Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Maybe I like to put together lists. I'll add that question to the list.
1. Why take the time to do that?
2. "There's an awful lot of activity here for a stock that isn't going anywhere. We must be on the verge with all these bashers here"
3. yea, whatever. so what purpose do u serve in the RCCH debate?
The burger king hat released that Hess had joined RCCH's board. It attracted attention. Looks like this guy did his DD and published it.
That was the pump and dump into the "move to the international exchange". JMHO Also of interest is the amount of shares it took to drive the price down.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=48664086
The burger king hat has completely lost it. He's now posting rants off of message boards on his $7.95/month website.
www.rccholdings.com
RCC Holdings Corporation (RCCH) Historical Stock Prices
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/historical_quotes.aspx?symbol=RCCH&selected=RCCH
Wichita Falls, Texas, publishes vendor field test report and chooses LED streetlights from GreenStar and Lighting Science Group
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
By New Streetlights staff
The city of Wichita Falls, Texas has started the process of installing of LED streetlight fixtures on the city’s roadways. Last week, crews installed 200 fixtures as part of a 1,436 LED streetlight fixture installation which is scheduled for completion in spring 2011. The project is funded by a $777,000 grant from the US Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program. Following a competitive bid, Wichita Falls transportation officials selected LED streetlight fixtures from GreenStar Products, a Texas manufacturer, and Lighting Science Group, a company based in Florida.
According to city officials, fifteen vendors met the bid specifications of the request for proposals (RFP) and provided LED streetlight fixtures for field testing and evaluation. “Our department did extensive field testing of the submitted fixtures. Our intention was to give every manufacturer an attempt to show us how their product performed in our local conditions,” said John Burrus, director of transportation for the city of Wichita Falls. The results of the field test were presented to the city council, along with the recommendation to purchase LED fixtures from GreenStar and Lighting Science Group, and are available here.
Initially, city officials planned on purchasing 1,000 LED streetlights, but as fixture prices continued to decrease, Wichita Falls was able to add nearly 500 fixtures to the original installation estimate. “The prices of LED streetlight fixtures have dropped considerably, and with this in mind, we hope to continue purchasing fixtures with our realized energy savings,” said Burrus. Calculations indicate that the city will save about $86,000 per year in energy costs for streetlighting. Burrus hopes to apply the savings to purchase additional fixtures over time.
© 2010 New Streetlights
http://www.newstreetlights.com/index_files/LED_street_light_news_Wichita_Falls_publishes_vendor_field_test_report_and_chooses_LED_streetlights_from_GreenStar_and_Lighting_Science_Group_264.htm
there is no office. eom
think I'll get a twelve pack and stare at the ask all day. lol
NASDAQ listing standards and fees:
http://www.nasdaq.com/about/nasdaq_listing_req_fees.pdf
I want to be listed first as the biggest dope to buy into this scam. Make no doubt about it. The Burger King Hat is a crook.
NASDAQ listing and R/S. I'm glad everything has been converted to common.
Why was the action approving the Reverse Stock Split taken?
Our Common Stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. The OTC Bulletin Board is an inter-dealer, over-the-counter market that provides significantly less liquidity than national securities exchanges, such as The NASDAQ Capital Market. We would like to have the flexibility to consider listing our Common Stock, in conjunction with a public offering or otherwise, on a NASDAQ market or on another national securities exchange, but we do not currently meet the listing requirements for a NASDAQ market or any other national securities exchange. To list our Common Stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, we would be required to have a minimum bid price of $4.00 per share. As of the Reverse Stock Split Authorization Record Date, the closing price of our Common Stock, as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, was $ per share. Additionally, the Board of Directors believes that the current market value per share of our Common Stock has reduced the effective marketability of the shares of our Common Stock because institutional investors and investment funds are generally reluctant to invest in lower priced stocks and many brokerage firms are generally reluctant to recommend lower priced stocks to their clients.
The purpose of seeking stockholder approval of a range of exchange ratios from 1-for-2 to 1-for-10 (rather than a fixed exchange ratio) is to provide the Company with flexibility to determine an appropriate reverse split ratio and bring it into effect on short notice, when, and if, needed to meet the listing requirements of a national securities exchange in connection with the potential listing of our common equity on such national securities exchange. The Board of Directors would effect the Reverse Stock Split only upon the determination that a reverse stock split would be in the best interests of the Company at that time. If the Board of Directors were to effect a Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors would set the timing for such a split and select the specific
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/866970/000119312510259023/dpre14c.htm
Can't figure out how you produce more in one month (April) and then again in one week (September) as much as you produced in all 2009, and then have 31 million in revenue for the 9 months ending Sep. 30 2010, which is basically total rev for 2009?
Also noticed in quarterly that LSCG books rev. as orders are shipped.
AAA #1
Thanks! nice report. eom
Anybody like this damn Ibox or what? lol
Looking through the 10q released in August, it doesn't reflect the productivity numbers the CEO was stating. He stated that in April LSCG produced more than they had in the previous year. Total rev for 2009 was around 30 million. That doesn't appear to be reflected in the last quarterly released. He also stated that in Sep 2010 LSCG produced more than all of 2009.
I'm wondering if significant numbers have been pushed forward. And it could be for a variety of reasons...accounts receivable and such. Looking forward to explosive numbers and contracts. JMHO
Are we expecting a quarterly?
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
2010
Revenue
$ 9,759,159
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
Revenue
$ 15,193,103
Just looking into Monterey Mexico. Looks like GE, Phillips, and Sylvania all have manufacturing plants there.
(LSCG) "It is working with contract manufacturers in China and negotiating to lease a 65,000-square-foot plant in Monterrey, Mexico."
http://www.tradereform.org/2010/09/an-american-innovation-in-light-bulbs-but-will-manufacturing-stay-in-the-u-s/
===============================================================
Another similarly "smart" city in the developing world is Monterrey, Mexico, which has emerged from relative obscurity and turned itself into a major industrial and engineering center over the past few decades. The city of 3.5 million sits adjacent to the dynamic U.S.-Mexico border region and has 57 industrial parks specializing in everything from chemicals and cement to telecommunications and industrial machinery.
Over the last decade, the area has consistently grown at a faster rate than the rest of Mexico--or, for that matter, the United States. Monterrey and its surrounding state, Nuevo Leon, now boast per-capita GDP roughly twice that of the rest of Mexico.
Although hard-hit by the current recession, Monterrey seems poised for an eventual recovery. Dominated by powerful industrial families, the area has long been business-friendly. It has also become a major education center, with over 82 institutions of higher learning and 125,000 students, led by the Instituto Technologico de Monterey, considered by some Mexico's equivalent of MIT or Cal Tech.
http://www.joelkotkin.com/content/0097-worlds-smartest-cities
=================================================================
Mexico
Philips Mexicana SA de CV corporate office is based in Mexico City.
There are several manufacturing plants in Mexico. Some of them are:
Philips Lighting in:
Monterrey, Nuevo León
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philips
================================================================
Cenin noted that the approximately 25 percent of Winchester’s products that are currently
exempted from legislation – 3-way incandescent and appliance bulbs, for example – will be
consolidated in GE Lighting’s existing plant in Monterrey, Mexico, where similar products are already
made.
http://crossroadsled.com/documents/GE%20PRESS%20RELEASE%20INCANDESCENT%20LIGHT%20BULB.pdf
GE Lighting has a history of innovation and is responsible for pioneering many of the world's most significant lighting inventions. GE Lighting's incandescent lamps have been manufactured in Monterrey since 1929.
http://www.ge.com/mex/en/business/lighting.html
=================================================================
OSRAM SYLVANIA's Electronic Control Systems Division today announced plans to produce electronic ballasts in Mexico for the NAFTA region. The company has signed an agreement to purchase a 62,500-square-foot facility located at Apodaca, Nuevo Leon, a municipality adjacent to Monterrey and minutes from the Monterrey International Airport.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:a7MsIB11YEcJ:www.allbusiness.com/manufacturing/electrical-appliance-equipment/6005102-1.html+monterrey+mexico+%22lighting%22+phillips&cd=15&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
arkie, I believe what you were referring to in this diagram is the cathode "lead" as in "leed". I don't believe there is any "lead" as in "metal" in the definity lamps. LSCG claims they are fully recyclable. There certainly isn't any mercury as in the CFL's. Yes, mercury is very dangerous. JMHO
http://lsgc.com/corporate/education/technical/what
Absolutely. Glad to know the 60w equivalent is scheduled to be introduced in January. In this exponentially accelerated environment, LSCG will have to stay one step ahead of the big boys. Product generations will be measured in months! wow nice run today. lookin good
http://ledlightinggroupllc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Haitz-email.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitz's_Law
The Burger King hat has always been there. And I suspect always will. I wonder if anybody tried to talk the Eagle out of using the Burger King Hat. I suspect they did. I'll bet the Eagle loves it.
I will no longer refer to our leader as the "Eagle"...I will simply state the "Burger King Hat".
example:
If RCCH has been pounded into the ground, as the Burger King Hat claims...how come the Burger King Hat won't take the first steps needed? As in: ungagging the TA?
Shareholders have a right to financial info. I guess that only works if you can actually locate the company and request it.
Should You Buy Philips’ LED Bulb? Video + Review
In the end, it didn’t seem to work as well as the $20 40-watt equivalent EcoSmart from Lighting Sciences. It was about the same as the Pharox bulb from Lemnis Lighting that came out a year ago. (We didn’t have a foot-candle meter or sophisticated test equipment. Our tests are real-world: people flip on the lights and stare.) Both Lemnis, founded by the great-grandson of the founder of Philips Lighting, and Lighting Sciences have stronger, newer bulbs coming soon.
Lighting Sciences beat out Lemnis in our last test. That makes it the reigning champ for now. But bulbs are coming from General Electric and Osram. All manufacturers are encouraged to show us what they have.
And when you piled on the higher price and the crazy exterior that somehow no one could ignore, it was hard to maintain the excitement. Check out the video. The results were unanticipated.
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/should-you-buy-philips-led-bulb-video-review/
sure is. did you pick any up bag?
Claiming a Worthless Stock Deduction May Have Become a
Little Easier
http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/committees/CL690000pub/newsletter/200807/reinstein.pdf
=================================================================
Worthless securities. Stocks, stock rights, and bonds (other than those held for sale by a securities dealer) that became completely worthless during the tax year are treated as though they were sold on the last day of the tax year. This affects whether your capital loss is long-term or short-term. See Holding Period , later.
Worthless securities also include securities that you abandon after March 12, 2008. To abandon a security, you must permanently surrender and relinquish all rights in the security and receive no consideration in exchange for it. All the facts and circumstances determine whether the transaction is properly characterized as an abandonment or other type of transaction, such as an actual sale or exchange, contribution to capital, dividend, or gift.
If you are a cash basis taxpayer and make payments on a negotiable promissory note that you issued for stock that became worthless, you can deduct these payments as losses in the years you actually make the payments. Do not deduct them in the year the stock became worthless.
How to report loss. Report worthless securities on Schedule D (Form 1040), line 1 or line 8, whichever applies. In columns (c) and (d), enter “Worthless.” Enter the amount of your loss in parentheses in column (f).
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch14.html#en_US_publink1000172262
=================================================================
But what if the stock still shows up trading on the pink sheets with an asking price of a fraction of a penny per share? Some advisers say that miniscule value means the stock is not worthless. But an experienced CPA and a long-time IRS employee both told me that if your block of stock would bring less than the broker's commission for selling it, they'd claim a worthless stock deduction -- assuming they had evidence that the company met its demise in 2007.
http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/taxtips/archive/2006/tax0313.html
================================================================
If the stock is worthless, Matheson said your broker can provide you with a worthless securities letter as your backup for taking the deduction. The deduction will be a capital loss and reported on your 1040 Schedule D. Write "worthless" in the sales price box, and your loss will be equal to your cost basis, he said.
http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2010/01/tax_rules_for_worthless_stocks.html
Now that's the first surprise that I've seen here in a long time. I'm kinda disappointed in you...hype... lol
I was thinking along the lines of being in line with IRS guidelines. Not so sure it would matter. JMO
this is interesting:
Sell the stock to your mother-in-law
Consider selling the junk for pennies to a friend or distant relative. (In-laws qualify, as does anyone other than your spouse, siblings -- either whole or half-blood -- ancestors, or lineal descendants.)
You then have a closed transaction, and the loss is certain and deductible in the year of sale. If the stock ever comes back and is worth something, at least the money stays with friends or family. Here's how you might do it:
Get the actual stock certificates from your broker.
Formally sell the shares to the purchaser, with a check for payment and a bill of sale.
Sign over the stock certificate (on its back) to the purchaser. Have the signatures verified by your banker and/or a local stockbroker.
Send the certificate to your stock transfer agent. Explain that the shares have been sold, and ask them to cancel the old shares and issue a new certificate to the new owner.
Bingo! For a pittance, your friend or relative has just bought a placemat or birdcage liner ... but you have a capital loss. You have a stock sale, a closed transaction, and an indisputable loss. No financial statement review and analysis. No subjective decisions regarding any potential future turnaround by the company. No second-guessing from the IRS. Sweet.
IRS Publication 550 has more information on worthless securities, but it still doesn't address the complex question of exactly when a stock becomes worthless in the eyes of the IRS. Don't risk running afoul of Uncle Sam; if you're holding some questionable stock, consider selling the junk and being done with it.
http://www.fool.com/personal-finance/taxes/2006/02/03/deduct-your-worthless-stock.aspx
Not so sure about that. It does establish some sort of record whereby the company has been in "non-communication" with its' shareholders. JMO
I feel sorry for you, too...
Claiming a Loss for Worthless Securities
By Kaye A. Thomas
Updated February 10, 2009
All stock pickers make mistakes, and sooner or later they make a really big one, investing in a stock that becomes completely worthless.
As a general rule, you can't claim a loss on a stock investment until you sell the shares. What happens if the stock becomes completely worthless, so that a sale is no longer possible? The answer is that you're allowed to claim the loss in the year the stock became worthless — but only under a strict rule that poses problems for many taxpayers.
The rule described here is for worthless securities, a term that includes bonds as well as shares of stock.
Worse than worthless
There are two big problems with the rule for worthless securities. One is that you can be stuck in a situation where the investment has no value to you, but it doesn't qualify as a worthless security under the tax law. You don't want it and you can't sell it. You're left singing the Dan Hicks classic, How Can I Miss You When You Won't Go Away.
What's more, the way this rule works, it can be difficult to determine when the deduction is allowed. If you claim it too soon, the IRS can disallow the deduction. But the same is true if you wait too long. It's like the riddle of the Sphinx: answer incorrectly and you face dire consequences.
That's why nearly worthless stock can be worse than worthless. You know your money is down the drain, but you may have a long wait before you can claim a deduction. On top of that, you have the hassle of trying to figure out exactly when the deduction is allowed, and the risk that the IRS will disagree with your judgment.
As with many of life's troubles, the best way out of this situation is to avoid getting in it. When you see one of your investments take a major hit, the tendency is to think you can recover your loss by holding on. More often than not, the best recovery available is the tax deduction you can establish by selling the stock.
Special accounts
You can't claim a loss for worthless stock that was held in your IRA. The same goes for stock held in your 401k account. In these accounts you don't have to pay tax when you have a gain, so you don't get to claim a deduction when you have a loss.
If the loss occurs in a custodial account for a minor child (sometimes called an UTMA or UGMA account), a deduction may be allowed, but it has to be reported on the minor's tax return. Often the minor has little or no income, so the deduction doesn't do any good. Nevertheless, it simply isn't possible for a parent or other adult to claim this loss: it belongs to the child.
Really, really worthless
You can't claim a loss for stock until it's worthless. Completely worthless. And this is the heart of the problem.
A stock that's in serious enough trouble will fail to meet the requirements for trading on a stock exchange. It will be delisted, which means you can no longer sell these shares in a normal transaction. For a period of time, though, it's likely that speculators will be willing to purchase shares at some dirt-cheap price, hoping they'll end up having at least a little value. Bids for these shares may be available through a quotation system known as the pink sheets. As a result, your shares are not completely worthless. They're just nearly worthless.
If you're in this situation, you may be able to establish your loss by selling the shares for a nominal amount. Even if there are no buyers, your broker may be willing to purchase the shares for a dollar. Too often, though, the cost of selling the shares is greater than the amount you can receive in a sale, and in some cases there isn't any practical way at all to make a sale. You're left in a kind of tax purgatory where you can't claim the loss until it finally becomes clear that the value of the shares has fallen all the way to zero.
Claiming a loss from worthless securities.
(Page 2 of 2)
It gets worse
It isn't enough to show that your stock was entirely worthless in the year you claimed your deduction. You also have to show that it was not entirely worthless in the preceding year. You aren't allowed to choose which year you claim the loss. You have to claim it in that single, unique year in which the stock changed from being almost-but-not-quite-worthless to utterly-without-doubt-worthless.
As a general rule, you need an "identifiable event" that establishes the worthlessness of the stock. Bankruptcy can qualify — it appears that old WorldCom shares became worthless when the company (now MCI) came out of bankruptcy in April 2004, because the court's ruling extinguished all rights of the former shareholders — but stock can retain some value even during and after a bankruptcy. You may need another event that establishes zero value for your shares, such as liquidation of the corporation or events indicating it has gone out of business with no assets left to distribute.
Dealing with uncertainty
You may find yourself in a situation where it simply isn't clear whether your shares continue to have any value. You don't know whether to claim your loss this year or wait for a sign from the heavens. There are two pieces of standard advice for people in this situation, although neither one gives a great solution.
One is to try to sell the shares, perhaps to a cooperative broker, as described earlier. You may not find a way to do that, or the cost of doing it may be more than you want to pay. And you aren't necessarily home free even if you succeed. Technically, if the shares became worthless in an earlier year (before you sold them), you're required to claim the loss in that earlier year, and the loss you claimed on the sale of the shares can be disallowed.
The other standard piece of advice is based on a frequently quoted opinion by a sympathetic judge. Noting the taxpayer's dilemma, the judge wrote that the only safe practice would be "to claim a loss for the earliest year when it may possibly be allowed and to renew the claim in subsequent years if there is any reasonable chance of its being applicable for those years." (Young case, 2d Cir. 1941). Apparently you would "renew the claim in subsequent years" only if the IRS disallowed the earlier claim, since you can't double claim the loss. In any event, the special statute of limitations for this type of loss (see below) takes some of the pressure off, so it probably isn't a good idea to claim the loss in a year when it may seem possible, but highly dubious, that the stock has become worthless.
Nowadays we can search the Internet for information about companies. If the stock is no longer listed on an exchange, check for a pink sheet listing or other indication that the shares still have value. Ideally, you want to document three things:
The stock had no value at the end of the year you claimed the deduction.
An identifiable event occurred, establishing worthlessness.
The stock still had some value at the end of the preceding year.
Abandonment
At long last, in 2008, the Treasury adopted regulations saying you can establish the worthlessness of securities by abandoning them. The regulations do not explain the steps that would constitute abandonment, but it seems reasonably clear that gifting or donating securities is not the same as abandonment: you have to give up all rights to the shares, including the right to determine who would enjoy the benefit if they somehow recovered value.
Note also that the regulations say abandonment itself doesn't create the loss; instead, it merely establishes worthlessness. That means you're still playing within the rules for worthless securities. The date of your loss is the last day of the taxable year in which the abandonment occurs, not the date of the abandonment. Also, you can't claim an ordinary loss when abandoning a security if you would have a capital loss under the usual rules for worthless securities.
Claiming the loss
When you're ready to claim the loss, you have to show it on Schedule D as a capital loss.* You can't claim a theft loss, for example, on the theory that the stock became worthless because the executives were a bunch of crooks — even if that's true.
The amount of the loss is determined by your basis for the shares. You may have seen the stock go sky high before it sank into oblivion, and that can leave you feeling like you lost a lot more than the amount you paid for the shares. You can't include that unrealized profit in the amount of your deduction.
You have to report the loss as if you sold the shares for zero dollars on the last day of the taxable year. That's true even if the event that establishes worthlessness occurs earlier in the year.
* There are limited exceptions under which losses on certain small business shares can be treated as ordinary losses rather than capital gains.
Statute of limitations
In a pinch, you can amend a prior year return to claim the loss. Recognizing the difficulty of determining which year to claim the deduction, Congress provided a special seven-year limitation period for reporting a loss from worthless securities — more than double the usual three-year period. If you're just now realizing that some of your shares became worthless four or five years ago (or six or seven), you still have time to amend your return to claim the loss. The clock runs out seven years after the due date of the return for the year the stock became worthless.
http://www.fairmark.com/capgain/worthless.htm
Lighting Science’s Zachary (Zach) Gibler moved into the CEO position in June 2009 and recently appeared on CNBC, where he explained how rapidly their volume is growing. “Production in the month of April [2010] was equal to our entire production in 2009, and production in just one week in September [2010] was equal to what we did in April [2010]. By January [2011], we hope to have production levels up to April’s level on any given a day”.
http://www.spacecoastbusiness.com/lighting-science-group/
Section 2 – Financial Information
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
On November 2, 2010, Lighting Science Group Corporation (the “Company”) will make a presentation concerning its business to analysts and other interested parties at the Lazard Capital Markets LED Day in New York, NY. The presentation will contain information about the Company and will also disclose certain information relating to the Company’s results of operations, including, among other things, that the Company recorded revenue of approximately $15.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010, had a backlog of approximately $15.5 million at September 30, 2010, and, consisting of the latest available information, a backlog of approximately $18.2 million at October 29, 2010. A copy of the presentation is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. A copy of the written presentation is also available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://lsgc.com/.
Section 7 – Regulation FD
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
As disclosed under Item 2.02, on November 2, 2010, the Company will make a presentation concerning its business to analysts and other interested parties at the Lazard Capital Markets LED Day in New York, NY. The presentation will contain information about the Company and will also disclose certain information relating to the Company’s results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. A copy of the presentation is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. A copy of the written presentation is also available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://lsgc.com/.
The information in this report (including Exhibit 99.1) is being furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 and Item 7.01 and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise be subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
Section 9 – Financial Statements and Exhibits
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/866970/000119312510242812/d8k.htm
It's not a "courtesy" that shareholders should be kept abreast of of a company's financial position. There is a fiduciary responsibility upon the CEO to provide shareholders with up to date financials, as well as making decisions in the best interest of the shareholders!
Best change your name again Vernon Gene, Gene Vernon, you're old and DONE. A lifetime of crap has finally reared it's head on you. That's right...DONE... LMFAO
In a number of interviews, our CEO has stated that LSCG has produced more product in one week this year, than they had in all of 2009.
This is the revenue for 2009, taken from the 2009 10k.
Revenue 2009
$ 31,376,816
If we say that's just for the fourth quarter and if my fuzzy math is correct...we're looking at around $360 million + in revenue for 2010? I'm thinking we head over $10 bucks a share. IMHO
FOX BUSINESS
October 27, 2010
Growing Business Facing Challenges in U.S.
Lighting Science Group CEO Zach Gibler on why it's easier to do business overseas.
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4390295/growing-business-facing-challenges-in-us-/
Somebody posted that Clod Smith was upset about something?
I remember that email well, sadly. Anybody else want to share. Sadly....
You blew it kid. Time to figure it out.
You gonna change your name? LMFAO
Hey Gene! Love ya kid! LMFAO
I have no worries. I just want to buy this company's products. Any ideas how to do that?