Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It's just mou and loi, not a done deal.
I don't believe it's legally binding if terminated.
And you can't use your phone conversation as an evidence unless you notified prior of your recording.
This just verified nnrx wasn't scamming investors. They were seriously engaging merger but didn't work.
Fact that Bishop still maintains with Terra made me comfortably guess the culprit was Waldron for the merger fell thru the crack.
Loaded more yesterday.
I responded to them with the following messages: no reply yet
"This type of info should have been released via a pr not selective emails"
"Btw without Waldron, do you still have lands for hemp? I'm talking about acreages here."
"They still have the land"
They means nnrx?
How many acres are you talking about?
Is it a public info that they have 9 square miles of seed? Link?
Email news stated eco system method and holistic approach. Doesn't sound like they have a lot of lands if any.
They are definitely covered in my opinion.
Insiders legally buy and sell stock in their own company all of the time; theirtrading is restricted and illegal only atcertain times and under certainconditions. The SEC considers company directors, officials or any individual with a stake of 10% or more in the company to be corporateinsiders.Mar 7, 2017
What Investors Can Learn From Insider Trading - Investopedia
Not defending Bishop.
Unless company insiders traded stocks, selective news release is not illegal.
Wish he released a pr this morning, though.
I expect Bishop to address all together with updates as he indicated. Waiting patiently.
My understanding is that Waldron doesn't own the 6000 acres but is leasing with contracts. I could be wrong.
I'm holding. I don't believe this is a scam but a failed merger. Hoping for the best.
I'm long.
" I am sorry for the bad news. I never expected this. However we do intend to use whatever it takes for him to repay us. According to his attorney he doesn't have it. That's a problem
Well I would ask his attorney. Mr Waldron has representation. I can not disclose anything except Bio Matrix has also retained counsel to purse the funds that were taken "
This sounds legit for some reason..
Have you contacted the number ?
I did.
Yes "if"
Contact law firm of Camden Law LLP (207) 236-8836.
Thanks
Perhaps you can enlighten us why it is an extremely important distinction?
Are you trying to split a hair?
C'mon.
The court system so far says it's legal. Tsy has no obligation to stop nws.
Thanks Obit, now if an en banc is filed in appeals court , generally how long do you expect to take to see a verdict?
Obit not Orbit.
Sorry about the typo.
Orbit,
Do commons bought today be inclusive as well?
Also can judge Sweeney override the 2:1 decision made by appeals court this week?
Thanks
That is "if".
Maybe, but it fnf fall into receivership then they don't matter.
They all be wiped out.
I would imagine that the money goes to government slush funds supporting programs such as obamacare, secretly funding isis, and give cash to iranians. Of course in the form of net worth sweep by fhfa to us treasury.
The mine was detached from molycorp and the rest of business became Neo.
Moly shares wiped out.
The mine belongs to the bond holders including Oaktree.
Nothing left for equity holders.
Do you have a link that shows equity holders have stakes on the mine? I would love to hear about it.
My understanding is that the Mountain Pass mine belongs to the bond holders per court approval. Common holders do not have any stakes since
Shares have been canceled.
That was the final nail on the cofin.
wish everyone here who lost shirt best of luck in the future.
Emerging from bankruptcy means current shares are to be canceled.
Why is this a good news?
It became an issue when you claimed that shareholders own Mt. Pass. They don't but creditors do.
Big difference.
Can you provide the link where it says the shareholders own Mt.Pass mineral rights or mine? I doubt it. Otherwise pps would be much higher than 4.5 cents.
Can you provide the link where it says the shareholders own Mt.Pass mineral rights? I doubt it. Otherwise pps would be much higher than 4.5 cents.
So Mt. Pass is completely detached
from Molycorp at this moment.