....no doubt we will get what their giving regardless of what we want. Probably anything is better than prior and yes .65 would be just fine with me.
BTW...I figure at most George could be holding up ti 40-50 million shares
Come on George the O.S. had to of been somewhere between 300-320 million and the forced conversion on Jan 1, 2019 probably 75 million at minimum but probably closer to 125 million looks like we are kissing 400-425 million common shares with nowhere to go except another promissary note or a shareholders meeting which would require a vote. You got series "C" shares starting to nip at you so what are you going to do? All you needed was a 10 day average but 30 days gives you more planning time.
Ok George I'm sending another case of Geritol within the hour, make sure you have your hearing aids in, turned on and up full blast, make sure your wearing your glasses and when you head to the door don't step on Rovers tail again.
.......3 days left?
Our Attorneys..fighting NeoGenomic
Mr. Daniel Nunn, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
https://www.nelsonmullins.com/locations - https://www.nelsonmullins.com/locations/jacksonville_fl#main
The above people are dealing with NeoGenomics from my understanding?
________________________________
Our IP Attorneys...Musick/Davison - "The Intel eaters"
https://www.mdiplaw.net/people
Come on George you got 4 days or should I say I got 4 left before I turn into a pumpkin...come on you owe me something non- tangable. ; }
I believe you have an excellent point...as for patent attorneys they are some of the best...I finally sat down and studied them after all these years.
You know the more I read and think about the patent technology the more I am leaning towards thinking that Intel has indeed incorporated a combinations of technologies their and ours to combine and super fast CPU chip that can operate their DAAL technology and the SVM-RFE together. The arrangement and speed resolves the short comings of SVM by itself. It appears at minimum that they use the XEON chip.
Look at the date of the article!
https://software.intel.com/en-us/daal-programming-guide-multi-class-classifier
So the truth in the matter is just merely the facts which are the patent belongs to HDC and nothing more!
....but you can't tell these young democrats that.
Infringe on a patent is one thing which has been proven but how would HDC prove infringement by product such as hardware? maybe software but hardware would be harder to prove.
So notice of infringement to Intel means what? It would seem HDC would need to know and prove infringement by software and or hardware.
If the infringement is involving hardware that could be some decent dollars for HDC and even software/flashing - chips could bring in some money.
...and to bring in someone of that caliber to take charge in these areas I would ask myself "why is he not the CEO"? So could McGovern work with a high end type of executive without feeling inferior and get things done.
That is why I have been saying we need a new CEO to take charge!
Absolutely NO to both... our CEO George McGovern would probably have his hands full of displeasure to even think of that. We know just what Barney brought to us shareholders..."Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me! Our CEO will make contact/contract with someone or an entity that would do far better. All in all I wouldn't expect more than HDC selling the patents but anything more such as an Intel buyout is really dreaming. I probably would hit the lottery before that would happen.
...for starters I would bring back Barney's good buddy "Scott Tobin"...now McGovern would know everything about him since McGovern has been invested in HDC since 2008. Is Tobin worthy in McGovern's eyes? I have no clue!!
Anyone they bring in must have connections to make things happen and in our case time has probably escaped us so the more reason to push this company as hard as possible with the right people in place. Who knows is McGovern accelerating HDC behind the scenes or continuing the babysitting job?
It is clear the share price is being held in place, no if and or but, period!
King Oil was not a moderator at the time when my message about Doc's place was deleted...I'm pretty sure it was Hokie but none of that really matters.
One of the 4 moderators new here had deleted my message about Doc's place and the other are old news to me. Go to the SHMP message thread here on IHUB...CEO Williams was our first CEO of Direct Wireless Comm before Barnhill.
I know where all these people are! Matter fact since I talked with Brasswell early on in 2003 he must have given my phone number to Barnhill's attorney back then as they wanted to know what connection in Pennsylvania may have been trying to destroy or harm HDC in our beginning. Wow was that a long time ago and just a vague memory.
I do have a question that has been bothering me for years!!!!
If our inventors make approximately 20% royalty from our patents and HDC makes no money where are our inventors living? are they at some City park eating cold "pork & beans" out of a can or what? I mean the patents are assigned to HDC.
...I couldn't resist : )
TTIME.......As you know you can go to the public access area and check out what is transpiring as to action and of course transaction history & Image file wrapper attracts my attention, plus of course other valuable information.Some patent application and patents getting near the end of their term are abandoned and updated/enhanced. You can even watch the language change along with more defined usage such as looking at the 4 pages involving this application.
https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
I would strongly believe and anyone who has been here for a while may agree with my thought that they are holding the share price really tight which in my mind something will be announced soon, I hope prior to April 4th ...come on George "Make My Day"....if within 6 days as I projected I get a million series "C" shares. ; )
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20180321245.pdf <<<<< this 4 gene patent issued in 2018 must be one of the block busters, just gotta be!
In other words the promissory note holders are holding aces while the series "C" holders hold kings, then the typical commoners...some eat first no matter what while others may not even get a hand out....one has to be able to laugh and smile regardless.
There is always plenty of money available for this company if the deal is sweet enough.
Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
Funding for Ongoing Operations
On October 23, 2017, Health Discovery Corporation (the “Company” or “HDC”) issued a convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) to George H. McGovern, III, the Chairman and CEO of the Company, and James Dengler, a Company shareholder (the “Note Holders”), for $300,000. The Promissory Note contains an 8% annual interest rate and is due on January 1, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”). The proceeds of the Promissory Note will be used for general working capital purposes. Pursuant to the terms of the Promissory Note, the Company granted to the Note Holders a priority security interest to all intellectual property as well as all past, current and future agreements involving the Company. The Promissory Note will be senior to all other unsecured indebtedness of the Company.
At any time, the Note Holders shall have the right to convert the principal and unpaid accrued interest of the Promissory Note into common stock of the Company at a conversion amount obtained by dividing (a) all principal and accrued but unpaid interest under the Promissory Note by (b) $0.004 per share, which is based upon the ten day moving average of the Company’s common stock on October 23, 2017 (the “Conversion Price”). The right of conversion (“Optional Conversion”) is solely at the Note Holders’ discretion.
In the event that there is a change of control transaction (a “Change of Control”) prior to the Maturity Date, the Promissory Note shall be immediately (i) repaid in the amount equal to 120% of the then outstanding principal or (ii) converted to common stock of the Company. The total number of shares of Common Stock the Note Holders shall be entitled to upon conversion shall be equal to the number obtained by dividing (a) all principal and accrued but unpaid interest under the Promissory Note by (b) the Conversion Price. The choice of repayment method is solely at the Note Holders’ discretion.
If not earlier converted in connection with a Change of Control Conversion or Optional Conversion, the Promissory Note will mature on January 1, 2019 and, at the option of the Note Holders, (i) principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable in cash at such time, or (ii) principal and accrued interest can be converted into common stock of the Company at the Conversion Price.
Additionally, the Note Holders shall be entitled to appoint two additional board members to the board of directors of the Company.
Stockholders' Equity
Series C Preferred Stock, Convertible, 45,000,000 Shares Authorized; 30,000,000 Issued and Outstanding September 30, 2016
Be right back movie over...let me find something in a recent SEC filing.
I truly believe they are shooting for a .05 x 30 day average to raise funds, they must as they can go nowhere without money and their attorneys can only bend so far...be back later have a movie to watch
You have a great point but????
OK...I "didn't" want the CEO of HDC to announce any plan right after the last 8-K simply because it would have told me he just wants to pump this to unload his shares. I do believe he has far more than 20 million shares that is if he is serious about moving this company however, I am getting impatient as it is getting close to my projected date of April 4th for some type of concrete direction from within HDC. It is clear to begin with that
most corporations would normally spend money on protecting their patent and since the Intel patent was basically assigned to them it doesn't matter even if it is worth 5 cents that they would still protect their patent just like HDC would. When HDC - George McGovern stated in that 8-K that they will look at their options that is just the typical lingo but yes we hope it wasn't the typical and that they have sincere options and some sincere royalties to follow in the future.
We have waited year after year and never NOTHING for us shareholders except the SOS!
As I mentioned days ago I figured by April 4th that that was enough time for HDC to come out (even with BS) to finally stae something for the future. As I said recently we have 12 patents "US" patents expiring in about 35-36 days. We are losing ground as quickly as our patents expire.
Barnhill was about Barnhill and no one else. I'm sure CEO McGovern might even smirk about him as Mc Govern has been invested in HDC since 2008.
BTW...just think anyone in our past that has been separated 3 years or more can legally compete/collaborate our technology know to anyone. Are there any past officers from our company that are competing with HDC?
BTW...CEO George McGovern I want to know what in the world is Mark Moore doing with SVM Capital corporation you know the one company that we keep on getting nothing from!...are you throwing any bones over to Mark or what? He was/is product development? well for what company? So we own 55% of SVM Capital? please explain what 55% of what? What percent was SVM Capital to make from Manifold partners back then? You see if shareholders don't know what percent SVM Capital were to make we can't figure the percentages let alone the factual money figures.
I forget, excuse me....why would we expect anything to change since we are so used to nothing from HDC.
Come on CEO George McGovern get going....about 7 more business days til April 4th...give Carylyn a call!!!
http://corporatestock.com/team-members/
Is .05+ your present 30 day target?
What am I thinking you probably already talked with her, right? ; )
To kill time you can look at one of HDC past shareholder meeting if you should care to read 18 pages plus the SEC filing which covers a total of 74 pages?
http://www.healthdiscoverycorp.com/Meeting.pdf
Common Stock as of April 15, 2016 by (i) each of our director
George H. McGovern, III, Director 14,500,000 5.1%
The reason I stay here...I got creamed with taxes in the early 90's so in mid 2003 I placed 75% Roth and 25% retail. Two firms and five accounts and it is all in HDC.
I said last year, the year prior and the year prior to that, that INTEL super sized and super charged that RFE-SVM/SVM-RFE patent and I was wrong!!!
I truly believe at most we could gain $5 million from NeoGenomic with with 20% of that the $1 million for our attorneys.
As for Intel I doubt that they sincerely need that patent to the extent some believe. Mind you it would be nice but just look at our patent portfolio and that asset value. It isn't that big or a deal anymore. We missed the boat back in the Barnhill days. There are too many ways around our patents and our back is against the wall with no cash just for starters.
Somewhere in the filings or past press releases I recall where HDC hired a company (years ago) to start noting the corporations that were using our intelectural property and where going to notify those corporations???? WTF ever happen about that deal?
Oh, also those who invented our patents even though they are assigned to HDC generally obtain receive 20% royalty from assigned corporation(s)at least that is my understanding.
Anyways we got screwed all these years and our present management is ok for babysitting but they are far far away from technological know how in dealing with other corporation in making those types of decisions. My hat is really off to them from babysitting HDC but they are wrong for our progress if there is any to be had but their salary kind of sucks so what the heck are we to do.
Our patents are not for Intel's chips as some may believe could it be developed why sure anything can. SVM-RFE is too slow from my understand.
Corporations are using MSVM and even PSVM ...Multi and Parallel vectors.
I am totally positive that if Barnhill wasn't too controlling (from what I had heard) our ship would have made it to the moon.
There is nothing I would love better than to have Intel or NeoGenimic corporation buy us out but would rather see them pump this up in a huge way but don't see our CEO capable of walking that line.
I forgot...we have like 50+ biomakers I think patented protected so how is that working out for us?
This is not what I was looking for but seems like HDC is no different than NEO
Taken from our SEC filings as follows.....
Many of our services will be based on complex, rapidly developing technologies. Although we will try to identify all relevant third party patents, these products could be developed by the business without knowledge of published or unpublished patent applications that cover some aspect of these technologies. The biomarker industry has experienced intensive enforcement of intellectual property rights by litigation and licensing. If we are found to be infringing the intellectual property of others, we could be required to stop the infringing activity, or we may be required to design around or license the intellectual property in question. If we are unable to obtain a required license on acceptable terms, or are unable to design around any third party patent, we may be unable to sell some of our services, which could result in reduced revenue.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to obtain patents on biomarkers and pathways that we have discovered and are attempting to commercialize. We face intense competition from other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. These include customers who use our products and technologies and are pursuing patent protection for discoveries, which may be similar or identical to our discoveries. We cannot assure you that other parties have not sought patent protection relating to the biomarkers and pathways that we discovered or may discover in the future. Our patent applications may conflict with prior applications of third parties or with prior publications. They may not result in issued patents and, even if issued, our patents could be invalidated or may not be sufficiently broad to provide us with any competitive advantages. U.S. and other patent applications ordinarily remain confidential for 18 months from the date of filing. As a result, patent applications that we file which we believe are novel at the time of filing may be determined at a later stage to be inconsistent with earlier applications. Additionally, the scope of patents we receive may not provide us with adequate protection of our intellectual property, which would harm our competitive position. Any issued patents that cover our proprietary technologies may not provide us with substantial protection or be commercially beneficial to the business. The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its validity or its enforceability. Federal courts may invalidate these patents or find them unenforceable. Competitors may also be able to design around our patents. If we are unable to protect our patented technologies, we may not be able to commercialize our technologies, products or services and our competitors could commercialize our technologies. Any of these events could materially harm our business or financial results.
Yes??? if I understand you that means anyone using those patents that will expire soon will not get off the hook! or should I say escape the HDC hand of hell!
Let me put away some wood staining chemicals and clean up the mess I made, then find a HDC filing/PR...as Arnold would say "I'll be back"
"CEO George McGovern" it is time... we have 12 U.S. Patents expiring in 2 months, actually 38 days, we need some good news with updated facts.