Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Why aren't they requesting this?
Yup, full sweep went through
Can hope for that why not, will find out in a few minutes
Didn't it already go through? I mean we knew since last Thursday evening
Where do you see that? I see way more sells than buys.
The whole market is dropping too. But this is kind of surprising given how we knew NWS wasn't through on Thursday evening.
Looks like big players are still bullish.
I think if it is real, then the question is why didn't the money show up in the DTS for yesterday? If they said they paid, they aren't holding onto the money. It's probably nothing but speculators might believe that it's not being accepted into the Treasury or they put it into a recap fund.
Ah looks like I mixed it up, do you know when they are posting it for 31st?
What do you mean diversion. It just isn't there. It was there in 2016 it's not there now.
Somebody CONFIRM.
I don't see "GSE dividends" under the Treasury DTS for March 29, 30, or 31st.
"GSE dividends" is listed there for the 2016 DTS report.
I'm thinking of what can be proved. By default I think they are crooks, and leveraging their position for personal gain. I would be shocked of they didn't and hardly even hold them to be morally accountable since this behaviour was probably what granted them their position.
Anyway, from what I have seen here it does not seem to be too significant in terms of recapping and releasing Fannie. They won't reject NWS just because CEO is helping his friends.
OK but what does it have to do with the conservatorship or our fight for recap and release, is what I am asking?
Can someone explain this? CEO of Fannie has conflict of interest with who exactly? Is this investigation irrelevant for us?
(((bad trade)))
Lol nice debunking there CNN
They're hiding something!
When he made that post I saw the 7.7 ~50k buy at ~10AM, now it's not there. It was a huge green bar, but it disappeared now.
HOLY SHIT! IT'S GONE NOW! I checked this morning! They deleted the trade!
FnF investors some of the most stubborn lmao. Glad to see we remain hopeful together. Hopefully once they see we won't let go, they'll stop trying to drop the price more and more.
I would not say idiot. I saw him being more timid and afraid of being called a crook of some sort. Also reassured some people that he would work with Congress on reform.
Maybe that's the lack of bad news feeling I am getting. It isn't really hope, I mean it's not like I always get good feelings, sometimes intuition tells me otherwise compared to reason. There are far too many good reasons to ending NWS for all the players except those working for TBTF banks.
It's my gut. Doesn't sense bad news.
There are so many people waiting for lower prices. With bulls and bears waiting for the same thing, it strange to not see this happening. You would imagine that Reuters news would be met with a larger drop in price. If people see no drop in price, it will likely go up as people try to get back in.
Don't celebrate just yet dude, it could still easily be no due to political BS. All logic and reason points to ending NWS, where everyone but TBTF banks win. But politics is politics and people can get scared, crooked, have "complicated reasons", etc.
From what I gather, it is up to Mnuchin alone to suspend NWS. Watt to release.
That bitch is a proven liar FAKE NEWS don't let her words mean anything. Corker is a rat and Trump hates him. If Corker is going straight to Watt in letter, it means he has no hope with Trump admin, and Trump admin already made their mind to suspend NWS. Him going to Watt is his last resort. Watt has asked to be able to recap for a while, he will do what Trump asks him to do. Mnuchin told him that he can start building capital while a solution is being pursued in Congress.
Can't remember think it was saying something like Trump will not release GSEs or something but left out one crucial word. If someone finds it please post so people stop panicking at MSM fake news.
Someone needs to get this crook. MSM fake news was always against us, maybe they know it's going through and trying to get out of their shorts.
Is this legit reporting? Starting to realise that fake news can cost money, why are Corker and crooks pleading for it not to go through then?
Will find out in 2 days if this admin believes they are more lawful than Obama admin. If they just blame it on Obama and take, it's no better than Obama blaming shit on Bush, maybe a little better since stock market tanked due to fears of Obama regulations.
I doAND zxfn't like it, but that's really not in opposition to anything he said. Plus I trust that you conveniently forgot all the liberties Obama and the Dems have signed away and are now thinking it's good guys vs bad guys in Congress?
I trust Trump to keep his word on the the things he said he would do. He never was a liberty candidate, that was Rand Paul, he was the economic pick, and that is what he will be.
30 year mortgage will bring all home prices down, not just low income.
It is critical to talk about where the money is going. It is a non-taxed income source meaning that it needs no approval from Congress for its use. If it is being used to fund Obamacare, then ending NWS for legal reasons "we won't conduct theft anymore", could be a front for letting Obamacare "implode" (now it's "explode") as Trump keeps saying. Ultimately we just care that the sweep is ended, but the reasons behind the move is what Trump and Mnuchin need to concern themselves with.
Sorry, I am sure there are tons of FnF level issues surrounding the White House and I wonder how much Trump can actually know. There is so much he has to do, despite what the media tells you, if you actually look at his schedule you'll see that he is far more busy than Obama, and I wonder where he gets the time to learn about things like the NWS funding Obamacare. Also wondering if Mnuchin would even tell him about it if he thought doing so would make Trump infringe on what Mnuchin thinks is a better political or financially sound move. I'm wondering if the relationship between Trump and Mnuchin is active, back and forth one, where new revelations are shared, or if it is just "I want this done, take care of it, let me know if you need anything" one.
I haven't heard their apology, but Alex Jones has always been trying to expose the pedophilia going on amongst politicians, religious figures, Hollywood, etc. From what I heard from him regarding Pizzagate, he said he had no definite position on it and that people were trying to associate it to his larger pedogate movement. Pizzagate is a very small aspect that focuses on DC area pizza restaurants that have heavy influence and contact with high ranking politicians, including the former president who held numerous fund raisers at Comet ping pong, which claims to be a children's pizza party place, despite posting obscene images on its instagram page ("honey fuck", naked men with pizza covering their junk, drawings of a penis squirting out pizzas, naked man covered in red paint", etc.) that would get my post removed if I posted it here, with many suggestive imagery involving toddlers, with the only likes coming from high ranking officials, including head figures of DC police.
Anyway, as for FnF, NWS occurred at the same time that Obamacare needed funding for subsidies. NWS isn't a taxable income and does not need approval for Congress. The statements that were posted on InfoWars and retweeted by reputable people, including Josh Rosner, are pretty much conclusive. I don't know what else you could want, or if you are just discrediting InfoWars because the MSM has duped you into believing that only they can tell you what a primary document means and that citizens can't do it for themselves.
All a matter of if Trump knows about the GSE sweep funding Obamacare or not. Sure if he did he would cut it off right away.
It might be strategic to quietly kill the NWS aka Obamacare subsidies, so that Obamacare collapses ("not long" according to new Trump tweet) faster. If he makes a huge motion it may look like he is leading a campaign to actually make it fail. Most strategic thing is to cut it off for other publicised reasons while trapping media again by making them report on Obama's illegal NWS.
Well if something did happen they would be left chasing up, it's called pricing in.