V--This guys gotta quit looking at porn--V

Porn may be contraband in prison but Ovalle's real crappy article just says Caceres was sending photos to Barnett.

Ovalle did not state in his slanderous Barnett/OOAG/Caceres article that "This guys gotta quit looking at porn." about Barnett.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V----These two really need to get a life----V

In Ovalle's really crappy OOAG/Barnett/Caceres article, Ovalle makes it seem like Houser and Young "These two really need to get a life."

Houser and Young get up worrying about Barnett/OOAG everyday, and the sleepless nights the two must have reeling in relentless turmoil over there OOAG losses.

What a pity they can't move on from stalking Barnett while he is in jail.

And if/when Barnett and Caceres beat the rap which Barnett seems so adept at doing according to Ovalle's slanderous article, how will Houser and Young mentally handle there inner anguish over his freedom???

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V-------Post#22466 has credibility issues reference-------V

Reference posts #22387 about credibility.

There is no "scam by scammers...both inside and outside the jail."
Who is doing the scamming??? Who are the scammers???

Posts #22438 states the SEC is "planning to delist OOAG soon." yet will not divulge how the information was received. Is that the scam by a scammers post #22466 is referring to???

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Delisting may never happen:

The real problem is....Why would anyone criticize another investors reasons for buying a stock??? Its the investors money.

There are many reasons to buy stocks or options or whatever one chooses. Personally I have a high risk tolerance and I like the leverage a penny stock offers.

I have from experience made good money buying penny stocks such as OOAG. I have also lost money, "oh well."

Whatever the reason is to buy OOAG, its the investors money and its his/her's choice to spend it the way they want to.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Process.and.Timeline.for.delisting.OOAG.shares.may never come:

There have been many posts stating OOAG shares will be delisted.

Posts that were posted years ago were stating that OOAG will be delisted, and yet OOAG still trades.

Timelines, groups of stocks, these kinds of posts are just more OOAG predictions.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V--------Makes it up as he goes along--------V

Ovalle just "Makes it up as he goes along" in his article about Barnett/Caceres/OOAG.

Quote from post#22459..."Barnett was a self-proclaimed "guru". No one else ever thought he was." end quote.

Quote from Ovalle's slanderous article..."Houser recalls meeting Barnett a luncheon in Las Vegas in late 2003, a pretty young woman draped on his arm, “Mr. Barnett was referred to us as a guru who would help us raise $5 million in investments,” Houser said."

From the above two quotes its easy to read that Houser states "Mr. Barnett was referred to us as a "Guru". Barnett did not state that according to Ovalle's really crappy article.

Another quote from post#22459..."All his deals lost money." end quote.

Another quote from Ovalle's POS article..."But according to court filings Barnett and the others illegally sold millions of shares – worth nearly $10 million – and pocketed the money meant to go to Biotech." end quote.

Looks like Barnett and others made plenty of money on this deal.

In my "humble" opinion. ;) Hehehe

Request#3.Post#22438..How.do.you.know.the.SEC.is.planning.to.delist.OOAG.soon?

Ovalle's.crappy.article.says.Barnett.was.known.as.a."Guru."

V----Hey look, the Bobsee Twins are back-----V

Not only that but when the judge does see Barnett and Caceres in court he will probably say, "Hey look, the Bobsee Twins are back."

According to Ovalle's crappy article, Barnett seems so slippery when it comes to getting convicted of anything, he'll more then likely beat this rap easy.

The more time goes by, the harder it will be for the DA to get a conviction against Barnett.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Post#22438-How.do.you.know.the.SEC.is.planning.to.delist.OOAG.soon?

How do you know "the SEC is planning
to delist OOAG soon?"

What is the contact number of the SEC person?

In Ovalle's crappy article Barnett beats the rap
a good percentage of the time.

"He was never charged" or "the charges were dropped" etc..

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Request#2...When is the SEC going to delist OOAG???

So they are selling OOAG shares on ebay now, cool.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Buying at .0006 before it ceases trading is no better than buying at .0016...no matter how "cheap" it is claimed to be.

When is it going to cease trading???

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Investors are free to buy more OOAG in
the meantime.

What does this mean? That Barnett/Caceres will beat the rap and resurrect OOAG?

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

How far out in the future will nobody

be able to sell there OOAG shares???

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

How is OOAG worth zero??

I saw 25 thousand shares trade at the bid price of .0006. The bid size was a guaranteed 10k shares at a price of .0006.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

When is the SEC going to delist OOAG???

For a long time now I have seen many posts on this OOAG forum make this statement and yet, the SEC has done nothing to delist OOAG's stock.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V----Is this trash for real? How pathetic----V

"Is this trash for real? How pathetic." The quality of Ovalle's article is so bad it can't be taken seriously. Ovalle states Barnett did this or that then he backtracks and states Barnett was "never charged" or "dropped the charges."

Posts have been saying OOAG will get delisted for a long time now and yet, "OOAG stills trades."

Posts have ben saying erroneously "OOAG is worth 0 or worthless" and yet someone sold 25k shares today for .0006, they got paid.

The SEC may do this or that to OOAG or maybe.......

Barnett/Caceres will get out of jail, sue Ovalle for slander and resurrect OOAG.

Struck a nerve? heheheh

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Dido

Pump and dumps are more prevalent to a scam because the investors are, as you stated, less confident in there position.

The investors worry about reverse splits, trading halts and freezes, or even out right delisting's. So the investors are always looking to dump when caught buying a stock to high.

Blue chips have a somewhat higher level of confidence. But either position, no investor likes seeing red in there portfolio.

In my opinion.

The real problem with TINO is its a-scam:

You are right about the "pump and dump" that is one of the ear marks of a scam, which results in low investor confidence.

I am not saying TINO will always be a scam.

The base of longs means little to this stock. Based on TINO's current share price, it would seem to me most of the longs are probably under water and waiting for the next pop in an attempt to recoup some of there investment, hence the dump.

In my post #4508, I outlined what my initial research leads me to believe regarding TINO.

In my opinion.

One of the problems with TINO is:

Before this latest little pop happened I wrote in my post #4508 that one of the cons with this TINO scam is "The company will sell shares into any pop in order to raise money to continue the scam."

I don't know who is selling but TINO popped and then dropped.

I am not saying you can't make money here, but I am saying TINO has all the traits of a scam.

Still looking to enter it though.

In my opinion.

All that may be true or it may not

I do know for a fact that predicting whether or not the SEC will delist OOAG is pure stupid speculation within any post.

I do think that all the technical jargon about the workings of the SEC in regards to the delisting of OOAG may seem to make a post seem legit, but the bottom line is no post knows what the SEC is planning.

I do know for a fact OOAG is still trading and has value.

I do know nobody can predict the future of OOAG shares up or down.

I do know each investor has a right to spend his or hers money however they choose to.

I do know going long and buying at a low price is a sound investment strategy.

I do know that blaming Barnett/OOAG/Caceres for losses is pointless and child like.

I do know according to Ovalle's crappy article Barnett has a great track record of beating the rap.

I do know according to Ovalle's slanderous article Barnett was known as a "Guru."

I do know according to Ovalle's stupid article Barnett is a hard worker and can raise cash and lots of it fast.

So until OOAG gets delisted which will not bother me in the least, I will watch the stock like I do many others.

In the interest of full discloser I own OOAG shares.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

I am going to sell my OOAG shares...

and run for the OOAG hills, OOAG shares are doomed.

The fact post #22433 corroborates post #22432 really adds credibility "NOT." Post #22433 has credibility issues reference post #22377.

Posts for years now have been saying OOAG's shares will be delisted or are "worthless", and yet OOAG shares have monetary value and still trade.

Like I have always said if you buy OOAG shares consider your money gone until its not. No post can predict the future of OOAG shares either up or delisted. OOAG's a long shot but one thing is for sure, purchasing OOAG shares at this price makes more sense then buying at a much higher price.

Buying OOAG shares at this level offers:

Spend/Loose less if OOAG delisted.

Much more leverage for a lot smaller investment if OOAG shares pop.

OOAG's a long shot gamble, so don't play the penny's if you can't afford the loss.

Bottom line is, its your money do what you feel is best with it.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

Child like, unprofessional posts do not help with....

any credibility issues TINO may have.

Attempting to excite potential investors to part with hard earned money should be left to the mirror and not the TINO forum.

In my opinion.

V---Obviously you didn't like yours, Looser---V

I'll bet when Houser and Young were confronted by the cops during there testimony the cops probably stated that "Obviously you didn't like yours, Looser" money when it came to giving it away to Barnett.

When going long buying any stock at a high price and expecting a good return is very stupid, OOAG's stock included. With the concept of buying at a low price the investor will usually spend a lot less money, receive way more leverage per dollar spent and that equates to a smaller investment if you loose and a much larger return if you win.

OOAG investing 101.

In my "humble" opinion ;)

OOAG investing class-401 is a self help class?

I am guessing Houser and Young took OOAG investing class-401. Isn't that a class to help the mentally ill deal with investing losses.

I am surprised Ovalle did not do more research and add this topic to his B/C/O article about Houser and Young, and there need to blame others for there own stupidity.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V--------------Lost it all and can't take responsibility--------------V

In Ovalle's crappy, slanderous article he makes it sound like Houser and Young "Lost it all and can't take responsibility" for there own actions.

There are no "sure things" in the market, B/C/O included, so quit whining you two babies, put your binkies back in, and go home. At least that's what Ovalle seems to be saying in regards to OOAG investing by Houser and Young?

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

OOAG investing 101...........

Investors are a greedy bunch, we all want to make money. Using Barnett/Caceres/OOAG or another financial instrument, the acquisition of money is the motivator.

If I loose my investment in B/C/O that is ok with me, I bought low in "hopes" of OOAG going up. I am also realistic and know OOAG can go to -0-. I will not begrudge anyone if OOAG zeros out.

The key to investing is don't get emotional about the investment. Also, the buy is key, that is where the money is made.

Houser, Young and all the investors that followed B/C/O bought high and sold low loosing there investment and now have no "hope" of recouping it, they are out, done. They should let it go.

I bought very small up high and loaded up on OOAG down low.

Meeting Mr. Barnett is not a requirement for me, and if I did, I will not rue the day win or loose. I am the one that pulled the trigger, and I will be take full responsibility for my actions win or loose.

I am currently watching two interesting scams for an entry point.

Good luck to future investments.

In my opinion. ;)

V---The Bobsee Twins are back together again---V

When Barnett/Caceres get out and sue Ovalle for slander the judge will probably say look, "The Bobsee Twins are back together again" in front of a court.

Hope can be a dangerous word alright:

I "hope" Barnett/Caceres won't beat the rap then sue Ovalle using the proceeds to resurrect OOAG.

Then...I "hope" OOAG's share price does not go up.

Because....think how stupid Houser, Young and the rest of the former investors will feel for investing high and selling low. Now they have no "hope" of recouping there investment.

Barnett the "Guru."

According to Ovalle's crappy Barnett/Caceres/OOAG article.


In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V---This looser started his OOAG share buy-back program---V

I'll bet Ovalle "This looser started his OOAG share buy-back program" today with the proceeds from his crappy Barnett/OOAG/Caceres article. Hehehe.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

My initial research indicates TINO is a scam.....

Having said that, I have made money on "scams" before so now I may look for an entry point.

With stocks like TINO an investor makes or looses money on the buy not the sell in my opinion.

The pros on TINO:

Low O/S share count. If there is a run up, TINO will move on relatively low volume.

Doing business in a corrupt country where verification of the facts within news releases will be hard to come by. Any news could excite potential investors to run up TINO's share price.

TINO's business model is old school and easy for the average investor to understand. Also the allure of striking a big mineral find is easy to grasp and has been done throughout history, which makes us investors looser with our money.

There is a chance the company could get very lucky and actually find minerals, which would increase share holder value in a more legitimate and longer lasting way.

The cons on TINO:

The company will sell shares into any pop in order to raise money to continue the scam.

Continued news releases without any production gets old for share holders and also makes a scam become more transparent.

Creativity in each new news release will have to be new and believable or could lead to a decrease in share holder value.

To many news releases could be bad and will show short sighted thinking on the part of TINO's top brass.

Having said this, TINO may be worth a risk, that's what investing is, "a big risk."

Good luck to all.

In my opinion.

Ovalle's really crappy article is just plain stupid:

Quote from Ovalle's article about Barnett:

In 2008, Miami police arrested him on charges of stalking after a former stylist at the salon complained he had been sending threatening text messages, then vandalized her car at the Coconut Grove mall CocoWalk. “My mission in life now is to punish you,” he texted her, according to court documents. Prosecutors, unable to prove the charges, wound up dropping the case.

"unable to prove the charges, wound up dropping the case."

Barnett/Caceres will beat the rap.

Another Ovalle crappy article quote:

“We expect Concord Dome to be a highly profitable project for many years to come,” Barnett said in a 2010 press release.
OMDA managed to sell millions of shares of stock to unwitting investors who shelled out at least $1.9 million, according to a federal indictment.
John Young, an Ohio investor, said that many people were lured in by Barnett’s affable nature and frequent company updates on online message boards. But as the months dragged on, he said it became clear the company was a scam. Young said Barnett used the threat of lawsuits to keep investors quiet.
“He used a lawyer as a gun. He sued practically everybody he came into contact with,” said Young, who lost more than $200,000 in stock purchases.

Ovalle, do you really expect us to believe that a guy having enough money to invest 200k in stock is going to be scared off from going after Barnett because of a...."threat of lawsuits to keep investors quite."....Give me a break Ovalle.

Ovalle's article, is the big Barnett/OOAG scam if there ever was one.

Slander suit coming Ovalle.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

I'll tell ya what Jim, I will throw you and olive branch.

You and I can go back and forth on this Barnett issue knowing neither one of us can predict the future and we are both set in our opinions, or.......

We can agree to respect that, you think Barnett will rot in prison, and I think Barnett and Caceres will beat the rap?

Then we can start arguing about something new;)

In my "humble" opinion;)

I do not dispute posts #22401..22408..22412's knowledge of:

Pornography, Prison and killing witnesses. Real renaissance posts for sure;)

Barnett/Caceres/OOAG have good chances of beating the rap, suing Ovalle and the rag that published his article, then resurrecting OOAG.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

How can you keep saying Barnett will not "beat the rap?"

In Ovalle's POS and slanderous article Ovalle himself writes about how Barnett seems to beat almost everything they throw at him.

I would say the chances are very good Barnett beats this rap to, then he and Caceres sue Ovalle for slander. The two will use part of the proceeds from the slander suit to resurrect OOAG.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

I do not dispute posts #22401..&..#22408's knowledge of:

I do not dispute posts #22401..&..#22408's acute knowledge of the following topics:

Pornography, Prison and "dropping the soap daily in the shower".

Chances are high Barnett/Caceres will beat the rap, sue Ovalle for his poorly written and slanderous article. With the proceeds from the slander suit and Caceres at his side, Barnett will then resurrect OOAG.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)

V---This POS has nothing better to do----V

"This POS has nothing better to do" with his life other then following Barnett around. If he really is a good prosecutor, he would bring Barnett and Caceres to trial.

After Barnett/Caceres beat the rap, they can get on with suing Ovalle for slander, and resurrect OOAG.

In my "humble" opinion. ;)