Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Per recent filings: "...comparing key financial results from the third quarter of 2023 to key financial results from the second quarter of 2023, including: total net revenue increased 48% to $1,162,631, compared to $786,489; operating expenses decreased 24% to $535,860 compared to $707,529; net loss decreased 40% to $215,065, compared to $359,766; total liabilities decreased 16% to $9,255,638, compared to $11,005,895; and operating income of $88,819 compared to operating loss of $405,819."
Seems pretty bullish, IMO.
Could it be about time for a pop?
Still pink limited. What gives?
Still holding fast, it seems.
Is another reverse/split on the horizon?
Robbin'-the-hood probably even shorts their own stock.
Wen moon? Where lambo?
Time to raise dat $BOTY?
True. Still lower highs and lower lows.
Still on the so-called expert market, eh?
Agreed, LOL.
Per today's 8-K., a change of control occurred. What happens next?
I thought you were saying that $1.10 was the bottom, but not just for that specific day.
Bid jumped briefly to $0.0004. Interesting...
Plenty of corrupt companies in a corrupt market overseen by corrupt regulators controlled by corrupt politicians in a corrupt government in a world full of evil, so there's not much hope of justice being served any time soon, unfortunately.
As KILLAZILLA correctly indicated, OTC stocks incur the $6.95 fee. Furthermore, TDA is owned by Schwab.
Who keeps trading 1 share? Schwab charges $6.95 per OTC transaction, so it can't be retail.
Same here. GLTY!
No different than most stocks in that regard... voting process is just a pretense for shareholders while the executives simply do whatever they want to. Ridiculous. It's just uncommon to propose a R/S at such a high PPS, right?
Why would the company do yet another R/S at the current PPS, which as of yesterday was $6.45?
The third of three options for shareholders to vote on regarding the annual meeting on 11/22/23 is:
3. To approve of one or more amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, to effect one or more reverse stock splits of the Company's issued common shares at a ratio of not less than one-for-two and not more than one-for-250 and in the aggregate at a ratio of not more than one-for-250, inclusive.
Yeah, I've been in it for about two years as a long bagholder. If it gets to $0.10, I'll average down a bit. Otherwise, I'll just wait indefinitely. Thanks for the good wishes.
Not sure what will happen or when. The PPS is still waaay below my average so I'll just be chilling until whenever.
I'm down 91.13%, even with patiently averaging down. Sure, the timing of my entry was off but that was back when I bought into all of the lip service years ago. At this point, I don't believe a single thing the mismanagement team says (or doesn't say during quiet periods) because I've learned that words are merely words. This company has done very little in terms of action. It's always "liquidity event soon" or "it's right around the corner"...etc. Ergo, I'll wait to average down one final time at $0.0001 and dump this hot garbage during the next spike. No pumping or bashing from me regardless of the outcome, as I'm dead neutral in terms of sentiment. I just want to be out of this stock ASAP.
Which changes did you notice on that page?
Check the daily chart for 7/3/23, precisely 12:46pm. PPS went from $0.0001 to $0.002 with a volume of ~600K in just a minute, supposedly. Now why it did so, I have no clue. However, I've seen plenty of other stocks do similar short-term spikes out of the typical range for seemingly no reason whatsoever.
[Sweaty] Captain Kirk: "Steady as she goes..." The bid appears to be rising, little by little. Bullish or bearish, them's the facts.
True! 1,369,200 @$0.0004 bid is not much support relative to resistance 14,288,000 @$0.0005 ask. Could no-bid/$0.0001s be right around the corner as the bottom falls out from underneath this potential pump-and-dump? Time will tell.
You and me both. I have endless patience.
Sounds pretty darn bullish. I started investing in $CYAP about two years ago and have been periodically dollar-cost averaging down ever since then. I'll hold for as long as it takes.
Thanks. I'll check it out right now.
Yep, I figured that would constitute dilution for WDLF shareholders, unfortunately. It is what it is. Not thrilled about it given where the PPS has been, but there's not much longs can do about it. I would prefer a CEO that can just openly admit to it being dilution rather than resorting to lip service in order to deceive and con, but whatevs.
Thanks. For anyone wondering, it's at 00:09:37 specifically. I'm assuming that converting shares in that manner could be considered as dilution for WDLF shareholders but at least MjLink shareholders won't be left with nothing. It's whatever at this point as far as WDLF and its constituents are concerned. Ken has switched gears quite a bit and that makes him seem dishonest and inconsistent but I get it... these are uncertain times and companies need to pivot often. All of these unnecessary wars and this junk economy with high interest rates aren't helping matters either.
As far as Ken, I simply don't care for his pompous attitude and disdain for forum members (even long shareholders) that express doubt or reservations about the company's direction and recent inconsistencies. However, I do give him credit for doing the Q & A presentation and for answering the questions that were asked. I always did appreciate his articulation of speech, but I just don't care for him as a CEO or person in general. Too smug for my tastes, but I'm long so I guess I'll be here for a while to see how it all turns out. GLTY and everyone else here.
Am I remembering that correctly though that MjLink shares will get converted into WDLF shares?
Isn't that the plan? I'm not trying to mis/disinform anyone but wasn't it stated during the most recent Q & A session that MjLink shares will get converted into WDLF shares?
Hmmm... that's unfortunate.
Unlike a few on your list, I refuse to profit from ill-gotten gains. But hey, that's just me. Because morals.
The bias that perhaps shapes my perception is to be bullish (I'm long) but NOT foolish (worshipping the CEO) or deceptive (disinforming others for the sake of ill-gotten gains). You know, because morals.
In addition to what you've said, Ken is often condescending. Remind you of any others? The students became like their teacher, I suppose. Ken scoffed quite a bit with an arrogant smirk during the latest Q & A session, as if even thehawk72 was wasting Ken's precious time near the end with such trivial questions. Great questions, by the way, thehawk72; I wondered the same. Ken apparently doesn't think highly of forums like this or forum members (even long shareholders) in general based on the response. Rather than open discourse, he seems to prefer a shareholder network (echo chamber) where he can control the narrative by removing any dissenting opinions. Methinks that since the mismanagement team, uhm... mismanages, they're looking for an easy way to quickly generate revenue such as through a lawsuit. Why not sue long bagholders such as myself or others here that post in forums, right? Salt in the wounds with so much class!
Threatening to sue shareholders in forums is grimy. He doesn't even make a distinction between the types of shareholders he would pursue. For instance, I watched every podcast and read the filings ever since I first started investing as a bullish long years ago. I have since then noticed inconsistencies between the lip service delivered to retail shareholders and the lack of follow through. The primary reason for me shifting sentiment from bullish to neutral was that the mismanagement team never seemed to adopt any personal responsibility for the company's lack of revenue and consequentially the declining share price. Rather, they blamed the market, legislators, congress, shareholders, and most recently forum members. With threatening to sue forum members (even long investors) for throughtcrimes against the totalitarian state, I'm starting to get a double-plus-ungood feeling about this company. We now have informants that report to Big Brother about anything mentioned that conflicts with the Ministry of Truth. It's all simply reprehensible behavior. I dreadfully regret ever trusting or having faith in this company and its leaders, but at least valuable lessons were learned. Investing in this company is a mistake that I own along with devalued shares, and I will certainly take the wisdom gained from the experience and make better investment decisions in the future.