Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yes a gamble but if you think about the many benefits of anatabloc verses the risk( minor dizziness) it's a very good gamble.
The FDA approves a drug for marketing after determining that the drug's benefits outweigh its risks. That statement is strait from my Congressman who has been in contact with the oversight committee and who is monitoring this issue before the FDA.
great post, thanks for the information.
Patrick Cox wrote briefly about Star Scientific today. He and associates at Mauldin's visited Roskamp recently. He said Mullen is working with the FDA to satisfy there concerns. The possibility still exist that the product will have to be pulled. The analyst at Mauldin's want to wait for details on the drug development program before making any recommendations, Patrick can only counsel patience for now.
good vidio, what year did Mullan give that presentation? tks
it take a Terd to know a Terd. Anatabloc is a good product.
your speaking for me now! great post!
My guess is the FDA will not force Star from selling their product even if Dr Mullan loses the argument/case. What could happen though is when the day comes and Star's IND need FDA clearance, then the FDA will say Anatabloc will have to be pulled before approval can be issued.
it is absurd, Stars insurance company isn't going to roll over for any trumped up charge.
I knew that, their anatabine is made from tobacco. So they say.
Nancy Lopes is lead plaintiff in the suit, she bought shares that went down in price. I don't know if she uses Anatabloc. The golfer Nancy Lopez uses Anatabloc.
after quickly reviewing the Nancy Lopes class action suit, one thing surprised me, all the players were mentioned except Breakthrough Technology Alert and Patrick Cox. I don't get it, did anyone see mention of BTA or Cox? John Mauldin and his "Outside the Box" publication was mentioned and all the other players were cited.
agreed, keep doing what your doing!
I've written the FDA with issues and concerns regarding Anatabloc and the Star warning letter. My Congressman who is very interested in our case has contacted the oversight branch to share our issues and concerns. I was informed that this Congressional inquiries will take on avg. 30-45 day's for an initial response.
Any new and relevant information will be passed on to my Representative at his urging.
your logic and reasoning makes, there may be a silver lining after all.
Thank you, that's what I was looking for.
I need a little help, can anyone tell me the post number that Nomo wrote he was a short. Thanks.
I had an idea that it would be a formulation, your right though, it makes more sense that the cocktail would be three drugs taken separately.
Luthor do you think that it is a possiblitiy that the phase 3 trial already has the cocktail ingredients included? Just a thought.
not at all, I'll try GNC online, our local store won't mark down Anatabloc.
thank you for this great post, I agree with your opinions of the people, the company's and the future. Anatabloc is a great product.
I check with GNC in Spring Hill ,FL and they are not discounting Anatabloc and never do.
right the FDA lawyers will have to write their opinion, do they have time constraints, dead lines?
exactly my thought! thanks.
thanks, I'm getting it, yeah, human kindness, I'm for that.
good post, does nomo agree with that? didn't he he write the letter to the FDA?
great post, that's helpful!
they will say its lies, IMHO your excerpts tell the rest of the story, the whole truth. I'll use Anatabloc derived from plant; thank you very much. And don't prohibit my access to Anatabloc.
yes..ditto!!
I agree that Star is probably far ahead of competitors in researching anatabine, the problem as I see it, is the single isomer drug because made from chemical not plants opens the field to any one, why would Star patents be needed?
correct me if I am wrong, anatabine is found in plants and citrate is from citric acid which is found in plants.
The extraction below was taken from article, see link.
The FDA ordered the company to correct the violations within 15 days. Warning letters are not legally binding, but the government can take companies to court if they are ignored.
Some of you may have missed this:
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/12/31/fda-says-star-scientific-illegally-marketing-products/
I wonder, but it sound like they make it with chems in the lab.
Star has been granted a patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office for the artificial synthesis of Anatabine, so it is made in a lab.
i thought Patrick Cox mentioned that it was made from industrial produced anatabine and Star processed it under their patent.I'd want to verify that with him though.
Leif...I extracted this info from nuke's article, this sheds light on the anatabine used in Anatabloc. See below for link to the rest of the article.
Star has been granted a patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office for the artificial synthesis of Anatabine, so it is made in a lab (not extracted from tobacco). The lab synthesized version is almost 100% pure and this is the active ingredient in Anatabloc.Star has also filed numerous patents for the anti-inflammatory applications of Anatabine in humans, especially as they relate to stopping the transcription of Nuclear Factor-kappa B (NF-kB). This is an early step in the JAK STAT inflammation pathway, and it is best understood by watching this video and reading this link. It should be noted that nutraceuticals can be patented for specific diseases, and Star has filed a multitude of patent applications, both at the USPTO and at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). In addition, this press release reveals that Star has filed a patent for the S-(-) isomer of Anatabine, which is not found in nature. This isomer (or enantiomer) would be the basis for a prescription version of Anatabine. You may note this was filed over two years ago, so we should be nearing a time when the patent could be granted.
http://seekingalpha.com/author/nuke-john/instablog
Thanks for the link. I just left my comment on his article. I didn't like his comments.
Thanks for the link. I just left my comment on his article. I didn't like his comments.
yes and with new management we're beginning a new chapter, Mullan's writing the next chapter, the story will get better. We've pasted from a glass half empty to half full. I'm going to take my Anatabloc and wait for my investment to come back. I feel positive!
I think your read on what could to happen is correct, I agree with your reasoning. I don't believe this company is going down the tubes anytime soon. I like the product so I'm holding.
a little sarcasm? do you think anatabloc just might be reducing chronic low level inflammation for a lot of people including me??? and that it is beneficial to users?? it's been established that excessive inflammation is harmful. If it didn't reduce inflammation I would call it snake oil.
I wouldn't do that, I'll tell you why. My wife is 63, she has "MS" and has had the same prescription glasses for as long as I've known her, many years. Just recently her eye's were examined and her eye's got better to our amazement. The doctor wrote her a script and she got new glasses. I'm seeing better and the only reason I can think of for the change in my and my wife's vision is the Anatabloc. I've experienced a skin conditions clear up, my allergy and asthma is improved and my ulcerated colitis is in remission. I use medication in addition I use Anatabloc. I wouldn't change a thing accept I expect that I will be reducing my med's after my upcoming doctors check ups.
If the fella was helped by using Abloc, that's a good thing, it shouldn't bother you, are you calling him a liar?
yes I think your right, good people, I noticed Dr. Margaret Hamburg has studied extensively in neuroscience, the neuroscience community is very likely well aware of the Roskamp Institute and Dr. Mullen. They have common interests, who knows they may even communicate with each other.
Husband Peter Browns hedge fund trades in all equities including big pharma, it's their job, you wouldn't expect anything else. Whether Mr. Brown has removed himself from the big pharma fund decisions, I'll not know.