Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Reality, Sir.
Every recent forward-looking event has been met with a sell-off and share price decrease upon realization.
Sure, maybe the next one might break the pattern. Or not.
8.5 million in t-trades, some were super late printing.
Hooray, smaller t-trades. Bust out the champagne.
Unfortunately, it happens. I was mocked on this board for suggesting that SEC suspensions could even happen to a company in the middle of bankruptcy. "No way the judge would let that happen", "Bankruptcy court power trumps SEC decisions"
Then I provided a very recent case example and suddenly there was not a single comment in reply.
His last mention of it on his own woof board was November 21. He's moved on from BRTX.
The post that promises no dilution for 45-47 days? Well, that didn't age well considering that we have been having daily t-trades now in less than 30 days from when that was posted.
My bad, 27 million in t-trades. The first 2 million had already left my TOS screen. Sorry about that.
25 million in t-trades today.
Share structure update tonight, looks like 54 million changed from Restricted to Unrestricted.
Authorized shares mattered to the judge that okayed 300 billion. Something to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to just ignore that looming guillotine.
That opinion is a myth. Fabricated. Bogus. Made-up. Does not exist in reality.
7.6M at .01527 and 5.2M at .01461
Two t-trades today, almost 13 million between them.
Does "flipping" always end up with a massive share structure increase and a crashing share price?
POR being Confirmed was a catalyst. POR being Effective was a catalyst. 8-K about coming out of bankruptcy was a catalyst.
Gotta ask yourself why every one of those ended up in a sell off and share price reduction.
What lie? Please, let's hear it.
The POR provided for various creditors of the bankrupt company receiving newly created shares in lieu of the money they were owed.
Selling and diluting have the same mechanic except for the fact that dilution refers to all the new shares hitting the market as opposed to just the same shares being handed back and forth.
The share structure has increased dramatically since the POR became Effective.
And some are using it to pretend like it's a good thing.
PAUL has a reputation as a dilutor, and it is not unfounded. Mind you, that is not to mean that PAUL themselves are diluting, it is that they are commissioned to sell the shares that large holders want to dump into the market that don't have the infrastructure and algos to do that efficiently like PAUL already has.
Here's another insinuation that PAUL was responsible for moving a stock:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159776868
Thoughts?
He did not "choose" shares instead of money. There was no money. Hence the bankruptcy.
No. he did not buy any shares. They were given to him instead of the money that he was owed. Read the footnote.
(1) Shares acquired from Issuer pursuant to amended joint plan of reorganization of Issuer (the "Plan"). Pursuant to the Plan, 100 shares of common stock were issued for each dollar of allowed unsecured claim.
There will never be a Market Maker that "drives" a penny stock up into dollars. Only interest in the company can do that. However, certain Market Makers do have a well deserved reputation for crashing a stock price due to the fact that they are the vehicles for dilutive shares hitting the market.
And yes, PAUL is one of those. It's not a coincidence that the price has crashed with t-trades getting reported at the end of the last 3 sessions after he showed up.
BTW, any opinion that "dilution can't happen yet, it's in the 8-K" is full of crap. Read the 8-K yourself, that shiznit ain't in it.
The CEO didn't buy squat. They were awarded.
Market Maker PAUL getting active, daily t-trades and the share price getting crushed.
Tough not to see it, frankly.
Yes, let's pretend the daily t-trades aren't happening.
Enjoy your investment being crushed by dilution.
That was foretold, by the way. If only one had listened.
Seems to me that anger should be more properly directed toward the pump campaign that drew in suckers just as the court directed dilution was starting.
The lawyers are making a killing. The investors, not so much.
Hmmm... Nothing there about no dilution for 37 days.
What am I supposed to be looking for?
Where does it say that?
I say it doesn't say that at all.
It closed an hour ago.
Unfortunately that was a T-trade, not a buy.
There is quite a difference.
Where does it say that?
T-trade yes, buy - no.
Surprise, surprise, another t-trade today.
2,726,240,135
Over a billion added since last week.
30 billion is only one tenth of what the judge mandated the AS to be raised to, 300 billion.
Why is that ridiculous?
Those weren't bought, they were awarded from the company in lieu of the money they were owed. It was part of the POR.
It was also plainly stated on the Form 4 if one were to read it.
No, it wasn't.