Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not so. Asher has another transaction before the $27K. There was another 47.5K with Asher which is convertible at 58%. 166,000,000 shares has been reserved out of the authorized stock for this. Go look at the filings.
Question: In the 8K, there is this mention of a prior note of about $47K convertible to approximately 166,000,000 shares. Can anyone shed light on this matter? The buyer of the note is also Asher
Thanks for any info.. BTW not bashing..just a need to know
the ice creme will be a big heat. what they should do do is get them inside bars, where all gents hangout. will be a big heat
this stuck goin to shoot up to the moon. maybe even beyond moon and outer space...watch for 100 new stores opening up.. imho
locked up yes. but who would want to buy the shares knowing full well that 18 billion shares are practically round the corner. my guess is there will be a reverse split to reduce shares at that time. this will destroy small shareholders. imho
Authorized shares has been increased to 18,000,000,000 shares
That's right 18 Billion shares. 11 billion goes to the new owners. OS would be a little over 11 billion shares. That leaves existing shareholders with very little of the new merged company. I believe a reverse split will occur after new shareholders receive their new stock. 18 billions shares: market can't swallow that much shares
IMHO
Why is the status DEAD? Check this link
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4008:to22ff.2.22
Let's say capital investment: $100.00
Future Funding: maybe 0
What a load of !@#$!@#$!@#$ PR.
PR is just to appease the ever-growing PO investors
Good lord..so you are saying then.......oh it can't be....you are saying that we are dealing with God then
Over 1 million shares sold at .0014
5,000 shares bought at the very end at .0026
This seems to have been the pattern the last few days of trading. Lots of selling at the low side and then someone props it by buying a few measly shares.
SO WHO BOUGHT THE 5,000 SHARES?? YOU MG?
Whether "release" or "released," it just changes the tense but not the gist of what was posted
Again, that WAS NOT A RELEASE.
It is not even dated.
dude/dudette: so you mean to say the bod will not do anything unless we keep quiet? problem is nothing has been done, quiet or not so quiet...why would their ability act be contingent on us keeping quiet? doesn't the bod work for the shareholders?
"perhaps the new bod is too busy monitoring..."
You must kidding? if they are monitoring this board, then reeltime is truly down the tubes.
Heavens...an investors can either provide capital (shareholder) or debt...in either case they have to be provided with info on how things are being resolved....
i'm amazed at how there are so many apologists for current mgt, if there is one.
You are reading it completely WRONG. Here you go:
"made arrangement to resolve the vast majority of debts...."
is completely different from
"and agreement has been made THAT RESOLVES the vast majority of debts...."
and wow, talk about looking through rose colored glasses: "that should come".....LIKE WHEN? tomorrow, next week, next month, next year, next decade...proof is in the pudding
they dont even state when they have started resolving it...how much effort has been made..that supposed announcement, which by the ways IS NOT ANNOUNCEMENT but something that is posted on a website, is nebulous and likely meant to be nebulous...meaning you interpret it the way you want to interpret it..
to be an announcement, you have to place in such way that ALL SHAREHOLDERS, not only those that read the boards, are aware of it...
and what about the "announcement" of that woman ceo...the therapist..if you interpret this announcement of Ussery being the new ceo via the web, then it could also have been interpreted back then of a new therapist ceo..that "announcement" was dated (Sept 2011 I believe)...this supposed new announcement of a new ceo IS NOT DATED......
Your response is off base. Read my previous post carefully. What is being said is that they just agreed to NEGOTIATE an agreement to resolve the problems. That is entirely different from actually resolved the problem by negotiating. Their statement did not say what % was resolved. Maybe 1% for all we know. The remaining 99% is just an AGREEMENT TO NEGOTIATE A MEANS TO RESOLVE IT. It does not mean an agreement has been made THAT RESOLVES the problems.
"They resolved or negotiated to resolve the vast majority of debts."
Read this statement very carefully. What have they resolved? What % has been resolved? Notice also the phrasing "negotiated to resolve." It does not mean that it has been resolved. It very well could mean they "negotiated to resolve" and not actually resolved them.
For example:
Person 1: Hey person 2, I will pay $10.00 to negotiate on resolving our problems. Here is the $10.00
Person 2: Accepted.
Person 1 and Person 2 have negotiated (in other word agreed) to resolve their problems, but not actually may have even begun resolving their problems. They just have an agreement to resolve their problems.
Its called legalese.
I suspect this is what happened or is happening.
The statement itself "resolved or negotiated to resolve the vast majority of debts" is not false by using the relational operator OR. One part of the statement can be true and the other false, and the statement itself or sentence would still be true. Just because of the word OR. That I believe is where he has a legal loophole to fall back on.
Funny on Friday's trades how everything went for around .0015 to .0017 and then a small 2500 at .0039 at the end.
WHO IS THIS GUY? HMMMM
I was hoping for the best, but starting to look more and more that the new website was a desperate attempt to stir up interest and trading volume on the stock.
Very easy to trace who, where, when something was posted with appropriate software tools or just subpoena investorshub to release the data.
Those of you who have had email communications from MF or MG or whomever it is, look at the headers of your email. That will provide enough to locate the person
Well there may yet be hope. They have actually made node/47 inaccessible. YAHOOOO!!! YAHOO!!!!
How difficult is that? Now HOW ABOUT FIXING THE CONTENT...which at the moment is elementary school level.
I'm beginning to think the pic of Ms. Amber is stock photo.
Picture of the girl in the link is the same girl in PIVAH.COM.. Ms Amber Finley..or whomever she is..
Let's see how quickly they move in "fixing" the web site. I have screen shots of the current web site now. Will be interesting in comparing the before and after.
It's becoming more obvious what a bunch of monkeys that were running or messing up RLTR, current PRES included.
What is interesting is the PIVA website. There is no publicly viewable content at all, which makes things more perplexing and questionable. Isn't the purpose of a website to invite people into your business and see what you offer and what you've done? Never seen anything like this.
Bunch of bozos.
More on PIVAH.
Look at this link:
http://www.manta.com/g/mr55tbj/amber-finney
Amber Finney is an employee, and the sole employee. Look at the business they are in. Interesting. The address of PIVAH is:
Pivah, LLC
18325 214th Avenue Ne
Woodinville, WA 98077-7107
ReelTime's address is:
13110 NE 177th Place
Woodinville WA 98072
Now look at the phone number listed for PIVAH: (425) 495-1612
Now look at this link:
http://pivah.com
Look at the very bottom of the web page and look at the phone number listed: (425) 495-1612
IT'S THE SAME.
So pivah.com is the same business as listed by manta.com
Mouse over the woman icon in the SOCIAL SECTION. When you mouse over, a box appears with the text AMBER FINNEY in it.
Click on the woman. Is that Amber Finney...whoa...easy on the eyes.
That PR was never released so is not a PR at all. What likely happened was an attempt to rename Reeltime (that failed), get a new pres (that failed). Hence the PR was never released.
Your comment that attention was now being focused on Reeltime Media implies that at one point, attention was being given to some other entity.. WHAT IS THAT ENTITY? THAT ENTITY NEVER EXISTED...hence, attention was never diverted from Reeltime.
You are just down playing the buffoon-like way that Reeltime has been managed or mismanaged, and that whomever is running Reeltime now has been caught red-faced trying to sell JEWELRY. Hey, the Jewelry "calendar of events" still viewable! It's
www.reeltime.com/node/1
According to the calendar here is what our Reeltime people will be doing:
September 17, 2012: Gem Showing, Tacoma Mall
October 8, 2012: Kent Valley Management Review
October 9, 2012: Fenwick Meeting
Novermber 27, 2012: Webinar
What? Nothing for DECEMBER? hmmm..maybe our Reeltime execs are taking holiday the entire month of December.
Hopefully, the new management (if it really exists) will not be a bunch of monkeys.
Agree. I've seen better websites constructed by high schoolers. Geez, you can even make a decent site by using Google Sites. What bugs the daily outs of me is the amateurish contents of it all...and the English...geez...guy must not have graduated high school....
shareholder here but just tired of the bs
someone posted here earlier that MG had said earlier that he was not aware that his name was still associated as pres or something of reeltime...WHAT A LOAD OF YOU KNOW WHAT...how can he not be aware.....this guy is just stalling, stalling, stalling.....a tactic often used when someone is caught red-handed.
More troubling things:
1. The letter from the CEO was never officially released! It was "released" by someone posting it on this board!
2. The letter from the CEO is not dated. Anytime you release something official, a date is required. Otherwise, when did this guy become CEO? When was the letter written? Without this date or an official release, it could easily be claimed that they were just creating web pages that were not intended for public consumption. Take a look at the page located at www.reeltime.com/node/47
A letter/announcement yes. BUT IT WAS NEVER RELEASED; SAME WITH THIS LETTER BY THE NEW CEO.
3. Take a look at the SERVICES page. Here's part of it:
"Our expertise also includes over 10 years of collective professional education in media and industry-specific skills in marketing, advertising, graphic design, multi media production, video, web development, digital marketing, social media, public relations and all new internet and web technology communications."
10 YEARS - IS THAT IT? JUST #@$!$!@ 10 YEARS. Let's see: How many in management? Let's say there are 4. That means on the average, they have 2.5 years of experience each? WHO'S RUNNING THE COMPANY? Graduates just out of college? hmmmm...maybe HIGH SCHOOL....
4. SWOT - take a look at wikipedia and their discussion of SWOT..
now look at the PROJECTS page of reeltime.com
whatever they mention of SWOT sounds like as if it was taken out of wikipedia reworded.
5. the overall website - the reeltime website is amateurish. Pages are full of grammatical errors, run-on sentences, incomplete sentences.
6. Looks like someone from reeltime reads investorshub posting..
when you go to reeltime.com/node, the list of jewels for sale no longer show...but reeltime/com/node/xxx (type in a number) still are accessible.
MORE TO FOLLOW
Here ya go folks. Here are things to ponder about and start to question things seriously.
Go to the following link:
http://www.reeltime.com/node
What the heck is this?
After you've gone to the link above, proceed to go to the following
http://www.reeltime.com/node/1
Go to the www.reeltime.com and click on PROJECTS
Who is this ADVA Media Group? Well I did some research and found out that the website had been taken down. But using Google Chrome, I was able to display a cache copy of the ADVA Media Group website before it was taken down. Well, low and behold, the ADVA Media Group website was exactly the same site that you now see for REELTIME. Exactly the same except that instead of saying REELTIME MEDIA GROUP, the home page read ADVA MEDIA GROUP. Content-wise the same, except for one thing: The ADVA MEDIA GROUP had an announcement of the new ceo which was a women, a physical therapist at that...Also, the announcement read to the effect saying ADVA MEDIA Group, formally known as REELTIME INC...
ONLY THING IS GOOGLE HAS TAKEN DOWN THE CACHE COPY OF THE WEBSITE TOO...So the cache copy is gone.. I wish I had taken a screenshot of the web page....
SO SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT FOLKS...
I'm gonna wait several weeks more. If this pattern of silence continuous, I am seriously tempted to post what I've discovered doing due dilligence. Come on, newly minted pres, or whomever you are. Say something.
As mentioned earlier, riding on the coattails of the Facebook IPO could have huge rewards for those that do.
Here is an example: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57437760/start-ups-cash-in-on-facebooks-success/?tag=cbsnewsSectionContent.9
Hope my speculations do come through and Reeltime does something with the social media craze.
Well you just wrote several hundred words. And I dont expect that you get into some sort of thesis (your thousand words) regarding RLTR. I am cautious with this as well and am familiar with ICTN, BCCI, and RLTR. I still have quite a bit of concern and until an announcement is made, I too have reservations.
But you make broad sweeping claims and assertations and when you do, you should put substance into it as well.
If what you say is worth $10,000 you should not be even on boards like these BTW.
Not saying that RLTR is in the same league with Facebook. Far from it. You should know that yourself. What is being implied is that, the timing of announcement could be done around this time. Social media content is where its at right now...just maybe just maybe they will have something that can get people excited over RLTR again that would have some sort of social media implications.
Make an announcement around this period, and YAHOOOOOOOOO...
you never know
Facebook trades publicly next week. Hey peeps at RLTR, hows about riding on Facebook's coattails and do something...STOP SITTING ON YOUR YOU KNOW WHAT
So enlighten us... what is the double speak. again in a capitalistic world, companies are swallowed up all the time...
what don'y you understand there....
"This leads me to the believe that BH is somewheat behind the new team. They are not really interested in ideas, but in money. Read the website carefully. After doing so in detail, I came to the conclusion that they will tell you the idea is great if you back it with money and give it to them. But otherwise, your idea is worthless. "
Just exactly where in the website led to you this conclusion? Granted it is not the best textually written website, I don't see (or read into) how you came to this conclusion. Seems to me what they are saying is: if your idea or product is great, but don't have the resources to take it to the next level, that is where we can come in and take it further.....
ANYBODY ELSE THINK SO?
You write in really broad generalities. I am cautious here as well, but goodness gracious balls of fire, aren't you jumping to conclusions?
You sure do sound bitter. Read one of your latter posts about RLTR stealing some of your ideas. What leads you to this conclusion earlier? Did you know something which others don't? As far as your comments in this post are concerned, IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME in a capitalistic world. And THAT IS A GIVEN. Just as a small example, there is a show called SHARK TANK on ABC. Entrepreneurs with ideas (some great) present their ideas to these sharks, and if one of the sharks likes it, will counter the entrepreneurs idea with another offer, often getting a CONTROLLING STAKE IN the company. IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME....SO GIVE IT A REST...geez...you give yourself to much credit I think for your ideas being stolen?
Hey Reeltime. Correct your home page! The 3rd sentence in the second paragraph of the home page IS NOT a complete sentence. GEEZ