Most Talked About Person on iHub
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your suggestion is absolutely absurd. Consumer Electronics companies debut new products every year in January at the CES show. Last year many 4K Televisions were debuted at the annual event. This year NanoTech will be showing the NP-1 and other 4K related products in the NanoTech booth in the South hall, as well in several other venues throughout the show. Two global distributors for the NP-1 and other NanoTech products have already been announced and have taken delivery of NanoTech products, and more are coming very soon.
I'm not involved in that information, but I'll email someone who is and I'm sure they'll update it.
Nothing they said disputes our statement that we cancelled the contract after the first month of service. Read the letter from NanoTech CEO. They were contracted for six months, and terminated after one. NanoTech stopped paying them after August and notified them of the cancellation of the contract.
I already posted on this board the answer to your question several months ago, right after they were hired. But here it is again. NanoTech hired them for their claimed services in social media, and NanoTech paid them for a month. After NanoTech was not satisfied that the level of presentations that were used to sell the service met the results that were seen on Facebook, Twitter and the Web, NanoTech cancelled thier contract. NanoTech also clearly stated, and required that they clearly state that they were not hired, nor were they doing any stock promotion work for NanoTech.
why am i here?
4K Studios has two film scanners that can take 35mm or 16mm theatrical film and scan it to 4K digital.
In addition to the film scanners, there are also two video machines that are used to take studio masters from TV shows and mini series and convert from video format to 4K.
NanoTech has a huge presence at CES 2014. The NP-1 is being featured in one of the bigger partner booths in the main hall. There are two different private demo suites at the Venetian and the Wyndham. There is a private meeting and demo room off of the main hall. NanoTech is being featured on the banners of the daily publications. CES 2014 will be a huge event for the company.
asked and answered.
First, nobody is nervous. The SEC is not asking questions. Nothing is filed without first running it by SEC counsel for instruction and approval.
Second, the forms are not Bogus. They are the proper way to inform investors of the transactions. SEC Counsel instructed the company to use these forms as they are being used in order to properly identify the transactions. Regardless of the current Form 15 filing, NanoTech is preparing and filing all information to maintain its current status and be able to easily move back to the OTCQB once the audits are completed.
Finally, OTC Markets instructed the company to file them using a different upload mechanism than was previously used so that they would show up as Insider Transactions on the OTC Website. They were previously uploaded using a different identifier and were not automatically showing up onto the Insider Transaction section. So, as instructed by the OTC team.
Again misinformation being spread. If you look at Amazon it shows 1 company selling the product and 1,250 units in stock.
our new web programmer started last month and after the new store is launched, the corporate website will be updated to include all of the subsidiaries. Stay tuned.
It's very simple. The investment firm that was supposed to pay for the audits never funded the company. In order to continue on with operations at a time when the company was unable to raise funding and yet wanted to maintain current status on the OTC Markets, the only option was to withdraw from filing audited financials until such time as the company could afford to pay for them. Had this option not been taken, the stock would have had a STOP symbol placed on it. For everyone involved, it was far better to take the actions that were taken. Now that the company has reversed its financial situation, the auditors have been paid, re-engaged and will be working with our new CPA firm to provide audited financials and once they are completed the company will then once again become fully reporting with the SEC.
Everyone on this board purchased shares AFTER the company had already taken this action. Every investor here purchased shares from a non-reporting company. Even though the financials are unaudited, due only to the burdensome cost, everything else has continued including quarterly and annual reporting, and an open TA. To somehow claim that investors here were duped into buying shares in a non-reporting company is misleading.
You may claim that the company is a scam or whatever because we are non-reporting, then don't buy our stock. However, your claims simply have no meaning, and the company will continue to file all appropriate paperwork and next year will uplist to the OTCQB and then uplist to a larger exchange as the criteria are met. We are already closing in on the annual revenue criteria and within the year all other criteria should be met.
Bottom line is that if you don't believe in the company, don't purchase the stock, but to claim anything else is just disingenuous and an obvious ploy to disparage a very successful company that has done everything not only to raise the money it needed to pull out of R&D, but to generate some of the worlds greatest products and technology in its chosen markets. With a an ever growing team of over 30 hard working people putting long hours in this company is destined for continued success and name calling won't sway anyone at NanoTech.
Wrong, again. NanoTech never published that Number nor gave it out as a line to call the subsidiary in MA. Your grabbing an unpublished number that was part of an internet package used during initial office setup, and then shut off when we put in much higher speed connectivity is very transparent as an attempt to flood the board with misinformation discussions yet again.
If you insist on dialing the MA office directly, through an unpublished number, dial (508) 570-4495. We don't give out separate phone numbers for our various offices, we have one main number, (408) 414-7355, and our system routes calls to any of our locations around the world depending on who or what department you are trying to reach.
The form was sent to the RA in July.
I won't respond to his conversation anymore as I've answered all questions and provided documents that show you are wrong and yet you keep bringing up a non issue.
The a in a/a stands for authorized. The board of directors is the only one allowed to set the authorized shares. A board meeting was held in June and they reduced the a/s to 740m effective June 30 2013. This was indicated on the form that was sent to to registered agent. The date in which the nvsos filed the change is irrelevant to the date that the authorization was changed.
No matter how hard you stomp your feet and try and claim the change is when you say it is the fact is the date of effectiveness is the date that the board enacted.
$699 unit now comes with Linux
321 7th Street is the 4K Studios San Francisco facilities. 2 stories 3700 square feet
It is ridiculous. Any transactions that Ted does will be noticed with a form 4 disclosure. Unlike the nonsensical messages here it is perfectly acceptable to use the form 4 with OTC markets to notify of insider transactions. SEC counsel has advised NTEK to continue to post them on OTC Markets until NTEK is fully reporting at which time they will be filed both with the SEC and with OTC.
UltraFlix is our new UHD channel. It is based on the NanoFlix engine and will deliver 4K UHD content on a variety of devices including debuting on the NP-1
No never did
And UltraFlix too
Here is some technical smoke since your analysis of how streaming works is incorrect.
NanoTech takes content, and creates multiple resolutions, multiple bit rates, and now multiple encoding methods (h.264 and h.265) and stores those files at its data center in Fremont, CA.
NanoTech's streaming channels, which operate on many different end user devices, including phones, tablets, and set top boxes have the playback software which contacts the server for a piece of content.
The codec is not sent to the machine, it's preinstalled in the machine. Updates to codecs may be transmitted down the player via software updates (in our systems done automatically and without user interaction needed).
When the request is made for a piece of content, information is passed up to the server including geographic location, playback device capabilties, and line speed and quality information. The servers then determine the closest edge network connection and the content is delivered via the edge caching servers to the player.
The player has to have the codecs and the playback software in order to become a streaming device. Simply having a computer is not sufficient. We didn't invent streaming, we merely are doing unique implementations of streaming using our own software.
Right now if you walk around any of these shows you'll notice there are only two constants behind the TV's showing off 4K content. You'll see a lot of Redray players and a lot of Nuvola NP-H1's.
Exhibit B - look at effective date
http://ihubimagery.s3.amazonaws.com/AmendedArticlesAfter-1.jpg
740,000,000 matches the NVSOS
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=NkUMPTHrDA9pc8U7pRWyJw%253d%253d
Approximately 8 Hours for the scan. We take 9 different images of every frame to create an HDR image of the movie, giving us much better dynamic lighting than typical scanners. From there we have an automated process for noise removal which takes roughly 2 hours. After that the process varies depending on the quality of the print. Anywhere from 4 hours to a few days based on scene by scene lighting and color correction.
That's a pathetic attempt at disinformation. The document template was created by me long ago and had been reused each and every quarter. Every copy of software was installed by me and registered by me as I have been in charge of setting up computers. Anyone knows that the author field doesn't change when the doc file is edited.
Since my previous posts with these sames answers don't seem to be clear I will try and speak slowly with small words and explain my past involvement.
I was previously the CEO. I was previously involved in helping file the financials.
I am no longer the CEO. I am no longer an officer of the company. I no longer involved in the financials. I am not involved in the Q1 filings (most recent filings posted) nor will be moving forward.
The company has hired accounting staff, CPA's and Auditors.
Not sure how to make this any more clear.
as I have already stated I used to do the financials and I no longer do. The company now has an accounting department, a CPA and Auditors. I'm no longer involved in the finances or reporting in any way. I helped out when the company didn't have the staff, and now I have moved on to producing new technology.
We've gone over this on this board time and time again. First Bankshot, now you. If you wish to rehash it, we can. I've always been open and up front with this board and every investor in NTEK. I provided this back in March, here it is again.
http://davidrfoley.s3.amazonaws.com/Foley.pdf
Get your facts straight. It was determined that there was $0 loss to the mortgage company.
There are many copyrights and patents in process.
My title is senior technologist and you're pulling that from old financials I am no longer CEO I am the longer involved in the finances of the company
I'm not the chief technology officer and I don't prepare financials.
I've been getting a bunch of emails and questions about us partnering with another aforementioned 3D company and I simply responded so that the questions will stop.
We were asked two months ago to look at them for possible collaboration and after reviewing the company, technology and content, we declined.
I have no ill will towards them and frankly have no opinion about them as a company. I simply feel our technology and content is better. I haven't given them a second thought until the last 48 hours when I have been barraged with questions and suggestions that we be associated etc.
Beyond that I don't wish anyone to fail. I just want to stop the barrage of questions about being linked or involved with them as it isn't going to happen and the discussion should be ended.
I wish any other company and their investors nothing but success with their company, investment and stock price, but please don't ask me to comment on being involved with them any more.
NanoTech is already a long way down the path to delivering 4K UHD using HEVC / H.265 on the NanoFlix system on the Nuvola family of products. We should be showing it no later than CES.
Share buybacks are completely unrelated to share price and therefor would have no relationship to up listing
Whether or not the company does a reverse split would be determined by the share price at the time of uplisting and would be used as a means to increase price so that it would be able to sustain well above minimum requirements in the new exchange. If the share price is strong enough for the uplisting no reverse will be used
Share buybacks are being done to reduce outstanding shares and are not done to affect share price
Ted and Jeff have crafted a plan to accomplish both goals but they are independent of each other.