Whoever I sue for in the near future, my claim is around $850,000 + the value of my 500,000 shares. My hourly rate is pretty expensive cause I hold a Ph.D degree.

Look at the big picture... A judge is hearing from a foreigner (CEO from GB who has an empty shell company) saying that he needs to make Billions of $$$$ from US brokerage firms and innocent US citizens... What will he (the judge) do in your opinion? Any comments?

I have a huge confusion here. Please somebody help...

1. Why in the h*ll did Mr. Megas dismiss Count#2-#5?
(a) Because he loves us, the fake shareholders
(b) To show that his intention for this lawsuit was NOT to blame us
(c) To prevent numerous counter claims/sues from us which can result in his bankruptcy
(d) To show us MERCY

--- according to my close friend, the answer is (c). He told me that Mr. Megas almost made him a homeless. You know what I mean?

2. If Megas wins this case (Count 1), is there any forced buy-in or squeeze play that we were waiting for?

--- according to my guess, the answer is "NO". Since he can cancel all fake shares by Jurisdiction, all we can get is the money back from our brokers. Finally BCIT pps will go to 0.0001 with NO BID.

Any thoughts? TIA!

The 10-K looks ugly to me.

500, what abount the court? In our answer, do we have to accept that we got fake shares to Judge?

so,, are all the brokers going back to Pino et al. then?

so,,, I am a little confused here.. Do I have to give up the shares to Plaintiff then?

Now,,, I think it is time to get together and prepare for the class actions against our brokers. They will tell us again "It is not our fault, check with BCIT for your shares"

Read the count 1. It is saying our shares are fake, so they must be cancelled. And there is NO +$10,000 for damage in count 1.

DANG!! I lost my $9 for the certified mails this morning!

I did it, check your e-mail.

A little concern about the template...


Further to the preceeding assertions, Defendant [Defendant Name] states categorically and for the record that he has never requested delivery of any share certificate(s), genuine or fraudulent, representing ownership in and of Bancorp International Group, Inc. or undertaken any action which would have resulted in delivery of phyical share certificate(s), genuine or fraudulent, representing ownership in and of Bancorp International Group, Inc.


---couldn't it mean that I am giving up the ownership of BCIT??

check your e-mail.

rnozaut,

I was just finished with the answer. Do you want to look at it? I will send you by e-mail if you want. I used the template, BUT I delete some sentences and add some sentences about the possible counter-claims/sues.

Good point anyway.

Do you know what's his damage anyway? I can't figure out how he came up with +$50M. TIA

Janice, What are the reasons? TIA

Anyone who communicate with Megas by e-mail,

Can you ask him to drop this ridiculous lawsuit and file a class action for major brokers with us (fake investors)? I am sure he can make more money if he does rather than sueing us.

What? OK Judge will do that? LOL! then I will move to Oklahoma and keep sueing other people in other states for nothing important. LOL.

In another words, he didn't mean to sue us to receive that money right? What kind of judge will let him do that? LOL

WOW, 50K X ~1200 DEFENDANTS = $60M for him! He wants to be a millinaire this way? LOL

I agree 100%.

I agree, it can be with just our answers. But, just in case for worst case scenario.

Remember, the charge is +$50K plus all the fees. It's not a joke if we go to trial and lose the case.

Who's gonna lead the group with Ameritrade? Anyone?

I think (wish) this POS lawsuit can be dropped only with our answers. BUT! Let's think about the worst case scenario and prepare for the mess. Let's group first and find the OKC attorney just in case.

Me. Can you start to make the name list? ex) 1.rnozaut 2.Woogieboogiedance 3....

I will join you! Put me in the list. TIA

How do we know his name has been dropped from the court web? TIA

What does "PRO SE" mean after the name in court web? TIA!

How do you see the whole documents for answers in court web? I am seeing only first page. TIA!

Is anyone here who doesn't reject the charges against BCIT in their answer? TIA

f1, it's me. send me by e-mail. TIA

From TD Ameritrade,

Dear XXXXXXX,

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to assist you today. The shares of BANCORP INTERNATIONAL GROUP were purchased in the open market by you. TD Ameritrade is a broker not a dealer.

We cannot provide any information or direction with respect to this summons. As you have been summoned, you should seek any legal advisement you feel is necessary. We cannot comment as to why you were summoned, how you were summoned, or the possible outcome of this situation.

If you have any additional questions, please contact the Reorganization and Safekeeping Dept. at 1-888-723-8504, option 1.

Sincerely,
Jane S.
Reorganization and Safekeeping Dept.

IMO, the defendants who are categorized below may face some difficulties to resolve this summons. IMO absolutely...

1. defendants with more than 4 million shares.
2. defendants who made profits by selling the shares.
3. defendants with short-position.
4. defendants who bought the fake shares directly from Mario Pino.

How did he figure out $10,000 per fake shareholder for his damage if BCIT was only a shell company? It's ridiculous.

Got a quick question,

Is there any chance that some in the list will be dismissed without whatever and rest of them in the list will have to pay to BCIT? or everyone in the list goes innocent or guilty?

TIA

the summons clearly says "You have been sued by..."

How did you know the originals are included in the summons? TIA

looks like it is +$50 grand to me.