Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
1) More questions about JPEX could also be indicative of more worried bagholders than in his other tickers. It says nothing about the popularity in a good way. Have you checked the daily dollar volume versus his other tickers? It seems the only time there is any JPEX volume is when people are selling. There is no interested buying volume, that ship has sailed.
2) He did not specify JPEX, he was intentionally vague and JPEX being included is only an opinion. The rest of that is a "forward-looking statement". If a company says something like that they have to include a prominent disclaimer stating as such, fortunately anonymous internet pumping opinions don't require them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-looking_statement
These statements can often be misleading, as they can be mistaken for factual statements, while they are actually speculation.
Sentences and phrases are forward-looking statements when they include any tense from present to future or similar inflection. Words like "believe", "estimate", "anticipate", "plan", "predict", "may", "hope", "can", "will", "should", "expect", "likely", "is likely to", "intend", "is designed to", "with the intent", "potential"
Yelling FUD! at the truth is the last bastion of desperate opinions trying to keep the share price up but it just ain't working...
Here you go, a claim that JPEX is a favorite ticker and already has a done contract.
Seeing as there is an injunction against a merger in place this is obviously a lie.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168711972
If everything goes according to plan, sure, maybe.
But this is the OTC. Anyone who has survived a while has learned not to count their chickens before they hatch.
I never said you made that claim. I said that the claim has been made on this board. Which it has.
Read my last post where I quote the board claim that does not include the about to close part. It specifically says all contracts done.
From this very board, a discussion regarding the tweet and claiming that all favorite ticker contracts were done with JPEX included among them.
Post# of 20149
I read the tweet by opp zone.. did not see jpex excluded regarding done.. contracts signed.. did I miss something?
Post# of 20149
No winner, you didn't miss anything. Good catch by you. We all saw the same thing. Kind of funny how all contracts done. No exclusion mentioned for anything, All favorite tickers..... $JPEX was probably THE favorite.
The lie is that JPEX is in the list of favorite tickers and therefore has a signed contract. Which has been said on this board.
And is obviously false unless Frank is violating the court ordered injunction.
So which is it?
Are you claiming that Frank's tweet indicates JPEX has a signed contract? Let's discuss.
Nope. Just don't like seeing people lied to.
Nor did they include JPEX in the "popular" tickers. They were intentionally vague so the hopeful in all their crap situation tickers would still retain hope. But the fact is that if JPEX was included in that list that had signed contracts then Frank has directly violated the court-ordered injunction against a merger.
Sooo, still want to pretend that JPEX is in the list of popular tickers with signed contracts?
Or should we face reality instead?
When discussing filings and status downgrades that anybody else can also read and verify as the truth is described as FUD you know you have lost the battle.
They did have filings - those were the Form C's that I mentioned. I had only seen Frank use those before and that's why I jumped to the conclusion that the fourth ticker was also Frank's when I did just a cursory check of filings and saw the C there before actually reading it.
I'm not sure why those forms seemed to sometimes grant almost instant Current status when they don't include very much information at all. They seem to be designed for crowdfunding outfits and have their own filing requirements. Seems like a loophole that was exploited, frankly.
Yet they did not keep up like they were supposed to have. Saw a tweet mention that the crowdfund status tickers still need to file an annual within 120 days of year end and that math works to being due Saturday it looks like. Call it the first business day after the weekend and makes perfect sense why they were hit last night.
ILIM and NWTT went direct to Expert while VNTH has 15 days. My bad on the other - LWLW was a different custodian that also did the SEC Form C trick like Frank.
Frank's tickers didn't do so well last night. Looks like two downgraded to Expert Market with no warning and another two to Pink Limited / Grace Period, which means they go to Expert Market in 15 calendar days.
All that on top of Frank having to reveal yesterday that the supposed TMX* merger has fallen through. No explanation given, just like his others that suddenly fell apart.
Things that make you go hmmm.....
It's an unfinished website, you're not supposed to be able to read and understand that text. It's just placeholder gobbledygook.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum
Claiming to have DD that just can't be released yet is right up there in the top 5 signals of something being fake. Pretending trusted friends have examined it for authenticity is right up there as well.
Only a truly naive investor falls for lines like these,
Oh sure, secret DD that no one knows about, awesome. Never heard that one before.
I guess it would have to better than ticker change DD, seeing as how ticker change DD does not exist either. It was a fabrication by bagholders desperate to lull in naive investors who do not know better.
Go ahead, show me where there was mention of ticker change request by any of the parties here.
Oops, there is none. Just baggy fantasy.
The judge granted the injunction because it was the course of status quo while further information is needed. He expressed displeasure at the reticence of Frank's team to disclose details of the merger even though they could be made private, no problem.
I know how to read too.
But the merger never concluded.
Don't believe me? Here it is, straight from the horse's mouth, https://twitter.com/VeeMost_IR/status/1505968176407924751
"Everything looked good" does not equate to a finalized merger.
And "Veemost will come back because they already requested name and ticker changes" is the baggiest logic ever even while being entirely false. Only the most naive of investor would fall for lame crap like that.
So you are claiming Veemost submitted paperwork for name and ticker changes before anything was finalized and before the merger actually officially happened?
"There is a process for this" seems less like up and up business and more like pumping out some premature information to ensnare the cash of naive and inexperienced investors with hopes of big profits but in truth facing exaggerated claims and distorted realities.
Are you really trying to claim that someone can just willy-nilly request a ticker and stock name change for a company that they have no control over just on the off chance that they might have a merger with them in the future?
That seems to be the claim, I just want to make sure I fully understand what is being said.
Why would Veemost submit a stock ticker change for a ticker they don't own?
You might want to re-read the press release.
Why would Veemost submit a name change? Why would they ditch the brand name they have worked years to establish?
I think you are thinking of Frank requesting a name change which at this point seems like it was just a pump maneuver back then.
What exactly would that accomplish?
The notion that "the quickest way forward" is waiting for a court case with no end date in sight and no idea which way the case might go anyway is ludicrous. It is a fantasy being foisted on the naive.
Don't take it from me, google "how long does a reverse merger take?" for yourself.
Yup, as little as several weeks for a brand new merger, starting from scratch.
Maybe we need more than just one Top Institutional holder with less than $200 worth of JPEX holdings to talk about.
Yes, the Top Institutional holder has less than $200 worth. Do the calculation yourself.
Maybe we can start a rumour that there is a whale somewhere out there holding $300 worth.
Are you calling the company's own filing erroneous?
The so-called "big players" in the OTC get sparked by being in on a frontload that neither you nor I get to know about beforehand.
Then sure, they tell everybody and their brother to get in on it.
But no frontload and they could care less what happens with a ticker. Why would they?
But the filings directly from the company show a different number. Thoughts?
Fair enough. Odd that the filing numbers don't match the TA Verified numbers on the OTCM website.
Where do you see a 4.4B OS?
My source says it's always been 3.2B since a November increase of 56M.
Of course there is skin in the game.
There is a limited amount of money that goes into the OTC and warning people off the bad plays based on lies and misinformation means more money into semi legit plays they can actually make money in.
"Somebody knows something", isn't that how the saying goes?
Wrong, they do show up in the daily volume even if they were in between the bid and the ask.
Volume has dried up, that's just reality whether one likes it or not.
By the same logic, every board that has been dead for years must have the most busiest companies ever.
That's ridiculous.
People have moved on because there is nothing here until Hovendick is taken care of and we have no idea when or even IF that will ever happen.
The only people that have the problem with the truth are the scumbags promoting based on lies.
I prefer folk put their money into tickers that aren't based on pure misinformation so they actually have a chance at profiting.
Getting pumped into lies bags them out, probably never to return to the OTC, which needs all it can get right now.
Pretend it's impossible for anyone to care about the truth, but it's real.
This will turn out to be a fraudulent filing just like it was two years ago when someone did the exact same thing with another ticker. They even used Pharma LLC back then too.
It was fake the whole time.
What am I wrong about? And I've had a couple comments here in the last four days since the dubious filing, not exactly years of history, sorry.
So, the DD is still one dubious filing. That anyone could have filed if so inclined. All the multiple "fancy cross checking" screenshots at NV SOS still all boil down to just that one single filing.
The Tina DD is bogus. There is no LinkedIn for Tina R McCullough, try it yourself - it comes back "no results found". Whatever source claims that LinkedIn entry includes the middle initial is lying through their teeth to you. Additionally, the Tina McCullough in the quoted entry is from Auckland, New Zealand and has a demonstrated history there going back decades. In other words, she ain't the Tina R McCullough from Reno, Nevada.