Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Tothe, this is awesome having an internet chatter inquiry chart!
Thanks thestocks, awesome chatter on INQD!...
NP kizmyarse and GLTU...
Tim, please pm me on this subject, thank you...
Thanks tothe!
Patience Grasshoper! Consider who's resume is added to this!
International CPA firm takes charge! Specializing in Private Placements, IPO's, M&A's and Reverse Mergers!
http://www.wwccpa.com
https://www.linkedin.com/company/wwcpc
Great answer Lakota!...
Digger, thanks for the news update, .24 is HUGE!
Dilution last month under 100,000 shares, compared to 300,000 million per month! It's done and the goose is cooked! Up 85% in two days trading, tomorrow should continue up and if more fins it's "well you know the rest of the story"
BP
Agree DS, Gratia Ventures is another possible merger!
Thanks jaiguruji, have a great day!
You have a point there, but I bank on Leslie Bocskor crossing one bridge at a time. Completing this Fincann merger and reward the long shareholders with liquidity. Fincann should have a decent balance sheet, bringing assets into the merger.
I'm looking forward to many more M&A's and I'm sure he will complete one at a time. Hopefully he already has them worked out and they will all happen with little delay.
Leslie Bocskor's resume is very impressive and believe we will be richly rewarded beyond our wildest dreams!
After initial M&A's completed, I can see this investment in one year or less trading at .50!
Thanks for your thoughts, always a pleasure chatting with you!
GLTU,
BP
GOT FINCANN!
Even higher than 007 if we see more financials!
Thanks tothe, do you see a problem with them having an agreement without signing and filing with the SEC. I believe they wanted to keep it confidential, due to the fact that Electrum Partners was orchestrating and advising the Fincann merger.
On another note, Tangiers Global got a huge piece of the action. INQD has no revenue to speak of and all the money's raised from the sales of 1 Billion plus shares went toward the Fincann merger IMO. Also a 10,000 promissory note with Electrum Partners, tells me the funds ain't going into INQD's account.
10-Q's should start revealing where the funds got applied to.
What are your thoughts on the total funds (3-4 Million) raised in the last four months and where they maybe getting applied to.
BP
Yes, but the ADVISORY AGREEMENT was not executed. Check edgar and you will see!
Move on and stop whining, Man Up and pay the piper .004 Monday AM
Don't make me laugh, I posted this contract months ago and asked tothe what he thought because it was never executed, no signatures. Also checked all of Electrum Partners filings and they did not execute this ADVISORY AGREEMENT. Maybe because they had bigger plans, you think?
Also Electrum partners invested $360,000 into another company last year and made other investments. They are broke, don't make me laugh! You keep up the false accusations of Electrum Partners and Indoor Harvest, you may find yourself in a court room.
Better get back in before it's too late and stop the nonsense!
Man up and pay the piper .004
GLTU,
BP
.05 when the STOP SIGN comes down! Thanks Killa
I agree, I will get my cheapies on Monday!
I agree Killa...
That's right Cowboy, Fincann Merger in progress, 10-K out now, notes paid off, hardly any dilution last month and all documented.
To shout out SCAM with no explanation, proof (documents) then it's just an opinion thats going nowhere.
Expecting the rest of the financials to be released this week.
GLTY,
BP
Lakota, do you think it was a coincidence that no more shares issued for WDLF and INQD? Both had huge investments from Tangiers Global and convertible notes that are now gone. They also own a lot of shares that should show up in the financials.
It looks like it may all be coming together for both companies.
News also on the horizon for WDLF?
GLTU,
BP
I did say, "Note Holders First" then Boom! We just seen the new updated OS and nothing to speak of. Financials started out on Thursday, we are heading to the moon! https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157557254
I think some MM's definitely want to hold this back as long as they can to accumulate more shares. They seen the 10-K and know they will be left behind and short shares. That's why they shorted even more on Friday! They are rolling the dice, and thinking Leaslie Bocskor won't follow through with the rest of the financials and he will space the filings out to give them time to acumulate more. MM's got caught with their pants down on thursday mornings 10-K filing. I am banking on Leslie Bocskor following through next week with filings and press releases. He knows the importance of completing everything before starting to release filings and press releases. Leslie Bocskor comes from Wall Street and if he doesn't know this, no one does!
Did you see how fast the hounds were let out the gate! they are here for one reason only, shake the tree! They know INQD will run like a freight train when the Merger takes place. They know ticker and name change coming and they will be scrambling to cover and buy back the 6.2 million shares from friday and possibly more Naked shorted shares.
The hounds don't own shares, why else would they be working early Saturday morning. Someones paying them to post negative to tone down the buying.
I believe they are in for a rude awakening come Monday!
GOT FINCANN!
Sprinter, I agree. They had 1/10th the OS of INQD and went over $2.00 on the Fincann news. In all farenese we could run to .25.
Your thoughts?
BP
Thanks BDEZ!
$INQD @fincanncorp October will be one for the books.. Of course, IMO pic.twitter.com/Dme4G755Jy
— BEAUMAN (@bowzachary) October 2, 2020
Fact! Finra report from 09/15/20 don't cut it! We want to see whats going on now! Easy to cover shorts right before Finra Report is updated! This clearly shows the shorts are at it again and shorting 6.2 million on Friday! https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/indoor-harvest-pk-INQD/trades
FACTS! 6.2 million shares unaccounted for yesterday!
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/indoor-harvest-pk-INQD/trades
100% agree staw, have a great weekend!
Same thoughts here, have a great weekend!
Nice close at .0036, up 24%, up 85% last two days!
The name change should also come IMO...
Naked Shorts an issue too!
Re: Name change -> CUSIP change -> Short Squeeze?
It appears a name change forces naked shorts to be covered.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82107281
The question: "Would a CUSIP change make the short shares have to cover?"
Seems from what I have read, a CUSIP change could force the cover of NSS positons if the change is done in conjunction with a name change. It is my understanding that the mechanics of the CUSIP change (with name change) would effectively prevent trading shares of the old CUSIP # and would create an entirely new set of shares through the DTC. By doing this, the DTC is forced to account for ALL of the old shares exchanged for the new shares. Without the name change, the old shares would simply be renamed. With the name change, they are physically exchanged which will isolate phantom shares and force covering.
At this point, I believe the broker who sold the Phantom Shares would be responsible for making good on the transaction. Perhaps the broker would force a squeeze in the NEW CUSIP shares in order to cover. The price again would spike as the broker(s) who were guilty of selling counterfeits made good through the new market.
Here is a conversation that occurred with the CUSIP Service Bureau:
...The CUSIP Service Bureau rep stated that a CUSIP # change "usually" comes with a name change, but not always. He stated that a name change will "always" come with a CUSIP # change though. He told me that the "name change" and the "CUSIP # change" starts with the company's Transfer Agent (TA) coordinating electronically with the CUSIP Service Bureau by linking the company's name and address. Then the CUSIP Service Bureau Coordinates with the Depository Trust Company (DTC).
The DTC will serve as the overseer to coordinate with the regulatory authorities and/or agencies whomever as deemed necessary. Sometimes the TA will coordinate with the DTC too for certain confirmations or transactions as deemed necessary. The DTC makes sure there is proper share accountability for proper dissemination into our brokerage accounts. This is all done electronically.
After the company/TA receives their new CUSIP # from the CUSIP Service Bureau, the company/TA (& legal team) then coordinates with the NASDAQ and SEC for the already coordinated amount of shares as the new inventory. The company/TA will then coordinate with the DTC to confirm the amount of shares and other key info.
After accountability is confirmed by the DTC, the DTC then authorizes the brokerage companies to change all old CUSIP numbers to the new CUSIP numbers electronically within our brokerage accounts. A CUSIP# change is not enough from what most believe throughout the investing/trading community to force a covering of a naked shorted position in my opinion...
The CUSIP Service Bureau further explained it as when stock 1234 changes its name and CUSP# to stock 5678, the shares of stock 5678 are given to them electronically by the TA to replace stock 1234. This is the key transaction. If only a CUSIP # change transpires then a lesser type of accountability takes place. The name change matching the address of the company is what actually forces an exchange of the "old inventory" of shares to the "new inventory" of shares. Without the name change, there is NOT a "movement of shares" from the TA that takes place.
Only one phase of the accountability process is required to take place to verify accountability when only a CUSIP # change transpires because of the lack of not having a creation of the "new inventory" of shares by the company/TA. Therefore no movement of shares takes place. This is a simple misunderstanding by many companies, but if not considered, it could be the difference for any type of forced covering of any naked shorted positions.
If there is NO DILUTION, a covering of the naked shorted positions should take place due to what's revealed during the accountability process between the DTC after getting the "new inventory" of shares from the CUSIP Service Bureau if there is not only a CUSIP# change, but a name change too.
Because of the CUSIP # change, the MMs will be required to account for each of the old shares with the new shares. Because of the name change, it's important because it forces the DTC to play a more finite role by not only accounting for the old shares to equal the new shares electronically, but forces them to match a "new inventory" of shares that have been given to them from the CUSIP Service Bureau as the new official/approved inventory by way of the shares given from the company/TA.
Start here and I will get you more info... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=135149179