Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I just know about four or five pot stocks that all got hit at the same time on Wednesday morning, as if someone was orchestrating the take down. Nothing about any of the stocks was stock specific to that particular stock, other than they ended up in the cross hairs of someone, or someones.
I just noticed that out of the bunch, PHOT closed green on Friday, while the others didn't. Just making an observation. Let everyone decide for themselves if there is any significance to any of this.
Were all of them hit like these others were?
Yes it did, exact same timing as the others, Wednesday morning thirty minutes after the bell.
Just checked on the four marijuana stocks that got hit this week, PHOT, MNJ@, CB!S and H#MP. Noticed that we were the only ones that closed green Friday. I guess the others are still getting hit.
The e-cigarette seems to have taken hold. The e-joint can't be far behind.
Another cultivation company would be nice. And another pharmaceutical company would add to the value.
How many companies pr viable acquisitions prior to pr'ing the actual acquisition? I've never invested in one company that pr'ed what companies they plan are acquiring, partnership with, ect.
Based on my experience, they like to keep those close to the vest until fruition.
If I was on the BOD, I could better answer your question, but that answer would most likely be, stay tuned.
The flip side, PHOT now has the potential to secure major additions to its diverse portfolio of companies and exponentially grow. Almost like weed that is very hard to eliminate. Just keeps growing and expanding its territory.
I'm afraid shorts will have to develop new biological/chemical weapons to control PHOT in the future.
I wonder if one of these meetings is like visiting a winery?
No more so than major acquisitions, IMO.
No more so than major acquisitions, IMO.
Put a buy order in before the bell at .285. Left. Just came back and noticed it got filled.
It is pretty common knowledge that the strong stocks are the ones that get this short attack kind of treatment, because those shorting know that when they quit, the stock will bounce back fairly quickly.
They can make $$$ by manufacturing panic, and then they can make money as it goes back to where it belongs...because it is a strong stock, and they are no fools. They may be some things, but fools they are not.
Me neither, so I wouldn't of advised a similar course of action.
Now, if anyone just wants the pps to drop so they can start a position at a lower price, then by all means, sell right off the bat, like today. Of course, that would have nothing to do with the company, but just pure manipulation of the pps. Is that your objective?
This is pink stock land, where manipulation is all that matters. Contracts, fundamentals, and management don't hold a candle to any of that.
As long as anyone down here realizes that the company has absolutely no bearing on where the pps is, you'll be fine. What controls the pps is not the company, no matter what they report. That is just the way it is down here.
Anyone have any ideas when this particular locust hoard will move on to the next crop field to try and devour so this one, which was nice and green and healthy, can recover?
So how much bs manipulation by groups that like to control things down here should one expect and tolerate.
It's never been about fundamentals of some companies down here. It is all groups manipulating share price for their own greed. I'm glad I don't belong to any of those groups. Money is not that important to compromise your morality as a decent human being.
No dilution, just flipping going on to create some volume.
Why would anyone want it think it was dilution that caused the increase in volume?
The gutters some crawl into for some money.
It's funny that some folks try to make the dip early this morning, some fault that the company has, when it really all about timed manipulation of the flock.
Exactly same drop offs at the exact same time this morning? Probably more than just those four. Things that make you go, Hummmm. And some here trying to make the drop stock specific.
Check out what happened to MJN@, CB!S and HEM&. See anything familiar to what happened here this morning?
How is that coordinated, btw?
Only one question/comment with that approach. does that approach facilitate a rising pps, falling pps, or a steady pps around where it is trading now?
One day, this will have to sneak upward, just based on common sense. Your approach would do what here exactly?
That was just one contract. Look forward to many more going forward, some probably larger, some smaller.
It does make you wonder if EWSI reported $30 million in profits, and not just a contract, if you of still been able to get those. I'm guessing yes, because after all, this is the market EWSI is currently in.
It's pretty obvious that someone, or someones, do not want this to rise. That's pretty much SOP around here lately.
My wife told me to put some money into one of these pot stocks. After much deliberation, I chose this one because of share structure, ongoing business and revenue increase Q over Q by multiple streams, and management.
This reminds me of the coffee stocks a few years ago. Or the oil start-up stocks of a few years also. The only difference is, coffee and oil big wigs have been around more than a few years. There are not any big wig pot companies.
Small companies that grow pot/hemp will be overrun by the big tobacco companies, trust me on this. Add the favorable share structure here, and this was the one worth investing in.
No different than a bid at .02.
Too large of a O/S, IMO
12yearplan, I don't have private messaging, but that was good. You took the back end of my compound word , which is correct in a literal back end sort of way, but I was referring more to the front end of my compound word that would also function as the back end of my message.
Can't believe I am actually on the same side of a stock as you for a change.
Can you provide any proof that it is 99.9%, or is that just something you pulled out of somewhere that would have part of my name in it?
That's nice to know. Both what the new share structure is and the fact that they followed through with updating it at the top first of the month, like they did in January, and said they would do with that December pr.
A pink stock company pr's a change in their reporting guidelines to their investors, and then follows up with two months of following through with what they said they would do? Just add that to the mix of under projecting and over delivering, and they really are acting like a company that would act on a bigger board.
Meanwhile, we still have to deal with rift raft. I'm sure they are as motivated to follow through with leaving their present market as the long investors are here.
Their website should update the share structure this week. They switched to monthly updates in December.
That has been the factual experience so far with projections. They are lower than actual Q figures. Don't expect that to change for 4Q either.
Anyone trying to convince anyone here that what actually has happened, has not, well, what can I say?
Of course they can. You forget where we are. This is penny land. Manipulation reigns down here.
If this company can break hold of the many penny in 2014, it will deserve gratitude, along with those longs that believed it could.
I'm one of those that believe it can.
That would be impressive and continue with the exponential growth of 2013.
I don't think it will be as high as $40 million. Closer to $33-35 million. It all depends.
Remember, the company gives out conservative estimates/projections. Just keep that in mind when factoring in whether to buy, sell, flip, or short.
Now, why would you do a thing like that? Or suggest a someone do that?
Ok, anyone have any guesses on who's behind the drop?