Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Given the TOTAL value of today's trades, about $0.44, I would call that minuscule; anyone stupid enough to invest in the scam that is SLJB at this point could not drop enough money to get hurt too bad.
IMO.
Think about it. What is the upside of this POS as an investment?
The upside potential of SLJB is almost limitless. In a similar vein, the potential downside is miniscule (it can only go down another $0.0018).
Think of it this way: As the very tip of the stern of the Titanic is slipping beneath the waves, the potential downside is close to zero, while the potential upside is huge.
The only problem is that for the Titanic to realize any of its upside, a miracle must occur. And the downside is as inevitable as, well, the tide. Thus it is with SLJB.
So, care to sail on the Titanic anyone? For SLJB, I guess the S.S. Minnow would be a more appropriate analogy, but at least the Castaways made it to Gilligan's Island. There will be no survivors from the shipwreck that is SLJB.
IMO.
That's just the evil naked shorts trying to keep pressure off the bid. I'm sure SLJB's price will take a more Lunar path... soon... really... any time now... right after the OSC apologizes...
</sarcasm>
I was marveling at that myself...
False and Misleading SLJB PR's
You're repeating yourself, Earnest.
;)
(A) Jannie has been very accurate in her predictions and evaluations of SLJB.
(B) Her claims of having communicated with Steve Sulja and the content of those communications has never been disproved. Indeed, given the evidence I have seen I believe her.
IMO.
SLJB has a special today and everyday on "all that nothing". That's what you buy when buy SLJB shares.
IMO.
You choose to be non-specific because SLJB has NOT suffered any injustice, but rather has perpetrated an injustice (several, in fact) against its shareholders.
IMO.
What injustice do you think SLJB has suffered, Red? Please be specific.
Congrats, fin/Scorpio, you hit the trifecta:
lol..Nobody whined at the SEC when it was filed. No one was out to decieve anyone on that 15c-211.
Wrong
That has to be one of the lamest concerns anybody has ever had. LOLOLOL.
Wrong
Bottom line...they'll have a green light here shortly. Keep spinnin' away. You amuse me.
And Wrong
Umm... does the payment for the attorney route through Nigeria?
I guess you just don't want people to believe you, Red. If you really wanted to support SLJB, you would provide some evidence that would back up your claims. As it is now, you have provided none, just random posts.
If you were to post a link in support of your claims regarding Steve Sulja, etc., it might increase the credibility of your claims.
Please post a link to the message you mentioned earlier containing statements about Steve Sulja and with whom he has spoken.
Thanks.
Well, Red is still doing a great service to the investing community by showing all the verifiable evidence that portrays SLJB positively.
Examples of this verifiable evidence:
*
*
*
That about covers it.
IMO.
If an SLJB long/pumper and an SLJB realist/basher EACH PM me the same phone number for Steve Sulja (and Steve is willing to take my call), then I will call and report what he says about his conversations (or lack thereof) with various message board posters.
Post a link, please.
I agree with you, Sandshark. I doubt there was any NSS cabal driving down the price of SLJB. I think it was supply and demand, pure and simple. That is, a lot more people (who were long on SLJB the night before) were selling than were buying.
IMO.
Do you think 100% of the drop was due to naked short sellers? Or was some of the drop due to fed-up investors selling at whatever price they could get?
If a commodity (like milk or eggs) is undergoing rapid price increases, do you think government price controls are a good idea? I'm really curious to understand your economic viewpoint, given what you just posted about SLJB's price drop.
Who, specifically, said there was no Vista Group?
<palm smacks forehead>
Of course! The reason is obvious. Thanks so much clearing that up, MM.
</sarcasm>
(And yes, I know Marketmann's post was sarcasm too...)
Now that's weird... TWO days in a row with no trades. Does anyone remember that happening with SLJB before?
Isn't this the second (or third?) time that counsel for PV has asked to be released due to inability to contact/receive instructions? I wonder if the rogues (by that I mean AD, PV and the rest of the charlatans) hope to draw things out for so long that the authorities will lose interest OR claim they were denied the right to a speedy trial.
IMO.
You're wrong on several points, JB.
First, no matter what EarnestDD posted, you would say it's not proof. He gave you an incontrovertible avenue by which you may prove or disprove his claims (namely, calling Turner Stone yourself). You are simply afraid to face the fact that he is telling the truth.
Next, people will say a lot on the phone that they would never put in an email. If people reasonably expect that the call is not being recorded and the conversation will be deniable after hanging up, they may run their mouth off. With an email, they KNOW they will be held to what they type in the message. It's sad that some (many) see this as perfectly valid behavior, but it happens all the time.
Now, why don't you just make that call and settle it? Oh that's right, I already said why above: You are afraid Earnest is right.
IMO.
Keep up the good work, Red!
Your posts, taken in aggregate, display the potential SLJB has: Zero.
The evidence you post to support what you claim shows the positive aspects of SLJB: None.
IMO.
Now, red, you're not quite right there. They would have pursued the case, but only if they were paid up front and not on contingency. The stated reason for this was because the chance of recovering any judgment was very very small. Note I said recovering, not obtaining.
Keep up the good work, Red!
You are subtly, but clearly, showing what SLJB has to offer. The proof and evidence you post in support of your claims speaks volumes about SLJB's prospects.
IMO.
I remain confident that each and every one
of my shares is a piece of Loftwerks.
Your SLJB shares ARE a piece of something... but Loftwerks was not what I had in mind.
;)
The company is currently the victim of a series of
circumstances that were launched by certain individuals
and/or groups of individuals who for some reason
or another had some kind of interest in seeing
SLJB fail.
Which circumstances and which individuals and which groups of individuals, Red? Please provide some detail.
Your reply is a complete non sequitur to my question. You claimed Gary Rennie screwed up again. That means more than one screw up. I asked you list the other screw ups.
Please do so.
I noticed the 988,000 million too. But you say Mr. Rennie screwed up AGAIN. What do you mean by "AGAIN"? What other screw ups did he make? Please be specific and cite sources.
Think LOFTWORKS going Moonshot !!!!
Think.
Mods (and everyone here), is the Chairman's request something that can/should be added to the iBox? If the Chairman has a page/link to which people can go for more info, that may be the best way to distribute the information.
IMO.
Hypothetical question, Sofa Spud: (and if this is not on topic, mods, sorry)
If SLJB were permanently suspended from trading, if the OSC/ASC/SEC laid out a mountain of evidence that SLJB was never anything more than a pump and dump, if Petar, Andrew and some of the others (maybe Steve) were tried and convicted, would you still be saying that an army of paid bashers led to SLJB's downfall? Or would you cling to your present beliefs?
Keep up the good work, Red!
Over the months you have effectively, if subtly, shown that there is not one whit of substantive, legitimate business remaining with any facet of things once or currently Sulja.
IMO.
Then,if this is the case (which is not),Why doesn't he resign?
To whom would control devolve if SS left? If he is cutting a deal with the Powers That Be, maybe they don't want to allow anyone else the opportunity to continue the scam that is SLJB.
IMO.
Well there you go. I was at a company that IPO'ed and the period was 30 days when we did it, but we did put out a PR saying that per SEC regs, we would not be talking blah blah blah.
My point is that a company CAN say that, for whatever reason, it will not communicate with the press for a while. SLJB has not done this, yet red stated it as a fact. I asked him how he knows it to be true. That is, is he getting inside info on SLJB?
IMO.
Realy now, How can you prove you can't talk if you can't tell anyone?
Simple, you issue a press release to that effect, and then you shut your (corporate) pie hole. It's common for companies to do this.
Also, my question was not if SLJB was in a quiet period, but rather how redskies knows that SLJB is.
The company, under legal advise, is in hush mode!
How do you know SLJB is in hush mode? Give us the evidence you have to support that claim.