Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Dilution started when the Plan became Effective. Nothing to do with the case being Dismissed.
It has not been dismissed like the Desmarais case was.
Okay, I'm just making sure you know that bankruptcy case is still quite open and not dismissed. Others have been confused by that.
That was the Desmarais case that was dismissed, not the BRTX bankruptcy. I suggest you look closer at the information.
That was the other case that was dismissed. Makes no difference for putting out filings.
That was the other case that was dismissed.
See for yourself...
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BRTX/security
They are a year overdue already.
So 136 million fresh shares added to OS, straight to Unrestricted. Where's a dilution denier when ya need one amirite?
There were no t-trades after hours because they finished selling their blocks during the day. Those were the big cross trades that came through.
Those were cross trades, a sign of dilution/block selling. You can tell because of the sizes and that the prices were not in line with the Bid/Ask at the time.
It's not looking like a Coinbase reverse merger with JADA is in the works.
We expect the Form S-1 to become effective and for Coinbase to complete a public offering after the SEC completes its review process, subject to market and other conditions. This Tweet does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale.
— Coinbase 🛡️ (@coinbase) December 17, 2020
We expect the Form S-1 to become effective and for Coinbase to complete a public offering after the SEC completes its review process
45 days for 10-Q and 90 days for 10-K filing. They owe going back to the 12/31/2019 10-K which was due by 3/30/2020.
IPO's do not use existing shells, so no.
Coinbase IPO means no reverse merger with anyone, much less JADA.
And the SEC was fully aware they were in the middle of the bankruptcy yet nailed them anyway. For not filing financials....
I was told on this board that SEC would not bother stocks in bankruptcy, you know, "give them the time needed to get their act together"
Unfortunately that is just wishful thinking and is not actually based in fact.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159390565
Halted in the middle of a bankruptcy. And the SEC was fully aware they were in the middle of the bankruptcy yet nailed them anyway. For not filing financials....
SEC is not some kind caring compassionate benevolent soul like one would hope for when invested in a company that is a year late in filing. They should have been filing this whole time, bankruptcy or not.
SEC suspends companies all the time for failure to file. BRTX is a year behind in filings.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions.shtml
A like on a tweet is not "confirmation" of patent worth. Get real.
Anyone can verify the 300 billion for themselves.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BRTX/security
Out of curiosity, where did you hear about a supposed uplisting on the 16th? I would love to see that for myself.
I have made no claim about whether or not there will be a reverse split or when.
One would quite obviously be needed if they tried for a NASDAQ uplist. But there are also other requirements that the company is nowhere close to meeting at this time.
It's been 10 minutes and I don't seem to have been met with any type of argument, cogent or otherwise. Should I keep waiting? Or shall I put another notch in my lipstick case?
Here's a link to the case docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17007804/biorestorative-therapies-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Here's a link to all 35 pages in scanned form for the crowd demanding that format: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160026681
I shall await a reply with baited breath. Or maybe not with bait, that stuff stinks.
Wow, "proof" on a private chat where no dissenting opinion is allowed? What was the strength of this so-called "proof"?
There have been claims that the POR says "no RS". I have asked for proof and every time the issue just gets ignored or redirected.
There is no mention of "no RS" in the POR. And that is not an opinion, it is a fact. It would be easy to prove me wrong by just supplying anything to the contrary. But that has not occurred.
Show it to me.
Sadly, the "no RS" claim has no basis in reality.
I have made no claim as to whether a reverse split is impending or when.
Claims that the POR says there will not be one are bogus, though. Easily "confirmed" by actually reading it for ones self.
Okay, show me what I missed. Dare, dare.
How's that "there is "no RS" in the POR and I've seen it with my own eyes and will point it out" reply coming along?
Did I miss it somewhere?
Oops, looks like stories of t-trades being dead were exaggerated.
Unfrickingbelieveable, trying to weasel out AGAIN.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160026093
Just post screen shots of the POR for BRTXQ/BRTX
Mr. Buffett wasn't referring to the OTC. He doesn't play down here in the mud.
Just repeating that it's in there does not magically put it in there.
It's not in there. We've read it.
I suggest one learns what t-trades are.
Still waiting to be showed where in the POR it says "no RS" as promised... How's that coming along?
There is a hearing dealing with their landlord and lease payments on the 16th.
What have you been told would happen on that day?
The 16th is scheduled for a "Motion to Object/Reclassify/Reduce/Expunge Claims filed by BioRestorative Therapies" hearing. That is the extent of my firsthand knowledge, I have not myself delved into whichever filing led to Trader59's understanding of it. His post explains it's about their landlord and lease payments: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160047493. I have no reason do disbelieve him, he has been spot-on about everything so far.
BTW, if you want to confirm stuff for yourself, as you absolutely should, you can view the case docket for free at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17007804/biorestorative-therapies-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc.
All of the blue "Download PDF" boxes indicate those have already been paid for and are free to view. Others must be paid for, of course.
November 16 is where you can see the name of the December 16 hearing.