Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I’m sorry you feel the need to personalize things, but even ES says we’re way overdue. I don’t know as much about the OTC (learning fast!), but I understand strategic thinking and communication—and more often than not I have a correct assessment on situations long before the opinion is widely accepted and action is finally taken.
One might THINK that, but the reality in the 21st century is that SOCIAL MEDIA will generate a firestorm if demand NO MATTER WHAT. So they might as well get IN FRONT of this and shape the narrative the way they want it to be shaped.
Have they no concept of “kairos”? My sports teams drive me crazy—and now my favorite stock team?!
Just post it in your Twitter and show us that way
I know. Tim lost a TON—which is why I’m shocked that they’ve allowed so much to be given back by their failure to buttress the gains with JUST ONE strong PR! I will say again: they need someone to help them with strong comms skills.
“Indecision is actually the individual’s decision to fail.”
If true, we need class action against Schwab: no one else permits margin buying on OTCs!
“Only” 88%?! We love you, man. But we need some auxiliary reinforcements in here: they’re fighting with laser-guided missles and we’re trying to fend them off with catapults and crossbows!
Oh we did! But with us having so much of the float ALREADY locked, HOW did they do that?
Ummm, you do realize it just lost 20% and you were calling for .089 tomorrow? Hope springs eternal, my friend. They murdered us today.
I’m focused and firm—just thought I should’ve been able to buy MORE in margin.
TDA wouldn’t let me buy on margin—even though I have a margin account! They said not with “this kind of stock”
How does one confirm these sorts of things?
Bon voyage—and safe travels
So you’re saying it can’t be done? I LOVE a challenge
That’s what I suspected (this is my first foray into the OTC). I will simply create a process and tools to monitor their markets and constrain the MMs to be compliant—and then use the legal system and the SEC’s own policies to compel them to get SOME control. Watch and see
Doesn’t the SEC have auditors? One should DEFINITELY be assigned to monitor CELZ
And THAT is why REFORM is needed!
“We have the technology” (homage to 6 Million Dollar Man)
Would two store managers within the same company keep their jobs long if they shifted inventory back and forth between their stores to create the ILLUSION of sales?
Would two different companies in the same sector, behaving similarly, survive long on Wall Street once their game was found out?
Why should the stock market be ANY different? It would be laughably easy to tag transactions and the buyers/sellers conducting them in such a way as to create more clarity and legitimacy within the process. As in retail, the true measure is NEW business/customers/stores.
IT’S TIME—unless the exchanges want the public backlash and black eye from whatever feeble attempt to DEFEND this duplicity they might try to muster (I could create a REAL argument, given more than 5 minutes—but I think the essence is clear enough in what’s here). In this age of data and information there is ZERO legitimate reason not to address this problem.
The ONLY way to change that is to create irrepressible demand that leaves them no choice.
Until we CRIPPLE them, they will continue to abuse this stock. Last time we reached for .07, they drove it back down to .041 the SAME DAY. This time the low is higher, but they need to be dealt with once and for all, so that they move along to another stock. Sufficient heat is sorely needed—and in an instant that leaves them no warning and no recourse.
Gotta get some new LONG buyers if we’re gonna hope to blast these MMs outta the way a bit.
They are pulling out all the stops—but still appear incapable of keeping this beast all the way down. That’s because volume and demand are strong enough—what we REALLY need is something to blast their butts outta the way for a spell, a MOAB of sorts. Lol
I guess CSTI’s wall has wheels. Lmao. Now it’s at .0675–looks like last gasp attempt to prevent .07
They keep throwing back more shares to rebuild a wall at .066–and they kee getting gobbled up
They are ALL OVER THE MAP! I think they know they’re about to get bum-rushed
Now the bid is HIGHER than the ask. lol
Now they’ve updated to huge gap up. .0657
They also appear to be hiding the current BID—you can only see it in L2. Top-line view still shows bid of
.0635
Nice! Let us know your impressions. Wife was looking at that very cruise for our 10th anniversary in a couple years.
Where in Italy? The wife and I are planning a trip to Europe—perhaps sooner than we had originally imagined!
I also infer from the smaller number of MMs present that weaker hands in their ranks are opting to step outta line (perhaps in order to avoid getting trampled).
Watch L2 closely—MMs SERIOUSLY on the move! 175K share walls st .658 and .675, there 15 minutes ago, are GONE. Bid AND ask are currently at
.0658. Stay tuned....!
“Mr. MM—tear down this wall!”
I have read each of your posts, so many of those posted by others, and so much else since finding CELZ—it has all been truly enlightening and inspirational!
My persistent question is rooted in something semantic/definitional and relates to ONE simple argumentative premise (which may not even be true—I’m a non-scientist trying desperately to understand the basic rules of engagement in this professional arena): as I see it, “other” stem cells, by definition, involve cells from any other person than the recipient of those cells. In that case, only someone who was pregnant (or had been) could produce cells which only SHE could use if medically necessary. HOWEVER, I now understand YOU to be clarifying my apparent (overly-literal) misunderstanding: I think you are saying that because Amniostem cells are “UNIVERSAL,” even though they may derive from another person, they do NOT fall under FDA guidelines for additional regulation and oversight?
Thanks so much for all that you do!
Ok! And stem cells so collected are not considered as “coming from someone else”?
Ok—I think THIS is what I was referring to: does this not suggest taking cells from one person and giving to another? My understanding was that THIS would lead to more red tape with FDA. I TRUST what they are doing—but I also want to “understand what I own,” as they say.
Awesome news!!!!
ES, to your knowledge do any CELZ approaches involve altering an individual’s stem cells or using cells from OTHER individuals? My interpretation of something I read recently about Amniostem caused me to think that the stem cell methods were somehow different in this respect from CaverStem—which, as I understand it, does NOT involve cell alteration or cell’s from another person (and so FDA regulations are less pertinent). Thanks for helping us TRULY understand the science and the mechanics here!
For those of us who don’t work in (bio)medical research, can you explain the connection between these articles (involving non-CMTH researchers and physicians) and CMTH’s efforts at patenting and commercializing the techniques that it sells? Another example is the article Tweeted yesterday about CaverStem by Dr. Gershman (I think the doctors were Japanese). What is the typical progression at play here?