oops had a link wrong, had to edit it. :o)

creapingman, here is the N. Lucky Mineral Rights Inquiry updated 2/18/2011:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=016909M
Actual expenditure $17,515.62 as of that date.

If you check the VALE claims they also show lots of work on them:
Here is just one, the one surrounding N.Lucky property:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=017004M
Actual expenditure $50,664.34 as of 3/15/2011

Here's just one more:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=017003M
Actual expenditure $51,213.59 as of 3/15/2011

All of VALE's claims on the Bonavista Penninsula have had updates as of 3/15/2011. A lot of $$ spent. Check them out.

Stingray, I guess my thinking was that because we do have a working relationship with VALE on the Lucky properties, could it be that VALE has a hand in any other KATX properties that we have not been informed about? Who knows. Just a thought.

About the BVIG shares, I prefer to wait for those and have them issued to shareholders when news comes out on Handcamp or when they reverse merge katx into BVIG/KATG. Then they will have value. I believe Ken Stead is working hard on that right now.

Silence can be a good thing. :o)

Stingray

FWIW: For a stock that people (you know who) continually say is worthless, the interest sure continues to grow in board marks.

TinkerBelle Member Profile TinkerBelle Share Tuesday, September 28, 2010 9:26:00 PM
Re: A deleted message Post # of 140618
"Nobody is interested"?

Quote:Nobody is interested in a stock that just seems to drift lower and lower.

The price has stabilized for a while now.

In May the Boardmarks were approx. 650
June approx. 690
July approx. 720
Aug approx. 740
Sept now at 773

And continuing to climb. :o)
I like to keep a tab on those kind of things. LOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54937542

Let me now on March 24,2011 add to the boardmark list:
Oct 2010 average. 780
Nov 2010 average. 775
Dec2010 average. 789 (on 12/27 it was 816 )after the dumpage
Jan 2011 average. 824
Feb 2011 average. 820
Mar 2011 now at 827

mappo, sorry I don't have any of Dr. Woods reports handy. Which one specifically were you looking for and I will try and find it. I remember there were several. :o) Thanks for all of your great posts mappo!!!

"Never Never Never forget (((WHO))) IT WAS WHO DISCOVERED ((EVERY)) PROPERTY THAT CORNERSTONE and KAT EXPLORATION has with ....................(((options to j.v. "joint venture" with GIANT VALE ))) Ken and his brother Tim Stead"......................from FB

warant Member Profile warant Share Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:34:41 AM
Re: None Post # of 75
VALE---Red Cliff---- NR???

VALE being the operator of the drilling on the Red Cliff property last year. The rumors I heard then was that they were happy with results.
Was talking with management today and it seem that we may get a NR on drill results very soon and lets hope that it includes more drilling on the property.
CGP do like Tuesdays for NR lets hope for this following week coming up!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61307625

Yes, I believe they know each other. They knew each other from when Ken Stead worked with Cornerstone. Warant always spoke very highly of Ken Stead's honesty, integrity and work ethics from what I read.

As you all know Katx has an option agreement with VALE on the Bonavista Penninsula for the Lucky properties, as Cornerstone does for Red Cliff property.
This post on the Cornerstone board is very interesting:

warant Member Profile warant Share Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:34:41 AM
Re: None Post # of 75
VALE---Red Cliff---- NR???

VALE being the operator of the drilling on the Red Cliff property last year. The rumors I heard then was that they were happy with results.
Was talking with management today and it seem that we may get a NR on drill results very soon and lets hope that it includes more drilling on the property.
CGP do like Tuesdays for NR lets hope for this following week coming up!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61307625

SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS WERE SPENT ON HANDCAMP LAST YEAR ***$725,340*** Handcamp Dollars spent by quarter #1. 41,037 #2. 29,703 #3. 394,573 #4. 260,027 725,340............THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION...... and $260,000 we did not know about until KATX filing came out recently.

Handcamp Dollars spent by quarter
#1. 41,037
#2. 29,703
#3. 394,573
#4. 260,027
Total.725,340

$$$$-- 260,027 -$$$$ IS THE AMOUNT SPENT ON HANDCAMP IN 4th QUARTER..... NOBODY INSINUATED THEY FINISHED THE JOB....but it looks to me as though Ken Stead during the harsh Newfoundland Winter was not sitting buy the fire sipping his earl gray tea at 2:00.... He started preparing Handcamp, trenching, tree removal and line cutting for a large second phase drill program while and during RR drilling.....then after RR drilling $$$$-- 260,027 -$$$$ was definately spent first q was 41,037...second q was 29,703 ...third was 394,573 and $$$$-- 260,027 -$$$$ ..... never b-4 have I been mislead doing my own DD http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=45740

Some roads merge to the left....Some roads merge to the right....Kat Exploration will ...Merge UP and into Kat Gold Holdings.
WHAT IS THE VERY FIRST THING MENTIONED IN THIS PR?....Here let me help you with that "CFSG1 is a leader in reverse mergers"............ Kat Exploration Inc. Engages Consulting for Strategic Growth 1 as Investor Relations Counsel

Kat Exploration (USOTC:KATX)
Historical Stock Chart
2 Months : January 2011 to March 2011

Kat Exploration Inc. (PINKSHEETS: KATX), a mineral exploration company in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, today announced it has retained Consulting for Strategic Growth 1 ("CFSG1") as its exclusive investor relations representative.

CFSG1 is a leader in reverse mergers, investor and public relations and corporate development for small-cap companies and private enterprises, both domestic and foreign. In addition to U.S. clients, the company's portfolio has included businesses based in China, South Africa, Canada, and India. CFSG1's long-term relations with investment bankers and private equity investors allow it to quickly position its clients in front of the decision makers, market makers and gatekeepers of the financial world.

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=46231165
http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/163179_118013898269379_100001823087522_121477_7078164_n.jpg
http://www.katexploration.com/PressReleases/Company_Update_Jan7_2011.pdf

Thanks Midnight!

I don't believe you need to worry about that bigbreak.

Katx's CFO is......

David Barnes, CPA
DIRECTOR, AUDITING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN
Mr. David Barnes serves as a member of our Board of Directors since April 2007. Mr. Barnes is the Chairman of our Audit Committee, as well as a member of our Compensation committee. Mr. Barnes, a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, is a licensed CPA in NY. Mr. Barnes has over 40 years of experience working with both public and private companies. Mr. Barnes served as CFO of several publicly traded companies including, American United Global, Inc., Legend Foods, Inc., Lifetime Corporation, and Beefsteak Charlie's, Inc. He is well versed in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has extensive experience with mergers and acquisitions as well as various board functionalities, including compensation and audit committees. Mr. Barnes began his career as an auditor for the accounting firm of Laventhol & Horwath and is a graduate of C.W. Post College.

http://www.cdii.net/board-of-directors.html

Read the posts?? Do you mean all?? Even the posts that have been deleted?? Currently and in the past!

Impossible! Too much manipulation with posts here. IMO :o)

eiddle, even Gump believes we are into the 3rd million. :o)

gump90 Member Profile gump90 Share4 Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:53:24 PM
Re: daggfish post# 135457 Post # of 138101
That showed to me that the first million dollars of the first major financing was received and spent. Then they were able to start drawing down from the remaining four million dollars. As of Nov. 30 they had taken down and spent the SECOND million dollars ( + ) and had just over $9,000 left in the bank. That was 3 months ago so it means they have been drawing into the third million dollars at a hefty monthly burn rate up to to-day's date. They have still not divulged the conditions they had to meet to keep the money flowing.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60569319

Of course people care, it's all good information! :o)

How would you know the feelings of everyone out there. Let everyone decide on their own.

There are many people who have been here for over a year, including me.

Nice to see.....

KATX in the PINK again. :o)

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/KATX/quote

Nice blog update on March 14, 2011

Update on BVIG Stock Distribution

As an update to the progress on the BVIG stock distribution, Computershare has informed the company they are now working with DTC to setup the distribution on their end and is hoping to have information over the next week or so. We have now approached the stage where shareholders will be informed of any and all progress of developments.

Ken Stead
President & CEO
Kat Exploration Inc.
http://www.katexploration.com/index.php?option=com_blog&view=comments&pid=30

Nice to see much more work has been done on Handcamp in the 4th quarter of the 2010 filings than we knew of.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=45740

Dagg, I remember this being wrong back when Katx website added that {KATX} tear sheet to its home page. When we were all looking for the correct share structure, there were many sites that had the wrong numbers. This yahoo site included.

chmcnfunds, nice info! :o)

Great article spitfire! Thanks for sharing. :o)

Love that quote " "Vale is exploring for sediment-hosted copper on the Bonavista Peninsula"

Gump, you also know that if this company is sitting on one or more JV's to be announced, then the PPS and the credibility of this company would skyrocket. :o)

Personally, I have no problem with the credibility of the Company.

MacCapone, As far as the one claim being orange, I do not know why. Maybe someone else can answer that one?

But the area to the left of South Lucky is surrounded in a green line, and on the legend of the map at the Geo survey site, it says "other" for that green line. I believe they are areas that cannot be claimed.

http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/

17 months ago VALE claim staked 300 square kilometers "the copper rush is on" around KAT LUCKYS!..PS:...two days later KAT bought the Twilite......PS: we were broke before that....think....who says (BOO)...when they drill a property....VALE.....who says (BOO) about drilling results....VALE.....PS: Which Company did the KATX Flow Chart Resemble Most?...VALE'S......Who has also been as Quiet as a MOUSE.....KAT.....I think VALE...has a Kitty by the Tale..................


The truth shall set you free!

Hmmmmm. Lots of names connecting here. What does everyone think?

Hudson merger agreement in January, with Rodman and Renshaw.
http://instacare.net/documents/Hudson_20110311.pdf

Rodman and Renshaw is a strategic partner with CFSG1, KATX IR firm.
http://www.cfsg1.com/strategic_partners.htm

Rodman and Renshaw has also done some work for China Direct, whose BOD is our CFO, David M. Barnes

A must read post from BigOwl. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60787897

Thanks BigOwl47 and Bio for all of your help on this subject! You're the best! :o)

There is also a phone # I was given to call for questions:

"211 group" # 240-386-5100

I was told, The rule has not changed, only the description of the rule:

From- “Failure to comply with Rule 15c2-11”.

To- “Ineligible for quotation on OTCBB due to quoting inactivity under SEC Rule 15c2-11”

The rule is still the same. FINRATM is updating the comment on the OTCBB Daily List used to indicate an issue is no longer eligible for quotation on the OTCBB due to a lack of quotation activity.

I was also told, that the only thing that would take a security to a lower tier on the OTCmarkets, for example, from OTCQB to OTCpinks, would be if they were not current on filings and such. Our BVIG is current.

http://otcbb.com/news/2011/GeneralNews/022511.stm
http://blog.redchip.com/index.php/stocks/otcbb-delistings-and-rule-15c2-11-what-happened.

I encourage you to read BigOwl's recent posts on the subject.

I agree....thanks usafa!

Liked this post of yours too.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60616674

MASSIVE gold demand continues to break records in China
Latest reports out of China put consumer gold demand in the first 2 months of the current year at a phenomenal 200 tonnes - and buying momentum is still continuing.-
http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page33?oid=121959&sn=Detail

Gump, the way I look at it the 4 mil has "shown up", using your own words, and they are drawing on it. You did not say, "when the 4 mil is used up" :o)

gump90 Member Profile gump90 Share Saturday, July 10, 2010 5:47:55 PM
Re: Splash59 post# 73428 Post # of 135634
If the 4 mill shows up .. I will leave. But FIRMLY. Deal ??

This Handcamp pdf someone posted gives some good information. (not sure who posted it) :o)

Http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/geofilePDFS/WBox027/012H_1780.pd
It gives the Claim #011745M

Whereas the Falconridge report did not.

And similar description of where property is.
(but with quite different distances 20 vs 40 km) than the Falconbridge Pdf.

Kind of leaves an open question still as to where Falconridge Handcamp work was done? LOL Who inputs the information on the Geo site for all to look up? if the distances are different?


http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/geofilePDFS/Batch03/012H_0668.pdf



Http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/geofilePDFS/WBox027/012H_1780.pd


Thanks Popunjay, looks like your map is correct if the information the Geo site put in is correct.

Thanks to Biochemist for posting this: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60122926
I couldn't get the binoculars to work on the geo site!
And for confirming that Ken Stead isn't a liar. I have always believed in his truthfulness. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60126368

Thanks to homevendor for all you do for KAT. Keep up the good work!

Silly to go round and round...will get to the bottom of this sooner or later. Good night. Have a great weekend!

That's just it. Its not the KAT GOLD handcamp claim map (that is from the BVIG/KATG 8k)that I have a problem with.

It's the Falconbridge drill map that you recently made. I believe that if you enter the wrong claim information (in your case you entered the current KAT GOLD claim #) for your Falconbridge map.

Lots to check up on, like homevendor said.

Have a great weekend. :o)

Thanks, you have a great weekend too!!!

Yes, homevendor,I agree, Nice job. I believe the problem here is Popnjay entered the current claim number, # 011745M, which is for BVIG Handcamp area.

Nowhere in the Falconbridge work report is that # mentioned.
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/geofilePDFS/Batch03/012H_0668.pdf

Popunjay.....did you get the "claim number" that Falconbridge uses for the property .....THEY......call Handcamp?

This is the offical Canidan Government one WORLD MINERAL DEPOSIT DATABASES
Society of Economic Geologists and Geological Survey of Canada
________________________________________
Deposit number Country Location Names Commodities
176 Canada (Newfoundland and Labrador) 49.16.55 N -- 056.04.50 W Handcamp Cu; Au; Ag

Database name: World Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits
Custodial agency: Society of Economic Geologists & Geological Survey of Canada
Compilers: J. M. Franklin, H. L. Gibson, I. R. Jonasson, and A. G. Galley
Release date: 2009-01-02

Deposit name(s): Handcamp (deposit name)
Political location(s): Canada; Province or state: Newfoundland and Labrador
NTS map data: 012H08 (Springdale)
Deposit clan (type): Volcanogenic massive sulphide
Deposit (sub) types: Mafic backarc ophiolite; 2
Geologic province: Appalachian
Geologic subprovince: Betts Cove
Commodities: Cu; Au; Ag
Geological ages: Early Ordovician (host rocks)
Radiometric ages: Age - Ma: 475; Event dated: mineralization; Interpretive comment: approximate age reported in SEG Centennial Volume appendix
References: Energy, Mines, and Resources, Canada, 1989
Canadian Mineral Deposits Not Being Mined in 1989
Mineral Resources Bulletin , Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, Publication code MR2-223, 400 p.

Resource data: Disclaimer - Reserves/Resource Data

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Natural Resources (NRCan) does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of Reserve and Resource information (Data) contained in this database, including whether the Data is compliant with any securities regulations or standards, and NRCan does not assume any liability with respect to any damage or loss incurred as a result of the use made of the Data.

Resource and reserve figures are historical in nature. The Data source provided with each set of figures should be cited if the Data are re-reported.

2.27 million metric tons ore; Combined with production?: no; Provisional entry?: no; Resource category: geological resource
Grade-commodity information: Cu: 2.62 percent
Au: 1.34 grams/metric ton
Ag: 56 grams/metric ton
Reference: Franklin, J. M.; Gibson, H. L.; Jonasson, I. R.; Galley, A. G., 2005: Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits; Appendices on CD-ROM, Section [Franklin] Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits, in Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, Edited by Hedenquist, J. W.; Thompson, J. F. H.; Goldfarb, R. J.; Richards, J. P., Special Volume, Society of Economic Geology, 1146 p., 1 disks
Percent weights allocated to deposit: 100.0%
________________________________________
Generated 2009-01-02 2:44:08 PM with GQuery -- 3.7 ADO (3.19..3.22 -- 2008-12-16)
GlobalDB System, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada
Reference: Franklin, J. M.; Gibson, H. L.; Jonasson, I. R.; Galley, A. G., 2005: Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits; Appendices on CD-ROM, Section [Franklin] Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits, in Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, Edited by He handcamp Kat kat Exploayion Ken Stead ……………..


Natural Resources Canada
www.nrcan.gc.ca

This aint the "Falcon H.C......or your grandpaws Chevy .... this is the Kat Handcamp property. Here is what both the US and Canada gov have on it! .................PS: HAS ANYONE EVEN POSTED THE CLAIM NUMBER FOR FALCONBRIDGE?......NO?.....HERE IS WHAT THEIR REPORT SAYS (( PNO22-16 )) thats #1 for starters.... and for number two the Falconbridge report describes it's Handcamp as being 20 kilometers north of Badger ....but here is the truth Kat's Handcamp "at it's southern border is a full 10 kilometers north of 20 kilometers....it's ....( 30 KILOMETERS ) .............................................................................................................
The US Government has the Handcamp property listed as the highest VSM gold grade for "ALL" VSM properties in Newfoundland!!! This is Huge and the report is recent ............……………… Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits, ....................Ken this should blow them away! …I visited the U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://tin.er.usgs.gov/vms/show.php?labno=750&place=fCA05
Page Contact Information: pschweitzer@usgs.gov
Page Last modified: 16:49 on 16-Oct-2009 And out of the 40 --------------------- Felsic VMS deposit, 14 of 40 in Newfoundland province (in Canada) ----------None of the 40 other VMS style deposits in Newfoundland had a higher Gold Mineralization Level ! “NONE” The Handcamp property was Numero Uno! Top Doggy! King of the Hill! El Fantistico! ? Anyone can go to this site and click through all the VSM sites in Newfoundland and scroll down each VSM property in your neck of the woods and check what I am saying!! http://tin.er.usgs.gov/vms/show.php?labno=750&place=fCA05
Discovery date 1928
Tonnage 2.27
Copper grade 2.62
Zinc grade 0
Lead grade 0
Gold grade 13.4
Silver grade 56.0
Next look at the Date it was up dated!!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ken Stead <kstead@katexploration.com>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ let me explain the difference of what we are calling the Handcamp and what the old records is calling the Handcamp.

In the early years of the old “GullBridge” copper mine, which is approximately 10 kms SW of our claims, much exploration was carried out in the vicinity of the mine looking for the main copper horizon that was hosting the copper at the mine.

Therefore, an extremely large parcel of land(hundreds of square KMs) was staked to the NE of the mine where numerous copper and gold showing were discovered. Gold was at an all time low and too costly to take our off the ground at any dept. That huge property became known as the “Handcamp” property. Over the years much work was carried out in various places with some drilling many KM to the South of our property, where they were still looking for the copper horizon that was at the GullBridge copper mine, yet it was all called the Handcamp. After a while portions of that property went back to the crown with lots of interesting data but not being compiled into one data bank to see the full potential of the whole area.

In the late 90’s a couple of prospectors discovers this tremendous gold zone way to the North of what was called the Handcamp property and they called this gold discovery (wouldn’t you know) the Handcamp property.

That’s why it has caused some confusion over the years as being a property overworked and changing hands, as Mr Bishop claims to raise $$ on, which is not accurate. This area is very under worked and we intend to see what its full potential really is, by drilling it and other areas as well if data proves it should(and it’s looking that way.)

The gold numbers are very high in the area and because of the overburden soil sampling and trenching has proved that there is much more to this area than what has already been discovered. We will continue to do what is necessary to bring this property to the next level and hope that it will warrant a feasibility study to become an economic deposit.

K Stead
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORLD MINERAL DEPOSIT DATABASES
Society of Economic Geologists and Geological Survey of Canada

Deposit number Country Location Names Commodities
176 Canada (Newfoundland and Labrador) 49.16.55 N -- 056.04.50 W Handcamp Cu; Au; Ag

Database name: World Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits
Custodial agency: Society of Economic Geologists & Geological Survey of Canada
Compilers: J. M. Franklin, H. L. Gibson, I. R. Jonasson, and A. G. Galley
Release date: 2009-01-02

Deposit name(s): Handcamp (deposit name)
Political location(s): Canada; Province or state: Newfoundland and Labrador
NTS map data: 012H08 (Springdale)
Deposit clan (type): Volcanogenic massive sulphide
Deposit (sub) types: Mafic backarc ophiolite; 2
Geologic province: Appalachian
Geologic subprovince: Betts Cove
Commodities: Cu; Au; Ag
Geological ages: Early Ordovician (host rocks)
Radiometric ages: Age - Ma: 475; Event dated: mineralization; Interpretive comment: approximate age reported in SEG Centennial Volume appendix
References:
Energy, Mines, and Resources, Canada, 1989
Canadian Mineral Deposits Not Being Mined in 1989
Mineral Resources Bulletin , Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, Publication code MR2-223, 400 p.

Resource data:
Disclaimer - Reserves/Resource Data

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Natural Resources (NRCan) does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of Reserve and Resource information (Data) contained in this database, including whether the Data is compliant with any securities regulations or standards, and NRCan does not assume any liability with respect to any damage or loss incurred as a result of the use made of the Data.

Resource and reserve figures are historical in nature. The Data source provided with each set of figures should be cited if the Data are re-reported.

2.27 million metric tons ore; Combined with production?: no; Provisional entry?: no; Resource category: geological resource
Grade-commodity information: Cu: 2.62 percent
Au: 1.34 grams/metric ton
Ag: 56 grams/metric ton
Reference: Franklin, J. M.; Gibson, H. L.; Jonasson, I. R.; Galley, A. G., 2005: Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits; Appendices on CD-ROM, Section [Franklin] Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits, in Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, Edited by Hedenquist, J. W.; Thompson, J. F. H.; Goldfarb, R. J.; Richards, J. P., Special Volume, Society of Economic Geology, 1146 p., 1 disks
Percent weights allocated to deposit: 100.0%
Generated 2009-01-02 2:44:08 PM with GQuery -- 3.7 ADO (3.19..3.22 -- 2008-12-16)
GlobalDB System, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada http://apps1.gdr.nrcan.gc.ca/gsc_minerals/gquerycache/vms/DP/dp176.html