Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I really was not going to post anymore just needed. There were 3 defendants. 1 was settled with and 1 was a default judgement. The 3rd is still pending. Maybe j Edgar Hoover could help you.
This is my final post but here is a copy of the 2014 settlement agreement. You will notice I am only posting the copies with the company signature rather than double posting. This should be very clear to all even the ones who think this settlement never happened. The mentioned note which is also in the financials and disclosure statement was what was defaulted on and the reason for the subsequent lawsuit
Let all the wild theories begin.
I hope everyone takes the time to read the entire complaint and exhibits and then you will realize what this has all been about. It had zero to do with Ross longoria et all period. This lawsuit was settled with UMMG only but then UMMG defaulted on that settlement which was made in 2014 and that's why they were sued again which resulted in the settlement for shares. Only settled for shares because they defaulted on the money settlement. Shares were never originally asked for or wanted
Just to show everyone that I glow does 5 cent dd here is the case #
Broward county Florida
Cace 12006967
His statements that no suit was ever filed was wrong inaccurate and mis leading. Hopefully no one will rely on his word or as he guarantee that no suit was ever filed and that this was all made up
I could easily give it to you but I don't like you. It is listed in the financials for every quarter as well you have told us all you subscribe to pacer. Should take you 1 minute to search
That's exactly correct. The judge and documents speak for them selves
Not trying to diminish company. Only trying to set the record straight because people are all assuming the wrong things
I hate to correct you. But this are just talking points. However 100% false and not true. Sorry to correct you
Not making negative comments. Only staying the unfortunate truths.
Of course. And actually as of today. Tom Kim may own shares and be the CEO but monster and mighty jaws defecto still own Ngcg. Ngcg is still a sub of monster. Those are owned by Ross longoria and Berrio
Ngcg is a wholly owned sub of monster. Monster is owned half by mighty jaws
Ngcg was owned by 2 entities. Mighty jaws llc and monster marketing group
Anything I say will get twisted by people do I emplore you to just look up the docs.
A complaint has been filed against their lawyer as well as to the Utah bar. Both are pending
I've told you 6 times it was for fraud
Your the investigator. Figure it out. I've said 10 times
Because that's what's in the court record. Not your speculation but rather what is in the court record and docket
I've said it 13 times. It is from a lawsuit filed in 2012 back when company was UMMG
Read again please. It was not for a loan
A default judgement was entered because Kim entered because never responded to the suit. He feals it is not his obligation because the debt happened before him. Finally 1 day before the final judgement was to be entered he is now trying to contest the default judgement. I have already shown and proven that his affidavit he provided in support of this was false and perjurous from him
The hearing we are waiting for is to determine if the judge will throw away the default or uphold it
If he upholds than the case is over Ruppert wins. If he throws it out than rupperts suit will continue on like a normal suit
Yes. What I am suing for now is 1 note from Kalisky I bought. I have notarized affidavits from Kalisky of payment from me and from company that nothing was paid
Also the rest is for money I loaned them trying to help them because I believed in Phil and Mike and their Kmart deal. Also I loaned it them trying to help them build a company and to protect my investment.
I do not want shares period.
They did successfully pay me back a 125k note which sent them a release on previously
And all of debts settlements and obligations are all clearly documented on the initial disclosure statement they filed in 2014. Nothing hidden
I posted it. But basically a lawsuit in 2012 was filed because my wife was scammed out of almost 200k back before it was Ngcg when it was UMMG. She won and had a judgement.
When Ross and group bought the company they settled the debt and agreed to make 12 payment of 17k per month. They defaulted and couldn't pay do a subsequent suit was filed.
Ruppert pAid her attorney 18 k in legal fees but it was accidentally left off the suit so a 2nd suit followed to collect for the forgotten fees by the lawyer
Keep ignoring details. Eventually someone will realize your providing facts.
Yes it states a debt was settled. But please post for all to from the complaint what the debt was. I guarantee you it will not be any kind of loans from him to the company as you keep stating.
Why do you insist on not showing everything
Thank you for the question. I am currently suing for loans I have them but not as a 3a10 for shares. Only for my money
The previous lawsuits had zero to do with loans, fake loans or anything of the sort. I have posted them before but here it is again
Ok so here's the rundown on the lawsuits for you
#1 Ruppert was owed legit debt day for back prior to Ngcg when it was UMMG of 200k. Sold part of the debt to his lawyer who came up with a way to recover funds.
#2 lawyer forgot to include the almost 18k paid to him for the first lawsuit in fees in the damages so Ruppert had to sue to recover
# 3 Ruppert sued for a debt owed to Kalisky that he bought from Kalisky which was not paid back. Kalisky had 5 notes with Ngcg and Ruppert bought some of them from Kalisky
I hope that clears it up.
Please state one fake loan. If you can show one 3a10 Ruppert filed for, for loans of any kind to Ngcg and I will personally repay any shareholder 100% of anything they say they lost.
Didn't say that. I sAid. Ever filed for loans given or your supposed fake loans. Never
Of course he has no current suit. He already settled it
Kakiskys timeline for review
December 2015 Kalisky brings Kim to shareholder meeting anonymously
Filed and settled 3a10 in Late January 2016
Crested financing from his own company which was announced
February 2016 using his employees name in the press release ( note financing never actually happened )
March 2016 in his own words he brought Kim in to make things happen
Would seem to me that there is s big difference between Ruppert and Kalisky which is not disputable as per actual court records
Kalisky is the Person to file a 3a10 lawsuit against Ngcg for loans given. And it should be stated if the suit is read and can be as its on line in broward county that it was only a 6 week loan in which Kalisky was charging 20% interest for that 6 weeks. That is effectively a 180% interest rate. Ruppert never sued under 3a10 for monies he loaned.
And like I've said. My lawsuit is business and not personal. If I lose I lose but I will let a judge decide the facts
The money is owed legitimately. One thing has nothing to do with another. I wish people could understand that. Even if and when I win I will need him to succeed so I can collect. If you were me you would want back your money as well.
Enjoy the fun !! Don't mean to burst any bubbles. Just throwing out some real questions that should be answered before anyone invests more money that's all. I actually pray for this to do well so that all if shareholders can make money and do well.
Funny thing is that the company hasn't said the name either. I wonder why????
Even if your correct 7 is not many ? What kind of math do you do? And it is many millions more than you have acknowledged having
As far as a jv. Kim never had said that Ngcg and Jspb would have any kind of affiliation or jv. And if do what are the terms
Does this bother anyone ? Apparently Kim according to everyone is a great businessman ! Assuming Vernon Oates and Joshua are not licensed and did terrible work than what does it really say about Kim if he bought this company without doing any real dd on them first. It would appear to me that anyone buying a public company would have their accountant review the books and their lawyer review the filing. If he didn't do this basic dd then that would not be very good leadership from a CEO and possibly speak volumes about his true intentions. If his staff did their dd and he knew of the problems but waited 5 months to disclose them then he needs to accept liability for not disclosing the problems faster considering in late June he signed off on Joshua's financials and filed them I can only assume he really did no dd before buying this company which means that was irresponsible
Question. Lawsuits aside I am still a shareholder with many millions of shares and have an interest in them succeeding also but I have a serious concern. Unless he is saying that he will put his wife's coming Into Ngcg wouldn't that be a conflict as they would be virtually competing businesses? What benefit would he have to drive the business to Ngcg when he could use his wife's company ? Has anyone asked him his intentions about merging Jspb into Ngcg. No one shoukd assume anything
Probably Kalisky didn't want to pay the lawyer. And a lawyer is needed file a late notice. B
Never spoke to Aron Joshua in my life. But I guess I was right. Anyone and mirrors. Only time will tell.