Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ladies and gents...
There has been a full day of decline after many of the recent PR's. Check the 30 day chart.
At least the first three recent/major PR's, starting with may 2nd. Full day down before climb each time.
am i wrong?
nevermind.
clerical error.
trying to do too many thins at once here.
thank you.
how can it be that there are 3 mm's buying at .02
... and yet i cannot even sell at .0195?
could someone PLEASE explain that to me!!
word, and sometimes more.
I am sure that others have already addressed and recommended this, but I just have to recommend it for myself now that I've seen it for myself...
A quick glance at a 30 day, by the day, chart, alongside a temporal comparison of the past five (or so) PR's, tells a VERY fascinating, and consistent, story.
take a look!
me too!
the reply wasn't at all meant to come across short.
oh i never mentioned getting out.
i was merely expressing satisfaction at the day's gains.
long.
i'll be satisfied with the 36%, thank you.
apologies... my computer/browser is freaking out. multiplying posts.
this is like a late nineties Jordan fade away jump shot... it's just that easy!
I can't wait!!
Dour Hour!
There is sumtin' for everyone out there..
indeed. and much of it - objectively - sucks.
i do not know what post you are referring to.
if by that you mean that i am drowning in endless, meaningless chatter. then yes, you're right.
if you mean anything else by it, well then... see the above point. there you have it. more meaningless chatter.
yeah man, definitely. best car seat ever. a skull and cross bones.
amazing.
BRILLIANT!
can you even imagine the creativity?
golly i just love death-art for toddlers.
well i for one am really going to miss his informative, substantial, and well-justified posts.
I distinctly read that L2 is available. And yes, i am geeked!
I have to wait a bit. i have the htc evo
I am wondering how credible is the claim that we were to have news this morning.
Seems unsubstantiated.
Seriously...
I mean perhaps not a cause for alarm yet, since it's the weekend, and he's no doubt a busy guy.
But, all the same, it is a little weird to have this much convo transpire without him checking in.
A1?
I was always a Wu Tang man myself, but I'm about to go into FLIP MODE!!!
Honestly, at this point, it's hard not to wish that i had all my T**U money in FBCD, given the pop that's coming.
I'm about to join you in going in to flip mode on the other one. I want to be convinced otherwise too. Here's hoping.
But if not, I'll flip it on the pop. There is no way I'm not getting something out of all these months of waiting.
hey there genius... forgive the repetition here, but i just want to make sure that i understand your reasoning. let me rehearse it.
your original claim was that this stock will not run next week week.
the only reason you give why this might be so is that it ran some on friday.
so you somehow seem to think the fact that it will not run next week follows from the fact that it ran last week.
this inference could only be valid if you assume that it is impossible that a stock run for two consecutive days, or in consecutive weeks.
and your reason for that assumption is... (wait for it! here it comes!)... if that were true, then everyone in pennyland would be rich.
that is your expressed reasoning.
seriously?
would you do me the favor of just tightening up the logic a little bit for me. that is, i have no doubt that your reasoning is perfect. obviously you're a smart guy. i just need some more help to see it for myself. so please, for my sake, just make a little more effort to explain that last part of your train of thought.
because it seems to me that your train of thought has jumped the tracks, rolled down a hill into a nearby residential community, extensively damaged some property, and even killed a cat.
so explain for us, one more time, how from the fact of the mere possibility of a stock's running two consecutive days (or weeks), it follows that, necessarily, everyone in pennyland would be actually rich.
you'll forgive me (because i'm quite dumb, of course) if that seems like the most extraordinary, asinine leap in logic i've heard since the last Richard Dawkins lecture i listened to.
could you perhaps just explain it a bit more then?
many thanks.
no worries.
out of curiosity though, what is the 'eom' acronym that i keep seeing?
you need to amend your definition of bashing.
i was the one who extremely dislikes one of the artists (as well as the general flavor of the "artwork" involved).
Does that make me a 'basher' of this stock?
hardly.
at most it makes me a person with developed and principled aesthetic opinions.
quite different.
Van,
I have no private message capabilities at the moment. However, I'm as articulate as they come (multiple graduate degrees) and a big fan of yours (and your namesake, as you know).
So please consider this me inquiring within... or without, or whatever.
Nic.
So I was just about to come in here and make sure you all were apprised of of FBCD. Obviously that's not necessary.
table-pounder indeed.
I am holding 87K, but which that i had hundreds, like in TIVU, for this one.
Got a target Van?
Can this thing go ballistic like some of these others? (JAMN, LEXG, etc.)
Or are we rather just looking for a good four to six bagger from here (.07-ish)?
Would really like to hear thoughts.
lol, nice. that's the range i was thinking too.
it is imprudent not to have exit strategies in place upon going long.
geez this is overwhelming.
i don't know what to think.
i tend to always side/sympathize with the skeptical position. so for a long time i was very on board with ID's doses of reality as they periodically dropped into the enthusiastic conversation. i tried not to get too excited.
so then ID flips to optimistic mode, which would normally be a thrilling moment in terms of my own expectations, if it were not for one small factor...
EVERYONE ELSE HAS JUST GONE SKEPTIC ON US!!!
so what to think? i honestly have no idea. the reasoning based on the financial data is over my head, as is any speculative reasoning regarding the causes of our present or near-term position.
so i'm simply tossed about by the waves here, trying to pick up any tidbits that i can in the tumult.
(sigh)
holding large and long... as for 'strong,' not so much.
I like how we're all so excited about monday that we just show up on saturday morning too.
hilarious.
thanks!!
hey fish, i REALLY appreciate the help on the reasoning.
looks interesting/promising
i'm in for 87k, and just trying to plan my exit points.
i think i understand the financial mechanics that your baseball card analogy is meant to convey. like i said, it seems fairly clear.
what is less clear to me is why the existence of this exchange (i.e. debt for future conversion) is thought by many here to be a cause/catalyst for the pps increasing.
but i think i understand now that, rather than thinking of it as a 'cause,' per se, it is rather being taken here by many as, um, an "indicator of reliable expectations." so suppose that there were a bunch of other kids on the block who also held the rookie card too, but they were unsure what they had on their hands, value-wise. then they hear that so-and-so has paid back his .60 debt with a .06 baseball card. they then think to themselves that this is a pretty good indication that the card that they are holding will get there. (the assumption being, of course, that the loaner who accepted the card as payment is no fool).
thanks for your help everyone. sorry if i've restated the obvious several times. i believe i get it now.
wait, i don't understand the point of your .15 x 4 equation.
i mean i understand the math (obviously) but i don't understand what you're talking about.
if they can cash in their shares at any time then why is this conversion/payment thought by many here to be indicative of where the price is going?
and i'm not sure that i understand...
they owe someone x dollars, so they tell them that rather than pay them x dollars now, they will give them y shares of stock. so is it that y shares of stock do not equal the amount of the original loan (x dollars) until the pps is .62? is that it?
and you say that the loaner can cash in before, at, or after the .62 price right?
and you're taking the fact that "they don't like to lose money" as being evidence of the expectation that .62 will in fact be reached, i.e. that they're unlikely to cash in early.
do i have all of this right?
here's a question... do the shares that are being given to the loaner already figure into the o/s count? or do they only figure in once they become common stock? if the latter, won't we possibly be hurt by their conversion, i.e. insofar as it would dilute our shares?
thanks for your help.
and sorry that my shift key is busted.
Can someone fairly knowledgeable and articulate explain this debt conversion/.62 thing to me? What is it? How does it work? What purpose does it serve? To whose benefit is it? etc. I would really appreciate it.
Can someone fairly knowledgeable and articulate explain this debt conversion/.62 thing to me? What is it? How does it work? What purpose does it serve? To whose benefit is it? etc. I would really appreciate it.
Mods?????
This board is for FCBD discussion.