Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I dont agree with you at all regarding nphc. time will tell.
NPHC is always late like most companies filing extensions. trying to make a big deal out of it is comincal.
That's just nonsense usual.
I know the answer Deitsch obtains toxic loans and uses it as his personal funds and reloans the company the same money twice.
Cause so many people cant remember or just missed it.
Here is what Deitsch the CEO has done for NPHC in 19 years:
just announced their first agreement to act as a product formulator and contract manufacturer for an outside company, Avini Health.
Added Many patents and trademarks to Nutra's portfolio
Clinical Trials in Multiple Phases
1. Multiple Sclerosis Trials
2. Herpes Simplex Infections 1 & 2 Trials
3. Adrenomyeloneuropathy Trials
4. HIV Trials
5. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Trials
6. Rheumatoid Arthritis Trials
7. Pain Trials
Products launched and brought to Market
1. Cobroxin
2. Nyloxin
3. Pet Pain Away
4. Equine pain Away
5. Luxury Feet
Published Research
http://receptopharm.com/drug_development/published_research.php
https://www.nutrapharma.com/research
Increased Sales on Amazon and Walmart
RPI-78M has received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for the treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis
Huge personal loans from Deitsch to NPHC tells me the CEO knows and believes in NPHC
Authorized Stock Increase will become effective on or about April 13, 2022.
YOu are 100% wrong.
The IP doesn't have any value
There is absolutely no sign that is going to happen in the real world.
A private company where he can simply shift all assets to while leaving nphc an empty shell and start over and go public later with the ne company!!!
Show me where there are 12 billion outstanding shares bro. I already know you can't. Lol
Maybe try learning the difference between authorized and outstanding shares too. that will help greatly.
There are NOT 12 billion shares. You can not dispute that. It's a fact.
That is only Authorized. Not outstanding. Glad i can help teach. Now you know.
Going from 8 billion shares to 12 billions shares.
Otc markets says otherwise.
There isn't 12 billion shares. In fact the authorized is still only 8 billion and the outstanding is 6.77 billion with 2.6 billion restricted.
SO there are 18 Patents out of 21 that are still good huh. glad to know. Looking for a new patent on nerve technology too. That was a funny "Random" look. Should look at them all.
U.S. Patent No. 5,989,857, Polypeptide compositions and methods was granted in November 1999 with 10 claims. The patent outlines a method of preparing a bioactive polypeptide in a stable, inactivated form, the method comprising the step of treating the polypeptide with ozonated water in order to oxidize and/or stabilize the cysteine residues, and in turn, prevent the formation of disulfide bridges necessary for bioactivity. This patent expired on May 10, 2016.
U.S. Patent No. 6,670,148, Compositions comprising bioactive peptides prepared without formation of native disulfide bonds was granted in December 2003, with 9 claims. The patent further describes a method of preparing a bioactive polypeptide in a stable, inactivated form, the method comprising the step of treating the polypeptide with ozonated water in order to oxidize and/or stabilize the cysteine residues, and in turn, prevent the formation of disulfide bridges necessary for bioactivity. The method can involve the use of ozonated water to both oxidize the disulfide bridges in a bioactive polypeptide, and to then stabilize the resultant cysteine residues. Optionally, and preferably, the method can involve the use of ozonated water to stabilize the cysteine residues, and thereby prevent the formation of disulfide bridges, in a polypeptide produced by recombinant means in a manner that allows the polypeptide to be recovered with the disulfide bridges unformed. This Patent expired on May 10, 2016.
U.S. Patent Application Number 11/415377, Buccal Delivery System, with 20 claims. The patent describes a delivery formulation and system for delivering inactivated bioactive peptides to the body. The formulation includes effective amounts of the peptide as well as a mucosal permeation enhancer selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium salts. The system can be used by spraying the formulation into the buccal cavity, e.g., to the roof of the mouth. This application is currently listed as abandoned as of December 2009.
U.S. Patent Application Number 11/431126, Immunokine composition and method with 31 claims. The patent describes a composition and method for preventing HIV infection of mammalian cells. One aspect of the invention relates to an anti-immunodeficiency virus immunokine capable of binding to a cellular protein in a manner that prevents HIV infection of that cell. The compositions can include either an active bioactive polypeptide, such as native cobratoxin, and/or an inactivated bioactive polypeptide, such as cobratoxin in which one or more of the native disulfide bridges have been prevented from forming. The term “immunokine” is used to refer to an inactivated bioactive polypeptide, whether inactivated by chemical, genetic, and/or synthetic means as described herein, with the proviso that a corresponding active bioactive polypeptides can be included where applicable (e.g., for in vitro use). This application is currently listed as abandoned as of June 2009.
U.S. Patent No. 8,034,777, Modified Anticholinergic Neurotoxins as Modulators of the Autoimmune Reaction was granted in October 2011with 7 claims. The patent describes a method of treatment of a human patient suffering from Multiple Sclerosis comprising the administration of a disease-mitigating amount of a composition consisting of detoxified and modified alpha-cobratoxin in a saline solution. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of drugs for the treatment of auto-immune diseases.
U.S. Patent No. 7,902,152, Use of cobratoxin as an analgesic was granted in March 2011 with 16 claims. The patent describes a composition of matter for an analgesic and its method of use is disclosed. The method of use is for the treatment of chronic pain, especially to the treatment of heretofore intractable pain as associated with advanced cancer. The pain associated with neurological conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, viral infections and lesions is also contemplated. The method includes administering to a host an alpha-neurotoxin that is characterized by its ability to blocking of the action of acetylcholine at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Currently, this would be applied to the Company’s current and future drugs for the treatment of pain.
U.S. Patent No. 7,758,894, Modified elapid venoms as stimulators of the immune reaction was granted in July, 2010 with 14 claims. The patent describes a method of protection from infections by administering a detoxified and neurotropically active modified venom containing alpha-cobratoxin. Protection includes bacterial, viral and parasitic infections. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in our production of anti-infective treatments. Currently, this would be applied to RPI-MN and RPI-78.
U.S. Patent Application Number 11/217,713, Modified venom and venom components as anti-retroviral agents with 10 claims was filed in September 2005. The present invention describes a method of treatment of human subject suffering from infection with HIV, comprising administering a disease mitigating amount of a detoxified, modified cobra venom composition in an amount effective to ameliorate at least one symptom of said infection. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of anti-viral treatments. Currently, this would be applied to RPI-MN and RPI-78.
U.S. Patent Application Number 11/784,607, Treatment of Autoimmune Disorders Using Detoxified Cobratoxin was filed in April 2007. The patent describes a method of treating patients suffering from autoimmune disorders comprising the administration of detoxified cobra venom. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of drugs for the treatment of auto-immune diseases. Currently, this would be applied to RPI-78MN.
U.S. Patent Application Number 12/317,115, Alpha-neurotoxin Proteins with Anti-inflammatory Properties and Uses Thereof was filed in December 2008. The patent describes a method of treating an arthritic condition comprising the administration to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising an isolated alpha-neurotoxin protein or an effective fragment thereof. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of drugs for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.
U.S. Patent No. 5,989,902, Method for determining the antimicrobial agent sensitivity of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism and an associated apparatus was granted in November 1999 with 3 claims. The patent describes a method for determining a sensitivity of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism to an antimicrobial agent. The method includes providing at least one receptacle containing an aqueous broth including a carbon source and introducing the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism into the receptacle. The method further includes placing into the receptacle (i) a slide coated with a hydrophobic material and (ii) a predetermined quantity of the antimicrobial agent to be tested. By observing the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism growth or lack thereof on the slide, it can be determined whether the predetermined quantity of the antimicrobial agent is effective in inhibiting growth of the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism on the slide. An associated apparatus is also disclosed. This Patent expired on November 13, 2017.
U.S. Patent No. 5,981,210, Method for determining a presence or absence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in a body specimen by using a DNA extraction procedure and a novel DNA extraction procedure was granted in November 1999 with 17 claims. The method of the invention involves providing a first receptacle and a second receptacle. The first receptacle contains a sterile aqueous broth and the second receptacle contains an aqueous broth including a carbon source. The method then includes placing into the first receptacle a first support surface having a paraffin wax coating thereon and placing into the second receptacle a second support surface having a hydrophobic material coating thereon. A body specimen, such as sputum, is then introduced into each of the first and second receptacles. The presence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in the body specimen is determined by observing (i) a lack of microorganism growth on the paraffin coated material of the first support surface and (ii) a presence of microorganism growth on the hydrophobic material coating of the second support surface. The presence of the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism can be further confirmed by performing a DNA extraction. An associated DNA extraction procedure is also provided. This Patent expired on November 13, 2017.
U.S. Patent No. 5,935,806, Method and apparatus for speciating and identifying MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) and testing the same for antibiotic sensitivity was granted in August 1999 with 3 claims. The patent describes a method of speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprises placing a paraffin coated slide in a receptacle containing a sterile aqueous solution inoculated with the specimen, analyzing the slide after exposure to the specimen to determine the presence or absence of atypical Mycobacteria, and after the analysis step, if atypical Mycobacteria are determined to be present, performing at least one speciation assay to ascertain if the atypical Mycobacteria are MAI. A related apparatus is also disclosed for speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprising a paraffin-wax coated slide, a tube having a sterile aqueous solution contained therein, the tube adapted to hold the slide, and at least one speciation assay means for performing an assay to determine the presence or absence of MAI in the specimen after the specimen is introduced into the tube holding the solution and the slide. An apparatus and method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antibiotics and dosages thereof is also provided. This Patent expired on October 24, 2009 for failure to timely pay maintenance fees.
U.S. Patent No. 5,882,920, Apparatus for determining the presence or absence of a paraffinophilic microorganism was granted in March 1999 with 4 claims. The patent describes a method of determining the presence of a paraffinophilic microorganism in a specimen taken from a patient. The method includes providing a receptacle containing an aqueous solution and adjusting the solution to mimic the in vivo clinical conditions of the patient. The method then further includes inoculating the solution with the specimen and then placing in the receptacle a paraffin coated slide to bait the paraffinophilic microorganism. The slide is then analyzed after exposure to the specimen to determine the presence or absence of the paraffinophilic microorganism. An associated apparatus is also disclosed. This Patent expired on November 9, 2015.
U.S. Patent No. 5,854,014, Apparatus for testing paraffinophilic microorganisms for antimicrobial sensitivity was granted in December 1998 with 2 claims. The patent describes an apparatus for determining the antimicrobial agent sensitivity of a paraffinophilic microorganism from a specimen obtained from a patient. The apparatus includes a receptacle containing an aqueous solution, an amount of antimicrobial agent to be tested and the specimen. The apparatus further consists of a paraffin coated slide placed into the receptacle. This Patent expired October 24, 2009 for failure to timely pay maintenance fees.
U.S. Patent No. 5,846,760, Method for determining a presence or absence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in a body specimen and an associated kit was granted in December 1998 with 15 claims. The method of the invention involves providing a first receptacle and a second receptacle. The first receptacle contains a sterile aqueous broth and the second receptacle contains an aqueous broth including a carbon source. The method then includes placing into the first receptacle a first support surface having a paraffin wax coating thereon and placing into the second receptacle a second support surface having a hydrophobic material coating thereon. A body specimen, such as sputum, is then introduced into each of the first and second receptacles. The presence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in the body specimen is determined by observing (i) a lack of microorganism growth on the paraffin coated material of the first support surface and (ii) a presence of microorganism growth on the hydrophobic material coating of the second support surface. An associated kit is also disclosed. This Patent expired on November 13, 2017.
U.S. Patent No. 5,776,722, Method of testing a body specimen taken from a patient for the presence or absence of a microorganism and a further associated method and associated apparatus was granted in July 1998 with 40 claims. The patent describes a method of testing a body specimen taken from a patient for the presence or absence of a microorganism. A transport/isolator assembly is provided which includes a receptacle and a baiting assembly including a baiting section having disposed thereon a coating material. A baiting liquid and the body specimen are then introduced into the receptacle. The method further comprises securing the baiting assembly to the receptacle so that at least a portion of the coated section is introduced into the baiting liquid. The transport/isolator assembly containing the baiting liquid and the body specimen are then transported to a laboratory for subsequent observation of the coated section for growth or lack thereof of the microorganism. A further method of processing the body specimen and an associated isolator/transport assembly kit as well as an associated isolator/transport assembly are also disclosed. This Patent expired on September 25, 2017.
U.S. Patent No. 5,569,592, Apparatus for testing MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) for antimicrobial agent sensitivity was granted in October 1996 with 3 claims. The patent describes an apparatus for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antimicrobial agents and dosages thereof is provided. The apparatus comprises a plurality of test tubes adapted to contain an amount of an antimicrobial agent to be tested and MAI complex organisms to be assayed and a separate paraffin coated slide adapted for placement in each of the test tubes. The growth of the MAI complex organisms on the slide can be used to determine the concentration of the antimicrobial agent necessary to resist MAI complex organism growth on the slide. An associated method is also disclosed. This Patent expired on October 29, 2013.
U.S. Patent No. 5,472,877, Apparatus for determining the presence or absence of MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) was granted in December 1995 with 6 claims. The patent describes a method of speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprises placing a paraffin coated slide in a receptacle containing a sterile aqueous solution inoculated with the specimen, analyzing the slide after exposure to the specimen to determine the presence or absence of atypical Mycobacteria, and after the analysis step, if atypical Mycobacteria are determined to be present, performing at least one speciation assay to ascertain if the atypical Mycobacteria are MAI. A related apparatus is also disclosed for speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprising a paraffin-wax coated slide, a tube having a sterile aqueous solution contained therein, the tube adapted to hold the slide, and at least one speciation assay means for performing an assay to determine the presence or absence of MAI in the specimen after the specimen is introduced into the tube holding the solution and the slide. An apparatus and method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antibiotics and dosages thereof is also provided. This Patent expired on December 5, 2012.
U.S. Patent No. 5,316,918, Method and apparatus for testing MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) for antimicrobial agent sensitivity was granted in May 1994 with 7 claims. The patent describes an apparatus and method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antimicrobial agents and dosages thereof is provided. The apparatus comprises a plurality of test tubes adapted to contain an amount of an antimicrobial agent to be tested and MAI complex organisms to be assayed and a separate paraffin coated slide adapted for placement in each of the test tubes. The growth of the MAI complex organisms on the slide can be used to determine the concentration of the antimicrobial agent necessary to resist MAI complex organism growth on the slide. An associated method is also disclosed. This Patent expired on May 31, 2011.
U.S. Patent No. 5,153,119, Method for speciating and identifying MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) was granted in October 1992 with 15 claims. The patent describes a method of speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprises placing a paraffin coated slide in a receptacle containing a sterile aqueous solution inoculated with the specimen, analyzing the slide after exposure to the specimen to determine the presence or absence of atypical Mycobacteria, and after the analysis step, if atypical Mycobacteria are determined to be present, performing at least one speciation assay to ascertain if the atypical Mycobacteria are MAI. A related apparatus is also disclosed for speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprising a paraffin-wax coated slide, a tube having a sterile aqueous solution contained therein, the tube adapted to hold the slide, and at least one speciation assay means for performing an assay to determine the presence or absence of MAI in the specimen after the specimen is introduced into the tube holding the solution and the slide. An apparatus and method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antibiotics and dosages thereof is also provided. This Patent expired on October 24, 2009.
Just a bunch of opinions and doubts however, the tech talk did happen as nphc reported. If it didnt, the sec would be all over that and the sec is not all over that.
I doubt the government is interested
Waiting on MS Trial updates too.
Waiting on updates from this.
In November, Nutra Pharma announced that Dr. VanderPutten was invited by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) to present their nerve agent countermeasure technology in a Tech Watch talk to an audience of military and civilian experts in chem/bio defense.
Earlier this year, the Company announced that they had engaged new IP attorneys at Christopher & Weisberg P.A. to work on patents and trademarks for Nutra Pharma’s products and technologies. Additionally, the Company announced recently that they had engaged the Washington DC-based government affairs consulting firm, Vitello Consulting to work with elected officials as well as governmental agencies to increase the awareness of Nutra Pharma’s products and technologies with the goal of improving sales, garnering grants and potentially speeding drug applications.
Sure you have. If you did you would know a sec reporting audit involves the 3rd party auditing company verifying and checking the assets. NPHC is sec reporting and audited.
I have been involved in 3 startups that went public - one was listed on Nasdaq - so I am confident I know more about securities law and how the audit process works more than NPHC investors.
You clearly have no idea what SEC auditing / reporting is. SEC rauditing / reporting means that the company's financials and assets are actually audited by a third party company which goes to the business and audits its financials and assets..
You need to read the financials more closely. You posted as toxic something dated from 2019 where You purposely omitted the dates involved which were "During February 2019," and " During June 2019,".
when i point out that nphc in Jan of 2021 eliminated the 50% discount to the average trading price of the three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty days prior to the notice of conversion. This removed the toxic debt.
The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of the lower of $0.0005 or 50% discount to the average trading price of the three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty days prior to the notice of conversion."
Read the financials more closely.
You omitted the dates involved which were "During February 2019," and " During June 2019,".
From the 2021 shareholder letter dated Jan 2021.
Dates matter
We eliminated all institutional debt with the company when a long-term investor purchased the last of these notes. We feel that this will be significantly healthier for the Company and our shareholders. This will allow us to move our business plan forward without fear of constant selling pressure from toxic convertible debt.
https://www.nutrapharma.com/single-post/nutra-pharma-letter-to-shareholders
Nphc tweeted they got rid of the toxic loans a couple years ago which is evident of no dumping. Only friéndly loans to the company. It's also evident as there are no floorless convertibles. Do some dd and you will see.
First, nphc products haven't been around for 20 years. Second, nphc is more than just the over-the-counter products.
The accumulated deficit includes drug research which we all know isn't free.
Look at the accumulated deficit
Glad you finally realized that Loans aren't revenue.
Loans aren't revenue
These are not toxic loans. Saying they are toxic is wrong. Only floorless loans are toxic loans. Do you know what that is? You keep saying toxic but that is not correct.
you asked where does nphc get its money from and i answered. I never once said i can show that nphc sales were more than their overhead.
Nice try cngreen but sorry to say you did not show this board that this company is ABLE TO GENRATE ENOUGH REVENUE TO AT LEAST COVER ITS OVERHEAD.
It is not good to mislead would be new investors sir, respectfully.
Currently through a combination of sales and loans (from NPHC CEO and other entities) to the company.
From where would nphc gets its revenue to cover at the very least overhead costs
I'm not comparing nphc to amzn. I'm comparing being positive cash flow to what you had said. You were stating because nphc isn't cash flow positive, they are a scam.
I didn't spin anything. Look at how many years Amazon was not profitable. More than 10 years.
If you are saying all companies are scams if they arent cash flow positive then that would mean that UBER, Airbnb, Blue Apron, Dropbox, Lyft, Peloton, Pinterest, WeWork, Snapchat. Zillow until just recently. Even Tesla until a couple years ago.
Using the same logic, these companies are all scams.
NPHC uses some of their patents.
WEll, nphc has 20+ Patents. That's a fact. I would bet we see another patent this year from last years provisional submission.
This patent also coincides with the nphc tweeted info regarding Dale Vander Putten's call with the military.
Then there is the Vitello consulting with the governemnt.
The old everything is a scam huh? where is the proof of that? I highly doubt that everyone with a video is an investor with a fake positive video review.
just non sense.
Scam video testiments from investors in a scam investment looking to recoup.
That would make me salty too and call everything a scam.
the end of 2020 saw nphc go from .0005 to .0157 in early 2021.
I dont know how anyone didnt make anything there. Bad trading for some i guess.
My average pps is $0.057. After splits that +100k shares is worth less than $260. Whoop dee fricken doo.
So you called the patent office and told them nphc was a scam. Then why would the patent office issue a new provisional patent just last year to nphc?
Real physical Products sold on amazon and walmart. 20 patents. Maybe someone should call the patent office and let them know you think its a scam.
You couldn't be further from the truth. YOu should look up youtube results from people who use pet pain away for their animals. from the videos I've seen, the dogs are much better and more active.
No placebo effect there. A Dog doesn't know it's getting something for their pain.
That is deceit and a scam
Try reading a 10k and understanding it. I know it's long but it would help.
That's not a toxic example. Again, a toxic example would be a floorless conversion. Which you can't seem to show.
They are not floorless as you can see the info on them in the financials or when the nite is converted
Every company takes loans or some sort of financing either upfront or later down the road.