Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
On such low volume? does it matter if we close a bit lower or a bit higher?
specul8,
call Lawrence at CYGX for a proper discourse on financing....LO has made many false accusations regarding CYGX and financing (moreso on RB)....don't waste your time with him. As a number of people have said...ignore him.
Welcome TheGame,
just a warning, you will get many opinions here...always verify what you hear...some people are dependible, some are truly not....any questions can be answered by calling the company itself, they are very receptive to any calls....alot of people here say stuff, both positively and negatively, without calling....
as far as the bacteria work goes...yes it is truly exciting, but the herpes results (of which clinical trials set to start in India) will give the faster results, farther along the line of progression towards a marketed product....
bacteria is still pre-clinical....
nigel,
why all the hostility? relax,
I did not read a NEW Hemco agreement, where did you get that?
Thanks,
would it have been possible for an arrangement to be in place which stipulated that CYGX had the right to buy back the shares at a future time?
but why for so little?
hanuman,
I would not take anything Larry says too seriously, but if he is right on this point, hell, even a broken clock is right twice a day.....
can I ask, why do you ask? seriously.
I agree....also, some are selling 500 shares, in the hopes that others will panic, sell now and make it easy for those that want cheap shares to get some....I think announcements are on the way....as per Malcolm's interviews, and I think they will be soon.....obviously not pumping, just repeating what malcolm said....
to no one in particular......
http://www.modimes.org/pnhec/188_716.asp
please read the second paragraph...last line....
it explains alot....
arnold, no prob....we should combine as I know the science, but am ignorant in business.....
just because Larry calls you friend, doesn't make it so,..
chipped2003
can someone contact chipped2003 and suggest he remove Larry for good? I am not talking about a Soprano hit, just off this board....he makes everyattempt to discredit anoyone who says anything against his agenda, beligerantly, kind of tired of it...
Archinla, as far as Arnold being a basher, I disagree, he has some points regarding the company, should be heard....
I guess some bashers jsut won't follow the guidelines for bashing....for example, #19
http://www.messageboardfools.com/bashers.htm
I apologize to the board again,
who am I to post the truth when there sure are other avenues to follow....forgive me
as far as true lies, man I loved that movie....
I thought so, I will chalk it up to his lies again, my fear was he made a profile with my name and started making stuff up. Thanks all.
oh yes, and please post my pumping comments, at my age I tend to forget what I wrote....
Dear board,
does anyone know of a yahoo board on CYGX? Thank you,
mayby you can help me larry, please post the link to the board. I would gladly talk to you there, but not here, nor on RB.
yahoo quotes lists the daily volume, and the current average....
no price increase that I see.....my guess it will stay in this general area without a specific funding anouncement.....
as far as the new meeting goes, no problem with it....I will vote my shares as always.....
I agree with archinla,
forget the loser....believe me, as he has called me everyname in the book, and then some, yet I do not respond to him....
I really hope one of the products targets lies.....hmmmmm, interesting thought
I emailed you his reponse, but until now, it is just hand waving....a little concrete evidence would be nice....
suky,
did lawrence talk about financing at all? I too think that is the only thing holding this back....once it is released, away we go....
Paulness, the volume on the site you list, says 0, is it just not listed? do you have another site that lists the german exchange?
sorry, don't follow german exchange....
how many shares were traded?
truthfully, depends on the journal, and how many issues are put out a month....once, twice, weekly...etc.....
not to mention throw in human tendency to wait until the last moment to review the papers, it could take a long time or a short time, depending where they submit.....
perhaps someone should email the company and ask where the data was/will be submitted?
I pretty much agree with that statement, I think the company is confident it will work, but there are never any guarantees...
once again, as someone did post here before, what happens in animals doesn't technically follow in humans, but I have to agree with Suky on this one....I think (hope) it will be successful....
neo,
larry is deliberate in his attempt to discredit the company....but then again, I have been labeled Pumper #1
I think it has something to do with the fact that whatever is posted in the newsletter is not new.....
more importantly, when the financing news comes out (and I say WHEN not IF), that will make it move....
also, does anyone know who gets the e-street newsletter? if not many people get it, then it will not impact the price. Also, if no new people get it, the same old people I think are not going to buy much more of CYGX until the $$$ comes.
don't know much about it, but I think it is used for reduction of fat....inject into mesoderm, ....not a good way to disseminate CYGX plasmid, unless you want hundreds of injections....
my guess is CYGX is using some liposomal vector, but I don't know..... that is why the first paper should be very interesting, technically.
arnold, there is a new post on RB with your name in it...
great post holy cow,
pesonally,IMHO, I think the herpes tests were and will be successful, but I am more interested in the oncology aspects, as this would be a more difficult problem to tackle...I would like to see some data on the lung cancer studies...
I have no problem with differences of opinion, but lies, and the quantity of them, were annoying., as far as the personal attacks on me, hell, I am the youngest of 4 boys, I have taken much worse than he could ever dish out....I hope the SEC does go after him.
Suky, I agree, we should all just not reply to him. and I have juut reported him to the SEC, it was nice to get the response of:
Thank you!
This response confirms that the Division of Enforcement of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has received your complaint.
That is why I asked if there was a governing body to whom I could report his lies....
suky,
as you know, CYGX technology is not antisense...yes it works via antisense...but is not antisense, in the classical sense...(get the pun?)
classical antisense utilizes naked DNA, and is injected into the bloodstream, or intramuscularly,....the biggest issue with that is the degredation of the antisense....very unstable....they are now making modifications to the DNA backbone that allow it to survive longer....but still an issue....
CYGX technology is vastly superior and different....once again, it is a plasmid, that is delivered in some vector (a carrier for the plasmid), that once into the cell, no matter how little gets in, creates ssDNA INTRACELLULARLY... in a large quantity, then the antisense phenomenon takes over, silencing the desired RNA.
As far as ignoring Larry, I just don't respond to him. I have him ignored on RB, but not here, I just don't respond to him. I just listen to his lies.
I am not a business man, so I ask the board, is there any way that he can get in trouble, I mean legally for telling all the lies? I know about insider trading, but does the opposite exist? In other words, if I report him to the authorities for his lies, can he get in trouble?
Arnold,
I wouldn't respond to larry, just ignore him...most people do, as I have now done, although he now sends me private messages..... Everything he writes is filled with half truths and outright lies...I wouldn't worry about what he writes.
as far as publishing, two years time to publish is a very long time, most peer review journals have about a 3 - 4 month initial review, then if accepted it gets published within 2 -3 months....if not accepted, it can be rejected outright, or rejected with the option of resubmision, if some of the reviewers concerned are addressed (typically 2 - 3 reviewers), once you re-submit, another 2-3 months before publishing....
to the board...
I am glad to see that everyone here can recognize a humungous load when they see it.....please, call the company with any questions...better yet, email them. They give direct answers...truthfull answers.....and they are more than willing to tell those that lie about them that they are full of a big heaping load of crap...I checked, and they are doing great....ask arnold, ask suky, ..time is our friend...some posters aren't.
have a great memorial day....
http://www.preclinica.com/content/articles/frame.asp?issue=0703&article=09
nice read....
the problem is the amount that gets in....CYGX bypasses that...
the poster is misinformed
delivery to deep seeded tissues yes, but not to skin, and the issue with past delivery problems has been the amount of DNA that gets in for the desired effect....CYGX circumvents this by having a vector that creates ssSNA intracellularly...that means when just a little gets in, the vector produces more than enough ssDNA for its desired effect....
so please no more talk of the delivery problem...the only delivery problem is of CYGX getting to the right ears for financing, and financing the company properly.
This stock will move, in time...hopefully sooner than later.
Happy holiday everyone.