Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You are absolutely correct ... I heard a "live from the scene" radio report ... either I misunderstood or Pat reported it wrong ... knowing that Pat has never made a mistake since he addressed Harry Carey as Milo, it must have been my hearing that was in error ...LOLOL ... I did find it very interesting that the judge set sentencing for 9/11.
Lay and Skilling GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS.
Wow TK, you know how to bring back memories ... first you bring up mention of Lawrence Mealey and now of good old Gorski ... what's next? Missing from the CLEAN article is the fact that MS was only appointed to the job on a temporary basis until a replacement could be found. Are you going to address the actual experience in the business world of our illustrious CFO? That will get some real interest. BTW, we reinvested our profits from the CYGX stock sales in SuperChicks company and today we got another order that was a little on the profitable side ... our stock would have had to go to over $2.50 a share to equal it.
TK, that may go back a year but it is still most impressive. The back shop gang just continue their "nobel" efforts ... BTW, I think the secret in their success is eating egg rolls from Tiantai.
Houndish, I could be completely wrong, but I seem to recall that being from a far earlier era and do not believe that it has anything whatsoever to do with any of the active intellectual property of CYGX. CSI would most likely refer to Cyrogenic Solutions Inc ... the forerunner of CYGX. Although the technology of that era is actually proving to have potential, it didn't at the time. Comparing that technology (frozen fetuscycles) to the current vector is akin to comparing watermellon rinds and caviar ... nothing in common.
No Paulness, this is 'Star Trekish" ......
On Wednesday at two minutes and three seconds after 1:00 in the morning, the time and date will be 01:02:03 04/05/06.
That won't ever happen again.
You may now return to your (normal ?) life.
Thanks for posting that Arnold. Good news on that front. They may have kept the appeal alive. If they are going to fight an action, I think it should be fought completely. Wonder why they let it slide so long??
This was just posted this morning. Looks like gdepc had the word before the court did.
Great observation ... I'm so very glad you can read a calendar.
The 3 dollar high I think that took place in 2000 over five + years ago
it is now 2006
We can all be very thankful for the recent gains ... but of course it will be a long time before we hit a new all time high. It would have to go over $3.00 and although that is possible, I don't think it will get there for some time to come. Maybe this summer if we get into production and can get some nice grants, contracts and orders.
Wow TK, those are some great tree pictures ... uh ... which one is the tree? I think I have been out of the jungle too long.
Oh and BTW, I think there is some misunderstanding about my clan ... it is actually my clam ... part of the crustacian research as applied to mollusks. LOLOL
... and maybe one of the Judges pet poodle, Puddles, was chasing Jimmy Joe's Mr. Kibbles around the office and they soiled the brief and it had to be sent to the haz-mat folks for sanitization.
I think that you posted exactly what I have been reporting, now, isn't it? Although the deadline has passed, the court waits a few days in case the response is in the mail.
Has the case been dismissed NO
Has the deadline passed YES
Maybe the deadline has been extended
Here's a copy of the events report and the calendar ... Of course, as I said you no doubt know a lot more than the clerk of the court ... yup, maybe the deadline has been extended and they just forgot to tell anyone ... happens all the time.
Date Event Type Description
3/21/2006 Response due to a motion or Court's Order. Appellant
3/9/2006 Supplemental Reporter's Record Filed Court reporter
3/1/2006 Appellant's brief past due. If not filed court may dismiss Appellant
2/10/2006 Brief Due Appellant
1/27/2006 Letter from mediator on mediation results
1/13/2006 Motion to extend time to file brief disposed. Appellant
1/5/2006 Record has been checked out-see remarks Appellee
1/5/2006 Record has been checked in-see remarks Appellee
1/4/2006 Motion to extend time to file brief Appellant
1/3/2006 Motion filing fee paid. Appellant
12/27/2005 Response due to a motion or Court's Order. Appellant
12/8/2005 Record has been checked in-see remarks Appellant
12/7/2005 Appellant's brief past due. If not filed court may dismiss Appellant
11/6/2005 Brief Due Appellant
Calendar
3/21/2006 Status Response due to Court's Order or case will be dismissed
Good one, TK ... still as funny as when you first came up with that name. ROFLMAO
I believe that is "red diaper doper babies."
Are those the same MM's who took the price UP?
MM's, took down the price
gdepc, I did just what you said and checked with the clerk a few minutes ago. He told me that there had been nothing filed and that the response was past due, but that they give it an extra day or so due to the possibility that it could be in the mail.
Of course, there is always the possibility that you know more than the clerk or the court. He's only there and is the one who receives the briefs and you are certainly in a better position to know what's going on than he is. Sorry that I had forgotten that you RBWs are never wrong.
and hogger check with your clerk buddy he is wrong
No it hadn't been extended as of about 4:00 pm today. This is the final day before it can be dismissed. That will be up to the judge(s). That is according to the clerk. He and I will talk again later in the week.
Has the deadline been extended the avgi case lives on
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
gdepc, only very foolish men ask questions when they do not know the answers. I have no desire of getting into that subject other than to say that I bought into various private placements and share swaps.
What's different between the private placement you did and other private placements
Don't get too fired up about trying to impeach me ... you might not like the doors that get opened. I certainly have no intention of opening them.
Instead of making a run at me, just enjoy the fact that we have had a nice runnup and that First Court of Appeals has not yet dismissed the CYGX appeal.
Actually, you are not correct in saying: the single strand ssDNA technology has not cured anything yet. The anti-ICAM indeed produced spectacular results in treatment of inflamation and probably in treatment of herpes. I know it worked because I played the role of a test subject. It is that personal knowlege (that I doubt anyone else on this board possesses) that has caused me to question many of the actions of management.
Can you offer even the most minor modicum of evidence to support your outrageous contention that the reason for the appeal involves a lack of ability to deliver? I doubt it.
Good one tibbcat ... maybe he can get Lawrence Wunderlich to loan him the prescription he used to have posted on the wall over his desk. It was the first prescription for the vector and contained the CYGX miracle hair restorer formula. Only problem is that LW retained the same "slicker-than-a-babies-butt" hair style that I share with him. LOLOL ... I used to be envious that he tried the treatment and was going to have a full head of hair and I didn't get to try it. Shame that it just didn't work, isn't it?
arnOLD! i can see your hair falling out from here. chill, babe.
Arnold, you are almost correct.
1. AVGI took cygx to court.
The truth is that CYGX took Waldroff to court. Waldroff wanted to settle the conflict out of court, but because of the involvement of Bardwell and Boyd, CYGX sued Waldroff and AVGI. That compelled them to countersue CYGX. When the jury found in favor of Waldroff and AVGI, CYGX appealed the verdict. That would be normal and expected. Then after jumping thru several hoops, CYGX quit filing briefs as directed by the Court of Appeals. My questions concern why CYGX seemingly gave up after so many of the folks on this board assured us that the case had no merit in the first place and that CYGX would prevail on appeal. Someone earlier today posted that CYGX didn't want to throw good money after bad. If that is the case why all of the action in the first place?
Your three final points are correct and well taken.
That Paulness is an absolute crock of nonsense. It has already been appealed. CYGX has spent a lot of additional money trying to win a reversal of the jury verdict.
I think something wonderful is about to happen, and that big money is coming our way ,and the appeal would only slow Cytogenix down right now ,so I don't think it is going to be appealed.
Hey tibb ... I just can't buy that premise. If it wasn't worth the time, then why did they appeal in the first place and then jump thru some of the other expensive hoops ... like the demand for mediation? All of those things cost money for both sides and CYGX is going to pay attorneys fees because they lost and the other side was awarded those in the jury trial.
Good morning HC. Looks like we should all move to either the Virgin Islands or Alaska. Folks seem to have less terminal flu and pneumonia there. Interesting that the two extremes are the healthiest.
BTW, I spoke to the folks at First Court of Appeals this morning. CYGX has still not filed their brief and the CYGX appeal could be dismissed at any time if it is not received in the mail today. Any idea why they are not pursuing this matter. I know it is only a few hundred thousand dollars that it is costing, but wonder why they appealed and then have not aggressively followed up?
Hey Scooby, that was an interesting attack. Why didn't you address the facts that I had brought to the table? Are you sure that you really want to talk about how shares have been sold in the past? I some how don't think you really know much about what has actually happened. If you had been in the court room, you might have learned something about what transpired with the equine and crustacian applications. Rember, CYGX got clobbered by the jury ... or can you spin it into a victory.
If you're not afraid to venture into interesting salient territory, give us an update on the litigation.
No, cygx sued and in turn provoked a counter suit, went to trial and they lost. They appealed and now according to the First Texas Court of Appeals have not been timely in filing their paperwork and are in jeopardy of having their appeal dismissed tomorrow. Check the court calendar for Case Number: 01-05-00492-CV. Don't worry, the total cost is only going to be a few hundred thousand dollars at most.
Speaking of killing two birds with one stone, is there any significance to tomorrow being the 21st of March? Does anyone think todays run-up is a prelude to the possible news coming tomorrow that CYGX has lost again in court and is going to have to pay a tidy chunk of money to some folks they should have never sued in the first place?
Holycow, your family Judge is a highly respected jurist. I remember him mostly for Iran/Contra and for the Malcolm X assassination investigation. Sorry it took me so long to snap on who you were talking about. As you alluded to - those senior moments are rather interesting ... LOL.
Interesting ... we'll have to check it out some time. Bet the corps de diplomat were jumping thru hoops ... LOL. Sounds like your family is as eclectic as mine. Three of my ancestors fought with the Texas Rangers ... uh, the Rangers shot one and hung the other two ... LOLOL
Hey JJ, wonder how long Happy will get for that ... lolol ... wonder if Nappy is representing him and if they will use the "But I'm a cygx shareholder and it was driving me crazy" defense?
Okay HC ... didn't understand just what you meant ... Do you have a lot of Judges in your family?
I come from a family filled with people in that profession and I prefer to keep some distance. When something is new, I imagine I would find out eventually.
Here's the verbiage from the Appeals Court.
Calendars:
Set Date Calendar Type Reason Set
3/21/2006 Status Response due to Court's Order or case will be dismissed
LOL ... not the one I saw. You must have it mixed up with the original plan for Southwest Airlines ... good one. I'll ask Bill next time I see him ... I'd ask Bardwell, but I haven't had a tetnus immunization lately ... rofl.
... Why don't you ask Waldroff himself or Avgi I am sure they know ...Hogger is it true the original agreement concerning Waldroff case was written on a napkin
LOL, gdepc. Nah, can't go there ... still have too much stock in CYGX to become antie ... hey, have you or any of the others got any idea why CYGX hasn't been following up on the Waldroff suit? After all, CYGX was the party that brought the suit and then lost it and appealed it. Do they still have Robert Higgason representing them? I just can't figure this whole darned scenario out. Help me.
I figured you would spend your vacation time cleaning out the anti cygx bunker since it has been vacant for some time now LOL
Moooooo, HC, sorry we hadn't gotten back to you inre the Waldroff suit. Arnold, Ilene, Nappy and I were on a cruise in the Carribean and just got back on shore. If I can catch happy hour (here, not at the Monkey Bar) I'll drop you a link so you can follow the mellodrammar yourself. I can't make any sense of the apparent scenario.
Hey nappy, is it true that ownership of CYGX stock has been successfully used as a defense for pot possession?
Okay Capt Crunch, now you've crossed the line. How dare you put my littled girl's picture on the internet? You'll pay for this ........ of course she really does love Houston ...
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/quotes.asp?ticker=CYGX&qm_page=10699&qm_symbol=CYGX
Yup, but I really hope that the dragon was off mark and had been inhaling too much pure oxygen. I'm sure that if there had not been any truth to his smoke rings then our RBW's like gdpec, PaulNESS and the others would have been here jumping all over me for passing along something like a dragons breath. You know how it is when trusting those winged serpents.
Maybe some of them will jump in here and get us (and the dragon) straightened out.
I guess so BigB ... it all started last night when I was taking my daily 5K run. I forgot to take an extra water bottle and I think thirst slowly gave way to dehydration. As I ran by Yao Ming's house, I saw a big dragon ascending from the mailbox. This really struck me as odd because my Chinese name is Big Dragon (Quong Long - same as Jackie Chan).
Anyway, the dragon soared high into the sky and then swooped down in front of me and thru the flames and smoke told me to beware of the 21st of March. Somehow in those great smoke rings he was blowing, I saw the letters slowly form spelling out "Court has had enough delay and is going to dismiss the CYGX vs Waldloff case." Well, that really got my attention because that's not how Bill spells his name. I shook my head and continued to run. About a kilometer and a half later it hit me ... my Chinese to Engrish translator apparently got those darned R's and L's confused again. Then it all made perfect sense.
Well, I hope this clarifies the current scenario. I'm going downstairs and wash my chopsticks so I can eat some icecream.
Have a great day and let's hope that danged dragon was all wet.
Hey Tibbcat, just curious, but is it possible that the only real news is that the appeal of the CYGX vs Waldroff suit is about to be dismissed and that CYGX will have lost yet another legal battle?
LOL Jimmy Joe ... at least I would have been able to understand a few words ...
At least the court clerk was not speaking Cantonese or Mandarin.
Just had a call from another attorney who told me that he wasn't so sure that it was over. Of course, he may know more about the circumstances than the assistant clerk ... LOLOL
Gotta run ... my Marvin Zindler connection and I are having lunch ... God, I love properly prepared roast Rottweiller - beats minature poodle tacos anyday.
I did check some of the copurt rules and wonder if this might apply ...
3.6 DISMISSAL DOCKETS. The following cases are eligible for dismissal for want of prosecution pursuant to T.R.C.P. 165a:
(a) Cases on file for more than 120 days in which no answer has been filed or is required by law;
(b) Cases which have been on file for more than eighteen months and are not set for trial;
(c) Cases in which a party or his attorney has failed to take any action specified by the court.