Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Misiu, you're welcome and I although she's not likely to now respond with anything specific, she will at least get the opportunity to be reminded. Thanks for your diligence and for following through. :)
Misiu, perhaps reply to her email wherein she stated that she didn't see anything working better for mortality than dexamethasone. In your reply discuss the latest information with her and see if she responds?
DBOT, what I've witnessed is a knee jerk reaction, many reactions when NP speaks, resulting in market turmoil. The fact remains that the science hasn't changed, in spite of NP's commentaries. All that changes are emotions and reactions. In the end, assuming there's either an EUA or full FDA approval, all of those past emotions and reactions will be a moot point. The share price will reflect a much larger and more important market reaction from institutional investors. Those institutional investors could care less about the emotional turmoil of the market. They care about one thing, profit. What drives that profit? Sales.....bottom line.
Thanks, I believe that as well. I sometimes think some folks simply don't understood the power of playing the market to better their positions. It's unfortunate for sure. But, it's definitely not for everyone and it does take some understanding of the market and the tools available to help. Again, thanks EponymousKook!
Moneycrew, I think it's wise to keep certain cards close to the chest. Good on 'ya for that!
Every single negative point that I've seen raised since the PR came out on Friday has been countered very effectively. The negative comments seem to come from one of two places, in general. Either there's an agenda or there's fear/lack of confidence. I hate to admit it but the FUDsters have done their initial damage but I think it's mostly ineffectual in that most here, I think, will continue holding. The positive results are by no means ambiguous, no matter how the FUDsters attempt to spin it.
Good posts from you....
So you don't know most of what you say either so why put it out there? The tenor of your posts suggest a very negative slant to your opinions and that all comes from negative assumptions. I guess that's the whole reason for having a place to discuss what we learn, what we think and what we believe based on those things. Sometimes it's based on fact and sometimes it's based on assumptions and most of it comes from a compilation of many tangible and intangible factors.
CTMedic, AMEN, I couldn't agree more! This was my main point to someone else who believes we won't get an EUA but instead will get an FDA approval but that there will be much more time waiting. I strongly disagree with that particular sentiment. I think the EUA option is, as you say, designed for these situations. Given that no other drug even comes close to reducing mortality by 24% and reduces the hospital stay by 6 days, I can't imagine any other scenario that causes us to not get at least an EUA....unless corruption wins out.
For the record I'm 100% long. Having said that, to your point that flipping can negatively impact a drug that can save people's lives, I have to disagree. The drug either works or it doesn't. I believe it does and that's why I have money invested. The action of the daily ups and downs have zero effect on the drug that can people's lives. Only the drug can have that impact once it has some kind of approval.
If I see the price has reached a point where I think it looks like it might come back down in price, on ANY stock I'm interested in trading, I'm going to consider selling IF I think it will then turn back around somewhere lower and head back up based on fundamentals. (If someone is going to do this though they should understand the tax implications and how you sell shares, LIFO or FIFO, long term vs short term gains, etc.) So, let's say the price is $5.95 and seems to be hitting a peak, with volume slowing down and starting to show signs of technical weakness (not fundamental weakness). I think to myself...."Self, now might be a good time to take a thousand (you pick a # of shares that works for you) shares off the table and try to buy back at a lower price." I now have $5,950 free ready for a buy back.
Now, my question to you is, if the stock is going to do that anyway, and I decide to play along to pick up a few extra shares, HOW IN HADES does that negatively impact the drug that can save people's lives? Now, let's say that price does dip back to 4.95. I then say to myself, "Self, now might be a good time to jump back in at a dollar per share drop in price allowing me to now own an extra 202 shares. My repurchase now helps with buying pressure, albeit a small amount. Again I ask you, how did my 202 flip/gain in share count negatively impact our drug that can save people's lives?
I'm not against people holding their shares because flipping is not their thing. It's definitely not for everyone and that's perfectly fine. I do, however, have a problem with someone attempting to cast dispersions on those who wish to better their position by playing the market. Oh, and for the record, you have NEVER EVER EVER seen ONE SINGLE post of mine that is designed to create Fear Uncertainty or Doubt in order to push the price down for my own benefit. I believe in being ethical in my trading practices. I challenge you to find one single post on all of iHub that contradicts what I've just said with regard to me posting negative information to better my position in ANY STOCK. I'll save you the time, there aren't any. I'm not so sure everyone here can say the same thing.
Oh, btw, that extra 202 free shares, at $100 (minimum triple digit price) will be worth $20,200....again, for free. :)
Scooter, interesting post but initially, I have two areas where I have to offer a counter view.
I believe it's because of this tweet:
FDA Long Hauler Clinical Trial Approved
Let's parse what you've stated:
You stated that what I'm saying has absolutely no bearing on either of our investments. What I stated was my opinion on where we are and my level of comfort and I spoke to institutional and retail investors in response to you. I also spoke to your comment about how you "need" buyers to come in to move the price up. Your need also has no bearing on our investment but speaks to your level of comfort in your investment.
When you say that what does having bearing is Nader and his ability to secure sales, eua's file an accurate BLA, etc., I would agree. I would add to that though that he is no longer acting alone. He appears to be acting in accordance with and under guidance of others who do know. He's learned and is still learning. Did he make mistakes? Absolutely. His past performance is no guarantee of his future failure or success. I'll ask you this question though. Is it possible that he has learned from his mistakes, taken the advice of other industry professionals and is moving forward more cautiously with a greater chance of success? Is it possible that, in spite of his past mistakes, that Cytodyn may actually pull this off in spite of your doubt and his past? Given the fact that the science is amazing and others are now assisting in the move forward and given the fact that the eIND and OLE hasn't been stopped, and given the incredible safety record going way back, and given the ever increasing attention to Leronlimab/Vyrologix, the molecule (not the company), isn't it just possible (probable in my opinion) that in spite of Nader, that because of the interest and involvement by so many others who know what they're doing, that this drug may just make it to market and begin making a difference in the world....and our finances. How was that for a long run-on sentence?
When you say that I can be comfortable with my investment or I can be like "most" where we would like the science to actually be allowed to be used worldwide, you're making it sound like I'm the only one here who is comfortable with my investment and that I'm the only one who doesn't want the science to be allowed to be used worldwide. Nothing could be further from the truth and it's ludicrous to say otherwise. Being comfortable with the money that I have invested has nothing to do with my desire to see this drug approved immediately for the benefit of all who need it. Obviously, we need the approval for Covid-19 s/c use but it's much bigger than just that.
Lastly, you stated that this needs legit medical professionals running it. I agree and I believe Nader has surrounded himself with exactly that and is abiding by their guidance. Look, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you and I understand where you're coming from, I really do. I simply stated my opinion and that I'm comfortable with what I have invested into this company and the reasons for doing so. You obviously have a different opinion and it seems to be solely based on your lack of confidence in the company and it's ability to move forward. I see and understand your concern but I think these issues have been addressed and will continue to be addressed/adjusted as needed by the professionals who are on board. I think we BOTH want the same thing, successful EUA, FDA Approval and uplisting followed by similar for the other indications.
GLTU
I can agree on the need for institutional investors vs retail investors. However, I believe that the institutional investors will absolutely happen when several of the things happen that we're expecting to happen such as uplist, EUA, FDA approval, buy orders from other countries, etc. Let's not also forget all of the other indications like HIV, cancer, etc. I know that for some the wait is painful for many reasons and I'm not unsympathetic. I too am in need of financial help. I'm not heavily invested like many here but only because of my financial situation. I'm comfortably invested, confident in the science due to the amazing folks who have shared their incredible knowledge so freely and am patient.
In the meantime, we are where we are because of the retail investors. For many, where we are is pure profit. For some others who were unlucky enough to buy on the big up up to $10.01, they're still in the red. That situation, in my opinion, will not last much longer and when that changes, the institutional investors, FOMO and MOMO crowd will arrive.
Have you considered that maybe most of those who are currently LONG are mostly already invested? Most folks here have been here awhile and already invested what they wish to invest. Personally, I don't need other folks to spend their money to bump the price up in order for me to feel better about my investment. My comfort level has ZERO to do with the daily price action and everything to do with the science, which is the only reason I bought this stock. I'll admit that when I first bought this I did so known VERY little about Cytodyn / Leronlimab and my only intent was looking for a quick flip. I quickly got up to speed and realized that this was much better than I first thought. This was back in April of last year. Since then I've enjoyed seeing the price drops and have been able to take advantage to build my position as my finances have allowed. In short, my happiness/confidence has nothing to do with the buy action of others when my investment is long-term and when I understand what I'm invested in. Also, I block out the FUD comments because I understand the science. I don't get anything positive out of reading nonsense. Having said that, I fully appreciate those who have the patience and willingness to debunk the FUD.
Black Ops, Notso, now that made me chuckle out loud. I'm enjoying following this thought thread. Thanks for continuing this saga. I believe the eventual outcome bodes well for the long and strong among us while the opposite side of the coin will suffer.
Turning stone, fortunately for me, I don't rely on the excitement or trepidation of others to dictate how I feel and am able to effectively manage my own expectations and levels of confidence. Hopefully others on here are able to do the same as it tends to help me with my own health and blood pressure. :)
For me, having confidence (and a "big picture" plan of my own) in the science allows me to sleep comfortably at night knowing two VERY important things:
1. The world will ultimately benefits from Vyrologix
2. My financial future will benefit from Vyrologix
This is all my humble opinion.
C-20, ahh, that makes sense. I was thinking in terms of ability to produce the capacity needed rather than the integrity of the drug. Thanks.
C-20, I freely admit to not knowing why this would be important to the FDA. Do you, or does anyone know/understand why this is important to the FDA? It would seem to me that this is a logistics issue between the purchaser (Cytodyn) and the manufacturer, not a regulatory agency. Why does the FDA care about supply before approval? Or, am I misunderstanding something here? Thanks
toffer003, Two weeks?
Date Posted:27 February 2021
B52T38, Date Posted:27 February 2021
Misiu, thank you for correcting me. As I said in a previous post, I'm new to the biotech world and this is my first experience in it. I'm having to learn the language, along with how things are done while at the same time having to sort out what's truth and what's fiction. I've muted the fiction, for the most part, because it isn't helping me. I appreciate you taking the time to explain this to me. I do recall reading what you've stated regarding us not missing our primary endpoint but forgot that. That's what I get for reading too many posts that have stated to the contrary. Thanks for straightening me on that. I knew I'd probably get something wrong in that post. :) But, hopefully, the gist of what I was trying to get across was understood.
Eklab, you stated awhile ago:
Eklab, it's like a marathon. You have spectators waiting at the finish line. Some of those have been here before and understand that it takes X amount of time on average for the front runners to reach the destination. These are usually adults with experience. Then you have their kids who just want to go home and play with their games and are bored, in patient and annoying their parents. The runners are doing their best to get their as quickly as they can because they too are fatigued but ready to complete what they started. The kids wishing this would hurry up and continually expressing this desire aren't making the runners go any faster, even though I'm sure the runners wish the impatience shown by some of the audience would, in fact, help them along. The fact remains, it will take them as long as it takes them to finish. They can't take short cuts to get there as too many are watching closely and if they tried, they would be called out for doing so and fail. Guess the audience will just have to patiently wait. The judges have set the rules and conditions and the runners are playing by the rules. The good thing about this race and the conditions in which this race is being run is that there seems to be an exception that allows for a quicker race (Covid-19 necessitates the increase in speed). Hang in there friend, we're almost there. Just wish it had happened sooner.
Eklab, I wasn't aware the FDA had promised it in July, 2020. I merely answered your question "Where is Leronlimab?" and then you followed up with all the death that's resulted in its absence. It appeared as though you were blaming Cytodyn and its leadership. I'm sorry if I misread your intent. That's the problem with the written word I guess. The good thing is that we are a path to what appears to be an EUA and eventual approval.
From my limited understand, it appears we missed our endpoint in CD10. I'll admit to being new to the biotech world and this is my first biotech investment. I'm learning as I go from some generous and intelligent folks on here. So, if I understand correctly, that we missed the CD10 endpoint, then was the FDA incorrect in its next steps and requiring further testing? It could be deemed a political move. It could be pressure applied by Big Pharma. Whatever the reason, I think the premise behind requiring proper testing/evidence when considering a new drug for approval is probably prudent, to say the least. When we come out on the other side of this fully tested and proven, we'll be the stronger company because of it with proper testing results to show the world and a strong foundation with which proceed with the other known and still yet unknown indications.
It's been painful (and deadly) waiting, and that is EXTREMLY unfortunate. This is true though of any drug being put through the paces, especially with a start-up biotech company. Again, I'm a newbie to this arena but it would seem to me that the length of time from where we started with Covid-19 testing to where we are now is relatively quick. For that, I'm grateful and surprised.
Eklab, this is Leronlimab's fault? I believe the company is moving full steam ahead. You know exactly where Leronlimab is, just like the rest of us so why place blame on Leronlimab? Relax, be patient (I hate when people tell me that), as you well know, this is moving along at a much faster pace than normal. Fretting about what's happening around us isn't going to solve the issue. Is it tragic? Certainly, without a doubt, it is, and I think we all know that by now.
The science is what the science is and it has to go through a painful process. Leronlimab is performing well from all indications and although we would all like for it to happen yesterday, it's moving along in a positive direction. It's extremely unfortunate that so many have died without having had the chance to use Leronlimab but that's just how it is. This will, in my opinion, change in the not too distant future and lives will be saved. Keep your eye on that.
SF Anony, got it. Thanks, like I said, hadn't yet had my first cup of coffee. I think I'll go resolve that issue right now! :) Oh, and what you say, makes perfect sense. Thanks for clarifying for me. I do appreciate it.
I'm often hesitant to ask questions for fear some might think I'm negative rather than actually asking the question and that's absolutely not the case with me. I have NEVER spent time on any message board in which I'm not long and if I'm going to be long then I'm not one to cast stones on my own investment, EVER. That's not to say that I might not privately have conversations with people about any real concerns I may have but never publicly. So, again, thank you for taking the time to answer!
Bill_ENG, quote of the day for me:
SF Anony, thank you. I think I'm following now.
So here, he's speaking about not having enough inventory and how that's a problem. I first read that as though it was a problem that we were trying to double the production. Duh...
Black Ops, I was with you until this part and then I completely lost your train of thought...??? I'm trying to read between the lines but I'm not smart enough, apparently. Can you flush this out a bit more so I can understand what you're saying?
Tryn2, oh, I understand very well how that works. In fact, Black Ops has tried repeatedly to warn people about the use of stop loss orders. Hopefully at least a few took the sage advice to heart.
C-20, I'm guessing/hoping you were able to add to your position on the precipitous and momentary drop to 3.85. Great time to have had the truck backed up into position for another load! Nasty bear raid that failed to do any permanent damage, unless you happen to be one of the unfortunate ones who were scared out of their shares. Too bad for those folks I guess. Just wish I'd had some more dry powder to buy some more with this opportunity.
The writing on the wall is good news. Data has most likely already been sent to the FDA prior to top line results as requested. Still have OLE and EIND access. Nothing negative out. So far, it appears that progress is continuing. The candle on the day has now turned green and life is good. Hopefully the FDA will quickly analyze the data and grant EUA very soon.
An uplist would seem like a likely event in the near future.
Fido, I agree, it's a long term hold, either way. Having said that, I have read absolutely ZERO that would lead me to believe that there is even a hint of an issue regarding the efficacy or safety of Leronlimab. I don't have any reason to believe, other than potential corruption, that Leronlimab's CD12 test results will fail.
Eklab, first shareholders gripe, moan and complain because NP overcommunicates and begs him to shut up because every time he speaks the price takes a nose dive for a few days and then shoots back up. So, NP finally takes heed and now folks are claiming he's like a lithium-ion battery company who failed to communicate with it's shareholders as though it's "simular" and asserts something must now be wrong. All of this in spite of the MASSIVE amount of information that's been put forth to the contrary. I really can't believe what I'm reading here.
Yep, @everyone, just give up now. Sell everything and move on because we're now like a non-communicative lithium-ion battery company in spite of all the medical reports talking about the miracle that is known as Leronlimab/Vyrologix. SMH
BWA, I wonder how many knuckles NP will crack....perhaps three?
Data Cleaners!
Closetinvestor, well, that's odd, considering I have TD Ameritrade and it's with that account that I purchased my CYDY. Perhaps you should call TD Ameritrade and tell them they made a mistake and sold me and several of my friends an OTC stock. In fact, they've sold MANY OTC stocks to myself and several of my friends. Wow, who knew?
Dieselpro, 'cleaning crew'....as in data cleaners perhaps? ;) I can just imagine them seeing this data and thinking.....hhhhhmmmmm......maybe I shoudl buy some CYDY!!!!
It would be great if this video were posted in rumble.com, newtube.app and bitchute.com along with other Leronlimab/Vyrologix related videos. I know these videos can be captured from YouTube while they still exist and then if anyone has an account with one or all of these sites perhaps they might be so inclined as to upload them.
JennyBuns, only you can answer that question but, to help with that, here are a few thoughts to consider. I've only been in this stock since last April. During that time, I've read the vast majority of the posts here. So far, there is one common denominator with respect to all the posts that claim failure. Very simply, it's this....not one single post has been able to verifiably refute the science. Many attack the various personalities involved with Cytodyn. Some of that may or may not be deserved. Some of it may or may not be right. I'm not here with my money based on the personalities. I'm here purely because of the science. I won't try to list all of the published articles, etc. that speak to what I believe as that would take an inordinate amount of time. If you were around before then you're no stranger to the workings of the short positions and associated efforts. Lots of negative speculation is cast and continually debunked. The other side of that coin is pro-Leronlimab. If you spend any quality time at all, you'll find plenty to support the science. I guess it comes down to which side do you believe? Do you believe an agenda that is profit driven to the detriment of society or do you believe a science that improves society and the side benefit can be substantial financial success? Which rings true?
Kharma, few people are 'lucky' enough to sell at the top and repurchase at the bottom of the retracement. Most traders attempt to avoid the head (lips) of the fish or the tail area. Picture the fish with the tail at the bottom and the head at the top of the chart. If you're the lucky one who sells at the top or right near the very top, you're in the head/lip area. If you buy at the very bottom you're at the tip of the tail. Good for you. However, it's still very lucrative to wait for the chart to show that the run is over and that it's just beginning to come back down. When it's making the move (head area), you attempt your sell. When it's bottomed out (talk area) and starts the move back up, you buy back. You've effectively trade the body of the fish. Be happy with that and you'll be profitable. There are charting tools, like the Fibonacci retracement tool that can help with indications of possible turn around points during the retracement. I won't get into the mechanics of that. There are plenty of videos you can watch about this. What makes this effective is that so many others are doing the exact same thing. "People do what people do because charts do what charts do. Charts do what charts do because people do what people do." It's kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy kind of thing. Take all of that with a grain of salt but it's proven to be effective for me and some others I know. Hope that helps.