How is that relevant to the .0004 trading you said didn't occur which did?

FACTS are right there on the chart on ihub for starters. Poor volume per usual but still qualifies as trading and discredits any claim of no sales.

What has ANAS stated as a plan to deal with this NOW (its been pumping 5HH for a year after all) as a public company to deal with the federal banking system that is not yet in place? Simple question.

This are changing but NOTHING is certain and you definitely can't pump a product for a year with no plan in place and just "hope" things change.

Is that update before or after the overdue Q4? Will it answer what ANAS has planned for dealing with finances while marketing a federally illegal drug? Credible questions that lack answers certainly should cause many worries, very correct.

Manipulation is all around ANAS. Its the only thing that breaths some life into this dying shell. The desperation around ANAS is strong. Warning lights all over this "company".

BTW those Q4 financials STILL overdue? Wonder what gems they contain...

HAHAHA!

ANAS is an empty shell that pumped a buyback but instead dumped close to a billion shares. Even if they would consider a buyback later they just raised the hurdle ALOT. NO CREDIBILITY.

Some try to drive the PPS higher so they can dump their shares for "BANK", IMO.

100% unsubstantiated speculation in all areas (since 100% apparently means something different now to say I was 100% wrong). Things are being "proposed" and things "may" change. Nothing to currently support any legit statements. In reality sounds like I was very close to completely correct... imagine that. ANAS was pumping 5HH a year ago, what was their plan? If they didn't have one they are hacks or liars.

So any response to what ANAS plans to do about marketing federally illegal drugs and managing their money/finances in that case?

If there is no question about 5HH this must have already been addressed, where did I miss it?

Also how exactly is 5HH supposed to go world wide? THC is illegal in most countries and IMO that isn't changing with any certainty to associate any sort of world wide claim with it.

I don't like the manipulation ALL around ANAS that is being used to make new bag holders. Anyone paying attention knows what go me inspired to take my time here to care, I value open communication.

If someone wants to gamble on this so be it but they'll go in eyes wide open. ANAS doesn't paint a good picture, sorry its so easy to shine a light on all the cracks. If it wasn't an empty shell there might be something worthwhile to present some useful counterpoints beyond regurgitating the statements from ANAS (which IMO history has proven to show are typically empty).

So back on topic, any input on how ANAS plans to deal with the federal banking system once it supposedly introduces this federally illegal product?

I think the market tends to package "shots" and "drinks" typically, and the shots are coping the "energy shots" thus the caffeine addition. There certainly are liquid THC beverages without caffeine already, off hand I'm not sure if any are packaged in a "shot" size. If liquid volume is off concern though most would direct their attention to the oils instead (drop drop) I would think. No that doesn't go against my previous statement that there are all kinds of edibles and 5HH isn't unique, (in a meaningful way).

However discussing packaging size is really a distraction from the main question I have posed. What has ANAS communicated to shareholders to address concerns about marketing an illegal drug and its implications on money management.

Are any of those companies publicly traded? If you read my post I've said the private companies have lots of hoops to jump through, I'd like to see the plan of action for a publicly traded one planning to sell a federally illegal drug.

Also yes there are already lots of THC edibles on the market which as I previously noted means 5HH is nothing special/unique, actual companies with experience have already staked claim in this market. 5HH trades on a hype name (that will likely get them sued by 5 hour energy if this was ever a real product).

What from ANAS addresses how they are going to handle the financial implications associated with selling a federally illicit substance? Most other MJ companies that are traded are consultants or secondary technology so they aren't actually selling a drug. ANAS is claiming it will market an illegal drug.

Yes lots of private companies internal to the legalized states already do this but they have lots of hoops to jump through when it comes to the money end. Seems like some high if not impossible hoops for a shell company with a mail forwarding address in MI (who's actual "CEO" is in another state) who will contract out the manufacture of 5HH to who knows to coordinate considering the federal banking system is still ironing out allowing MJ companies to utilize the system (including banking transfers). If this fictitious product comes out is Matt Briggs going to drive from store to store collecting sacks of cash which are then needing to remain inside state lines to avoid the implications of crossing a state border with "drug" money?

What plans does ANAS have in place? What have they laid out to shareholders to ensure them they've thought this through?

Swap them if you like.

So you as much as anyone should realize ANAS ran on hype and delivered nothing (thus the reason its back at the bottom) and still has nothing new to entice new blood (ie suckers).

Here's the thing on 5HH. IMO its fake but assuming they actually had intentions for it:

ANAS has zero experience in the field, they have an idea (don't we all). However all qualified business folks realize there is a LONG road between the two, ANAS came out the gate hiding the fact they had none of that in place, they said it was going to on the market in a couple months.

Reality: They don't have a manufacturing partner, haven't laid out a legit business plan and partnership idea on how to accomplish development/release/etc. They started pumping this product way way before knowing they could seriously execute it, IMO they are hacks or liars.

The second this company sells this potential product (which is still illegal on the federal level) they open up a can of worms, have any of the three iterations of the CEOs acknowledge that to the shareholders and shared a plan of action there? Anyone that has followed the CO businesses would be aware they were denied access to the federal banking system, had to conduct business in cash (cash had to be kept on premise in safes), and had to pay their quarterly taxes in person in cash. They are still working to iron out that process BTW.

How exactly did ANAS as a publicly traded company plan to address all those issues to not violate federal banking laws yet manufacture/sell the product and maintain transparency to shareholders? Remember they were stating it would be on the CO shelves in June 2014 so they must have figured all this out already if this was ever a serious product, has anyone seen any mention of that huge issue?

I would think a publicly traded stock on a company claiming they are going to sell something that is still illegal on the federal level would be one's first/main concern. ANAS was hyping 5HH a year ago when there was nothing in place for MJ companies to utilize the federal banking system legally. Things are starting to get in place but still not smooth sailing.

Did the implications of a publicly traded stock actually marketing illegal drugs cross anyone's mind? IMO one more check mark in the "this is only a hype idea" column.

Which new CEO which time? LOL. ANAS is an empty shell running out of lies and interest.

"5 hour" would be in the application, do a word search on it. Only 5 hour energy items are live, all others are dead. So even if they applied for a trademark they'd likely get beat down on it.

But the company or someone else is more than welcome to pull up the application if its listed under something else and prove me wrong. Floor is open, just bring facts to it folks.

Share count increased during a time they said they were doing a buyback. I agree its not impossible at some future point in time but that isn't what ANAS was pitching and they are no longer pitching a share buyback which IMO would be laughable as a selling point after dumping close to a BILLION shares.

There are no new PRs stating there is a share buyback and instead there are statements that they aren't pursuing one currently, which we all can see. That's the complete fact.

Oh the irony... Selective statements seems to follow ANAS around.

You are aware that applications show up in that search as well right?

I agree that registration takes a while, luckily for us they post applications both live and dead. I see NOTHING for any of the ANAS products on there. Just more empty intentions from ANAS.

"A stock buyback, also known as a "share repurchase", is a company's buying back its shares from the marketplace. You can think of a buyback as a company investing in itself, or using its cash to buy its own shares. The idea is simple: because a company can't act as its own shareholder, repurchased shares are absorbed by the company, and the number of outstanding shares on the market is reduced. When this happens, the relative ownership stake of each investor increases because there are fewer shares, or claims, on the earnings of the company. "

Share structure INCREASED nearly a BILLION, there is no buy back occurring.

IMO many penny stocks are scams or failures so I guess ANAS fits in.

3.11 BILLION shares on an empty shell makes for very little investor value. Much nicer when you see penny stocks with less that 100 Million shares that are also actually making credible headway on products, those are gems.

Share buyback = reduce outstanding shares. ANAS increased the outstanding shares nearly a BILLION. That's not opinion.

IMO there are lots of misleading things around ANAS.

Feel free to use the trademark link search to disprove my statement. I'll wait...

Also the share structure increased to 3.11B as of Sept 30th.

Those aren't opinions. ;)

False/unsubstantiated information

1) All share buyback PRs are outdated and instead FACTS show dilution, no longer a substantiated statement.
2) ANAS management is -90% in investor eyes, no comments on individual traders "activities" from me...
3) NOTHING credible to substantiate 5HH any longer but trend of PRs that went no where are left in its wake.
4) IMO the lack of a registration record of a trademark would once again prove there are LIES being propagated by ANAS. FACTS don't lie, ANAS does. Public record backs my statement, floor is open to produce PROOF otherwise (and an ANAS PR isn't proof...).

Lots of FACTS are being stated here that public record confirms are not just opinion.

So much lack of transparency surrounding ANAS, now there is lots of information available regularly for traders to do DD!

We all have motivations. There is a special place in my heart to make sure, for the time being, all new eyes are well informed on the issues that surround ANAS. If they want to still buy so be it.

Q4 late.
Lies on share buyback = close to a billion shares diluted instead.
90% loss since this became ANAS.
No credible information to substantiate 5HH.
No registered trademarks and false statements listing "TM" being circulated.

Its a free country, just posting FACTS. Like the lack of trademark, the lies on the share buyback, etc. Factual rebuttals are a good way to counter all the information on ANAS that has been posted, I'm not one to keep posting things in the face of credible evidence otherwise.

That would be one of the ways, among others..., to decline my interest in posting facts here.

Are you able to pin the lack of trademark link?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=111685134

That way its an easy link for all folks to verify with their own eyes there is nothing credible about any statement that contains a "TM" about ANAS. I'm not a liar about the lack of trademark and I'm willing to back up my statements, there is my proof on a silver platter for anyone to prove otherwise.

When the lies were fresh ANAS had volume, now they are old and tired and the same crap keeps getting tossed out there hoping some sucker will bite.

This had 10x+ volume at 10x the share price (really money flying around not tossing pennies in the wishing well) when management had credibility. They've clearly demonstrated they are an empty shell. IMO now that's likely all it ever was, however even if they actually intended to do anything they are obviously incompetent. Either way this thing is bleeding out.

The only thing management has been successful in is dilution. That's a fact, just review the share structure, no way to deny that. Share buyback is a lie. Be wary of statements otherwise which ignore the FACTS...

History proves the dilution is lurking. Where are those overdue Q4 numbers, curious to see how much more was dumped since Sept 30...

You want the pumpers to buy their own flips? ;)

You mean like making $1200 in trades so far today seem important?

You can ask it but if you don't get it then its meaningless, I didn't see any volume at .0007, heck even last week when there were a few .0007 trades it was only a couple hundred dollars total. No volume...

Heck the share structure increasing is just factual proof they are diluting out shares (while lying about a buyback) if they don't trust you. No one should trust anyone here but I try to point to the places folks can confirm for themselves all the lies that float around ANAS.

Yeah we were watching out of curiosity now we're just making sure new folks don't get the wool pulled over their eyes by all the unsubstantiated information being pumped.

Some stocks just make bag holders as they go down, down, down. Stocks like ANAS stink and folks can smell the desperation on ANAS.

This had little upticks as it fell to one step off the bottom (peaked at .0136 initially and fell to .0002). Folks still had faith and they bought in at the .003s plataue, then it was a .002s, then it was .001s. All the while hoping for that .01+ redemption. ALL FACTS, just review the chart history, public record doesn't disappear...

And THEN the Q3 came out with lots of dilution and pathetic revenue. ZERO has changed to entice buyers back, this is a empty shell and that picture has continued to come into focus as FACTS come out and there is NOTHING CREDIBLE to counter the picture they paint. Q4 is overdue but I bet its a stinker...

Lies + Dilution = Bag holders

Anyone wanting to know the truth should use the links in this post to look at the US patent and trademark database themselves:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=111685134

THERE ARE NO TRADEMARKS.

Also just read the diluted share structure in the intro if you want FACTS.

US patent and trademark database (a mod should pin)

So new investors can easily verify for themselves any statements relating to trademarks are fictitious:

http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-process/search-trademark-database

Link to the word search:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=4801:un34yz.1.1

Feel free to locate any of the "claimed" trademarks ANAS has...