"Returned Executed by LG Capital Funding" that makes no sense

I see no proof of service. You really need to wait for word from iTalk before jumping to conclusions

shorts almost started to cover the other day when they thought TALK was done with the UMS ch.11 but then they piled back on

It is what it is

What do you have against clowns? The sun comes out tomorrow just a FYI and it hasn't come out since trump was elected

that would be king congo lol

sorry I'll try to keep quiet but you were supposed to tell us how the bk is going, not add shares in secret

We are well aware but hoping and praying the manipulators get burned when TALK turns a profit, no joke

Was there ever any doubt?

Last size 30,000 or $15 sell order for TALK with a brokerage fee of $9.99 gives a net of $5.01 that proves to me a massive short is holding this down. Time to go back to bed

Why would the price be deliberately held down with 2,000 share sell orders every time TALK goes up a tick the little baby sell order jumps in moments before the close? Because a massive short position exists and the price will not be allowed to rise until something changes with TALK

4 trading days to cover! TALK will be vindicated....

Buffet is not as smart as he seems then. TALK will make a ton of cash for long investors shortly. Especially smart money who use dollar cost averaging

TALK is the ticker to own in the cellular industry

True that! TALK can absorb operations and UMS can go away. iTALK is the name we all want to have.

Shorting another billion is not prudent IMHO ... TALK may prove to be a winner

iTalk, Inc.? @iTalk_Inc 1 Oct 2016
Replying to @iTalk_Inc

This is bigger than you think. Everyone will soon see what we mean and agree with iTalk. 2 Thumbs up @LeEcoGlobal

'China’s Google' LeEco announces US debut next month https://t.co/mmCUnVArT1

— iTalk, Inc. (@iTalk_Inc) October 2, 2016

LeEco will not acquire TV maker Vizio as planned
https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/10/leeco-will-not-acquire-tv-maker-vizio-as-planned/

Perhaps the 2 billion dollars are going to be used to acquire iTalk instead

730 million users of LeEco wants to go public
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-10-21/leeco-makes-a-push-into-the-u-s-market
Could iTalk be their vehicle?

It was both but they are getting shafted for threatening and extortion

1600 locations of CPD Mobile. For some reason, I don't think it has been fully accounted for

How about Kramer threatening to destroy UMS? Sounds like a legitimate excuse to me. Silence is golden to the true longs in the TALK. The massive short debacle will be glorius

no dog, no pony, sorry

or Maybe there is an excuse

If there is no excuse then why is TALK still trading?

Public disclosure is a good thing in my book and I've been reading plenty of it.

Last chance for romance. TALK is a true gem...

TALK is not in BK. It doesn't take much DD to find the facts. Try reading this:
"Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization of iTalk's indirect subsidiary CPD Mobile"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/iTalk-Inc-TALK-25950/

*corrected typos*

Soon the fraudulent garbage claim will be dead and gone with proof of revenue

Let me spell it out. SOME(S.O.M.E.) seem to think Levy is in jail as evidenced by the artificially low share price of ticker TALK. The word "some" is not directed toward any 1 individual. I did NOT imply any price manipulation

That DD gives the impression that reverse mergers are against the law. There is nothing wrong with reverse mergers, only pump and dump schemes which obviously comes with a jail sentence.

Apparently the latter. It seems some believe Levy is in jail but that myth is easily proven wrong. Here is your erroneous DD on Levy:

Relevant tickers - Banneker, Inc. (BANI), Cardiac Networks, Inc (CNWI), Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc (PDMI), Metatron, Inc (MRNJ), Emerging World Pharma, Inc (EWPI), Talent Alliance, Inc (TLAN), and GreenGro Technologies, Inc (GRNH).
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=70236062

This great DD neglected to look at the middle name of Levy

If they want money they should go long like everyone else. TALK is not going to be destroyed

Yes sir, "Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper
purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose
the challenging party to sanctions"

Signed by the judge!

https://cdn.pacermonitor.com/pdfserver/SWUEH4I/69583748/United_Mobile_Solutions_LLC__ganbke-16-62537__0145.0.pdf

Are you sure the answer is no?

Perhaps I'll get my order filled to average down my purchase price per share in TALK

Nice chart PB!!!

Thx Eng62...noted n reported...but will not be heeded

NITE shorted TALK to oblivion and is using every trick in the book to kill the company. That is the only explanation for me.

How is that cheating an employee? It is happening nationwide. It is the norm. It is a negative idea scraped out of the depths of negative thoughts. The dark side is calling again