- LEGAL COUNSEL & ECONOMIST
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Mark this post. You will eat your words in less than six months time. I guarantee it. ATTD is about to rock!
LOL... get real. ATTD will hit a penny per share within the next six months, easy.
Well said. I agree with all your points! Stay the course, ATTD!
Still sounds like MMTE has a ways to go before the PPS might make any significant upward movements, IMHO. :(
So what is this rumor about GREAT NEWS for SAPX on Monday all about??? Just a fairy tale, or do we have real data?
I believe the problem lies in the ATTD patented process of "folding" the milk to increase protein content and decrease/filter out sugar content. The process occurs with the milk in liquid form. I'm not sure they'll ever be able to make a powder that does the same thing their patented "folding" process does, IMHO.
CORRECT... ATTD's 2011 fiscal year ends March 31, 2012.
DAMN... THANKS FOR THE BARGAIN SHARES!!! Sweet!!!
Nice work! If we all did that, ATTD would be a $25-50 million company in no time!!!
Muscle Milk is established. Phase III should sell with a much lower mark-up to undercut Muscle Milk while the public becomes familiar with the superior, new product, IMHO.
Well, then damn it, tell WL to fix this mess and bring MMTE up into the double zeros at least ASAP!
WL is, for all pratical purposes, MMTE.
LOL... the PPS takes care of MMTE's image just fine!!!
That would mean that retail stores are marking the product up more 45.5% per can (i.e., more than $2.50 to $3.69). That is not realistic, and if it is, it needs to be changed; it makes the product far too expensive, especially as a start-up! Such a market up for food products is highly abnormal.
That's $2.50 per unit, which is right on target for wholesale pricing. I'd say that's fairly accurate.
We haven't heard ANYTHING very real from WL for long, long, long time. He's likely in the Caymans enjoying the money we gave him by investing in MMTE!!!
It's the start of the new dive into the .0004s... that's bad enough for me.
Extremely frustrating!
Once the forward split is fully executed, aggregate value should return to DNYS.
I have e-mail her (i.e., Hanna - the CEO/President) REPEATEDLY, even in my official capacity as legal counsel. She has responded exactly ZERO times.
No, of course not... but a substantial hoard of shares have traded at .0004 per... a lot more than a dollar's worth, that's for certain!
Over 10,000,000 shares have traded today... so far. Nothing close to just one dollar of share value represents the mass of shares dumped by panic-striken investors selling at .0004! Damn... I'm just hoping MMTE somehow (sans reverse split) hits .0009 again, which mark still sits substantially below my average purchase price. However, even a moderate loss would be better than selling at these insane prices! :(
True... but not even I - a skeptic - thought MMTE would ever see the .0004s again!!! THIS IS DANGEROUSLY BAD FOR MMTE!
You make solid, good points that prove important for consideration by all MMTE investors or potential investors. Nice work.
Be honest with yourself, in January when it went above .001, did you ever think it would be back where it is now? If you go back and look at the board, doesn't look like many thought it would. I remember some people saying they were waiting on 4's to get back in. The chorus chanted: "Never going to happen! Get back in ASAP or you will miss the boat!" Remember that?
Flash forward two months. Here we are. This will go where it wants to go, all depending on a certain CEO and how he executes. I hope the CEO lives up to all the longs expectations. This has a lot of potential, if everything is on the up and up. It shouldn't be too long before it is figured out one way or another. After the long wait, I think it is finally reaching a tipping scale.
I too find that no one in my various other circles of investment contacts has ANY further interest in investing in the train wreck that MMTE has become over the past year.
[N]obody is investing in MMTE to watch the share price churn lower day in and day out. [T]hat's just crazy talk.
THAT ENTIRE AREA shows that MMTE failed to hold its little, early 2012, spike and dropped right back down like stone through stillwater lake!
I also expect the sales revenue figures for each subsequent quarter to increase by at least as much as they have for this quarter (e.g., approximately $250,000.00 per quarter). Hence, net revenues for ATTD for the three month period ending June 30, 2012, should come it at about $500,000.00. Net revenues for ATTD's three month period ending September 30, 2012, will likely hit no less than $750,000.00; while the net revenues for the three month period ending December 31, 2012 should acheive more than $1 million. Such revenue projections, which I believe modest, would put the 2012 calendar year total ATTD net revenues at no less than $2.5 million.
Then, for 2013 I would expect to see an annual net revenues for ATTD at or well above $7.5 million... and growing rapidly.
I said NOTHING about the short-lived spike in MMTE's PPS price in early 2012... neither bullish nor bearish. I only linked the recent drop from that spike as bearish. Further, I clarified that MMTE's pisspoor performance occurs in the aggregate, meaning the early 2012 PPS spike did current investors no good. See, e.g., http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73830433 .
WRONG! The value of MMTE is its best represented by the market cap (i.e., the price investors are willing to pay for the company's issued and outstand stock). Assuming: (1) an O/S of 6.6 billion shares, (2) 15,000 C1 shares, and (3) 205,500 C2 shares (see, e.g., MMTE QUARTERLY REPORT, Nov. 2011) - concordant with a current PPS of .0005 shares, MMTE is thus valued by the open market at about $3.35 million!
Realistically, the MMTE concessions' have had NO lithium market stimulus or reason to have increased in price or value compared to the actual price MMTE paid for its concessions (with borrowed monies). Thus, the "VALUE" of the concessions are a wash! MMTE could only sell them for about the same price MMTE paid for them. That means the concessions have a net value of ZERO!!!
The Chilean high deserts are vast, remote, and inhospitable geographic regions dotted with sporadic salt beds known as “salars.” Under some of these salars lie pools of brine water that contain anywhere from faint to fairly rich concentrations of lithium ore. From these salars and brine waters, experienced and well-funded mining exploration and development companies painstakingly prospect for the most lithium-ore-rich lodes to extract, transport, process, refine, and sell for high dollar to end users such as lithium-ion battery manufacturers.
Some say that MMTE's value is based in the lithium in the ground… that all of the other, above aspects of exploration, mining, evaporation, harvesting, processing, refining, transporting, selling, etc., mean nothing. A more ludicrous statement one would find hard to make. As discussed, the owner of any lithium mining concessions own only the scant value of the trace lithium amounts floating in the groundwater in one of the world’s most barren and isolated regions. The value is just not there, especially where other regions prove far more lithium-rich than the concessions obtained by MMTE.
First, unless MMTE can find an entity crazy enough to merge or create a joint venture with the devalued, diluted, forlorn, newcomer MMTE to mine & refine lithium (eventually) the relatively tiny land acquisitions/mining concessions MMTE required some sort of an ownership interest in – or some such other miracle happens – I believe MMTE will have mislead investors, financiers, financial institutions, and perhaps governments. The concessions are almost certainly still worth exactly what MMTE paid for them (with borrowed or shareholders' money); thus, there is no GROSS PROFIT margin in the value of the land/concessions. The sale of the concessions or land, especially with closing costs and transaction fees, would likely recover ONLY that which MMTE bought them for in the first place. That's NOT increased value; it's just a debit-credit wash.
Second, The world's most lithium-rich geographical salars DO NOT include MMTE's purported "concessions" to relatively small salar portions deep within Chile's most inhosptiable region (e.g., Salar de Maricunga, Salar del Laco, Salar de Pujsa). Indeed, the world's primary/vastly superior lithium-rich and lithium-producing salars - among which one will fine ZERO (0) MMTE salar concessions - include: (1) Salar de Hombre Muerto; (2) Salar de Rincon; (3) Cauchari, (4) Olaroz, (5) Salar de Uyuni, (6) Salar de Atecama, (7) Taijanier Lake, (8) Zhabuye, and (9) Silver Peak. MMTE's concessions are not among the world's approximate top ten lithium salar land masses, and as far as lithium-producing salars go, there really are not very many of them in toto anywhere on the planent. See, e.g., MMTE Website @ http://www.mammoth-energy.com/projects.php ; Signum Box, "Salar de Maricunga: Project Review," p.5, tab. 3 (June 2011) @ http://www.li3energy.com/projects/signumBOX/IVG-LIEGsignumBOX2011.pdf ; Lithium Investing News, "World Class Deposit" @ http://lithiuminvestingnews.com/investing-in-lithium/lithium-world-class-deposit ; R.K. Evans, An Abundance of Lithium II @ http://www.worldlithium.com/AN_ABUNDANCE_OF_LITHIUM_-_Part_2.html ; New World Resource Corp., "Projects About Lithium," @ http://www.newworldresource.com/s/AboutLithium.asp . THIS IS FACT... THE REAL TRUTH!!!
Third, based on the press releases and, inter alia, the above facts (including all cited information/links), MMTE appears far from selling, merging, or establishing even the most basic resources required to mobilize and initiate a successful precious metal mining and refining operation. Moreover, without mammoth dilution and/or a reverse split, MMTE will almost certainly find itself unable to finance the colossal industry entry costs inherent to precious metal mining, even with a JV on board and small brine mining operations included. Further, where MMTE is nothing short of a financial train wreck and where MMTE's purported salar land ownership interests are NOT found among the very few, lithium-rich salars on the planet, one would find it rather unlikely that any truly viable or reputable mining company might want to enter a joint venture or merge with the cash-strapped, struggling, heavily O/S diluted, forlorn penny stock, MMTE.
Simply put, MMTE bought comparatively poor quality portions of salar concessions (the higher quality salar portion concessions either in listed the above top salars or already snatched up by MMTE geographical mining "neighbors") because that is all it could afford, even after selling so many printed shares to the investors and shareholders (i.e., us) to pay for the lower quality salar concessions now dragging behind MMTE as a liability, just like its drags behind its bloated, bulbous, massive O/S sac! Value in the ground or even in the company? Not so much!
MMTE's market cap therefore STRONGLY suggests that the company is WORTH about $3.35 million right now... nowhere NEAR the silly computations of $240 to 720 million! The share price and market cap bear witness of this. The true "worth" or "value" of MMTE is only what investors will pay for its aggregate outstanding shares, and right now that's ~ $3.35 million.
You mean the prior tanking period on the MACD with the current indicators showing the MACD is now about to DOWNCROSS the EMA? That's NOT bullish.
Yes, I would take even that with open arms!!! (Hannah, I'm still talking to you!!!)
HOW? I need SAPX to make me happy!!!
IMHO, I estimate ATTD will report its sales figures (e.g., net revenues) for the three-month period ending March 31, 2012 within the range of $175,000.00 to $250,000.00. NOTE: THAT WILL BE only the tip of the iceberg for the oncoming masses of revenue increases each quarter to follow for many, many quaters of ATTD market share growth! Yet, even that tiny iceberg tip of approximately $212,500.00 in this quarters' net revenues would STILL represent an 518.3% increase over net revenues from just the last quarter (i.e., the three-month period ending December 31, 2011). THAT'S HEADING IN THE RIGHT DAMN DIRECTION!!!
Nope... not at all. The problem, I believe, is even more insulting to to shareholders; I don't think Hannah really cares what the hell the PPS is! Further, putting together accurate and detailed financials - even the very good substnatively ones that I sincerely believe are just awaiting completion - is not fun for Hannah... too much damn non-fashion related work for her!
WTH is wrong with PAWP's L2 - even on non-iHub sites??? It shows the bid at .10 and the ask at .38, but I KNOW THIS IS WRONG because I have an order in between that range for 2500 shares!!!
NOOOOO!!! Stop the bleeding, damn it!
HOLY COW... SAPX's scalding hot blood bath!!! My holdings are pure, blood red. :(