Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If one makes a claim, one should be able to provide evidence to support that claim.
Apparently asking for that evidence when it is not provided is too hard for some to fathom.
I've always been proven right.
I guess that hole works.
How about providing actual DD instead of fake DD and pretending indignance when it is questioned.
Trial headcounts changing? Well that's interesting, where can I verify that information for myself?
Could be they also miss out on the money they have invested that disappears forever.
Phase 2 has been in the pipeline for literally years and no legit company has wanted any part of it since Pfizer bailed out.
Congratulations. May you trade them wisely.
Why the claims about funding that doesn't exist?
Someone is being milked. Fleeced. Whatever you want to call scammed these days.
22 million shares from Restricted to Unrestricted Thursday night, enjoying the comedy? Have a laugh, everybody.
Oh gosh, the mean man says the DD isn't legit.
Many investors have not actually done DD, they were influenced by opinions. Many of which were not actually founded in actuality.
I hope it happens. But claims that it is already in motion are straight-up bogus.
That's like saying if you don't like watching someone getting robbed then don't watch someone getting robbed.
F that. Anyone espousing the opinion that everyone should just look away when a crime is being committed should be examined themselves.
Why has there been no funding? Excellent question. And one that every investor here should be asking themselves.
That's the problem. It is found nowhere.
One cannot read what does not exist.
There is no funding. Just empty claims that it exists with no actual proof whatsoever.
Why not?
Show me some funding. "Show me the money!", as they say.
Those are trick questions because there is no funding.
How much was funded? Who funded it?
Trick questions, I know. GLTA
The company never said it, but unscrupulous social media has been claiming that they were fully funded for a while now. And that has drawn in many uninformed and misinformed investors, as it was designed to do.
They're at a halt risk every single day that they are delinquent and they are just now hiring a new accountant to get to work on financials?
Wow. I though Lance was supposed to be a go-getter. Everything went Effective two and a half weeks ago.
You mean just like the fully funded posts?
Yup, no proof. The difference is I'm not required to present proof of something that does not exist. It's up to the party making the claim that fully funded DD exists but doesn't actually provide said DD. Just says "Confirmed", when that is not the case at all.
It's not up to me to prove that something does not exist. It's upon the party making the claim that it does exist.
How tough is a screenshot? A quote? Anything?
Proof that something doesn't exist?
That's not how logic works. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim that the DD exists.
Just a screenshot, is that so much to ask? Who provided the funding? How much was it for? I would think investors should be given this information if it existed. But so far it does not. Just use of the word Confirmed, even though that does not seem to actually be the case at all.
It's not incumbent on me to prove that fully funded DD does not exist. It's on those making the claim that it does exist that need to prove it.
Just a simple screenshot of their DD and I would have to STFU, wouldn't I?
But it doesn't exist.
But I have looked out the window. Turns out it's actually raining even though I was told it's sunny and Confirmed.
I can't take screenshots of non-existent things.
Nope. I'm asking for proof that there is any DD to back up the fully funded claim. There doesn't seem to be. Just the word "confirmed" with absolutely nothing to back that up.
15 million bucks, per Desmarais himself.
And that's just for Phase 2, mind you. Things get even much more expensive if there is a Phase 3.
It's up the the party making the claim to prove it, not the party that is doubting that it even exists in the first place.
That's how logic works.
Strange that no fully funded DD can be presented.
Let's see some fully funded DD.
Bring it.
No, I do not have screenshots of things that do not exist. That's just kind of how the universe works.
But thanks for asking.
You got a screenshot or something? Anything?
Thank you for "confirming" that there is no DD behind the claim that Phase 2 is fully funded.
The truth sometimes hurts.
If there was, don't you think there would be quotes and screenshots posted?
But there don't seem to be any.
Just saying "confirmed" is proof of absolutely nothing.
I guess some are fans of the false claims that this traded on NASDAQ in the past. Some have even tried to go NYSE.
But all those claims are bogus. <Tears running down my face as I type that, obviously>
Negativity, yes. False, no.
Wasn't that the same source as the "no more than 1 million shares per day can be diluted"?
Oh look, an attempt to claim that this traded at $80 in the past. Which was since proven to be totally bogus, that was a split-adjusted price.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159282178
What have I posted that has been untrue?
Uh, "my friend", forgot to throw that doozie in there.