Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
>> Royality income "streams" are a top investment choice of very conservative people. <<
uhmmm... so Sunncomm is now an investment vehicle for widows & orphans? lol
The shear volume of delusional comments based on less than Bush had for WMD is so amazing that I have concluded, as fantastic as it sounds, that SCMI & UFO sightings must be for real.
Forget all that trivial stuff like filing, reporting, doing what you SAY you're going to or operating as if you were a real company... easier to pay "analysts" to recommend your stock, continue to make false promises and have the Lockness monster crowd babble incoherently about shadowy rumors in place of facts & revenues.
Don't worry gang, the aliens are on our side!!
Broke no more,
Alright, alright I apologize. I'm really, really sorry. I apologize unreservedly. I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact and was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice and I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
I was delusional, being under the jacobs svengali influence
But hey, no excuses, you were right, I was wrong...
I'm also as greedy as the next guy and was really hoping for an "undiscovered" gem here, a big score. He seeds what he says with just enough truth to make it sound reasonable/plausable and then sets the hook, allowing your own greed to cause you to hear what you want to... standard con-artist technique though in this case I still think he believes his own fabrications and half-truths.
Unfortunately neither of us profits from you being right ;-(
lol... you refer to MY posts as "spam" after Sunnyboy comes on here and types in 5 posts in a row of pure fantasy speculation?
I get having optimism, I even get believing Jacobs, hell I did too not so long ago, but I don't get the blind, myopic viewpoint that doesn't consider the negative points when regarding your investment...
My thoughts are well reasoned, certainly more so than "we're gonna win, we're gonna beat Macrovision, rah rah rah"
I don't want you to lose all of your money on this, cause then I would suffer too, but seriously, you might want to take a reality check.
don't ever let facts get in the way of mindless cheerleading
Eliminating the CD will be a tough sell to consumers who already have billions invested in CD players and librarys, so it is unlikely DVD will replace CD's anymore than DVD Audio or SACD, despite considerabley better audio performance, have gained much traction.
DarkNoise holds the potential to silence the copying issues surrounding even broadcast material over mediums such as radio or TV. The reality is the technology doesn't work yet and may never work at a level high enough (quality wise) to interest the very picky ears of the major labels. But at least we have a dark horse technology that could literally reset the entire paradigm and which would, imo, result in the near immediate buyout of Sunncomm by Microsoft which is seeking to be king of DRM.
Real companies don't have to pay for research coverage and recommendations, but scams always do... one more reason shorts have to target us.
Btw, recommendation = dilution in this case... and we were just wondering why the float increased. I should also point out that once these firms get their shares they typically turn right around and sell them... so now we also know where all the sell volume suddenly came from... another brilliant move by management that accomplishes exactly the opposite of what is intended.
Were they receiving advice from anyone besides the pump&dumper crowd (ie Investment Bankers) this wouldn't have happened... but all is well.
>> With the QTIG share distribution first, and the SHO regulations second set to come into force on Sept. 30th and Jan. 13th, respectively <<
This must be the theater of the absurd. All of the "get shorty" efforts have been in vain, a waste of time and energy. SHO is toothless and will not help us at all... go back and re-read it's implementation.
Lastly, it does not take revenues to release an audit supposedly already completed nine months ago, not does it require revenues to become blue-skyed nor to file or become fully reporting.
I can clearly see we have splintered into two camps here, those who still believe management and those who now have healthy skepticism.
>> BTW, it's "recommend". <<
Sorry... been sick as a dog all weekend (flu) and didn't spell check
Regarding MVSN, I'm not saying they are the safer choice technology wise, I'm saying they are the safer choice COMPANY wise. No one could doubt MVSN will be around in five years, but the same can not be said for Sunncomm... so my point (repetitivly) was that we desperately need to address the corporate governance issues to increase our odds of being chosen.
I have not argued that Sunncomm's technology isn't better, in fact they've been very clever for an incredibly small company, but you have to comprehend that MVSN will now be developing nearly exactly what Sunncomm is offering, so our advantage there is temporary.
>> What counts now is that SCMI has stated quite clearly that when a second major label signs on for a full partnership, the whole procedure for moving on to a proper market will swing into action. <<
This is what I was told and understood as well, that is until I was told otherwise by management. I was told this is not a priority and that's what I have an issue with. When I believed as you, and still had confidence in management, I was happy to be patient and wait.
>> IMO, your delight in piling on the agony is really running away with you here. <<
I don't see how reasoned discussion constitutes "piling on" ?? My points are valid, there is a problem, and the share price is indicative of it... to argue otherwise is simply to be blinded by the dream (and Peter's sliver tongue).
I've been "fed" the same rumors from management as I assume everyone else has... namely Uni, EMI & Apple (iTunes) though perhaps not in that order.
Of course a year ago I was told re Uni, "done deal", so you have to keep things in perspective. Also you have to factor in MVSN trying to buy itself time with their recent clever PR despite that others say it was "fluff". IMO that PR was designed with one goal in mind, to try and delay the other majors from embracing MediaMax before they see what MVSN has up their sleeve... this in effect buys MVSN more time to actually come up with somethig that the labels will want...
Prior to this MVSN thought they KNEW what the labels wanted and that's what CDS-300 was... now, thanks to Sunncomm's success, they know exactly what the majors will buy and have to be rapidly copying the basic functionality. This is why I say it is a mistake to count MVSN out of the picture and rejoice too early. This could well be a case of winning a few battles and losing the war.
It doesn't help that Sunncomm refuses to behave like a good corporate citizen, which adds to the risk of a label choosing them over MVSN which does file (and on time) is fully reporting and transparent. It's also easy for the labels to see that MVSN will be around in five years because they have the assets to ensure that they will.
Trust me, that is a major factor in a decision that could cost someone their job if they chose or reccomend MediaMax over the safer and more sure choice, MVSN.
Not trying to paint doom&gloom but some here should be careful about the cheerleading... we are a long ways from being out of the woods yet.
Based on numbers from management they believe they will eventually, through a combination of feature sets they plan to sell, gain as much as 0.10 per CD/DVD. As it stands right now, MediaMax is a loss leader as we are having to give away the farm to get them to sign. The majors are nothing if not greedy little tight wads and they know that they have Sunncomm over a barrel right now.
Now this cuts both ways, as it is likely that they will want to keep Sunncomm around to compete with MVSN, thereby ensuring a cheaper price per CD for the labels than they would obtain if only MVSN was in play.
FWIW, I'm hearing we get some major news over the next thirty days... if that came from Mario I would hang myself before I believed it.
Hope everyone is having a well deserved long weekend
>> I consider this a risk, but I don't think that makes it a scam. <<
I don't recall anyone suggesting it was a scam... we have a number of investors, including me, who have been fed exactly what we wanted to hear from management for a long time now and only now is the suspension of disbelief wearing thin.
It's not whining to expect your corporation to adhere to common, minimal industry practices when dealing with corporate governance. When I believed there would be progress in this area shortly (because management said so)I was happy to wait and see... now however, I am at a loss to understand how I could not feel betrayed, lied to, whatever, when I am now told by the very same management that they intend to do nothing and instead focus on signing record labels.
Doing one, should not exclude the other and alters the stock pps dynamics rather sharply when either are ignored as is happening now.
Perhaps you would prefer to only hear positive spin on what's happening at Sunncomm, but I fail to see how that helps you make better investment decisions going forward.
Of course I could choose to simply imagine that management is lying to me (again) and that we will shortly file our long overdue audit, distribute QTIG shares, become fully reporting, move towards being on a listed exchange and copy protect all the hits from the Tooth Fairy.
Stingray,
I had no concerns regarding any of this (because for 2 yrs I was assured not to) but based on a phone call recently (within last 30 days)it was made clear to me that (paraphrasing) "We are going to focus on signing record labels and the corporate governance issues simply are not a concern to us... if you don't like that answer then sell your stock"
Well I will indeed sell my stock but at a time of my own choosing and I still have enough of the never never land fairy dust on me to think we can fly once more... if I saw .20 cents I would be ecstatic.
Recall that thanks to the massive dilution over the last two years, the old high at .40 cents is now roughly equivalent to a .20 cent price. Thanks Peter.
>> I was am able to ascertain that the relationship between MVSN and Apples I_Pod was not made in Heaven. Certainly all that can change. That is whywe muststrike while the Iron is hot! <<
Ok, from "Peter", MSVN worked around the iPod thing while we went and played nice with Apple, therefore supposedly not angering them and it is expected that that may play in our favor later (or not). Also he says that BMG has been pressuring Apple to go with Secure-Burn on the iTunes site... of course this was suggested it was going to happen nearly 6 months ago as well as filing, audit, Qtig distribution, EMI, Universal, etc etc etc.
>> I welcome criticism of all kind as long as it is constructive
in naturein which case it benefit us through feelings and understanding and can help in creating proper discourse with management into what we as shareholders expect!<<
Well, these are the "tough" questions that management is ignoring, so good luck having any "discourse" with them on this when Peter fires back with "if you don't like it then sell your shares"
I think my criticism is constructive because I am questioning the credability of management, which after all is our ONLY source of information. This is much like being a Soviet citizen in the 60's and reading Pravda.
I'm not exactly sure where to go from here because once you begin with the tenet that management is not to be trusted/believed it's hard to do anything besides guess as to the future.
I know this for certain... no company ever enjoyed success on Wall Street until it conformed with minimal, normal corporate governance expectations. And once Wall Street stopped trusting management (ala Enron) no amout of news is able to lift the shares... is it possible a few of the "big" supporters of the stock have also soured on management??
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but perhaps this line of logic is at least arming a few here with another viewpoint that will allow them to make good decisions.
As to speaking to management, I see no point in doing so when I no longer believe anything they tell me.
Trust me, I'm not happy to have arrived at the no-confidence position regarding Mr Jacobs... I took him at his word for nearly two years and have come to the conclusion he is simply a dreamer, but quite convincing on the promotional front... Jacobs could sell outdoor glass furniture to people in Florida right now!
Nothing I or others have complained about is particularly unique or complex, just part of the fundamental corporate responsibility that every other real company on Wall Street abides by. For some reason, Jacobs believes Sunncomm is above the constraints of "normal" companies and of course he is quite wrong on this (as the pps demonstrates)
As to why I would add to my position... the 250k was a relatively small addition to my holdings simply meant to round to the nearest million. If I wasn't confident of arriving at a higher position than here, I would not be adding, but in fact selling... my love affair with Jacobs & Co is mercifully over.
If calling on the company to behave like a good corporate citizen is "bashing" then so be it.
Have a great extended vacation everyone... and now a bit of breaking news:
------------------------------------------------------------
BESLAN, Russia — A shaken President Vladimir Putin (search) made a rare and candid admission of Russian weakness Saturday in the face of an "all-out war" by terrorists after more than 340 people — nearly half of them children — were killed in a hostage-taking at a southern school.
Putin went on national television to tell Russians that they must mobilize against terrorism and promised wide-ranging reforms to toughen security forces and purge corruption.
"We showed weakness, and weak people are beaten," he said.
Even if true, do you not believe that MSVN will eventually get it right?
Well said... I think most people are here for the technological promise and become somewhat blinded to the realities of the company or ignorant as to what constitutes normal acceptable corporate behavior.
Heck, Stehisit isn't even bashing, just asking the company to do what it has said it was going to and he's right on the money with regards to Peter. He is a real snake charmer and could have even put a positive spin on Chernobyl.
Looks like my 250k was filled around .085 (sigh) that'll teach me to leave a GTC order in at a reasonable number!
I doubt you can read much into todays action besides a relatively large player unloading some shares... last Friday was a single individual accumulating and he did so again today after the drop. For all I know the seller today was Peter... since they aren't required to file we'll never know.
LOL... that was exactly what I was going to write in response
Don't bother, somehow in the coolaid world they reside the fall off in share price is "meaningless"... "if it goes to zero, I'll buy more".
This is the problem with falling in love with a stock, it eventually breaks your heart. As to what Peter is doing today, undoubtedly spinning all of this into a wonderland where share price doesn't matter and shareholders don't ask too many questions.
>> Here we sit in one of the most exciting times for us and what do we do? Complain about filing and being on the pinks. I have news for you if/when we get this contract with EMI it's not going to matter cause this thing is gone! Bye-Bye! Hello AMEX <<
Hey, I get the excitement and trust me I wish that you were right, unfortunatley landing EMI will do nothing for the pps. That's not to say it's not a huge accomplishment, it is, but landing EMI will not bring in new buyers, it will simply satisfy existing shareholders, who I would suggest, already have just about as much SCMI in their portfolios as they can stomach.
So in order to move higher we need to bring in new buyers... how do you do that? I believe if we were to land something with someone major, say a Microsoft or an Apple iTunes (rumored for 12 months) this would be a major enough event, with a very visible public company (Universal, BMG & EMI are not) to bring in new investors.
Normally a company in Sunncomm's position would, as they enjoyed success, see a rising interest from institutions that have the clout to help stabalize the pps and neutralize shorts. However, we will never see that in Sunncomm's case until the basic corporate issues are resolved.
You say some (me) are whining about "filings" and being on the "pinks" as if these are just token corporate responsibilities to address, but I assure you they are far more than that. Even just being late on your filings colors a corporations record just as paying your bills late, does an individual and prevents serious players (lots of money) from playing in your sandbox.
As long as Sunncomm has to rely entirely on retail (small) investors, shareholders will remain plauged by Hedge Funds (lots of money) as they short shares with impunity... who is going to stand against them? They can overwhelm anyone (retail) with naked selling and they can do it whenever they feel like it. This is just how the jungle works on Wall Street.
This is why it is inexplicable to me that management expects to ignore these issues as if wishing on the tooth fairy is a substitute for good corporate governance and the enrichment of shareholders that would result from adressing it.
Merlyn, was that enough detail?
>> I clearly understand that SCMI is being severly shorted, but until the SEC starts enforcing their regulations (which isn't happening), no plan to "outsmart" the shorts is going to work in my opinion. <<
Not true... the shorts are here because Sunncomm is not run like a real company and so frankly deserves to be shorted until they do. All of the schemes amount to nothing, when the simple solution is to take care of basic corporate governance.
Management refuses to address turning Sunncomm into a real company and instead hatches one scheme after another with advice from so-called intelligent advisors. In fact they do not have a single investment banker advising them and have ignored advice from the same in the past.
We are missing a golden opportunity to capitalize on the very real successes we are enjoying with the record labels simply because management refuses to do what every other company is expected to. Frankly I don't understand it at all, but this is what has me frustrated and I don't believe I am alone.
perhaps that's why I'm upset, I don't have chump change at risk here
...the approx 21k is rather a small percentage of my total holdings... I am just doing this to round out my current holdings to an even number, but it should serve to demonstrate my confidence of higher prices to come (despite the issues I previously detailed).
Just for full disclosure, I have an order in to buy 250k all or none @ .086 ...as I said, I still see a significant bounce from these levels on purely speculation.
Thanks for the reply and for the record, I still stand behind those comments made previously, it IS impressive what they have accomplished to date.
My concern stems from the fact that all along I've been fed a song and dance that they were going to fix the corporate issues and basically "not to worry your pretty little head" about them. I accepted that at face value and then watched as one "scheme" after another has been foistered on shareholders to "spook the shorts". While I believe that the shorts have had a field day here and are anything but a figment of the imagination, I also see Jacobs as a later day Ahab in search of his Moby Dick.
Peter has had an open ear to every short busting charlatan and embraced more positions on this issue than John Kerry. In short he has recieved poor council and yet continues to surround himself with unqualifyed people like Mario.
It has been made clear to me(verbally) that there is simply zero concern about fixing the fundamental structural problems at Sunncomm, that somehow this will all just "work out" because of the success on the technology and record label side. That is not a view point with which I am in agreement and is completely different than the partyline I've been fed for nearly 18 months. I would also argue that the share price supports my contention rather than managements.
That is the reason for my change of heart on this investment. I sincerely hope that I am completely off base and EMI & Universal are announced and we're off to the races, however I have been around Wall Street long enough to know what works and what doesn't... without sound corporate governance it remains largly unlikely that this will ever ascend to the heights that most here wish and the technological success enables.
Good luck to all... I've beaten a dead horse as much as I care to.
Benefit of the doubt goes to those who don't obfuscate, exaggerate and lie. There are so many broken promises they are incalcuable as well as unforgivable. At some point one either faces reality or continues to listen to the bullshit to ones own detriment.
I will gladly cede kudos to Peter & Co for the great job of arriving where we are, on the verge of having all the major labels using MediaMax, however with no clear vision or plan to solve the fundamental issues of corporate governance, these great accomplishments simply ring as hollow testimony to what could have been for shareholders.
The current shareprice speaks far more eloquently to the issues surrounding this troubled company, than I could ever do justice to. I still cling to the hope that they can engineer one last spurt in the share price and this time, unlike previously, I will happily sell my shares to those who have more confidence in managment than I.
Sometimes the dream really is just that.
Be careful about falling in love with a stock... also plz undersand that the shorts don't need your shares... they are happy to create ficticious equivalents to trade with.
I will no doubt be out next years as well and am simply hoping for a bettter price. Management has made it clear to me that they have no intention of running this like a real company. As long as this attitude remains, this company is headed no where, regardless of the successes they enjoy on the record label side and the current pps confirms my viewpoint.
The best thing shareholders could hope for would be for a real company to come in and buy us out but I don't see that as very likely.
we are in complete agreement then. I believe it is a sign of weakness frankly on Macrovision's part to be waging this campaign of F.U.D. in an obvious attempt to prevent the remaining labels from signing on with Sunncomm right now.
Promising the moon is a tried and true technique when you don't have a product to compete with and you see your potential customers embracing your competitions technology.
I don't disagree that CDS300 in it's present form is a dud... Ford blew it on the Edsel and then bounced back with the Mustang. My point is, sooner or later Macrovision won't be playing the class clown and will get it at least reasonably right. I don't own Macrovision and I'm not rooting for them, but to ignore the reality of their substantial cash reserves to "fix" problems such as this is just sticking one's head in the sand...
Again, we have a narrow window of opportunity. It would have been nice to see them moving forward on all aspects of the company rather than focusing on record labels to the complete exclusion of corporate governance... they need both.
As to the mythical "big event", I no longer believe in the toothe fairy. Making your filings on time, doing what you SAY you are going to do and getting to a real exchange, should be job one at Sunncomm. But they it's not.
>> and the biggies have them on the radar screen. <<
Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeaze, there is no "biggie" on Earth that buys pink sheets, let alone non-reporting pink sheeeeeeetz. SCMI is held entirely by individual investors and some Hedge funds that have mercilessly shorted the crap out of it to great reward for them.
>> Anybody else heard the rumor... That Apple's FairPlay is doing a licensing deal with Macrovision? <<
So much for "Macrovision" isn't making any progress... wouldn't surprise me in the least.
The price does not drop during accumulation... your thesis is highly flawed
That's because, unlike Sunncomm, the company was full reporting. With Sunncomm you could foolishly own ALL the hsares and never have to file and no one would be the wiser... that's what "non-reporting" means... you don't report, lol
Actually, this is probably just short covering at their leisure... they will hold the price here and cover positions taken at higher prices, then repeat the process once it runs back up to .10 cents. Rinse, Dry, Repeat
Do I really need to explain something this simple? They are not fluff in the sense that A. The company IS working on matching Sunncomm feature for feature and B. The company is using this to attempt to stall the labels from making comittments to Sunncomm until they see what Macrovision has to offer... we're still waiting the much leaked and very late by now releases on EMI & Universal... one might conclude that Macrovision is being successful at their strategy.
I don't own MSVN stock, I own SCMI, but this doesn't have to simply become a rooting section for SCMI and ignore what is going on around you... unless you're re-enacting the scene on the deck of the Titanic
It seems the predominant choice here is to simply believe everything Peter says and hope for the best... good luck
Hey... I'd like to be wrong believe me!! I think steh is frustrated with management and sadly thats the camp I'm in now as well. This wasn't always the case and there were some things in the oven that changed and as part of the process changed my view. You know how you tend to grant someone credability and trust without having really earned it?? Well the flip side is that once that trust is violated (un-met repeated promises etc) you begin to see everything as bullshit. I think the truth is somewhere in th emiddle... management clearly wants to win and just as clearly is working really hard to try and make that happen and in at least some areas I believe we are enjoying tremendous success from those efforts... it just comes down to the whole airplane metaphor... you need both the engines AND the wings to fly.
We have the engines (revenues from labels) but we still need the wings, solid corporate structure and governance. It's frustrating that they don't get that and, at least for me, is the reason I no longer expect a homerun here. My basis is around .10 cents so I still expect to turn a profit here but at one point not long ago, I still imagined/believed we could be $1+ going forward.
The MVSN pr's are not just fluff and to expect them to stand still and not make progress is silly. I do however think these pr's are part of an overall effort by MVSN to try and delay the other labels from committing to MediaMax by holding out the promise of something "better" even if at this point it sounds as if it is purely FUD.
why are u ragging on steh? From what I can read of his/her posts there is nothing unreasonable in any of it and sadly I have come to agree with him/her. I no longer have confidence in Peter & company and while I still think we could get back to the .20 - .30 cent level, I doubt the homerun scenario that I was once convinced of... convinced of mostly due to conversations with Peter where a web of fantasy was spun that I chose to believe.
Of course there is always the wild card of a buyout or something equally extreme, but my historical luck in the market tends to preclude that possibility.
It's time for Sunncomm to start paying attention to details if they hope to be around much longer as major competition is obviously coming and it seems to me that Macrovision is taking the gloves off.
If I were a betting man, I'd be betting on Macrovision to beat Sunncomm in the long run simply due to their significantly larger pool of capital not to mention that they are actually run like a real company. So while we've won some early battles, the outcome of the war is far from secure or certain at this juncture.
Well, talking to Peter would have you selling your first born to buy more shares, but then Peter's enthusiasm is infectious and seldom accurate. Seems to me that he's been a miracle worker getting Sunncomm to where it is, but I doubt he's the right captain going forward.
Sunncomm will never get any respect(pps) for all the hard work and accomplishments until they deal with the mundane aspects of running a company, ie: fully reporting, on a real exchange, management with experience(success), reduction in number of total shares.
Most of these are simple enough things to do and certainly what is required of all successful companies. I hate to say it but I am growing increasingly concerned we may be stillborn before ever getting to taste the sweet nectre of victory.
It never pays to underestimate your competition... if you were the record labels, the "safe" choice would be to go with the industry leader and expect them to get it right... which they will eventually do. Hel even Microsoft eventually puts out decent code.
I spoke before of a window of opportunity and articles like this about MSVN advances, only serve to heighten my concern. Unlike MVSN, Sunncomm only has one shot to get it right here.
The trouble for me is... if they can't even manage the corporate structure, which is relatively simple, what would make me think they are capable of success against a much better funded opponent? Someone said it earlier that MSVN "buys" the technology it needs... so did Microsoft.
This is the old Microsoft game of FUD... planting Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt into your customers. The idea is to promise them something "amazing" so that they hold off committing to the competions product to "wait & see" if the new stuff is really that great... this then gives company A (MS & MSVN) time to work on their product and close the feature gap while at the same time denying your competitor mch needed revenue that they would have derived from selling their products to your customers.
I think the labels are gonna want it cheaper and I know we are giving it to them for a steal right now to get the foot in the door, which is probably a good idea. I think your scenario is possible but I dount you see those kind of numbers for three years... hopefully by then we'll have filed and gone to a real exchange.
I agree... I think we have as much as 9 months to a year lead time... mostly due to the 6 months testing the labels put Sunncomm through and could be expected to repeat with Macrovision as well...
"Do you have any
doubts? "
Yeah, I have a lot of doubts. First off this is a technology company. The leader in the industry is clearly Macrovision and Sunncomm & Co are to be congratulated for carving out a beachhead in audio copy-protection, but make no mistake, the company with the assetts, contacts and relationships, is Macrovision. Just because they are behind for now does not mean with a liberal dose of money that they can't get back in the game... indeed I always expected we'd simply get a portion of the audio CD revenues, so the success to date is greater than I would have imagined.
So yes... my concern is Macrovision.
My concern is also management or should I say the lack of it. While the OEM deals are critical to the companies future, so too is running the company as if it were a real company, ie: filings, fully reporting status, on a real exchange, quality people in managment positions such as CFO and legal council as well as PR.
These are fundamental, business 101 items that are as crucial to success as wings on an airlane... certainly the contracts are of primal import, however you don't ask, "which is more important, an airplanes wings or it's engines?" because it's obvious you need them both... so too in Sunncomms case, we need to be run like a real business so that we can attract the capital that will raise shareholder equity.
Managements response so far has been to stiffle these issues to shareholders with accusations that investors are simply day traders and not patient or advice to "sell your shares if you don't like it". These are hardly the responses one would expect from a management team that knew what it was doing.
So yes... I am concerned and have doubts. I took a lot on faith over the last two years, have held and never sold, even on the big run up and have added a lot more while it was super cheap... ohhh yeah, it's still super cheap.
The technology appears solid and the labels are using it... I hope they fix the rest of this mess so shareholders can get rewarded. My guess is we have a narrow window of opportunity here and the door could close faster than the .40 cent paper profits dissapeared.
Good luck to longs.