Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just proves the MM's run the market and not the other way around.
bloomsfield is a dead end. I have tried to sign up a couple of times and they don't do anything.
had one too many zero's, meant .006
Long and strong.
With bid at .0006 and ask at .0007 there isn't much chance of ETIM going above .0007 now.... nuts.
Know of any collection companies other than CLBE? When I first looked at them they were in the 4 penny range, now they are 3 cents (I have made enough donations to downward spiraling stocks). CLBE looks like a group of educators that banded together to form a company, they do have the technical knowledge but they need some people that have business degrees and a business plan to succeed in the corporate world.
When I decided to invest in stem cell companies I did look at CLBE, but decided that it didn't have the potential I was looking for. I concluded PLRS was the best price/risk option and have been rewarded for that decision. When SCLL integrated PLRS's patent I looked hard at them and took the plunge into their company. If CLBE starts to look promising I will pick some up. Thanks for the tip.
PLRS is a 100% buy!!!
http://quotes.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=PLRS
Upward and onward. I'm cashed out or I'd get more... maybe I'll find some cash somewhere......
The key word is 'most'. And his ignoring the issue made him smart? Sure. He was the most ingnorant president ever!
But right now Bush is putting his foot down on embryonic research other than a few select strains on ethical reasons. Soon as we get someone less ethical in office the ban will be lifted. Not that embryonic stem cells have any more promise than other stem cells.
Politics will always drive a wedge between people, but we do agree that PLRS is going to make us rich.
I agree that PLRS and SCLL are floating each other's boat. One going up is good for the other. I have both of them in my personal portfolio and ROTH. Damn, they were the biggest raisers today.. SCLL is very inexpensive. Not many nickle stocks that have so much potential.
Stem Cells are the future of medicine (hopefully.. hopefully)
Good luck to all.
This stock has potential. Check out their webpage and look at what the world is doing. Bush is holding back the embryo stem cells but I don't recall Clinton passing any legislation in the 8 years he was in office. What the heck, the patent will be sold to anyone anywhere in the world and not every country has such repressive laws regarding stem cells.
I wish you great luck and may this stock go to a buck soon.
I agree that it looks like the previous 'table', might be a few more sideways days, a down day then it jumps again.
"They haven't even delivered a single urn yet."
I would like to point out the 'single urn' sent to the President of AKC.
Any other concerns why this 'sky high' stock is pushing a penny?
mojocash, I can't PM you but this is my trade today:
Filled Buy 80980 ETIM Limit 0.0065 13:01:51 04/16/07
I averaged up from 80980 to 81000, my bad.
I figured out my taxes yesterday and it took an extra couple of hours because I couldn't get my stock trades to come out right. I finally figured out I was forgetting a $1200 dollar trade then it came out right. Then I sent in my forms and forgot to add my W-2. Now have to wait for them to send me a note before I get my refund to apply that cash to ETIM!!!!!!!!!!!
Gee, the price is under a penny but I don't consider 29 million shares traded in a day 'low volume'. If compared to the big eared mouse stock which has traded 6 million shares today, it seems that today ETIM has a 5 for 1 advantage.
When ETIM does hit a penny there will be many, many happy people here.
All aboard the ETIM train, it's slowly building up steam and ready for a runaway.
What's the commotion? The CC coming up is the commotion. Now some are (atttempting) to put doubt into the minds of investors or future investors. They know that doubt will be erased on the conference call so they are doing all they can to put dis-ease into ETIM. Ignore the what-if talk and let's all sit in on the call.
I got 81,000 more shares at .0065 today. Long and strong.
3 traders are in the ETIM rocket, the long has his foot on the accelerator, the shorter has his foot on the brake and the flipper is tied to a bungee cord attached to the outside.
The clowns say wheeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!! ETIM is going to the moon!!!!!!!
Seen them and with the steps they have taken they are outstanding. Eternal Image has gotten millions of dollars in free advertising so they are wayyyyyyyyyy ahead of the game. So they had a down quarter? I don't really care.
Look at it this way, I'm looking at the field full of newborn cattle and thinking of what they are going to be worth soon. You, on the other hand, are looking at the fertalizer they are dropping and you're thinking 'is this all there is??????'
Still, this is a pink and the tried and true charts are just supposition of future events. They might when it's on a better market and stable at a buck or more!!!!!!!! God, that just excites me to no end.....
Yawn... most companies have to work hard to break into a new market, not here. Again, most companies lose money for years and some never make a profit. Again, not here, it's that demand has outstripped supply and they can't make their urns or caskets fast enough. In fact, they haven't even penetrated 100% into the American market by looking at the distributors map.
If you have such 'concerss' about investing in ETIM, why not just put it in a nice, safe bank account that pays about 1% a year?
I agree that craps is more exciting than blackjack, as one can lose it all on one roll of the dice.... where blackjack is a 50/50 proposition.
ETIM looks like more than a normal pinky since they have a product and not a promise. They have exposure and not promises. They have new interest in an exsiting market. Take away market share from the existing producers? Absolutely. :)
VOTES IN CONGRESS last week
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS: Voting 63 for and 34 against, the Senate on April 11 sent to conference with the House a bill (S 5) to extend federal financing of embryonic stem-cell research beyond limits set by President Bush. The bill would give researchers access to thousands of embryos that otherwise would be frozen or discarded by fertility clinics. Donors would have to consent to the research.
Bush’s order on Aug. 9, 2001, limited federally backed research to about two dozen embryonic stem-cell colonies produced before that date.
Stem cells potentially can develop into any human cell or tissue.
Supporters say the research can lead to cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, while opponents regard it as the taking of human life.
Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said: ‘‘All told, more than 100 million Americans have diseases that one day could be treated or cured with embryonic stem cell research.’’
Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said he also wants cures but ‘‘cannot in good conscience support a bill that forces American taxpayers to fund research that requires the destruction of innocent human life.’’
A yes vote was to pass the bill.
Chuck Tom Grassley Harkin NO YES
STEM-CELL ALTERNATIVE: Voting 70 for and 28 against, the Senate on April 11 passed a bill that sponsors described as a pro-life alternative to S 5 (above). The bill (S 30) authorizes federal funding of research using embryonic stem-cell lines that were produced during in vitro fertilization but which after seven days or later stopped dividing because of natural causes. Bill backers call such embryos ‘‘naturally dead.’’ In vitro fertilization involves the production of eggs outside a woman’s womb.
Sponsor Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said: ‘‘A ‘naturally dead’ embryo is an embryo that, after the seventh day, has a cessation of the division of cells. It no longer can be implanted and become an embryo, but the cells that remain are viable, just as my heart, liver, kidneys, or lungs remain alive while I have an irreversible cessation of brain waves.’’
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called this ‘‘a cover vote’’ and said: ‘‘For the 100 million Americans who suffer from diseases that could be treated as a result of stem cell research, there is simply no alternative to S 5.’’
A yes vote was to pass the bill
VOTES IN CONGRESS last week
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS: Voting 63 for and 34 against, the Senate on April 11 sent to conference with the House a bill (S 5) to extend federal financing of embryonic stem-cell research beyond limits set by President Bush. The bill would give researchers access to thousands of embryos that otherwise would be frozen or discarded by fertility clinics. Donors would have to consent to the research.
Bush’s order on Aug. 9, 2001, limited federally backed research to about two dozen embryonic stem-cell colonies produced before that date.
Stem cells potentially can develop into any human cell or tissue.
Supporters say the research can lead to cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, while opponents regard it as the taking of human life.
Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said: ‘‘All told, more than 100 million Americans have diseases that one day could be treated or cured with embryonic stem cell research.’’
Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said he also wants cures but ‘‘cannot in good conscience support a bill that forces American taxpayers to fund research that requires the destruction of innocent human life.’’
A yes vote was to pass the bill.
Chuck Tom Grassley Harkin NO YES
STEM-CELL ALTERNATIVE: Voting 70 for and 28 against, the Senate on April 11 passed a bill that sponsors described as a pro-life alternative to S 5 (above). The bill (S 30) authorizes federal funding of research using embryonic stem-cell lines that were produced during in vitro fertilization but which after seven days or later stopped dividing because of natural causes. Bill backers call such embryos ‘‘naturally dead.’’ In vitro fertilization involves the production of eggs outside a woman’s womb.
Sponsor Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said: ‘‘A ‘naturally dead’ embryo is an embryo that, after the seventh day, has a cessation of the division of cells. It no longer can be implanted and become an embryo, but the cells that remain are viable, just as my heart, liver, kidneys, or lungs remain alive while I have an irreversible cessation of brain waves.’’
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called this ‘‘a cover vote’’ and said: ‘‘For the 100 million Americans who suffer from diseases that could be treated as a result of stem cell research, there is simply no alternative to S 5.’’
A yes vote was to pass the bill
Statement of Administration Policy
H.R. 810 - Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
July 17, 2006
(Senate)
STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY
From the WhiteHouse PDF
H.R. 810 - Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act
(Rep. Castle (R) DE and 200 cosponsors)
The Administration strongly opposes Senate passage of H.R. 810, which would use Federal taxpayer dollars to support and encourage the destruction of human life for research. The bill would compel all American taxpayers to pay for research that relies on the intentional destruction of human embryos for the derivation of stem cells, overturning the President's policy that funds research without promoting such ongoing destruction. If H.R. 810 were presented to the President, he would veto the bill.
The President strongly supports medical research and worked with Congress to dramatically increase resources for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This Administration is the first to provide Federal funds for human embryonic stem cell research and has done so without encouraging the destruction of human embryos. The President's policy permits the funding of research using embryonic cell lines created prior to August 9, 2001, the date his policy was announced, along with stem cell research using other kinds of cell lines. Scientists can therefore explore the potential applications of such cells, but the Federal government does not offer incentives or encouragement for the destruction of human life.
Over the past five years, more than $90 million has been devoted to embryonic stem cell research through the NIH. However, this bill would provide Federal funding for the first time for a line of research that involves the intentional destruction of living human embryos for the derivation of their cells. Destroying nascent human life for research raises serious ethical problems, and many millions of Americans consider the practice immoral.
The Administration believes that government has a duty to use the people's money responsibly, both supporting important public purposes and respecting moral boundaries. Every year since 1995, Congress has upheld this balance on a bipartisan basis by prohibiting Federal funds for research in which an embryo is destroyed. The Administration's policy upholds this same principle.
H.R. 810 seeks to replace the Administration's policy with one that uses Federal dollars to offer a prospective incentive for the destruction of human embryos. Embryonic stem cell research is at an early stage of basic science and has never yielded a therapeutic application in humans. While no treatments or cures have been developed from embryonic stem cell research, there are therapies and promising treatments from adult stem cells and other forms of non-embryonic stem cells.
Alternative types of human stem cells - drawn from adults, children, and umbilical-cord blood without doing harm to the donors - have already achieved therapeutic results in thousands of patients with many different diseases. Researchers are now also developing promising new techniques to produce stem cells just as versatile as those derived from human embryos, but not requiring the use of embryos. The Administration believes that the availability of alternative sources of stem cells further counters the case for compelling the American taxpayer to encourage the ongoing destruction of human embryos for research.
Moreover, private sector support and public funding by several States for this line of research, which will add up to several billion dollars in the coming few years, argues against any urgent need for an additional infusion of Federal funds, which would not approach such figures even if completely unrestricted. Whatever one's view of the ethical issues or the state of the research, the future of this field does not require a policy of Federal subsidies offensive to the moral principles of millions of Americans.
H.R. 810 advances the proposition that the Nation must choose between science and ethics. The Administration, however, believes it is possible to advance scientific research without violating ethical principles -- both by enacting the appropriate policy safeguards and by pursuing the appropriate scientific techniques. H.R. 810 is seriously flawed legislation that would undo current safeguards, and provide a disincentive to pursuing new techniques that do not raise ethical concerns.
Fox news is showing a story about a parapalegic walking again thanks to...... stem cells.
The medicine of the future.
The sad thing is that as long as the price is going up, there will be flippers and daytraders. Little do they realize that they could make much more by buying and holding long term rather than making a quick hundred bucks here and there.
There was a post regarding submission of Eternal Image to a newspaper. Could someone give me the post number?
Thanks.
What's the difference between a tax and a fine? A fine is a tax for doing wrong and a tax is a fine for doing well.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
maybe he meant another stock would be .0045 by today... I'm sure some stock was .0045 today...
We are Bond, Etim Bond....
V, I replied publicy to an unsolicited private message that slammed me for my opinion on ETIM and found out that was a no-no here. I take in all opinions about ETIM because they are all based on personal information, right or wrong as they may be.
Keep doing DD and decide for yourself if ETIM is worth buying today.
Isn't that the point of buying stocks, thinking/hoping they will go up? If you think a stock is going to be going up, then buy. If you think a stock is going to go down, then sell.
The market decides the current price, period. It doesn't determine future value because no one knows (or are supposed to know) what is going to happen.
Look at what happened after 9/11. The market dropped because of uncertainty of the world and not because an individual company's future value but the state of flux of the entire world at that time.
Now that you are asking specifically about 'valuation', ETIM is a bargain right now relative to it's future value. Think of it as buying future dollars for pennies.
Good day, sir!
It's worth whatever you can get out of it. Nothing more, nothing less.
I don't think anyone really cares if you sell. With 3 billion shares outstanding yours are a small, small drop in the bucket. If you are in for a quick pop, you missed it in Feb. Is it going to happen again soon so one knows for sure. There are thousands of stocks someone will sell you for more than they paid for it.
CURRENT valuation is determined by the CURRENT stock price. Today it's varying between .0065 and .007. The supply/demand/willingness of indiviuals to buy or sell on current and past informatin determins the value of any public business.
As we current stockholders value the stock higher, the shorters value it lower and the market makers value it in a range.
I think it's worth $1
Some cute answers, but I'm waiting to see which ones EI chooses to answer and what else they will have to say. Might be a major PR out pre-conference call and maybe not.
Very hopeful that the CC will spark some buying and not cause a 'sell on news' upchuck.....
what if one answers an answer to a deleted post? Is it deleted, too?