Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Here's one of the items:
Thanks GONEOM.
What does THAT mean? LOL, an expedited re-exam is requested now?
Because of a civil action which was stayed months and months ago?
2 days before Success's and JP's deadline date of 4/16/08?
That can't be.
Maybe there IS a problem with NeoMedia lawyers not being paid to do anything. Kinda looks like nothing's really been done.
jonesie
It amazes me that in the face of ....
.... constant new multi-year lows , company management including CEO Chip , CFO Frank , VP of Sales and Marketing Terry , COO Christian .... everybody .... remains adamantly mute.
No usual Conference Call this quarter even after an Annual Report , and not even a whisper to shareholders as to why not.
No word on a legally required and most likely legally late Shareholders' Meeting.
No hard news about anything to do with core NeoMedia for 224 days.
No nothing.
It's like they're either working on one last Hail Mary Pass (Google/Android/AT&T/APPLE/iPHONE) that may or may not ever even be seen by us ... or they're not working at all.
Hard to believe the former could be true with the PPS at .0042 and no apparent interest in buying , along with the fact that any previous interest in buying has been nearly immediately rewarded with double-digit percentage losses.
So , what are the odds a Hail Mary Pass is being loaded and locked?
Thank goodness we'll at least know about the patents by the April 16, 2008 deadline. ;)
jonesie
Hey , it's just manipulation ....
... shaking the tree , trying to get shares from weak hands , one day before the promised-by-many deadline date of 4/16/08 for finding out that our patents have indeed been upheld and perhaps even broadened and strengthened and the mobile marketing universe will immediately bow at our feet.
I mean , that's after they first put on sackcloth and ashes and gnash their teeth and tear at their hair and scream woe is them as they are turned upside down and onto their heads.
Make it so.
;)
jonesie
Yorkville seldom forces a BK
And I'm not sure what events trigger it when they do.
Typically it seems to be more lucrative to keep the public
company operating and reap the benefits of being able to sell
shares on the open market indefinitely.
I've got 236 or so Yorkville Clients on a Master List.
Out of those I've done some detailed analysis of certain aspects
on 117 of the 236.
Out of those 117 I see only 3 companies which actually filed
bankruptcy and 3 others which were delisted for other reasons. I
could be off a bit on those , ferreting out the BK's weren't my
primary mission.
Out of those 6 at least one , HRVE , is still operating under BK
protection and it looks like at least a couple of others are
still trading as well.
I'd have to look to see if any groups of shareholders were
actually 'wiped out' in any reorgs, etc.
But I guess the point of the above is , Yorkville seems to seldom
force , or cause , or allow , a BK. If the numbers of
BK's in my analysis are correct , maybe only 3% to 6% of the
time. IMO that's actually an amazingly low percentage for these
penny-pinkies , so I guess it really is most lucrative to
somebody to keep them running.
Even at .0045/share and with 5 Billion++ shares fully diluted.
R/S might be more likely at some point than a BK. In that same
list of 117 Yorkville Clients I show 23 companies having done
Reverse Splits , with several of them having done Reverse Splits
more than once. Shoot , FMDAY , GO's CEO gig , has done one or
two R/S's.
So that's 3% to 6% tops doing BK's as far as I can see , and
that's almost 20% doing the R/S thing.
Yeah , R/S far more likely , keeps the machine running and gives
an artificially higher share price to being decimating anew.
JMHO
jonesie
DOGGR has the facts ....
.... so asking DOGGR seemed to make the most sense.
DOGGR was queried.
DOGGR can only answer DOGGR-related questions so Howard as you can see there are a couple of questions left which you can pose to L. Blystone if you are so inclined. That's entirely up to you because I found out most of what I wanted to know on this subject and I think I know the answers to the remaining questions anyway. -jonesie
DOGGR says:
-- Q. Are the PV wells classified as confidential at this very moment? Yes/No
-- A. NO
-- Q. If 'yes' , why? If 'no' , why wasn't any PV production reported along with the other wells in January?
-- A. If there was any January PV production it should have been reported.
-- Q. If confidential status is being sought but has not been obtained yet, will TIV then be reporting PV production to DOGGR for Jan/Feb/Mar .... soon? Yes/No If 'no' , why not?
-- A. Confidential status is being sought but has not been granted as of yet. Therefore Jan/Feb/Mar production should be reported ASAP and should normally be reported regardless of any future granting of confidentiality.
Remaining questions , not related to DOGGR:
-- Q. Since TIV has reported no increased oil or gas production on virtually any front to DOGGR for quite a long period of time , is there a valid reason for not reporting any such increased production accruing to PV wells to shareholders? Yes/No
-- If 'yes' , what is it? (My guess is the answer is No, no valid reason.)
-- Q. Whether or not DOGGR does in fact grant confidential status to PV wells , will revenues from Jan/Feb/Mar PV production be reported in the 1Q08 Quarterly Report filed with the SEC? Yes/No
-- If 'no' , why not? (My guess is the answer is Yes)
The Complexity Of This Web Grows
- Adding two more Yorkville Clients to the number of companies promoted by Tobin Smith , bringing the count to a total of 4 known so far.
- Adding one new BOD Membership with a Yorkville Client to George O'Leary's workload , bringing the count to a total of 7 including the British CEO position.
- Now showing the 4 Ft. Myers, FL links.
Quite the picture. -jonesie
Brand spanking new multi-year low just printed.
And while NEOM is sitting at .005 even , management remains mute.
Thanks Chip. Thanks Frank. Thanks George. Thanks JJ.
jonesie
Unreal bleedingedge, that is very cool!!
Thanks for posting.
NEOM fell out of the Buzz Cloud ....
.... nobody is looking for NEOM.
We moved down from Cloud 2 to Cloud 1 then hit the ground.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/tcloud.asp
This page gives you a look at the most frequently searched for
tickers in the last 24 hours.
Ckrush Launches Groundbreaking Social Media Agency, Ckrush Social
Tuesday April 15, 9:00 am ET
Ckrush Social Helps Brands Authentically Harness the Power of Social Media
NEW YORK, NY--(MARKET WIRE)--Apr 15, 2008 --
Ckrush Inc. (OTC BB:CKRU.OB - News), an entertainment and social media content company, announced the formation of Ckrush Social, an agency dedicated to helping brands harness the power of social media in an authentic fashion. Ckrush has close to one million registered users across three of their own social media properties -- Audiostreet.net, Mixstreet.net and LiveMansion.com. Potentially using these users as a base, Ckrush Social can "prime the pump" for new social networks and use their experience and insight to shepard brands through the complicated social media space.
"The hardest part of building a successful social media property is obtaining the first twenty-five thousand users," says Jonathan Ressler, Chief Marketing Officer of Ckrush, Inc. "By tapping into our network of a million users, we virtually guarantee that any new social media property, whether it is a social network, mobile application, video sharing or anything else, will have tens of thousands of users within a few months which can translate to a cost savings in the millions of dollars in marketing spend."
This strategy has already been proven successful for the launch of the Hard Rock Hotel San Diego. Ckrush's emerging band social media property, Audiostreet.net launched an online battle of the bands where the Grand Prize was opening for the Black Eyed Peas at the grand opening party for the hotel. Over the course of 4 months, close to 5,000 bands signed up for the competition and reached over 15 million targeted consumers who participated in the program.
In addition to social networks, Audiostreet.net, Mixstreet.net and LiveMansion.com, Ckrush also produced 3 major motion pictures in the past 18 months including Artie Lange's "Beer League," "Pledge This" starring Paris Hilton and "TV the Movie" from Steve O and the team at "Jackass." Ckrush is also the group behind "Live Mansion The Movie," the first feature film produced by an online community. The film, which was cast online, is being Executive Produced by industry legend Spike Lee. Ckrush has also executed online promotions utilizing their social media properties for Paramount, Universal, Hard Rock, Michael Eisner's Tornante Company and many other major entertainment brands.
About Ckrush
Ckrush is an innovative entertainment and interactive media group at the forefront of the convergence of entertainment content with social media, online communities and digital technology. Ckrush produces feature films and other content and develops and maintains websites, including online communities primarily geared towards young adults 18-34. Ckrush's fully interactive online communities include "LiveMansion.com"(http://www.livemansion.com/), "AudioStreet.net" (http://www.audiostreet.net/) and "MixStreet.net" (http://www.mixstreet.net/). The Company also is helping brands to communicate effectively with consumers through social media applications. Ckrush's feature film productions include "Beer League," starring Artie Lange; "National Lampoon's TV the Movie," starring Steve O and Wee Man of "Jackass" fame; and "National Lampoon's Pledge This," starring Paris Hilton. Ckrush services also include website design, development, hosting, advertising and media placement. For additional information, please visit www.ckrush.net.
(Disclosure: Haven't touched this thing in months but enjoy following the predictable process)
Still ski season in Colorado in March?
Hey Mark, have we got any gigs near some ski slopes?
Hey guy, hmmm, let me check the map. U.S. ski slopes?
Yepper.
Okay George, hang on a sec, let me look .... okay, hmmmm, right here, Isonics, in Golden Colo, we've got some 13%'ers on 'em, close to Keystone, Vail, Aspen, Breckenridge, Steamboat Springs .... how's that sound pal?
That sounds awesome Mark, can I get on the BOD like, yesterday? Won't even need salary yet, just need to attend a 'board meeting' while the powder's still nice, yeah, that's it, a (snow)board meeting.
Hilarious. Done deal dude. I'll make the call, we'll get you on board before the Q comes out so your name will be in there, you'll just have to file a quick Form 3 and then you can hit the slopes on us, I mean, on Isonics' shareholders.
Ciao Mark, thanks!
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1023966/000110465908017359/a08-8057_110q.htm
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1430860/000110465908020224/xslF345/a3.xml
George O'leary gets even busier ....
.... taking on BOD duties at yet another Yorkville client.
Does that mean he's done with us? Or that we are done?
Excerpt below taken from the most recent 10-Q for Isonics:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1023966/000110465908017359/a08-8057_110q.htm
Interesting that NeoGenomics is the only other of GO/YAGI clients that is mentioned. Also , YAGI is referred to by Isonics as "The holder of our 13% Debentures" a whole lot of times, rather than just saying "YA Global".
"Item 5: Other Information
On February 28, 2008 our Board of Directors unanimously appointed George O’Leary to fill one of the vacancies on our Board of Directors. Mr. O’Leary accepted his appointment on March 10, 2008. Upon acceptance of his appointment, Mr. O’Leary was not appointed to any committees of the Board of Directors, however in the future we may determine it is appropriate to do so.
There is no arrangement or understanding pursuant to which Mr. O’Leary was appointed to our Board of Directors. Mr. O’Leary has not had a direct or indirect interest in any of our previous transactions. Upon his appointment, Mr. O’Leary was not granted stock options or any other form of remuneration, however in the future we may determine it is appropriate to grant Mr. O’Leary stock options in consideration for his service as a Board member.
Mr. O’Leary currently serves as a director of several other companies including NeoGenomics, Inc. (NGNM.OB), a publicly traded cancer genetic testing laboratory. The holder of our 13% Debentures (YA Global f/k/a Cornell) has a business relationship with, and has previously invested in NeoGenomics, Inc. Our Board of Directors has considered the potential conflict of interest of Mr. O’Leary concurrently serving on our Board of Directors and other companies that have or had a business relationship with the holder of our 13% Debentures, and has determined that any such relationships will not interfere with Mr. O’Leary being able to faithfully carry out his duties as a member of our Board of Directors."
Howard , if you are in fact interested ....
.... would you query and let us know? That would be great and it sounds like you have a good rapport.
The questions are:
-- Are the PV wells classified as confidential at this very moment? Yes/No
-- If 'yes' , why? If 'no' , why wasn't any PV production reported along with the other wells in January?
-- If confidential status is being sought but has not been obtained yet, will TIV then be reporting PV production to DOGGR for Jan/Feb/Mar .... soon? Yes/No
-- If 'no' , why not?
-- Since TIV has reported no increased oil or gas production on virtually any front to DOGGR for quite a long period of time , is there a valid reason for not reporting any such increased production accruing to PV wells to shareholders? Yes/No
-- If 'yes' , what is it?
-- Whether or not DOGGR does in fact grant confidential status to PV wells , will revenues from Jan/Feb/Mar PV production be reported in the 1Q08 Quarterly Report filed with the SEC? Yes/No
-- If 'no' , why not?
Thanks Howard. Much appreciated. Rough draft , wording optional.
jonesie
So, did Yorkville/Cornell control ....
.... enough shares back then to control the vote on increasing the AS to 5B (to thwart takeover lol) all by themselves?
Or did they perhaps need all of management's shares voting along with them to accomplish that?
I'm sure it was all legit , that's not the question.
TIA to anybody who knows.
jonesie
Hmmm , that's interesting geoscience ....
.... thanks. I haven't seen a company PR to the effect of all
PV wells being confidential .... interesting that some would
claim knowledge of such a thing.
Is the proper-dissemination-of-info-bucket springing leaks
again?
With what you've said about confidential status plus the
research leftybobcat did on the DOGGR site itself about
confidential status , one might have to assume the reason for
getting the PV wells' status changed to confidential could be
your (2) , applying a technology to the field which , while not
exactly new technology per se , is new to that
particular field.
So , a company could get their wells' status changed to
confidential based on that.
Kind of begs the question ... why would a company seek
to change the status of those wells to confidential?
TIV's earlier comments (twice in January?) about a PV well's
initial production said it was 200 BOPD or so , maybe more. Is
that record-shattering production or something?
With TIV shareholders being starved for actual production
increases for YEARS while TIV has spent a lot of money
purportedly to increase production ... along with
increasing "shareholder value" as I believe one of the favorite
phrases goes .... why would TIV choose to use a DOGGR
reporting loophole so as not to have to report it .... if in
fact they do have increased production?
So they can buy more land/leases around there more cheaply?
If that were the motive , why PR continuous and steady
production at a certain rate to begin with way back in January?
Putting out PRs with numbers in them isn't exactly keeping a
big secret.
Also , if using horizontal wells at PV could be deemed
confidential and one wants to have the option to buy
surrounding leases cheap if things go well at the onset ... why
not classify the wells as confidential to begin with , just in
case?
Lots of questions lol , relatively few answers , and with TIV
perhaps choosing to go the 'confidential route' the factual
shareholder-informing answers seem to be getting more and more
rare all the time.
Perhaps this production-reporting-stalling tactic will only
last a brief while. I'm not the expert but it would seem to me
that even if DOGGR allows TIV to leave the PV wells' specific
production numbers 'blank' in their reports to the State of
California .... if TIV actually is producing oil at PV
and selling it in quantities any where near their PRd
quantities , then the resultant revenues will eventually have
to find their way into SEC-required quarterly reports ....
right?
(That is still the point of this exercise , right? To
sell oil ... and for profit?)
First quarter '08 ended over 2 weeks ago.
TIV said they had steady production at PV in January.
I'm assuming they kept on steaming/producing in February and
March.
At their PR'd production rates those PV revenues should make a
substantial difference in quarter-over-quarter oil revenues
which we'll see when the 1Q08 Quarterly Report gets filed by ,
oh , by Mid-May right? So not too long to wait to see what
really matters .... INCREASED REVENUES.
Or can they keep that secret too?
jonesie
p.s. I'll do some checking on this confidentiality stuff to
see if in fact the PV wells ARE confidential at this moment in
time and , perhaps more importantly ... if they were
confidential in January or February or March.
p.p.s. Wild thought: I suppose if one PRs production a little
too hastily and that production subsequently declines rapidly
... one might want to go the confidential route? Sure
that wouldn't be what's going on , would it?
"use the float"
If one is going to make calculations of potential share prices
(such as .15) based on comparing an initial over-hyped
over-pumped run with Tobin Smith's crowd involved .... to a
possible run now while NEOM is teetering on the edge of BK ....
and make those calculations comparing the float back then to
the float now .... that's about as much of an apples and
oranges thing as I can imagine.
'use the float' might qualify in a case of a company
having X shares outstanding and 5X shares authorized , IF
the balance of the authorized shares weren't totally committed
to somehow.
For instance , if there were some employee options out there
representing a small percentage of the remaining AS and/or some
warrants out there representing a small percentage of the AS,
then 'use the float' might make sense. In a situation where
50%-80% of the AS wasn't committed to in any way, then
using the float alone might make sense.
But that's not the case with NeoMedia.
Every one of those 5 billion shares in the AS is 'in play' ...
every one of those remaining ~4 billion shares that isn't
already in the float is committed to Yorkville , is owed to
Yorkville , some for absolutely free , maybe even a billion or
two more than that , by virtue of Yorkville (along with a few
others perhaps) having rights to every share in the AS that
isn't already in the float.
Barring someone coming in and buying NeoMedia from Yorkville ,
as soon as Yorkville can get their hands on those
shares they will get their hands on those shares and
sell them on the open market , putting them into the float.
That's what they do.
jonesie
geoscience, I'm catching up on posts here ...
... and I kinda missed this one of yours. Thanks for the reply re: DOGGR production numbers vs. sales numbers, that was very helpful.
Yes, there was a past revision but that was only because there were some errors by the contractor who did their DOGGR reporting and she had the same exact numbers for a while ... and they got those fixed and re-reported one month.
Thanks again,
jonesie
"would be the equivalent of $0.15 with 1-Bil. in the float at present"
There may be only ~1B in the float, but there are at least FIVE BILLION shares accounted for in a fully diluted situation because Yorkville has the rights to convert/exercise/othewise get their hands on so many shares and dump them on the market as they wish.
And everybody knows that.
Nobody was thinking about float or authorized or fully diluted back when the PPS was pumped up to an over-exuberant .75 so whatever the share count/float/AS was then isn't even relevant to such current calculations.
FIVE BILLION shares may even be low , I saw some math the other day which gave a strong indication that at today's PPS NeoMedia could well be responsible for handing over SIX TO SEVEN BILLION SHARES under certain circumstances.
The company may or may not succeed. I can't even begin to envision a possible revenue situation where current non-Yorkville non-preferentially-treated shareholders can "succeed" much past a nickel a share. A nickel is a 10-bagger from here as they say and would be IMO a miracle in and of itself.
"but they are hiring". How do we know that? From Help Wanted ads? We don't know whether or not they have hired anyone since Terry do we , at least not from anything the company has said.
JMHO
jonesie
p.s. When COPI was hitting .10 a while back the over-enthusiastic amongst them was trying out simultaneous equations on the crowd and using COPI's "IPO price" of 1.50 or 1.60/sh to make the case that COPI was heading for at least buck and pronto. COPI is hitting on all eight as best they can yet they are at .02 now. That fuzzy math just doesn't fly in otcbb-land.
COPI FELL OUT OF THE BUZZ CLOUD
AT THE MOMENT
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/tcloud.asp
NOTICES TO DRILL, RE-WORK, ABANDON
No notices for Tri-Valley for week ending 4/5/08
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/weekly_summary/2008/04-05-2008.pdf
Speaking of 'breakouts' ....
.... it would be very cool to see a breakout-to-the-upside from this descending triangle formation in the mid-term weekly chart.
That $6'ish area certainly provided good support yet again, with only the one recent exception to that having occurred back in January.
Weekly Chart looks good overall IMO with accumulation seeming to be the overriding theme.
jonesie
Recently TIV has been bumping up against ....
.... the upper downtrend line in the current short term downtrend channel.
It would be nice to see some volume take it above that , creating a bit of a 'breakout' which would possibly denote some continued share price appreciation to come.
JMHO -jonesie
"Is NEOM still using contingency-based lawyers?" (edited)
Since the company stopped talking to shareholders months and months ago .... they might have found some other contingency-fee-based lawyers at one time but that could have fallen by the wayside by now , no way to know.
Which brings up this subject: Anyone who says the company is doing anything productive at all is talking through their hat IMO. All we've actually seen is some unknown blogger/contract-geek say he helped NeoMedia tweak the NeoReader to work on an iPhone so they could use it in demos.
Other clues:
-- we have some trade show appearances sans announcements in a tiny booth
-- some Help Wanted ads for jobs that may or may not be getting filled and for all we know those are put there to give the illusion of something going on.
-- the constantly declining PPS
-- we know what they are NOT doing ... they are NOT in trials with the dozen or more companies Scanbuy IS in trials with.
-- we know that to date the only "frictionless ecosystem" we've seen is the ecosystem which operates more like a greased chute frictionlessly moving money from NeoMedia's market capitalization (OUR value) into Yorkville's treasury coffers.
The company has been incredibly remiss in their duties to update shareholders. And with Yorkville being the BIGGEST shareholder all things considered , ethically they shouldn't know any more than we do ... but something tells me that isn't the case as they get preferential treatment re: information for the purpose of 'managing their investment' , quite possibly by virtue of having GO on the BOD.
JMHO
jonesie
Thanks for the kind words.
jonesie
Ben88, yes to all ...
.... they impose and collect fines (saw that happen in CYBR and elsewhere) and they get to keep the money to fund their operations as far as I know. If they root out something which people think is 'bad' , then they appear to be 'heroes' at times.
But the SEC only has resources for a finite number of endeavors , with otcbb-land endeavors probably being lower on their to-do list. I assume they have to force-rank all of their opportunities.
My point in creating the graphical representation of most of the inter-connections and making the comment that I did was to say that the more interesting or convoluted one of these situations is , the higher up their to-do list it might be placed.
Also , the SEC has taken a few shots at Yorkville f/k/a Cornell in the past , as well as at Corey Ribotsky's NIR Group which is similar to Yorkville. I don't think they've been very successful in their past attempts , someone there might still have a bone to pick , and thus try to ferret out what the heck is/was really going on in this tangled web.
JMHO
jonesie
p.s. You'll note that I do not include current management , other than the omnipresent time-warping GO , in the matrix. I think it's possible that most if not all of the shenanigans occurred on the previous watch. Whether our interests are still important to current management in even a tiny way remains to be seen , and the jury is certainly still out on what CH may or may not be able to accomplish. I'd like to see him succeed at something even if the 5 billion shares (possibly more?) of full dilution caps our PPS benefit. Something higher than here is certainly better than something lower than here.
I'm not sure what 'benefit' might accrue ....
.... to the SEC for any particular actions on their part.
But this entire ugly situation does seem interesting enough to perhaps make it stand out amongst all the other absurdities that go on in otcbbland/pinkyland.
If anyone knows of a more 'involved' situation than this one I'd like to hear about it. Even close I'd like to hear about.
kmathern , thanks.
Yes , I found a reference on another board where TREN was taken off Tobin's reco list.
If you see any others let me know.
With NEOM , MOBL , SMTR , TREN + a few others , I see a second Featured Cozy Network coming up which will include the otcbb companies + Yorkville Advisors + Mr. Tobin Smith.
jonesie
Found this on another board ....
... thank you mld38
Some of this may have found its way onto this board already , I apologize if my memory causes duplicates after a few months :)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21818890
re 2005: Another Hedge Fund Discloses PIPEs Probe
NOTE year is 2005 By Matthew Goldstein, Senior Writer , 12/1/2005 7:12 AM EST
http://www.thestreet.com/markets/matthewgoldstein/10255157.html
NOTE these articles also from the year 2005 where referenced in the article:
see Nov 2005, http://www.thestreet.com/markets/matthewgoldstein/10251000.html
and Oct 2005 http://www.thestreet.com/markets/matthewgoldstein/10245895.html
A few recent (2007) article re CCP:
July 2007: Cornell Capital Partners still doing the same type PIPEs
http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2007/07/12/earth-biofuels-bankrupt-biz-cz_df_0712earth.html
....plenty of embarrassment to go around here. In addition to Earth's red-faced celebrity directors, there are supposedly savvy fund managers, including Sandell Asset Management and Cornell Capital, who poured $50 million into Earth a year ago....
July 2007: Former SEC commissioner, Richard Y Roberts, appointed to the Board of Directors of Cornell Capital Partners Offshore, a private investment firm specialising in structured finance and direct investments.
http://www.hedgeweek.com/articles/detail.jsp?content_id=150770&livehome=true
....Yorkville Advisors LLC, the investment manager to Cornell Capital Partners -- a private investment firm that specializes in structured finance and direct investments -- announced that Richard Y. Roberts has been appointed to the Board of Directors of Cornell Capital Partners Offshore....
Jan 2007: ...The PIPEs market keeps expanding despite a long-running regulatory investigation that has cracked down on abusive trading by hedge funds in shares of small companies doing PIPEs. Some had feared the investigation would be a death-knell for the PIPEs market....
http://www.thestreet.com/newsanalysis/banking/10334514.html?puc=_tscs
...But if anything, the inquiry may have invigorated the market by driving out some of the bad actors and forcing the Wall Street firms that arrange PIPE deals to clean up their practices. The list of most active PIPE investors continues to include familiar players such as Iroquois Capital, Cornell Capital, NIR Group and LH Financial -- outfits that invest exclusively in PIPEs of small-cap companies. But the list of frequent PIPE players, according to Placement Tracker, also includes some big Wall Street names...
Drmyke , I probably should.
Which companies on the list in my Rogues' Gallery did TS recommend besides NEOM?
Just MOBL , right?
Interesting that TS would 'just happen' to pick two YAGI clients to pump , which is something we've mentioned before.
jonesie
TS wasn't the 'problem'.
Sure, he is an outrageous pumper and certainly didn't hold back
in that regard with NEOM.
But when he really seriously realized things were
bad-to-irreparable .... he told everybody to bail. He may
have even bailed sooner , he said he did at least in part ,
but he eventually told EVERYbody.
The PPS was at .11 then as I recall.
And NEOM execs et al said TS was wrong , but everything he said
turned out to be right and the problems led to where NEOM is
now in terms of price and dilution.
The 'problem' was (is?) that execs + cronies + Yorkville are totally in it for
themselves.
They were (are?) NOT running/puppeteering that list of public
companies as a way to enrich public shareholders who 'believe' in them.
Execs + Yorkville + cronies were (are?) running/puppeteering the public companies in that list because
it gives them access to money by facilitating the dumping of
shares into the open market which , even at ever lower prices ,
continues to put money into their pockets.
JMHO
jonesie
.<font color=red>FEATURED COZY NETWORK
Information similar to the info presented in Table C , with a different visual perspective.
jonesie
Here's an interesting look ....
.... perhaps a little easier than my 'Table C' for visualization.
Anyone for some dot connecting?
George O'Leary has been involved with SMTR ....
.... for a long time.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=9964
The QR code directs to ....
http://www.myspace.com/juleisteinmalig
QR code version 4-Q mask #5, encoded in BYTE.
QR code is trademarked by Denso Wave, Inc.
Just in case anyone without a phone-based reader wants to check out the site it directs to.
jonesie
Relentless selling pressure ....
.... absorbing all buys.
Pathetic , and all the while the company remains mute on all fronts , CC , SHM , activities , everything.
If they ever do come out with something it better be big and it better be apparent the silence was due to the huge scale and complexity of the deal.
A LOI with some unknown in the Philipines or a MOU with some Chinese cab company won't quite get it.
JMHO
jonesie
" .... just the right bloggers ..."
Meanwhile, selling pressure is taking SUPI down.
Down for the count?
Down prior to another swing up?
Whatever .. down on no news isn't all that great.
Down if it's company employees/officers/execs selling would be really not great.
I guess we'll see!
Stupid stock.
jonesie
More dollars trading in SUPI ....
.... this pink sheet stock (IF those are real trades and not MM swaps lol) than are trading in a .OB fully reporting stock with numerous qualified employees I'm in.
That means something lol , I just don't know what!
jonesie
DAILY CHART
A few similarities between the indicator setups on March 10 and now.
Timing denoted by two blue vertical lines and specific indicator positions denoted by blue circles , then and now.
Will we get a blip up all the way to a penny again?
Will it be a shallower blip?
Will there be a blip at all this time?
Time will tell.
jonesie
220 days since the last ....
.... hard news about core NeoMedia.
"This financing will allow NeoMedia to launch their aggressive new global sales and marketing initiative in response to the rapidly expanding global demand for camera-initiated transactions and active mobile codes.
A significant amount of funds will be deployed to build world class sales and marketing activities."
220 days ago
5 days until an alleged USPTO re-exam completion deadline of 4/16/08.
jonesie