Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Paige, do some DD on the "dangers of nano", there's plenty of info on the subject. If you're curretly using this nano shampoo it could be seeping into your brain cells. Oh... so that explains it! LOL Just kidding.
Nano particles are 1/80,000th the diameter of a Pookie hair"
"Despite studies suggesting that the new properties of nanoparticles create unique human health and environmental risks and the public's growing exposure, no health and safety testing protocols for products with nanomaterials have been developed and no U.S. government regulations protect the public or the environment from these unassessed risks. FDA relies on safety testing guidelines that were developed for assessing risks of bulk scale materials; however, scientists universally agree that the properties and adverse effects of nanoparticles cannot be reliably predicted from the properties of the material in bulk form....
http://www.icta.org/press/release.cfm?news_id=19
"Lab animal studies have already shown that some carbon nanospheres and nanotubes behave differently than conventional ultrafine particles, causing fatal inflammation in the lungs of rodents, organ damage in fish and death in ecologically important aquatic organisms and soil-dwelling bacteria."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/04/AR2005120400729.html
Because it looks like another MN1-type promotion scheme Sand.
Paige, I recently read an in-depth article on nano tech. Opponents were saying that things like nano shampoo, sun screen, impregnated clothing, or anything utilizing nano that comes in direct contact with the body has an unknown factor associated with it.
No one knows how these nano products may interact with the body and there's no regulatory agency protecting consumers at this time.
We're currently witnessing the wild, wild West of nano technology as it applies to consumer products.
They say that the majority of the products advertising nano tech don't use it at all. All marketing hype.
Geez Paige, I dunno, it's your rumor, not mine! LOL
A who might this certain reporter be Paige?
You're right Z, he really didn't have to go so far as produce a product. His primary job of slowly burying the fradulently advertised Loch Harris tech was executed quite well.
He has kept hope alive to the tune of 28 million dollars.
Nice having you aboard Z, it's refreshing arguing with a newcomer from the TCL board. LOL
"I go back to the US Army test of ELF when they said the product worked but was too slow and the footprint was too small."
Go back a little further Z. Right after he took the job from the Boyz. Remember what he said? There were no technical obstacles which would prevent getting ELF/EM-1 to market.
OOPS! LOL
All vintage MP- ring leader extraodinaire.
"how much do you suppose the recent PR campaign is designed to offset the 10-Q due next week?"
They're always thinking how to push any accountability ahead... to the next Q.
"Today, we have a backlog of clients that are awaiting installation of expanded ValiMed™ units and we are preparing to start that delivery process.”
"The 10Q2 was yesterday."
"Look forward, not backward"
"The glass is half full"
buzzzzzzzzzzz..............
CDEX now uses, "Enhanced Photoemission Spectroscopy". This reminds me when the Pentagon was trying to come up with a pleasant sounding name for the "dirty bomb" which was designed to counter the overwhelmingly superior Soviet tank force in Europe.
The DOD coined the phrase, "enhanced radiation warhead". It was a winner.
The customer resistance curve seems to still apply only to the large teaching hospitals. Valimed is still completely out of reach of the smaller hospitals regardless of a few more sigs and a new QA software feature for "compounding".
The key phrase remains- "niche market". High-risk, compounded, liquid meds only. Even Dssu6255, who posts (TCLB) as if he's a pharmacist or pharm tech claims he can't see how Valimed could ever be used in a busy pharmacy. It just takes to long.
MP appears to still be targeting new PP investors that don't know the history of the scam.
Bobby may make his payment yet. LOL
The history of MalSpeak suggests the following:
"Today, we have a backlog of clients that are awaiting installation of expanded ValiMed™ units and we are preparing to start that delivery process.”
"backlog" = four (4)
"clients" = beta partner hospitals with Valimed units.
"expanded Valimed" = new cuvette port + signatures/software additions
Some people have been wondering if Timmy is still CEO after the MN1 webcast. So what can be inferred from this PR statement:
“Our expanded ValiMed™ solution provides greater functionality and detection sensitivity that we believe brings true value to our clients and a higher level of safety to patients at healthcare facilities,” said Malcolm Philips, Founding CEO and Chairman of the Board.
Yes, MP was the founding CEO and Chairman of the Board, but what is he now, a consultant or once again, CEO?
A half-truth is a deceptive statement, that includes some element of truth. The statement might be partly true, the statement may be totally true but only part of the whole truth, or it may utilize some deceptive element, such as improper punctuation, or double meaning, especially if the intent is to deceive, evade blame or misrepresent the truth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-truths
If MP is still a consultant, then the statement is a half-truth.
Some people call it MalSpeak! LOL
Paige, I don't understand what you mean when you say, "Canada is my choice."
Choice for what?
Baxa is already exclusive distributor in Canada ya know.
I hear Valimed is selling like hotcakes up there! LOL
CDEx claims they don't have the money to send a representative overseas, yet they continue to pay themselves exorbant salaries. What kind of management is that?
My conclusion is it's all BS and there is no overseas market at this time. Talk of overseas interest is a carrot to attract more PP money IMO.
Management just cannot be that stupid!!
Sorry Paige, I accidentally got up on the testy side of the bed this morning. LOL
But think about it, there is absolutely no excuse for such imcompetence. That's why I believe it's BS as per usual.
What can be done to keep CDEx from closing their doors?
Cut ALL executive salaries to 100K/year and exercise an incentive plan based on performance.
That would save at least 500k/year, enough to cover all overhead expenses with money left over to send a salesman to Japan.
"First, let me say that I really like the ALL CAPS touch you've given to your message."
And look at his use of paragraphs... Harry, you've come a long way baby!!
"What do you think this is all about...hua???...I'm always scratching my head .."
It means that Valimed isn't going to electrocute anyone and meets occupational health and safetly guidlines (OSHA- USA).
It's the Euro version of UL approved.
You can't sell a product in many places without it. In Los Angeles county we can't sell any electrical equipment which operates from a standard 120 VAC electrical outlet without UL approval.
Baxa would never have became a distributor without it.
UL, TUV, CSA.... lo mismo.
There doesn't appear to be much MM effort to create a market for CEXI. Perhaps there's more profit in artifically maintaining the PPS and selling through boiler room activites.
Of course not, otherwise CDEx would have a multimillion dollar contract by now!
CDEX has revolutionary technology, but TSA has to get their sheet together and take advantage of it!
I'm I right Paige? LOL
And I thought INET was referring to me! LOL
Hey!!! I would appreciate it if everyone leaves Harry alone.
He actually thinks he's being realistic just like Raiderman believes he's being "cautiously optimistic".
It's okay to be wrong if he really believes it. That doesn't make him a bad person like the perps.
One day Harry will overcome his denial and suddenly realize why people call him "the apologist". That's gunna hurt.
:)
Paige, it's not clear to me whether you're attempting to construct an argument or your post is the same ole incoherent random pasting of old articles which happen to share common key words with my post.
"...ChemTech has acquired a state-of-the-art fluorometer that will build the database of signatures of contamination-free data that make it work."
Hmmm.... so they bought a COTS fluorometer just like they bought the fluorometer for Valimed. I believe the only difference is that Valimed was not a manufacturer's COTS model, instead, it was custom built with an OEM manufacturer's COTS components like the example in the article about Nano Drop.
So how does that work Paige? They buy a commercially available spectrometer, then wave their magic wand over it and it suddenly becomes revolutionary technology? LOL
And BTW, Harry says all the old Loch stuff is BS and we can't rely on that information. I'll have to agree with him as far as the particular excerpts which you cited. All their claims about neural network based, expert systems where the machine "self-learns" (ELF) was a bunch of baloney.
When you want to blow some science over someone's head use high-tech jargon and find hairdressers, realtors, insurance agents and other nontechnical people with money.
Kapeesh?
I wonder how many doctors, pharmacists and other technically orientated people invested in CDEX after being exposed to the revolutionary technology at the beta hospitals?
Do you think any of these people invest their own money into CDEX?
... or should I have said, choice of vendors and expenditures.
Oh Sand, who said we have to be accurate. I was still much more accurate than CDEX bookkeeping I'm quite sure.
P.S. quit, quiet
Yep Crow, exactly how I see it and exactly how it be.
Look at Milchip go. Milchip is catching on FAST!!! Go Milchip go.
"The meth gun is by now a relic. ValiMed can't read through bottles and although it serves a useful function, it has limited utility in terms of its meager library of signatures and its affordability."
Ditto the Myth Gun which MP claims will be released with only the meth signature.
Hey Mr. Tally man, tally my bananas, the daylight's cummin' and I wannna go home....
16 million bananas and they're still hungry?
.... not to mention salaries and stock options.
What's in it for MP, why would he quit his lucrative job with... blah, blah, blah...
- Nasfanium
Q and A time........
Q1: what has been the real tally to get Valimed to market?
A1: $26 million + <$2 million> (negative cash flow) = $28 million (less the cost of the Myth Gun [not a typo] development).
Q2: How much would it cost to have a OEM spectrometer manufacturer design Valimed from COTS components?
A2: $300-400K max.
Q3: How much would software development cost, including beta partners?
A3: Software development is typically twice the cost of hardware development. Add the additional consulting cost of beta partners for a conservative estimate of $1 million.
Q4: How much would initial inventory cost?
A4: Retail price was $79K. Baxa would receive a typical 35% distributor discount which means CDEX sells them for about $50K. CDEX claims a 60% profit margin so total manufacturing cost is around $20K. Therefore, the cost of 25 initial production units was around $500K.
Q5: What is the cost for CDEX's health care industry consultants/advertisers?
A5: Helluv I know (TM- Crow), but let's figure $300K.
Q6: What is the cost of patents? (Even CYA, worthless ones)
A6: Xeno? I'll guess about $75K ea. or around $500K total.
Q7: How much to boolsheet ex-loch investors with phoney explosive detection nonsense for three years?
A7: Priceless (to prevent law suits). And very little cost to CDEX, in fact, I'd be willing to bet (sorry Scared) that the Boyz helped with the tab. Let's say it was $500K.
Q8: How much for operating cost including salaries?
A8: Again, a conservative estimate for property lease, utilities, green fees and other similar overheads would be $100k/year with salaries at about $1.4 million/year for a total of about $9 million over the last 6+ years.
Q9: Even with such ridiculous salaries for a small start-up company, what should be the total operating cost of CDEX since inception?
A9 A little over $12 million.
Q10: What happen to the remaining $16 million balance?
A10: Anyone???????????
LMAO!!
Typical CDEx to screw up simple dimension specs:
* Width: 9.5"
* Height: 21"
* Depth: 10"
* Weight: 34.5 lbs
Yeah it's 21" in height if you stand the unit on end.
That's what I expected Pookster! Not much to say. LOL eom
LOL Not bad Xeno. eom
OEM spectrometers... less than 26 million dollars:
http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/ShowPR.aspx?PUBCODE=020&ACCT=2000000100&ISSUE=0705&RE...
Paige, are you still advertising CDEx to your clients?
So what's all the excitement about, did Valimed Jr. hit the market?
I wonder how many new PP subscriptions this was good for:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01212&read=22831
Sanddollar, I don't believe we'll get a non-bias assessment from Tourville. I suspect that he's a paid endorser/beta tester, and besides, he's from Dallas, too close to the scamster's home base for comfort IMO.
LOL! What's even fuunier is how CDEX stock promoters like Capnmike and Pookie dig so deep to find anything positive, but only come up with obscure, highly speculative links when the obvious facts which show a scam-in-progress are staring them right in the face.
Kinda like the penny wise, pound foolish anology.
There never was 22 to my knowledge. Butterfly, Raiderman and a few others suddenly came up with that number with no one every verifying it when challenged.
If you go thru the PR's you can probably get an accurate count.
I think Bitbull has caught on to the boolsheet story about the booze checker. It's about time some of these people wake up. Just like liquid explosives detection, it has no value if you have to sample it using a cuvette.
So far CDEX has demonstrated that their technology is nothing more than a standard COTS fluorimeter modified for a niche market.