Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It's none of your business where SG posts.......
Or anyone else.
This isn't shareholders property.
Stay on topic.
Thanks
SG was asking about sub 2 cents this am.......
I was wondering if you sold more today?
But why did Max sell though? Will it continue?......
SFRX said this about Juno.
While non-ferrous targets have been identified by the SeaSearcher, none of these targets have been exhumed yet. There is also a strong possibility that there are no artifacts of significant value located at the Juno Beach shipwreck site.
There was plenty available and always seems…….
to be that way.
He’s unloaded at least 71,200,000.
He owns 6.7% and claimed it only……,
takes a day or to locate treasure using the tech.
He was in one of the videos making that claim.
Maximilian Thyssen - Shareholder 556,927,580 shares
My guess would be Max is still selling…….
He’s already sold at least 71,200,000 per the 10K.
GL Gman
If you read the next sentence, SFRX says this…….
While non-ferrous targets have been identified by the SeaSearcher, none of these targets have been exhumed yet. There is also a strong possibility that there are no artifacts of significant value located at the Juno Beach shipwreck site.
If the tech works, even though it's still in development, how could there be a strong possibility there is nothing of significant value at Juno?
The boiler room talk doesn’t match the company’s disclosures.
Just an observation.
WWII Era Shipwreck Found - SS Arlington (1940)…….
Rules for thee TB?……
Let me ask you a question Shadow……Does
this sound familiar? Please see the post that was responded to as well. Even more familiar, eh?
Interesting that Max has already sold over 71MM shares, and others said they sold some too. See what’s in bold.
Aren’t boiler rooms supposed to highlight successes….
of the company being touted?
Wait, never mind.
You have parades when you win the……
World Series or Super Bowl.
When Buc was here as a shareholder y’all were trying to have a parade. He explained that it was just an Exploration Permit, and he was right.
I don’t remember anyone correcting their posts then…..or now.
A boiler room is probably a good description of what it’s like here at times.
Good to know you don’t own shares Shadow……
Still skeptical, are ya?
I understand.
Of late there is a shout going forth……
almost every day.
TODAY IS THE DAY, which is similar to what Mel Fisher used to say. Why wouldn’t I being checking in?
Just waiting at the dock for the treasure but folks such as yourself keep hitting me up while I wait.
You have talked about this thing hitting paper when treasure and a media deal is announced, and the word is……they hired security.
Maybe I’m looking to enter though still skeptical.
But after seeing Max sold at least 71,200,000 shares, which is almost as many as you, perhaps I am being cautious.
But all that’s gonna change when soon, right?
I said I would congratulate longs and sticky the post for one month.
Relax, success is nigh and I’ll be eating crow, right?
You were laughing at the trailer park post earlier. That’s the birdie I like seeing.
Happy Saturday!
I actually said the hot air balloon rides……
were based on the same type technology…ie seeing gold and silver under the sand.
Perhaps I could have said the same type technology claims, but I’ll stand by the statement.
Also, I noticed you didn’t correct your statement about the device being complete in your comment to Gman.
The way a message board works is you……
explain how it’s not correct, just as I did the other day when you posted this.
Apparently to live in the heads of giddy…….
longs, as well as some that don’t own shares here that love to be my shadow on Ihub.
I’ve never seen anyone so (ahem) ignored that was so discussed.
But when the companies you all tout have no accomplishments, I guess you have to pass the time somehow.
I didn’t tell, I “axed” the skeptic…….
You picked up in the middle conversation, but that’s okay.
It happens, and I’m sure it will happen again.
Happy Saturday!!!
Any idea why Max sold 71,200,000 shares…..or
maybe more?
Just curious. Was it the same reason you sold some shares?
Thx
It’s a good thing certain shareholders are keeping…..
it real by focusing on the accomplishments of SFRX and not putting other posters down.
Riding in a hot air balloon puts you in a position to look down on others, and some let that go to their head. Not here though.
Very classy.
They are both a reflection of SFRX’s credibility……..or
lack thereof.
One was full of it regarding a patented technology, and the other has been told by the Bureau on multiple occasions what they were/are (ahem) attempting to do (salvage the Concepcion) was illegal without Spain’s permission.
Reynolds is not that stupid, is he? Isn’t his daughter the Compliance Officer and didn’t they tell the state she was coming on board after Tim got them shut down at the ring area?
How does a company not comprehend why they were shut down? It wasn’t just because they brought up about a dozen artifacts without permission. The reason they have to have permission is because of either the SMCA and ASA.
There may be an agenda at the state, but that agenda formed the statutes. Folks at the FBAR helped craft the legislation.
Unless grandfathered, all wrecks in state waters belong to the state unless they are protected by Sovereign Immunity. A wreck from the 1715 fleet that hasn’t been discovered yet would be protected under the SMCA. That is not very hard to understand, yet Tim is out there telling folks those are the very wrecks they are going after. You have people here that believe this crap, or at least say they do.
The state can’t allow someone to violate the SMCA or they can be held liable. Those wrecks do not belong to the state, but the state is charged with protecting them.
Regarding Torres, all SFRX had to do was their due diligence. It seems a bit too convenient that they didn’t. Logic says the patent documents would have been attached to the agreement with Torres. The assignment of rights shouldn’t have taken more than a week or two through the USPTO, but about 9 months after the agreement was entered into SFRX is touting the death mask at the Henegar Gala.
In July of 2018, the Company entered into an assignment of rights agreement under which an individual agreed to assign all of the patent rights, including right, title and interest to an original inventive concept for a system for detecting precious metals buried beneath the ocean floor to the Company.
I agree that pretending to be a war hero is about a low as one can go, but when SFRX “figured out” Torres schemes they kept it to themselves and a select few. Weeks later Reynolds is on board to build the same type device they claimed Torres was building with no mention of what Torres had done.
But hey, it’s time for the critics to eat crow cuz they’re gonna bring up the bling at Juno, which is grandfathered.
At least you’re skeptical.
BTW, it looks like Max has sold over 70MM shares.
What does having more credibility than Torres……
mean?
And who wouldn’t qualify? Based on what SFRX has said, isn’t that a very low bar?
Reynolds has his own credibility issues. He got SFRX shut down at the ring area when he instructed the divers to bring up artifacts the FBAR had not approved to be retrieved.
Further, after being told yet again that disturbing a Spanish sunken vessel without Spain’s permission violates state and federal law, a few months later he’s in a YouTube video with Kyle talking about going after 1715 fleet wrecks.
I appreciate the skepticism based on past performance, but Reynolds isn’t Mr. Credibility, no matter who you compare him to.
In my brilliant and humble opinion, of course, but folks can decide for themselves when they do their due diligence.
They cut ties without mentioning they were defrauded…….
They only made shareholders aware when they were required to in periodic reports, though a few knew he was gone. Good ole selective disclosure.
After they cut ties with Torres they announced Reynolds (Wild Manta) was on board and working on the same type device.
After claiming a year ago it only takes a weekend, they said earlier this week the device was still in development.
Hot air balloon ride then, hot air balloon ride now.
And I agree, one ride has nothing to do with the other.
Two different hot air balloon rides, yet based on the same type technology.
If folks actually did their due diligence, as you say they should do, there is no historical data supporting a treasure galleon sinking in the Juno area.
Further, folks doing such due diligence would learn entities with far deeper pockets than SFRX have not had any success developing what SFRX has claimed they have, the see all find all treasure finder. But now SFRX says the tech is still in development.
How can it only take a weekend if it’s still in development?
GL. Hope it works out and I get to eat a fresh plate of crow. It’s garden planting time so the crow should be plentiful here soon.
So, are you saying it’s SFRX fault that…….
the death mask was fake? They said Torres was the fraud, but that was after Kyle called him a brilliant scientist and deBry said the mask was authentic.
There is only ONE that can make......
the share price drop, and that is the defendant in the current lawsuit. No one even comes close, not even Phantom Shorty!!!
SFRX "alleges" that's EXACTLY what he did with his posts here, and they wanted million$. Later they wanted him to go to jail for sending a PM on Facebook. He had them shaking in their boots.
After you watch this video, you can understand their concern. Hide the women and children. This is not for the faint of heart!
I'll answer the other issues you raised in another post.
Happy Good Friday!!!
Well, what you’re suggesting is there could…..
never be a pump and dump scheme because no one is holding a gun to someone’s head and making them buy or sell a stock.
Not saying this is such a scheme, just saying.
I’m here following SFRX. Their claims make me suspicious and have for years.
I don’t tell folks to buy or sell SFRX, I simply share my opinions based on my knowledge of the industry. I doubt more than a few dozen folks read my comments. Those that do are likely have their minds made up.
To paint a word picture, I am waiting at the dock for Team SFRX to show us the bling. I’ll be wearing shades in anticipation, even if it’s a cloudy day.
I’m not telling folks they better load up or dump their shares. I’ll leave that to the stock pimps and Phantom Shorty.
Yes, the settlement separated them from Torres….
but don’t forget, in June of 2018 they gave him 61MM shares for a patent he didn’t have.
Patent ownership is transferred. 7 months after issuing the shares he supposedly finds a Peruvian death mask at Melbourne, and about 7 weeks later Kyle said that find proved his technology works.
Why did they not have this patent transferred to them when they had already issued shares for it?
The whole story, as is pointed out in the Pretend podcast, makes SFRX look very unprofessional.
But hey, Torres got them from the trips to near 2 cents, and to some that’s all that matters.
Odd, after all the touting SFRX did during the Torres Rally, they never made an announcement about the fraud UNTIL they had to disclose ithe lawsuit in a SEC filing, which was months later.
No apologies or explanation….nothing.
Then they announced Tim Reynolds was in the house like they were sweeping Torres under the rug.
You have admitted selling shares already…..and
now you’re ASSuming folks got left behind because they doubted a company that has lost about 28MM dollars and issued over 8B shares without ever finding anything significant?
Are you saying if/when tech is proven there won’t be another opportunity to make money on SFRX?
That if you got left at the dock you’re SOL?
Is that why you sold some?
The reason I asked is because didn’t you admit to knowing things the public doesn’t know yet, and yet you sold?
Thanks for clarifying.
The last permit was from the US Army……
Corp. of Engineers, which a federal. They already had the DEP permit from the state.
The only folks that appear to be upset are “real shareholders” who can’t believe anyone would have any doubts about SFRX and share them.
“Real shareholders” can’t highlight any accomplishments the company has made since inception, but in their mind all of that is irrelevant.
Kyle even admitted they have been a failure because they haven’t found treasure.
They have the permits, now let’s see RESULTS that proves the tech works, not more hype. If/when that occurs I will be the first to congratulate shareholders and sticky the post for one month.
Happy Good Friday!!!
Make your plea and if it follows the…..
terms you agreed to follow when you joined, then Ihub will resolve it.
FWIW, it actually goes back to 2014. Folks were claiming SFRX had a Recovery Permit and treasure would be on deck in 30 days. The defendant was attacked repeatedly, but it turns out, he was right.
There was no Recovery Permit as SFRX claimed in SEC filings.
I have no issue with individuals engaged in such……
a transaction. To the contrary.
I understand you likely have skin in the…..
game, but leave folks gender out of this while you enjoy the hot air balloon ride.
Plus, a confused Cajun millionaire is far more amusing. I mean if you’re going to deflect, like you all desperately do, let’s laugh about it.
Thanks
Here’s more on the Torres lawsuit. Kyle……
once said he was a brilliant scientist and the mask find proved his tech worked. Lots of folks cashed in on some hot air profits then. Ran from the trips to near 2 cents in about 4 or 5 months.
Oh, and Spain’s attorney chimes in on SFRX’s view of salvage law…ie Sovereign Immunity.
Enjoy!
https://pretendradio.org/episode/treasure-hunter-michael-torres-vs-seafarer-exploration-corp/
He did, and the Judge rejected the settlement…….
in part, without a hearing. That hasn’t happened.
Been waiting on SFRX for almost 10 years to make a move.
SFRX has to prove he was libel and they were harmed.
His (ahem) admission was in order to get the issue resolved, but here we are almost a decade later and it still isn’t.
What are they waiting on?
You remember that convo y’all were having…..
with him when he was telling y’all to slow the heck down and SFRX didn’t have salvage rights?
He really made y’all look…..well, you know.
Almost 10 years later no treasure, not even a positive ID.
It doesn’t matter, SFRX shot itself in the foot by bringing up Spain’s property. The state would be liable if they allow SFRX to disturb a Spanish vessel without Spain’s permission.
But hey, hot air profits, right?
That’s really all that matters, isn’t it?
FYI, I wasn’t aware Tony called. Have him……
hit me up again.
BTW, I have emailed Tony and got responses from Tony.
But there was one time he emailed and I responded, but he didn’t respond back, which didn’t surprise me.
Chef said Tony was only joking.
I wasn’t.
Next?
Yes, I know it's still open and the.....
defendant has an attorney (Vinny Adam) who represented him at the last hearing when the Judge was about to toss the case because SFRX dragged its feet for years and didn't move the case forward.
You would think it was one of SFRX's salvage projects that never go anywhere.
You do know he was a SFRX shareholder, and he knew SFRX didn't have any salvage rights, and he confirmed that with the FBAR (Roger Smith).
Folks were on here claiming treasure would be on deck in 30 days at Melbourne. He simply said, not so fast they only have an Exploration Permit, which allows for minimal disturbance.
Then all hell broke loose.
About 10 years later the case is still open and SFRX is still exploring Melbourne.
Go figure!
Judge Stephens told SFRX that in order…….
to win their case they would need to provide witnesses who sold their stock based on the defendants postings, and then the witnesses would need to explain why they didn’t buy back at lower prices when they realized the postings were false.
The lawsuit is almost 10 years old, and SFRX has yet to go to trial. They also haven’t provided a list of witnesses that could testify as Judge Stephens directed.
BTW, the defendant has counsel, and has had counsel since June 2021, as well as given SFRX notice of availability.
The defendant rightly explained to the giddy shareholders here that SFRX only had an Exploration Permit at Melbourne, not a Recovery Permit as SFRX claimed they had.
For a year SFRX filed with the SEC claiming they had a Recovery Permit at Melbourne, which wasn’t true. Then they claimed it was a Dig and ID Permit.
Thanks to me they finally got it right and correctly said it was an Exploration Permit, with a Dig and ID amendment.
Glad I could help, along with Mary from the FBAR. She explained to Kyle there were only two types of permits the FBAR issued.
Huge news! I’m loading first thing in…..
the am!
Maybe pre-market.
Thanks for the heads up!
Maybe one day you fellas can point......
to an accomplishment SFRX has made.
And maybe one day they'll get the tech they've claimed works for almost 5 years........developed.
Maybe.
Maybe not.