Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If it had been put to bed you would be able to show me when and where. But you cannot.
Because it has never been put to bed.
C'mon show me... When and where was it solved? George never announced it. FINRA certainly never announced it.
The only place it is claimed it has been put to bed is by lying pumpers with no proof other than saying "put to bed" over and over and over.
But it has not. Or else you could prove it.
That was before the 2019 FINRA Notice of Deficiency was slapped on. None have been granted since. Cutler even tried the "but we're a new company and new people, that was before out time" defense but it did not fly. FINRA wanted those missing filings that they could not produce and that George cannot produce either.
I would love to see George announce that it had been taken care of somehow, but he never has.
It's not fake nor was it ever put to rest.
"It was put to rest" is lying pumper talk for "No, I have no answer to that but hopefully people are dumb enough to believe me when I pretend it was already taken care of even though it was not."
When did George announce that the FINRA Notice of Deficiency had been taken care of? You know, the one that blocked GVSI last corporate actions attempt?
Oh wait, that's right, he has never announced that. As far as anyone knows, that is still in effect. The reason for the Notice was of course those 6 missing years of filings that George has already said he cannot come up with.
Were any of those foretold by a shitty boomer meme tweet beforehand?
"Memory lapse"??? WTF are you talking about? You still drunk this morning or something?
Probably idiots thinking George was "hinting" with the Christmas tweet.
You would think those idiots would learn after the recent "bicyclist coming through Monday" tweet did not in fact result in news being released the following Monday.
Damn, some of you people are desperate for anything to grasp at to pump with.
He just posts shitty boomer memes. Nothing more, nothing less.
I don't promote stocks. At all. But if there is something good happening somewhere then hopefully perhaps I can be in it along with others.
Certainly better than being stuck in something with lying pumpers trying to convince people that late filings are no concern as long as hey, the stock still trades and crap like that.
Those late filings might just be a sign of something, something not good.
Or maybe filings show up today and all is great with the world.
Maybe.
Don't you think they should have done their homework first on the 600 million shares instead of publicly announcing it just to retract it again right after the weekend was over?
I don't agree with your assessment of "like good businesspeople" for such an incompetent act.
I just hope it was due to a momentary lapse of reason and not something of deeper, darker significance.
What I am attempting to do is let folk know that a filing is late, in case it is in fact a cause for greater concern than might be apparent just on the surface.
They didn't even bother with a Late Notification. That's not a good sign.
I suspect that you are the type that wants people to remain blissfully unaware of these kinds of things so you can take advantage of their naivete.
Well that's a worrisome thing, IMO. Things don't seem to have been fully transferred over in entirety and now this Q being late, without even the bother of a Late Notification, yikes.
Who is responsible for the filing as of now? They are certainly shirking their duty. Or have both parties stepped away, maybe thinking the other would be filing this round?
It is certainly odd.
Frank's tweet today sure doesn't bring any comfort by his acknowledging that his mergers have been abysmal. And that's his own word, not mine....
I brought up the late filing just so folk that may not keep tabs on these things might become aware. I hope it's not a harbinger of another Frank merger falling apart but people should know, just in case that it is.
And no, I'm not "bashing for cheapies" for the accusatory type of person out there. You know, the same type of people that defend late filings as "hey, everybody does it, no big deal, ignore it, the stock still trades".
I just want folk to not get totally bagged if things turn sour and hopefully still have some liquid funds for another play another day. One that I'm also in, and we both make some money.
But for now, come on JPEX, get the filing in , whoever is responsible for it....
When did George say GVSI will be AI?
You wouldn't be lying to people, would you?
Let's see a link.
Or are you just another full of shit scumbag?
Whether I am outside, or inside, in a box, or with a fox, on a train, or on a plane, it matters not.
The Yield sign is still there.
Maybe you should be complaining to JPEX management instead of whining on ihub that a poster is pointing it out.
That's an SEC semi-annual filing related to the stock offering and it only covers through June 30.
They earned the Yield sign by not filing their September 30 OTC Markets Alternative Reporting Quarterly Disclosure.
Try to keep up.
"Cool story bro"
Utter crap.
Go ahead, prove that MM's "control" stinky pinkies but then somehow lose all "control" when an acquisition is announced. How can they control it before then but not after?
Wouldn't they want to be in control during the big profit phase? I mean, that would be the important part: when the money is made.
"The MM’s will control this until the ACQUISITION is ANNOUNCED. That’s when they lose all control and make big profits on all the shares they collected at the bottom."
Only an idiot thinks that a Market Maker with millions and millions of dollars to work with would dedicate resources to "manipulate" a stinky pinky that only did $59,000 in dollar volume today.
There is no liquidity here for a major player. It's silly to think that there is. There are thousands of stocks out there where they can actually move real money in and out.
But this is not one of them.
That is simply an extremely lameass excuse used when a price doesn't move the way one wants it to and it is beyond understanding why so to a dedicated holder.
News flash, sonny: not everyone is as enamored with your precious little stock as you are.
You're right, who wants to see on-time filings as long as the stock still trades?
Heck, why don't we just do away with all that pesky filing anyway, they're such a bore to read, yaknow?
Investing purely on "hunches" sounds much more fun.
Only if FINRA decides to process the actions.
Which is not guaranteed.
So, can't argue any points, you have to resort to insults, huh?
Pathetic.
The more brilliant move would be to not even announce thinking about it if it wasn't going to be tried.
Certainly not a good look, I'm quite amazed George did it. One would hope he's above that. But perhaps not....??
If it turns out that was a last hurrah pump attempt just before having to announce FINRA denial then that will certainly follow him for the short rest of his career which he has already made clear is coming to a close.
He has been horribly ambiguous with this acquisition thing.
The court filing could very much be read like someone was acquiring an asset from GVSI, which could of course be the control block of shares, in theory. Hey - merger city in that case. What other asset could it be? Maybe just an investment block of shares, but not control? Either of those make sense for needing to finalize the share cancellations so everyone knows where they stand, share structure-wise.
The alternative, that GVSI is acquiring an asset, like today's tweet kinda sounded more like, would be a different situation. Is he buying an existing working company? Just rolling in a startup? Either of those pretty much indicates he's going the holding company route. Certainly not as glamorous as a reverse merger which is what OTC players want to see.
Or is he just buying a bitcoin mining machine or something? That would certainly be a reason for keeping mum about it. Not sure there would be a reason to be held up by finalization of share cancellations though.
Quite frustrating, George being this ambiguous. And it certainly seems by design, for whatever reasons he has.
George said asset acquisition, not merger. And yes, there is a difference.
"MERGER COMING!!!!!"
Does anybody want to tell them that they got the Yield sign at OTC Markets last week for not filing their Quarterly?
LOL, "just now reading this news" and "Guess I should read this MB more often"
You've made almost 40 posts in the last month but pretend it's all new to you, RRRRIIIGGHHHTTTTTT.........
Imagine that, a lying pumper, here of all places.
For the "George gives GVSI hints in his boomer meme tweets" crowd, here you go. That's quite the hint of what to expect. Ouch.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 17, 2023
He never said "it's a reach" for the just-completed cancellations.
"Sharp has to say “it’s a reach” by nature, to protect himself. He always takes the more conservative route when making announcements; he has to, it’s what he ALWAYS DOES!!! EVERY SINGLE TIME. PERIOD. "
Oh? So why don't you tell us EXACTLY what George meant with that ambiguous phrase and how you know that FOR SURE.
You're full of shit.
George's one and only mention of looking for additional shares to cancel was ten months ago and was already underway. It's obvious by now that he didn't find any more.
The only one claiming there are more to cancel is you, one lone little lying ihubber.
He's lying about a 2nd share reduction.
That's why he can't produce for you where he saw it.
He's counting on people to be dumb as shit and just believe him without any proof whatsoever.
Don't be that dumb, people.
Demand proof. And when he can't produce it make sure you take note that he is one of the lying pieces of crap on this board.
Oh good lawd, just post the damn thing. Like this:
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 15, 2023
You are complaining that I call out lies being told?
Okay, noted. You are in the "lying is good" camp, I guess.
I'm not. I think liars are scumbags.
Bullshit. You are lying.
"There is a second share reduction for GVSI. "
This has been explained to you before yet to keep persisting with your lie, man that's scummy.
George only made one mention of looking for possible additional cancellations and obviously it never went anywhere, seeing as that was 10 months ago. He most certainly never announced a second round as you claim.
$GVSI is preparing an initial court action to cancel over 294 million shares. Records are being examined to determine how many additional shares might be cancelled.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) January 14, 2023
You are lying. That's not what George said.
"FINRA has responded and Name Ticker change coming "Soon""
He said there will be a response soon, but with no indication of which direction it will be.
FINRA has just informed $GVSI that we expect a response to the application for a name and symbol change "soon".
— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) November 1, 2023
A thousand bucks isn't a paint job.
It's someone not confident they could get the same price tomorrow.
10 bucks would be a paint job.
Yep, and how many years does it take to lose 100% with an OTC?
Actually, these things can go bad at the blink of an eye. They don't even require years.
Not claiming GVSI will, just OTCs in general.
And I'm not trying to scare anyone, just giving a dose of reality to counter all the bullshit.
You are lying.
"FINRA has all they requested"
You have no idea if FINRA has everything they requested.
George has only stated that they had everything requested from the Transfer Agent, specifically.
I wonder why he pointed that out but has never said that they had everything requested in total. People would want to know that if it were the case. Maybe it's just an oversight. Maybe not.
George Sharp himself is calling you a liar. "There are no guarantees" despite your claims that "there is no debate on this fact" and "there can be no denial" of FINRA approval.
"FINRA approval SOON.
There is no debate on this fact.
There can be no denial, despite perma-bear speculation, opinion and hand-wringing. "
I fronted about $50K to $GVSI for this ruling, so if things go slower than some would like, I DON'T CARE, especially after I admonish the public that "there are no guarantees", "it takes as long as it takes" and "don't invest money you can't afford to lose", which all still apply https://t.co/4EFPw1ECAh
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 9, 2023
Some are more speculative than others.
There is a huge difference between OTC and blue chip tickers, for example. Like, worlds apart.
Yes, speculating. High risk, high reward.
And I believe you will find way more people lose money than emerge as millionaires in the OTC.
In the OTC? This is speculating, not investing.