Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Inet never fails to amaze me with his excuses! LOL! ...
"kires I hope I never do, if it means sucking in other people with lies and BS to make me well. That is how you and I got in this so called mess."
Highlighted Text- where Inet's doesn't get it. He's been sucking in CDEx lies and BS for several years and stubbornly defends them with hilarious excuses.
The longer he continues to do so, the bigger a mess he'll one day find himself in when he wakes up.
The more obvious the lies and deception from CDEx, the funnier are Inet's excuses.
I'll confess and admit I don't read evey post in its entirety, but I do scan them and look for sentences that start out with: "Sure...". I think those parts particularly funny.
Tell me it's all a comedy act Inet! Please!
Paige, the problem with your speculation is that it's always about where we may be headed and not where we are right now.
Why is that?
A: Where we are right now has never been a good place.
"This will be our year (2006)."
-Raiderman (2005)
"what is all of the expense of the patents then?..We do have one that can see thru containers..already published..I brought it up for Skitahoe a while back..."
You're talking about the first awarded patent which is XRF-based (only), all subsequent patent/apps are UVF-based and cannot see through opaque containers.
Even with XRF, the return signal has limited penetration. I believe WP talked about sealed tupperware and ziplock plastic bags- materials transparent or translucent to visble/UV light. Certainly not metal boxes!!
Speaking of metal boxes, remember how Capmike suggested through his irrelevant posts that characterization of nuclides in glass-lined, stainless steel nuclear waste drums was an important application for the fradulently advertised tech.
Gee, with Dr. Liaw running our nations largest nuclear waste depository, I wonder what ever happen to that application?
Well... I don't think Mike is an engineer so we can't fault him on what he was lead to believe. The important thing is that one learns from their mistakes.
Q: Do you think P4316, with a graduate degree in nuclear engineering, should know that x-rays cannot travel 30 meters in the atmosphere? How about 2 meters? What about the much lower intensity return signal?
Is the return signal in the x-ray range or the UV range? If it's in the UV range, how will that limit the return signal from penetrating opaque material?
Nevermind.
Yawn.....
Great review Sanddollar!! After reading Milchip's 'P4316 posts', then reading what P4316 wrote to lmorovan:
"...if you are believing what is said on the Boards, wow, you really have problems."
-P4316
I'm LMAO!!!
If anybody reading this believes a word I say... well, you really have problems!! LOL
Skit, your concept of UV is totally wrong. Consider it like visible light, what is opaque to visible light is also opaque to UV.
Did you know that the glass which covers valuable paintings in museums is opaque to UV, yet allows visible light to pass? This prevents damaging UV from breaking down the oil pigments in the paint.
"People were sounding like they could detect the UV signature of a substance that was enclosed in a metal shipping container."
Stock promoters and ignorant, brainwashed investors say things like that. Reread capnmike's "wow" post. They were also saying that elf could detect a landmine through heavy brush and even through a 6 inch diameter tree trunk.
This kind of nonsense continues today, unfortunately, there's about a two year lag time before the average, honest and trustworthy shareholder realizes the truth.
By that time the perps have moved on to a new Golden Widget and the cycle repeats.
"Lather, rinse, repeat." (TM- X)
Scared, email or call CDEx and ask him. eom
Paige, perhaps that is why Merganthaler quit, he struggled with moral guilt for writing false PR's to back up MalSpeak.
That's all it is, a PR written by MM. How many embellished, deceptive or downright fradulent PR's have we read coming from Loch/CDEx? A: virtually evey single one.
Call both those Army locations and try to find a contract number. If you can come up with a confirmable CDEx contract number for that time period, I will personally come to LV and sweep your salon floor for a week. If you cannot, you buy me two round trip tickets to LV (not to visit the salon).
I'll give you until the end of CDEx's 3Q.
Deal or no deal?
Holy Cow!!!! .............
"Game was good enuff to "attempt" to qualify for the open... but, (sadly) not close to good enuff to qualify for the open."
Holy Cow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"I have over 600 CD-ROMs and no index."
"Is there another compeating device which does the same job without taking a sample ?"
Yes Jenn, ASD's RxSpec does not require sampling and validates pills nondestructively as they are dispensed into the vials.
Wherever it went, it must have been the will of God and Malcolm Philips.
240z makes fatal mistake here...........
"...in the opinion of management."
"However in a pharmacy where the ValiMed is to be used on drugs, if the wrong pills were put in the container designated for a patient and the ValiMed detected it..."
Solutions only Gary.
High-risk solutions.
High-risk, compounded, solutions.
High-risk, compounded, IV solutions.
And why would anyone use Valimed for pills when there are faster methods (or soon will be) where the sample does not have to be crushed, then loaded into a cuvette?
Even you acknowledged that.
"Commode: quit/quite/quiet trying to harangue Lmo about the pay-for-tout webcast links. Learn something before you spout off, Commode."
Don't put it past him, remember his backstabbing of
Nancy Badger and Milchip.
Two comments to your post Jenn...
"I would assume that Vmed has prevented errors. I would not expect anyone to admit specifics on record."
MP claimed it is documented, therefore on record. If those records are unobtainable, don't say it.
Although he claimed Valimed has "saved lives" and that errors have been documented, I don't remember if he specifically stated that the "live saving errors" were documented.
I seriously doubt it, especially with MP's track record for clever wording that suggests something which later turns out to have been totally deceptive. I believe at this point it is clear to everyong that when something can be stated plain and simple without ambiguity, yet MP continues the same deceptive writting style, it is intentional.
MalSpeak.
"I am more concerned with omissions in his spiel.. never was real time emphasized as a feature of our applications...nor their size/convenience /portability/expandability(the USE of signatures)... these are real features and sellingpoints for consumers as well as investors(individual or VC, whatever)."
Jenn, with todays computing speed, 30-60 seconds can hardly be considered real time. But even if the "enhanced" Valimed has reduced the shoot time, it is irrelevant when the bottleneck lies in the preparation of the sample for testing.
I believe it is for this reason that Valimed will never be useful in a busy pharmacy environment has described by "dssu..." on the TCL board. Valimed will remain viable for its targeted niche market as a supplemental QA tool for high-risk, compounded, IV medications.
It may still wow health care professionals working within that niche, but it's never going to make Drumbah rich! LOL
MP has went from admitting he doesn't have the experience to run CDEx to now claiming he has run major corporations?
LOL. This gets funnier and funnier.
It seems obvious he's no longer trying to pull the wool over our eyes, he knows that's existing shareholders are not going to be a significant source of PP money, if any at all.
It appears he's targeting fresh meat with enough money to throw down the rabbit hole without a second thought.
Not even INET would throw another penny away on this one.
Raiderman I don't know.
"So overall, his self-description was 3/4th lies and 1/4th truth."
So that wouldn't even be considered a "half-truth"?
Skitahoe, if that is the case, do you think MP should be claiming in public advertisements that it is "documented" that "Valimed has saved lives"?
I don't believe a word he says without proof.
Thanks Arloco, ...... Mr. Philips, is this YOU?
Valimed saving lives, "a hero moment" LOL!!! That is nothing more than a rumor, hearsay created by the perps.
It's business as usual. Sell those PP's.
The statement has as much merit as the claims of a DEA contract for the meth gun I heard a year ago.
Catching a medical error is one thing, admitting to making a deadly error is a whole different animal. Who has admitted to that?
The Mi team claim they've caught a couple errors, but that is a far cry from saving a life. Besides, they were beta partners on the CDEx payroll and no doubt paid handsomely to program the damn thing to work in a pharmacy. For that reason, they may have grown a little more fond of the unit than is warranted. Catching an error is a feather in their cap.
Or than again... money it was just about the money. LOL
Unbelievable... literally.
Whoever is making the claim should prove it or STFU.
Get the rope.
No Paige, not a chance! eom
Z, is this a "verified fact"?
http://www.ahuracorp.com/index.html
http://www.ahuracorp.com/index_5_02.html
MP sez CDEX can produce 10 new signatures a month (5/fortnight [TM- artabraham])
MP sez they have "expanded massively" the signature library.
17 new signatures in the last 6 months.
Is someone "asleep behind the switch"?
"...train one hundred and two,
is on the wrong track and headed for you."
- Jerry G.
Paige, regarding fentanyl, you said:
"We just may have a place in the operating rooms or the hospitals pharmacys first..??"
Isn't Fentanyl a base signature in Valimed? If not, then it certainly should be available as an upgrade signature.
"We have mentioned the fentanyl and measuring the concentrations for a while now ..but the dea is real interested in fentanyl and meth on the street...
and... that is a fact..for what ever it means..."
Exactly, I believe JG talked about Fentanyl during the CC in reference to Valimed signatures. Valimed has the ability to measure concentrations, a Fentanyl "gun" cannot measure concentration.
I don't think the Fentanyl gizmo MP mentioned is a gun, It'll have to be a baby Valimed using a cuvette if it's going to measure concentration and even then I doubt it.
It will detect the presences of Fent, not concentration IMO.
The milestones which MP forecasts will be achieved before the end of the year sounds good. The only problem I have is that I don't trust a word he says. With his track record anyone that does is foolish.
Show me, don't tell me.
What about that small unit that fit into a typewriter size case? I think it was the one Monsoonman alleges he saw test a uncrushed pill.
I think it's also the same unit that Griffin used to Validated the Tamiflu sample. (The demo with the not validated result, so he had to shake it up a bit.)
That was my first impression.
"What I want to know about our...Fentanyl Gun is.."
Gun?
What I'm yawning about is how CDEX has jumped onto every "crisis" bandwagon since the ELF days. These niche markets seem to be getting narrower and narrower IMO.
Why don't they put the fentanyl signature into the meth gun?
OT: Did you notice any improvement with MP's hair?
MP stated that it cost $10 million to bring Valimed to market.
My SWAG was around 12 million, but that also included three years of phoney boloney explosive detection "cover-up for the Boyz" nonsense:
Q9: Even with such ridiculous salaries for a small start-up company, what should be the total operating cost of CDEX since inception?
A9 A little over $12 million.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/post_reply.asp?message_id=20113173
I still wonder what happen to the unaccounted for $18 million?
Is it Ground Hogs Day again? Fentanyl, the latest crisis making the news headlines.... CDEX to the rescue.
Yawn....
Mike, I believe investors are still being scammed out of their money. Be very careful.
You've made HUGE errors in the past.
diddy
P.S. highlights for your enjoyment. LOL
"Would be nice to see "Officer" rather than Chief Executive Office..."
"CDEX, Inc. Appoints Malcolm H. Philips, Jr. as President...
No correction necessary.
It appears that they are trying to make the current Valimed more appealing to smaller hospitals instead of manufacturing a smaller, lower cost unit which they have talked about.
Can't blame them if they don't have the money. We wouldn't want to see them take salary cuts.
Does it say who will win the NBA championship?
So the latest picture on the website is still the original "Big D" with a smaller cuvettee port and updated software?
Which would mean that the smaller unit is yet to come.
lmorovan, did MP really say these words?:
"I am very much at peace with who I am, what I have done inside and outside the company and what I am doing re the company today. I fully believe that I am in God's will now and my actions are according to that will."
God willed him to wear Rocky?
Paige, you've see a Valimed, is the latest picture a new enclosure? Is it smaller or shaped differently?
"But caught some kind words from the fantasy boards..."
I'm glad to see that MP's words are no longer taken at face value by the Longs as they once were.
They are being scrutinized as they should be. Lessons learned.
LOL Crow. If MP ever gets those Meth guns "shrink wrapped and ready for shipment" (Visualize that thought in your head Paige, that was the intent of the statement, it's much more encouraging than reading an actual test report! LOL) we will learn more about what "substantial" standoff means.
Meth has strong fluorescence characteristics which will allow detection at greater standoff distance compared with other chemicals.
If we ever learn at what standoff distance the meth gun can operate we will also have a better understanding of what "substantial" means.
I say about twenty pissants stacked end-to-end.
"Did MP NOT understand the "colorful background" of MN1.com related folk... meaning, MP didn't perform some basic due diligence to determine these folks would fit in with his beliefs?"
Someone that boasted he plays penny stocks in a "big way", an advisor to Loch Harris and CEO of CDEX didn't understand the "colorful background" of MN1? LOL!
That's funny.
Any reasonable, halfway intelligent person could determine that in two (2) minutes by reviewing their website.
It took me at latest about five minutes.
You're the greatest Capnmike, you just need to lose some of that ego and not be so "full of yourself" too.
I quit with the drama queen acting, you're terrible at it.
Kapeesh?