Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
have you ever posted actual information here?
Has Valis proven you wrong on halting otcbb yet? Good luck to him on that, hey?
What ticks me off is when someone is so certain of something they are so wrong on.....and the Rufusites believe it.
"90-95% of them are going to succeed successfully without any problem."
30 consecutive days with close above $1 required.
Even the Brittenum Brothers?
Hey Matt,
How come this is allowed to be posted at CSHD, in regards to Serfdom, and yet he gets banned?
"Because, he is a pathetic person who has nothing better to do with his time. He is a miserable person, attempting to bring other people down to his level of misery. Not even worth the resources it takes to allow him to survive (food, clothing, shelter etc). It would be better spent on someone that actually attempts to further themselves and the ones around him."
serfy, thought you might find this interesting. It is in regards to you, yet you get banned, he doesn't:
Because, he is a pathetic person who has nothing better to do with his time. He is a miserable person, attempting to bring other people down to his level of misery. Not even worth the resources it takes to allow him to survive (food, clothing, shelter etc). It would be better spent on someone that actually attempts to further themselves and the ones around him.
Edit: lady, I did forward it to Matt.
T1215,
I posted my last 4 posts yesterday regarding it, and even after I'd used all 15, one poster continually posted the wrong info regarding the CPA.
I've not seen it corrected.
If you are speaking of the other error, it could have been prevented with a bit of effort.
Hey, this board is a great service, when we keep name calling, blatant and unsubstantiated bashing or pumping, and stupid petty arguments out of it. IMO.
People might read these posts who don't belong to cult of Rufus. Perhaps the DD might help them. Plus the pumpers need balancing.
This is Due diligence how?
I guess Matt quit monitoring
But they were all this company and management team.
Why is it not relevant when it shows they constantly say they are going to file something and do not?
posting bad info is a bad thing though.
like the poster who repeatedly claimed the forensic FA, who is in NY, is the same CPA RPH says that CSHD hired. He is not, he just has the same name.
Unless a CPA can be a partner in one firm in NY and at the same time a state auditor in MI, and live in both places at the same time.
That's a form T trade.
i.e., it's an avg price trade, where someone bot or sold the stock all day for their client then posted it as one block at the end.
Good day all. (my last post). Good luck to the longs who deserve it (you know who you are). Bad luck to the pumpers.
Best soap opera I've ever watched!
avg price trade.
I think the forensic guy is the NY one, not the MI one....
is that the michigan, ny or illinois tom benson, cpa?
everyone who wants to buy, has.
no one wants to sell.
benson is certified.
see, that's the problem with posting false info.
Now people will buy into it as true "DD".
who got banned? unfortunately not my least favorite member.....
Les, I get all that.
It's just that some suggest[i/] that RPH has buyers lined up at the higher price. I'm doubtful, is all.
It still doesn't explain adequately why anyone would buy at 54 who could buy at 1.03. Nor does it explain "prearranged" trading. Methinks you have stars in your eyes preventing you from any skepticism. In fact, you seem to be the king of the pumpers. Most of the others think there is at least some possibility that all is not as appears.
If it happened 8/18, why do they say in the 8k the following:
"On September 8, 2006, the Company executed an engagement letter with Thomas Benson, Certified Public Accountant of 4599 Mistywood Drive Okemos MI 48664 to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ending"
You realize a nasdaq listing requires 30 trading days above $1.00 plus certain revenues or profit?
If the buyers are "ready", wouldn't they buy at 1? You gots to be a good friend of Rufus to forgo stock at 1 and then buy it at 54.
BTW, wouldn't the NASD consider that "pre-arranged trading"?
But CSHD claims to have the asset going right to book value, without the corresponding liability, according to the pumpers.
Read a bank or S&L's balance sheet.
They have the cash on the asset side. They have "customer deposits" on the liability side. The rest is obfuscation.
but that doesn/t square with the filings, does it?
But they also list it in their "liabilities" column on the balance sheet. THus my $32.46 doesn't go straight to their book value.
That's cool with me. If you are aware of the questions, but can wait for the proof in the pudding, then you have done your research and accepted the risk.
I hope there are valid answers to all of these questions. I'd love to see this coming to pass, but doubt it will. IMO.
NOt from me sir. I just spent 2 hours over morning coffee reading.
That said, you (nor anyne else) haven't answered my question.
Rookie, that's a lie.
Show where one of them was "convicted of fraud". If not delete your post. (IMO that sort of lie calls for IHUB jail).
So if there are bonds, rufus doesn't own them? so why are they part of the book value?
With all due respect, that soundds like crap.
But even if the bonds were given to the company to manage, what makes you think they become shareholder equity? either the company would issue shares to the bond-grantor, or they'd carry them on the balance sheet as a liability under "customer deposits" or some such.
Oh my, another comparison to google. ANd a move to the big board?
- Impossible to recall an 8k event filed with the SEC with a CD order
Does anyone have any proof on this? This is the first of heard of tht (amazing the number of firsts with this stock) and it seems a cock-and-bull story.
Do you have a link to prove this?
There is also a safe-harbor provision.
Were I tut, I'd worry. THAT seems like material non-public info.