Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We do not control what OTC Market posts why don't you ask them
It is not the form it is an Edgar Cover sheet used to search for filed forms for the company since it is the same company just under a different name all filings are now under the new name. If you do not believe me ask Edgar Systems directly for clarification. The actual form D begins on page 2 of the PDF which is page 1 of the form
Form D
If you look at Form D page 1 (the actual form not the Edgar Cover Sheet) you will see that the issuer is SPOOFEM nor MIHL. I am posting the link for you to download the form if you did not download it from OTC Markets.
The link is: http://www.4shared.com/office/7_tQWfR_/Form_D.html?refurl=d1url
Or you can also download it from out temporary documents page:
https://sites.google.com/site/mihlinfo/
I believe the forms are self explanatory for anyone that looks at the form and not the Edgar search cover sheet.
The only filings that our company had filed were the OTC Markets Initial Disclosure Form and Exhibits. We have not yet filed any SEC forms. The Schedule D was filed by the old management in 2010 long before we became involved with the company on June 14, 2012. When the name change occurred any place the old company name as used it was updated to the new symbol and company name. However, if you download the form you will see that it is in the old company name and symbol.
Todays Trades
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:58:12 PM 0.0025 10,000 25
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:48:32 PM 0.002 350,000 700
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:35:39 PM 0.0021 150,000 315
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:16:17 PM 0.0029 50,000 145
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:03:50 PM 0.0022 31,800 70
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:03:44 PM 0.0022 200,000 440
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 03:03:40 PM 0.0022 50,000 110
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:59:50 PM 0.0021 400,000 840
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:18:56 PM 0.0021 15,700 33
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:18:51 PM 0.0022 50,000 110
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:18:45 PM 0.0021 72,000 151
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:18:13 PM 0.0025 5,000 13
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:18:12 PM 0.0025 15,000 38
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:16:43 PM 0.0025 5,000 13
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:16:37 PM 0.0025 100,000 250
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 12:16:28 PM 0.0026 50,000 130
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 09:44:00 AM 0.0021 6,000,000 12,600
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 09:40:41 AM 0.0035 5,000 18
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 09:40:31 AM 0.0036 5,000 18
Tue, Sept 18, 2012 09:40:31 AM 0.0036 5,000 18
What do you think is happening when Matt's group is buying shares - they are buying shares in the company on the open market from other investors.
I irrevocably state that MIHL did not sell any stock and currently holds the same number of shares as at the time it took control on June 14, 2012 and as filed with the OTC Markets - we ARE NOT SELLING SHARES
Why is our having knowledge of the Arizona Group so incredible? They called us introduced themselves and asked if we want to sell them some stock. What is so incredible about knowing who is a major shareholder in your company?
Who did you speak with in the SEC? Please provide their contact info, we would like to speak with that person.
Unfortunately we cannot do anything about who is buying the company stock and at what price. We can only control the issue of new shares or the sale of shares we own. No new shares have been issues and non of our shares sold on the open market.
Arizona Investment Group
I received permission from the Arizona Group to post their contact information:
Matt Tamke
BBMS Investments LLC
matttamke@yahoo.com
Matt told me he is looking to buy even more shares in the company. If anyone has any questions they are welcome to contact Matt directly.
Neither MIHL or any of it's officers, shareholders and/or directors have any relationship either personal or business with Matt or his group with the exception of his group being a shareholder of MIHL.
You should be however reassured that a significant investor group from Arizona are buying these shares and now hold approximately 4% of all outstanding shares and over 25% of the float. They contacted us today to inform us of this. They are also looking for more shares as I was told. They would like to hold a 10% stake in the company.
I believe it is a positive development since it removes shares from the market and in the end will increase share value.
Some investors have been contacting me privately to ask if I know where the large blocks of shares are coming from that are being sold I.e. 6 million shares sold today. In response - I do not. As you know there is a public float of 135 million shares out there and someone is selling. You can see the list of shareholders posted on the OTC markets - the only thing I can say that I know that the Group from Arizona is purchasing these shares and has no accumulated over 30 million shares. No one from our company nor anyone involved in structuring our deal sold major blocks of shares and our holding percentage had not changed. Your guess is as good as mine as to who is selling the stock.
As stated previously Integrated Consulting Resources is a non profit organization which is a licensed Small Business Administration Technical Advisor and assists New Americans in starting their own business. This company is a 501 c3 company as determined by the IRS. Larisa is a director of this firm. In addition she owns M&R Wine & Spirits Importers LLC. She is the President of this ATF licensed importer, whole seller, and distributor of alcoholic beverages and tobacco products. I do not see your point? ICR has nothing to do with the liquor or tobacco products as stated before. What exactly are you attempting to prove?
As stated before any questions from you should be addressed to Robert Ringold the company IR at rringold@montagueholding.com. I will no longer respond to any requests from you for clarifications or etc. if you are unhappy with you DD you are free not to be an investor in the company. I am not offering this as an investment advice but just as comment. You of course are the only one who can make your own investment decisions.
Based on the way you are taking my responses I had decide to ignore your requests for information. You may conduct your due diligence as you see fit - I will however no longer assist you.
Again you read incorrectly what was stated she was never part of Excel Finding and as far as disclosure the required disclosure is 5 years not 6 or 7
To save you time I had posted on our temporary website the documents filed with the various Secretaries of State so that you can see the new President and Name Changes. Our temporary web address is: https://sites.google.com/site/mihlinfo/
This is the last time I will be replying to this issue:
1. In 2006 Larisa was part of a collection agency that won a contract to collect for the City of New York and also for one of the counties in Georgia.
2. Her other partners in that agency were Leonid Shusman and Irene Malozovsky.
As part of the collection effort to be able to collect in the State of Texas, State of Florida and the State of New York - Integrated Commercial Enterprises Ltd. incorporated 3 subsidiary companies in those states under the same name.
3. In late 2007 this business was sold to Donald Banks. Who in May and June 2008 changed the names of the various companies with the Texas Company being changed to Excel Funding Inc. in Florida to MAK Financial Inc. and in New York to New York Funding Group Inc. But in each and every state he failed to file notification of new directors, officers, and address. In addition, he then failed to to file the appropriate documents to documents to maintain the charters of the companies and according to the Secretary of State sites for the various companies went out of business in 2008 when the various corporate charters were revoked.
4. Until you brought this issue up, Larisa was not even aware that he failed to remove her from the companies listings with the various secretary's of state involved.
5. Since the companies no longer legally exist it is not an issue that old information is listed and we are not able to update the information due to the following:
1. We have no legal standing to do so since the companies are owned by Mr. Banks.
2. We cannot update any information without reinstating the companies and we cannot do so since with have no legal standing with these firms.
Therefore the statement that Larisa had nothing to do with Excel Funding Inc. Furthermore the WikiCorporate site that you are using for your due diligence is in error. Basically they were showing the various subsidiary companies of Integrated Commercial Enterprises Ltd. but failed to show the Florida and New York firms. In addition they failed to show that Integrated Commercial Enterprises and Integrated Consulting Resources have never been associated or part of the same company structure. What they did was show Integrated in Texas with a new name change as linked to the company.
You should be very careful how you use the Internet for your DD many times it is faulty as in this case.
In addition since all of these events took place over 5 years ago they do not need to be disclosed either to the OTC Markets or the SEC. Especially since they have nothing to do with the current company.
We hope by Wed
Integrated consulting is listed under its dba "Help Is On The Way". As far as the other companies: she was never associated with Excel and her association with Integrated Commercial Enterprises ended over 5 years ago and disclosure requires only 5 years.
No I am not - it's Robert Ringold, why?
It was not a shell as defined by the law since it was always considered operational but we purchased the company less it's operations and assets. In this forum to avoid a winded reply I used a word shell however the company always had active operations so it cannot be defined as a "shell company" legally under SEC rules.
Posted from my IPhone
GOOD NIGHT AND A HAPPY ROSH HASHANAH TO EVERYONE
I will not be posting or available until after the New Year. I will return to IHUB and my office on Tuesday of next week.
Thank you all
This is one time reply
1. The company that was purchased was a shell as all the members of this forum are aware. As a shell it was sold without assets and/or liabilities and an Attorney Certification and Indemnification was received as such.
2. The change of control took place on June 14, 2012. 3rd Qt began on July 1, 2012 - no business was conducted until FINRA approvals were received on July 20, 2012. Therefore our first Qt. in control of the company is the 3rd Qt.
3. We purchased Evan's stock this money was paid from our pocket to Evens for the shares he held. Nothing was purchased from the company so no money was paid by us to the company, since none was due.
Legitimate Question
You may send all legitimate investor questions via the company email which is listed in the introduction and was previously provided by Robert Ringlod in this forum.
INVESTOR QUESTIONS
All legitamate investor questions can be email to the company via its email address which is provided in the intro. statement.
The management holds all insider stock through Montague Investments as advised by our attorney. Before you ask: as per the disclosure statement Larisa Saltsova holds 100% on Montague Investments. As far as the other 23% it is the public float, and other shareholders as listed on the posted shareholder list.
Shares on Financial Statement - when the control of the company changed hands it was done via the purchase of shares. Why would the shares that were purchased (not using company funds) be reflected on the company's financial statement? The company does not own these shares they are held by a major shareholder.
It is only one holding company - Montague Investments is our personal investment vehicle that purchased the original Hi-Tech Crime Solutions and holds the majority of the shares in the company.
The shares held by Montague Investments are Rule 144 restricted stock. We cannot sell them until the restriction comes off.
As to typos - the document was prepared in a hurry to remove the CE. We were only advised 1 day before the filling that so much information will be required. If you like to send me via email all the typos that you found we will correct the document and re-post it as version 2.
The R&D was the business plan development and market investigation expenses as to what we plan to do with the company in the future. This expense was not paid for by the company.
We are starting the 3rd Qt with $0.00 in every column and will show capital, acquisitions, and cash-flow that we will complete bringing into the company by the end of the 3rd Qt. This way the actual financial situation of the company will be portrayed.
The structure of the disclosure was based on the form provided by OTC markets. You may download the document here: http://www.4shared.com/office/Bsd-z9f6/DisclosureGuidelines.html?refurl=d1url directely or from temp website: https://sites.google.com/site/mihlinfo/
Based on how information I provide is received by you, I had deciced that in the best interest of the company and my personal sanity to ignore all further public and private communication from you. You will need to get any information you are looking to get elsewhere.
You asked where he was at 6:00pm on Friday night so I had responded. Some of us do have a life outside the office. There is nothing wrong with believing in God and ones own religion. Yes the top management of the company has people of both christian and jewish faiths- what is the problem with a company that respects religion?
Same pronouncement of doom and glum for the past 2 months as before you are wrong the company and it's shareholders will prosper
Carlo its Friday almost 6:00pm on a High Jewish Holiday weekend - I would assume he is with his friends and family - he does have a life outside the office
And again for every sell there is a buy so you theory is again faulty there is good demand since someone purchased the shares offered
What do you base you claim on? I can categorically state that not one share was sold on the market by anyone associated with the company since change of control on June 14, 2012. Back up your claim with facts that can be substantiated
I had never admitted collusion and quoting me out of context will still not help you achieve your goal of spreading baseless rumors and untruths. I firmly believe in MIHL and it's management - I believe we know what we are doing - and I want to believe that people and companies that buy MIHL stock do it based on intelligent analysis and DD. Therefore the statement that was made that you should think that people in the investment business might know what they are doing based on the public information and analysis. Since I am not a conspiracy theorist it never crossed my mind that statement would be understood in any other way
Oh my god I don't even know who they are but they are buying the stock maybe their analyst are not enjoying bashing the company and it's management but like our message and think we have a future and are a good investment
What does this have to do with MIHL
Did you think that maybe they know what they are doing
In response to your questions:
1.d/b/a means doing business as - which allows a company to use a registered trade name. In our case its "Help Is On the Way". This is a non profit company that assists individuals newly arrived in the United States in forming their own business. We are also a SBA Technical Advisor and can assist with small business loans for those individuals and companies. We help New Americans achieve the American Dream of financial independence and entrepreneurship. Yes our site is still not up since the gentleman who volunteered to put it up had moved and we have not found another volunteer yet to take his place since there is no money in the non profits budget for site construction.
Also thanks for giving us a heads up we thought the address had been changed online since the State communicates with us at our new address. I will let someone in legal know to contact them.