Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Still buying!!!
When pps was coming down Accum was going up. Will the inverse happen???
Watch out for the headfake and Reg SHO!!!!
Blah, blah...
"Longs will be rewarded."
That was 2 weeks ago when it was at a technical high. It is now at a technical low...,I also started buying again earlier this week...
It is buy low, sell high!!!
Who's fricking selling? Bunch of pansies!!!
It won't go down if you don't sell.
With a grain of salt folks (used to post here as Dounome:)
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=ACMG&read=6709
"I was just talking to the man and women thats answers alex'es
cell phone,They speak broken english and kept saying thailand.
I said is this alex cell phone the man said yes I said is this Siam and they hung up on me.No kidding this just happen 5 min ago."
I'd like to add that - as MP has already stated - the trading freeze ordered on those companies though they did NOT include ACMG, does not COMPLETELY exonnorate [sp?] ACMG; it is implied by the "Kron" finding and an assumption on my part based on what I have heard about emails going back and forth between Alex and someone at SAT.
My advice is to keep digging for Alex. The closer you get to him the sooner a PR will come out, IMO.
Someone should call that cell # using "Skype" and trace the IP...
ML8
I'll take that as a compliment, I guess, LOL!
God willing, we should start to see a story unfold...
Well, through all the digging that has been done here starting that weekend 2 weeks ago just on the internet, I think the SEC/NASD with their long-arms had an easier time of it (also, using the internet, LOL!) and whatever else they have at their disposal i.e. registration forms, RTO registrations, etc. They just needed to pointed in the right direction, starting with SAT and the list would've been anybody SAT was TA for...
Anytime before that order was released...
Oncd the new mgmt at SAT gets organized, and if you are still a shareholder of record, you will either get an email from you B/D followed up by a letter in the mail, or a communique by SAT itself; probably the former, IMO. This is a SAT f'up NOT an Alex f'up.
This mess has to clear itself up before Alex/SREG is going to come out and say BAU.
You need to be patient...sheeze!
I did email SAT/FST last night (I was a little 'tipsy':)
*****************************
Subject: Select American Transfer
To: Jackie.rossel@fairrossstocktransfer.com
"Jackie,
I am inquiring about this article:
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=249086.
Has the acquisition been completed and all clients contacted?
Will the TA continue to do business as Select American Transfer?
Will new managment continue to take part in scams designed to "hijack" shells during/after reverse mergers?
Just asking as I have a large position of a company that SAT is TA for and they have been on the Reg SHO list for over 90 days.
TIA,
X.X.X."
Name of your dog?
Okay, Sgt. Schultz, go back to Cnl Klink!
You know "nothing!"
This is BIG!!!
What it means is that no fraud was perpetrated by the parties at SAT or internally giving the company the appearance of legitimacy:
"4. Select American, acting as the transfer agent to these companies, may have issued false share certificates for trading in securities of these issuers in the over-the-counter
securities market via the Pink Sheets;
...
6. In addition, with respect to Yevgen D. Konaryev ("Kron"), it appears that Pharm Control issued press releases at the direction of Kron that contained misleading or untrue material
statements with respect to the financial state of the company;
...
IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to subsections 127(1) and 127(5) of the Act, that trading in the securities of the following companies shall cease and that any exemptions contained in
Ontario securities law do not apply to them: The Bighub.Com; Advanced Growing Systems; LeaseSmart; Cambridge Resources; NutriOne; International Energy; Universal Seismic;
Pocketop; Asia Telecom; and Pharm Control;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to subsections 127(1) and 127(5) of the Act, that all trading in any securities by Jason Wong, David Watson, Nathan Rogers, Amy Giles, John Sparrow and Kervin Findlay shall cease;..."
Since we have NOT been halted, it was found that ACMG was NOT engaged in fraudulant securities activities. Through implication, this means that ACMG HAS been investigated in order to make that determination (#6 ["Kron"]) which means Alex et. al. had to be available during the investigation.
Same number as here:
http://www.lightsmedia.com/eng/contactus.asp
There's a number here:
http://pateridis.com/index.asp
LMAO!!!!!
Mine is in music theory and composition! What's your point...you never answered my whole post - only part of it.
You didn't answer the whole post. I think you are the one that needs to READ and COMPREHEND. I said,
"What about BHL email to THT3?
Last week you were complaining that the PR issued by BHL "for and through" ACMG wasn't 3rd party verification. Have you just disregarded that piece of evidence."
You only addressed the SECOND half of the post and DISREGARDED the initial statement about BHL's email to THT3. The 2 go hand in hand.
It is obvious that the PR from BHL for ACMG has no value until you take into account the alleged email from BHL to THT3. It has just as much credibility than does Chuck's post about Alex emailing SAT.
Get it?
Back at ya...
Hard to COMPREHEND when you write DOUBLESPEAK, bulls!
Yeah, baby!!! LOL!
Yeah, baby!!! LOL!
Mystery,
Glad to have another level headed thinker on board.
Like your sig!!!
Huh? The email that THT3 allegedly received from BHL confirmed that BHL issued that PR. So you statement, "...And my previous 'complaint' that the BHL issuance of a PR 'through ACMG' was not 3rd party verification is correct..." is incorrect IF you believe THT3 and Sentinel's eyes. Why would THT3/Sentinel be more credible than Chuck's finding of Alex emailing SAT?
Me thinks you talk out of both sides of your face.
I dumped 25% of my position at 037 and started buying back at 03. Those shares were "earmarked" for flipping - I have a 375k share core - I also posted my sells and my buys.
I don't follow pete everywhere he goes. He was way to invested and was looking for a pop that never came. I will still be accumulating, bulls.
Thanks for the virgins pete.
I've called that same number several times with the same results. She says hello fine, but then hangs up; laughing in background...
What about BHL email to THT3?
Last week you were complaining that the PR issued by BHL "for and through" ACMG wasn't 3rd party verification. Have you just disregarded that piece of evidence.
His posts are full of wisdom. I wish posts were like his.
"However, what I know for sure is that AC has completely lost his reputation and his so-called “integrity” being a part of this dirty game by whatever reason. His chicken behavior doesn’t leave any room for further respect and trust."
Even if it is a court ordered "gag?" Not saying that it is, but something must be going on IF it is NOT a scam.
"Take whatever information you want and draw your own conclusions."
How can I if it is not valid or verifiable?
Guess we are all in the same boat called, "Heresay."
So by that logic Sent, ALL of the emails you have provided this MB allegedly from Alex are not valid or verifiable either. We can only trust that they are authentic because you say so?
It's not a scam according to the email from BHL to THT3 that Sent just verified.
Actually I think only about 600k of those were pete's today; he dumped Friday too.
At least now it'll be a little easier for me to catch up to you. LOL! I been buying while you been selling. Hmmmm!
So, Jack got to you, huh?
Whatever. I took it to mean that they would start the formalities immediately. Usually takes about 3 weeks to do an RTO if there are no "hitches" which we already know is NOT the case with ACMG re: SAT.
An IPO would've taken forever and everybody would still be complaining. Even after the stock starts trading, there is a "quiet period" for 90 days afterward...
How many spin-offs or IPO's have you been involved with that start trading immediately? I think the wording it fine for someone that knows SEC rules/regs re: IPO's/RTO's and "quiet periods."
I posted this weeks ago.
Same one. Has now been confirmed twice...