Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'd say it is a 100% certainty Guzman and Maffio are getting paid via the 500m share S8.
Where we likely disagree is what they will do with them. You probably think they'll cash out 100m shares for $100k... I'm betting it's 10m shares that they've been assured will be millions of dollars with the plan.
If this is today's lunch time lows, I'm feeling pretty good about the afternoon.
I call shenanigans... pun was definitely intended
Yup, well see how the market likes it, but even if not today, they'll like the financial results that come out the next year which include these.
Think about how absurd the situation is.
"Dilution" wasn't here having a meltdown last night about Luis Guzman not being famous enough for us to keep owning shares here.
Plus carlitos way... which I don't bring up as especially more noteworthy than the others... outside of did anyone realize the crazy lawyer was seen penn this whole time? Who knew? Apparently been him for the last 25 years. I didn't remember that.
I am so damn close now. Will be timed so well with the end of the notes too. Let's see where it can go.
"The agreement extends to network and national spot advertising sales, and in-program sponsorships and advertising in the United States, its territories, and Canada for all VIVA LIVE TV APP channels and content. Under the terms of the Agreement, Oi2 will share revenues on all advertising and sponsorships revenues generated, as well as assign approximately 15 advertising specialists to work on behalf of Viva."
There is an important distinction between advertising sales (above) and advertising buying (when you see something that says "sign up for viva live")
There was also supposed to be advertising buying in November, but it trust there are many reasonable causes for delay that can make holding my shares worthwhile. Anyone's choice to feel otherwise. But in any case, this is a firm misunderstanding on the role of the 15 both by you, and seemingly more than half the people whenever this topic used to come up.
https://seekingalpha.com/pr/17008529-viva-entertainment-group-signs-agreement-oi2-media-group-act-lead-advertising-sales-agent
4m shares, somehow skirt 50m of bid support... to double print below bid.
I don't know what it means, but I know there are multiple steps of fishy at play.
Snuck around the countless 9s willing to buy. Fake MM trade.
VNDM, also parked on this message board, describing itself as this terrible entity you have no choice but to sell into the bid to avoid (their bid).
Appreciate the appreciation. Welcome.
Last year was end of january, unsure on prior.
You are also correct.
Also funny how the "beginning of time" is always the random day it hit .009.
If that timeline randomly extends back 2 weeks, it's up.
What would happen to the price today if there wasn't 35m on the ask...?
It would clearly move up, and if those people wanted to sell, they would sell for more.
The ask is simply put there to discourage buying and lock it in range. For now.
My eyes aren't shut to obvious manipulation on L2. So therefore not too worried about the headline "price decreased"
The best stocks are beaten down the worst. Happens all the time.
Bad stocks have no haters.
From balance sheet
Related Party Payable 112,070
From related party transaction note (no change)
In addition, John Sepulveda funded $10,000 to the Company for working capital during the year ended October 31, 2016 which remains outstanding together with advances, net of $102,070 from the spouse of the company’s Chief Executive Officer as of July 31, 2017.
That table you showed from the non-amended 10Q does not have the underlined row from your printscreen
From the Notes Payable note
In addition, John Sepulveda, a related party of the Company, funded $10,000 to the Company for working capital during the year ended October 31, 2016 which remains outstanding together with advances, net of $102,070 from the spouse of the company’s Chief Executive Officer as of July 31, 2017. Both notes were due on demand with interest at a rate of 8% per annum.
All of us are in on our DD. It's solid. But the market never acts how I feel it should.
End of conversions should mean end of mind boggling price movement.
There was a link to the document for all to read.
Yes. It can. Open the 10 q/a.
I don't know how to post photos.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=12406532
Post 114704... in conjunction with the implication we loaned her money in 114703.
Stated point blank.
You then said it violated our bylaws by lending her money... which is not stated in any filings.
Well someone is a jerk. Ask starting 1 tick below market price. Not that this matters whatsoever.
This was a loan to the company, not the company to her. How are you spinning this as the opposite direction?
Also with all your digging I am sure you noted the difference in the 10 q/a from the 10q. So why did you present the outdated version?
The notes in the 10q/a corrects the presentation as not convertible.
Both the 10q and the 10q/a reflect it properly on the balance sheet as a related party payable, instead of a convertible note payable, so it was apparently not called out as a material change in the 1st note (can't wait to hear why this is the end of the world) but they did update the notes. The related party transaction note reference is identical. But it was removed from the convertible note schedule and placed into the notes payable.
So cash went from her to the company. And the 8% interest isn't predatory. How did they violate anything by "lending her money" here?
Follow a shit ton of loading is a pretty good motto.
Nothing to worry about here. As long as people exist for the purpose of demanding we sell, we know take off is a certainty. That is the only DD needed, they did it for us, and assure us it is good things coming.
Because the only reason for someone to tell me to sell is they want my shares.
Had I stumbled across something alone in silence, maybe I care.
But you carry a giant flashing sign that says "stay in no matter what" so no reason to even begin to care.
Well the baseline motivation is obvious - make people sell
The only debatable question is the secondary motivation. Which I think is to clearly buy what is sold.
Just absurd
Your baseline point is every piece of news needs to also include prior news or the prior news ceases to exist.
Wow, phone numbers
They list
NY
93.1 amore
97.9 mega
LA
96.3 mega
97.9 la raza
They would be the place to start for whoever is up for the task. La Musica app.
I assume 1 of the 4 NY or LA FM stations on that app. Go be the first to listen and bring clarity.
But I do not accept "they did not run because we don't know the stations" when we know the stations, and clearly the naysayers were gonna say it without listening. So I'll say they are running without listening. I put in 20 min, caught 2 commercial breaks, didn't hear it, means nothing. But that's all the spanish music I'm gonna listen to for the cause.
Because he luvs it.
I think we've all spent the same amount of time trying to verify our stance. None.
But it was stated the stations weren't released. And I found them based on the release by searching spanish broadcasting system in Google play. So seems they told me.
If only you were 1 of the 500,000 people who downloaded that app, you would clearly see the FM stations from the two cities listed. Get listening, it's there.
SBS stations.
Go download the La Musica app and get listening.
And how do I post to you hearing it on the radio?
Unless someone follows you around with a boombox while taking video evidence that you heard it, then is the plan to say it doesn't exist?
And yet they didnt.
Oh no... all 50m of them? Someone is thrilled to get filled. I am with them.