Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly .. Chung worked for the University who paid for all the research and development .. not Chung .. guess who is going to be in deep doo doo ?
Hookem what you going to do when you find out that Tubercin is not owned or controlled by Chung .. but by the University that paid for all the research and did all the work on it ... LMAO
Do you think King went all the way to S.Korea to only speak with Chung .. no way ....
What is going to shock you is the lawsuit that is being filed in South Korea to shut it all down ...
Rmarc... WATCH
Hookem .. no money to pay for Pacer ? ... now who is laughing !!!!!!
We can call it . Tuber"cin" possession of HTDS and Tuber"cin" not in possession by ATKJ .. quess you don't have access to Pacer do you Hookem .. LMAO
Hookem better check your Pacer .. don't cry little girlie
Rmarc .. guess you haven't seen Pacer then yet today have you ..GO HTDS
Sorry Nano .. I think it is you who does not have a clue .. you shall see soon enough... ATKJ has at this time tubercin in a very limited application ... only for CANCER and specific types only .... and has a termination clause .. this will never go forward .. EVER... HTDS reclaims tubercin soon .. Special Master working and Dixon soon to be enlightened by the antics
Hookem you did not respond to the one question that was simple to answer .. your posts have no releavance at all and are poorly written ..
Nano .. sorry my friend . you are wrong .. Chung holds the patents only for the substance--- yes .. but not all the applications for such .... ATKJ is limited only to Cancer use and probably limited only to specific types of Cancer .. its going to be a nothing event in that case ... your CEO has no application patents for use of the Tubercin .. thats truly so awful
Hookem .. Chung owns only the Patents but has no control over the use of the tubercin .. have you not read the LICENSE ? .. and .... according to gknight he is being followed and watched .. and atkj is not even a pinkie ... you need to find out how it is classified before it gets totally delisted from all radar screens ...
I don't think Eric is very fond of ATKJ .. or Shinn .. or Knight .. I think he is fond of HTDS .. and I think he has a lot of documents ....
Hookem .. you know Eric Schopfer ? .. Nice guy with lots of documents ..... hmmmm
We need to know Hookem .. I am sure Dixon will see your posts about the hidding of evidence and shredding .. should prove to be very good for the shareholders of HTDS as there is a restraining order upon doing such things ... people are being watched .. just ask Gerry
Hookem you can tell us now or later .. what is your connection with the legal offices representing shinn and knight ?
With all that PHD money why have you not bought a share in the last month . ATKJ has traded zippo for six months ? .... if you think its going to dollars ... as you state .. I will tell you why ... YOU KNOW I AM RIGHT and it scares the hell out of you
Not Lame Hookem ... Tubercin can only be used in specific types of Cancer .. ATKJ does not hold an application for any other use .. not for pain .. not for arthritis .. not for HIV ... not for infections, or bird flu .. NOTHING
NO .. not enough said .. The courts will award to HTDS .. and ATKJ only has Tubercin for specific types of Cancer .. not for any other application ... that is GiVEN!!!
Hookem .. where is your promised Ricks ruling by the August date .. believe it is another month down the road .... you have nothing to add to this board other than nonsense ... Ricks rules for HTDS .. then watch for the punitive against for a malicious lawsuit .... she can only rule one way and thats in favor of HTDS .. as Offil did not respond!!!
Hookem .. the board is for constructive analysis .. you refuse to answer simple questions for all to understand and play Na na nana nano instead .. that's ok .. I didn't expect anything more from your PHD types
Hookem .. lets play this game .... answer just one question at a time .. do you think you can play nicely with others and do such ? ... 1) WHY DID HURLEY ONLY ALLOW 350 MILLION SHARES RATHER THAN 530 MILLION SHARES TO BE AWARDED POTENTIALLY UPON REQUEST TO SHINN.. THIS IS NOT VERBALLY DISCUSSED IN HIS OPINION .. DO YOU KNOW WHY ?
Hookem ... there are no lies ... everything I have posted is based on public information and documents ... and is clearly before you ..... You just prefer to be selective in your review ... but I would not be here if I was no confident of the end result ... some are very leary of the legal system .. the "smoking guns" HTDS has in its possession currently make this a shut and closed case for HTDS victory .. when you are spoon fed such information .. you will go oh my god ........................... You might want to let Dr.Chung know .... the monies he received from HTDS ok and t-19 via Shinn and not Shinn Capital .... We coming for !!!!!
Jammer .. Knight will be the first to run ... he already has even though he doesn't realize it quite yet with his submission to the courts of his recent document signed with Shinn without legal representation for the submission of such ... already pointing fingers at Offil
Hookem .. will you say that when you have the proof before you or will you hide ... or will you join someone in the pen ?
Ask yourselves ... why did Dixon have to appoint a special master ... what will the special master have to say and what will be contained in his report back to Dixon .... The motion to Compel and the Interoggatories not being answered .. this should really concern all of you ... there are reasons why these are not being answered ... I know why .. do you ? ..... Hookem another thing for you here sweetheart .... Shinn and Knight have to keep ALL corporate records for 7 years ... all the originals that where submitted to courts have to be available ... now why in the world would HTDS want to see original documents ?
Nano .. you wan't to know what Chung got .. he received monies from HTDS OK and T-19 that are unaccounted for ... money that came from the preffered shareholders .... the same ones mentioned in the Nov 2003 letter ..... Now for Hookem ... do you know what a "smoking gun" is ? ... I do .. HTDS already has several "smoking guns" .. we are just rounding up extra ammunition now with the Motion to Compel and the Special Master .. did you not read the brief submitted to the Appeals committee about the discovery that was NOT given in the Federal Court Case that GKnight gave to King . Just that one piece of paper changes Hurley Decision but that is by no means the Bomb I have referred to in the past ...... Nano .. obviously you have not ever reviewed the documents I suggested .. the license , the sublicenses, the sea ... the entire exhibit file .... the briefs and additional discovery ...... Ask yourselves today .. why on page Three of the recent Pacer document is it notated that OFFIL refused to sign the Special Master Order and then also ask yourselves why did KNIGHT and Shinn directly submit paperwork to the courts rather than thru the required legal council ... if you don't know why ... I can assure you .. that I know why ..... Read Rule 60 .... Rule 60 trumps an APPEAL .... and especially when the very same Judge has notated lies and Frauds in his opinion ..... Tubercin will become the full property only of HTDS based on DD of Public Documents .. Rmarc .. have you reviewed these yet ?
Hookem . that speaks volumes for the people running your company .. they would have already destroyed it .. of course they would not destroy it if they didn't have control over the possession of such .. you have no clue what I am talking about .. but soon you cry
Why lose all your play money . take the time and look at the documents .. read the brief filed by Arrastia to the appeals court .. don't hang you hat on .. almost all appeals are affirmed . because this case is going to blow your mind and all your play money ...
That is such a brillant post Nano .. you deserve to lose all your money with that kind of post ... at least I bring factual information to the table .. If you get out the documents .. you will see the factual information before you ..
Nano . you started this board .. what are you going to say .. when the "truth" comes out and we where here to try and share the truth but you shut the door .. then what will you say ? .. you know that has real possiblity and probability don't you ?
I know exactly what was done ... special master will soon enough also .. should be a very enlightening information gathering event .... then watch out .. it goes nuclear
Rule 60 trumps Hurely .. The rule 60 will save some face for Hurley .. still major issues in his final opinion ...thats enough for today .. plenty to think on guys
Are you familiar with a letter in the public documents in Nov of 2003 .. after Shinn says he resinded a SEA ... that states ... how are we going to tell the preferred shareholders in Hawaii mainly about our plans to go forward ....and how sensitive the issue would be for those shareholders .... and are you aware that not all of the Directors signed an agreement for the recision of the SEA on the date told to the courts ? ... there where still officers on record as of that date ... and for many weeks further ... I suggest you get a complete copy of the court records and exhibits ...
Nano .. you don't get it .. read the License yourself .. the License given to the courts says only Shinn can cancel ... and that Chung can never cancel ... however in Hurely's opinion he err's by saying that Dr.Chung could cancel the License ... now that I have made that very clear to you .. I will let you come up with all the possible reasons for that error either by Hurley .. or whether there is something else to consider .... Nano .. you need to get your documents together .. you may as well do it now .. because I can guarantee you .. you are not going to like what you see when it gets spoon fed to you .. and it is my opinion .. that all Shinn has ever done is rescind a SEA .. he never terminated a sublicense in any way ..... show me the document that terminates a sublicense ..... and the exact sublicense ..... also it doesn't matter if Hurely says it is terminated .. it is not up for interpretation .. it is and has to be factual .... and thus the reason for an appeal ... but better yet .... a Rule 60 trumps an appeal ..
Let me give you another clue here .. Hurley also in error .. stated that Chung could cancel .. if you look at the license .. between chung and shinn capital it is very clear that only Shinn can cancel .. Is that what Dr.Chung believed to be the case when he signed it ? .. why did Hurley get this wrong in his opinion ? .. I know .. do you ?
rmarc .. that is an assumption you are making is it not ? ... obviously you have not looked at the "multiple" SA's have you ... how about the one's with Gatlin .. or with others ? ... what if there is something else in the boxes that the special master is looking for ... hmmm
rmarc .. what would your comment be if there where " no termination clause in the SA " presented to the Federal Courts .. do you think Hurley would change his opinion then ?
The "investigation of a shell creation group is continuing" and now " a special master has been introduced for further Discovery" .... LOOK OUT