Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
WHY have they not 8-Ked the Amniostem news from last Friday???
Protect investment: LOCK ALL SHARES! Mine are GTC sells above $5
+1. Spot on
You deserve it!
Well they certainly didn’t seem as eager to drive it downward as they appear to have been recently (much less volatile—especially downward). Care to educate on how that works?
L2–looks like MMs are gonna manipulate badly again today, after taking yesterday off
So let’s review: a measly 1% of that market, under the current share structure, would create a PPS of $4-5. Yeah I’m good with it.
Isn’t this verifiable?
Well, the one from Friday was fairly strong (for anyone who wants to think about and extrapolate from what they said)—and yet we’ve traded flatly to slightly down. Normally one might argue that this was “already proved in”—but this cannot be the case here, given that there was no prior communication regarding this particular initiative...
Move the decimal at least once to the right
Funny wide spread. Feed NOT the spread!
Shake and bake: be not shaken
WOW—thanks for sharing THAT!
I recall reading something several weeks back that indicated that the trainer would remain on-site through the doctor’s first procedure. I left thinking that it was probably a 2-3 days tops process per site from beginning to end. Just my inferences here though. With this talk by some of a return below 3¢, we need NUMBERS on CaverStem that will get us above 10¢: that territory will remove from our midst a good segment of flippers, and will provide CRITICAL progress and expedite our journey toward dollarland (when we can leave the OTC behind for good!).
Here’s a link to a message by BB from about a month ago (CaverStem URLs to date)—btw, where IS BB?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141413081
“Good minds,” monte! I found this link and was about to post the text when I saw that you had done so. Here’s the link (for those who wish to read other related comments):
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139866407
Cool—thanks! Where can you see this kinda detail? I’d also be interested to compare the short volume on that day vs. short volume last Friday.
No—on that same day when it bottomed at .0415, what was the highest it rebounded to THAT DAY?
On that day two weeks ago (Friday, I think) when it hit .0415, what was the highest it rebounded to intraday?
Absolutely correct—about 1/4 of Thursday’s volume in one pop
With such a bold claim, would you provide some source reading?
So 4-hundredths of a cent (.0004), the difference between.0411 and .0415 says that it will go sharply down instead of sharply up? Yo me that seems like using charts as an analytical straitjacket. Most would say that these two points are close enough to being the same.
That has been my premise all along (for which I have been criticized)...
Didn’t know that. Maybe the same is true of some of the other sites I frequent (news only appears when 8-Ked
Agreed. As soon as they release details of how many doctors are signed for CaverStem (we’ve heard of 40+ city-specific URLs, and one poster here has contacts with a urologist who is already performing upwards of 5 procedures per DAY!) then this will pop to 10¢, imo.
Is that particular chart visible on the TDA app?
I’m thinking that many sites (including iHub) don’t post news until it appears “officially” in an 8-K. That was the case with the last one regarding CaverStem International, LLC—WE all found it a day or two before CELZ’ 8-K on the topic hit the wire.
Correct—they are a helpful part of a COMPOSITE strategy
Like I said earlier: good luck to insurance companies (and big pharma) trying to argue in favor of keeping patients weak and emaciated when an alternative arises...
I wouldn’t say it’s lost or wasted—they’re clearly committed and will ride this to the top. I for one feel fortunate to have found them, this group, and this stock!
Blessings and prayers on and for you all, doc
I intend (not intend)
Potentially huge (not hug)
They (not the)
Sorry a lot to write on my phone (too lazy to get up from my recliner on Friday night!).
Intend to be skeptical like you, my ramblin friend. Here’s what I see in today’s news—a HUGE potential for the FUTURE that Amniostem portends. As I read it, this is an “add-on” to the already existing patent for Amniostem: kudos to the CELZ team for seeing a potentially hug and unexpected opening just ONE MONTH ago when President Trump signed the “right to try” order. These CELZ scientists are VERY cautious and circumspect: the already know that Amniostem will do what they think it should, and in the ways that the FDA requires—otherwise they (a) wouldn’t waste their time and (b) wouldn’t announce it. If you’ve ever had a loved one suffer through chemo and radiation for cancer, you know how real (and sad) cachexia is. Now here’s the MOST beautiful part (at least as I see things): because an emaciated body fights less capably than a more robust one, I see a HUGE potential for insurance coverage of Amniostem for this medical indication (providing again that it develops, both medically and procedurally, in the ways that the CELZ scientists expect it will). Therefore, good luck to insurance companies trying to argue in favor of maintaining weak and emaciated patients, when this alternative is available.
Pfizer (PFE) current MC: $207B. So yeah, I think it’s VERY conservative to imagine that CELZ, given CaverStem and Amniostem alone, could reach $3-5 PPS=$2-3.4B market cap by early 2020. And bear this in mind: PFE is only ONE of the tickers that CELZ is preparing to “disrupt” (however slightly)...
Precisely. That’s why I’m having a VERY hard time (even as I try to be critical, conservative, and skeptical: underpromise and overperform, right?) not seeing this stock at (minimally) $3-5 PPS by earlier 2020.
The worst of what we say yesterday seems due to buyers with large “stop loss” orders at 5¢ (even though we were just there and the MMs are NOTORIOUS for shaking the tree and creating 1-2 cent swings INTRADAY. I think is safe to say that at least half of the shares sold yesterday and today are in stronger hands (with longs who LOCK them). This may account for fact that the lowest we saw today (almost identical to the low LAST Friday, though I’m on my phone and operating from memory), around
.0415, bounced high and hard (unlike last Friday, when it ended down somewhere between 15-20%) and rose to around .053. Fairly low volume, massive selling by weaker and uncommitted hands, followed by rapid rise—all show huge strength by CELZ.