Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Maybe our former BOD member needs another loan? IMO and lol
Post 147100 is true IMO and widely discussed all over the internet even
TTCM does not own the app, the company only leases the app. The company owns a 3d scanner and a bad note from awesome lol
IMO
Yes I am sure
Defend the company on public forums with unrelenting positivity and loyalty. IMO
Question when does the paid stock promotion start?
Still would love to have an explanation as to why they felt awesome was a good BOD member. Did they google search him? Or did they know he was suspect? Why did they give him 150k. Very poor management here IMO
Then the app can live by being leased to a new shell?
The company owns a pretty cool 3d scanner and they lease an app IMO
Soon it will be worth awesome money. IMO
SOON new 52 low! IMO
Down loaded tried to use the app.. asked question and was called names on company cheer board then deleted and sold millions of shares into the bid. So awesome!
TTCM appears to have no assets to support an investment. IMO it is a charade lol IMO
Down 28% on Friday and SOON it will be down that much more! Go TTCM the company that owns a 3d scanner and a bad debt for 150k so awesome!
IMO
Can anyone list some other companies that have shareholders paying to develop products the shareholders do not own?
Doesn’t seem normal to have people fund something they don’t own. I guess people can giveaway or donate money.
That’s one expensive 3d scanner!
IMO
Strong relationship ? Investor funds are developing a product they don’t own, yup seems normal. Or maybe it is NOT normal and SOON everyone will SEE. Lol IMO
TTCM doesn’t own the app and I believe that is factually correct. So investors do not own the app they are paying to slowly develop. Seems pretty fishy. IMO
I guess we will know SOON lol
Is it possible management wants this to fail because TTCM doesn’t even own the app? Remember people my understanding is the company only owns a 3d scanner they bought for Main Street shopping and that looks like a flip.
Developer the app on TTCM’s shareholders fold and take the app away. Think about it. Does TTCM own anything?
IMO
True and you have been correct all along. IMO
Heck they even tell shareholders to sell and get out after calling them names on the company cheer board. I guess it is a good strategy. Lol IMO
So they are even warning shareholders just have SEE it to understand. IMO
LOL
The reverse split was discussed by company leadership and that is a fact.
IMO
True because it is so awesome!
Down 28 % ouch! Lol but love it so awesome! IMO
Trip 0 by year end IMO
New 52 week low next week mark it! If I am wrong I will apologize
IMO
This is so awesome! Nothing like a true credible honest company with “seniors” and name calling. Very profesional DLM!
IMO
Amazing the teddybear site thing the drops were a coordinated attac by people who are against the company. That’s just an “awesome” theory. It is more likely to gain support for the previously discussed reverse split, you know the small one! Lol
Love the price action representing the value lol
Hey keep telling people to sell and calling them names, seems to be working out for you all. Lol
Love it
Trips before the end of year IMO
All opinion of course. Continue on your awesome way.
Can’t wait to read the excuses for this price action lol
Love it! Cheer on!
Soon a new 52 week low! IMO
Touched new 52 week low today that’s awesome! IMO
Save small town businesses from COVID 19? Read that once on the company message board. So far I believe they are trying to finish the partnership with the projector phones first. IMO
The company sure looks less than honest. Just look at the messages that get deleted. Look at questions that don’t get answered.
Consider the constant name calling and telling people with questions to sell and leave.
Sure took a long time to oust awesome from the BOD. No reputable company would have placed him on the BOD.
The fear from insiders is obvious to some of the public.
IMO
Fear shareholders will not like the answers. But hey continue to suggest people sell and call them nasty names, that’s working! lol IMO
Maybe they are paying Awesome and don’t want to tell shareholders
IMO
They are afraid of your questions IMO
Now predicting .0039 by thanksgiving holiday IMO
Lots of selling today
Of course if they announce a reverse split the price predictions will change IMO
Yes that occurred on the company official communication chat board. That is how they treat people that ask questions now. I guess they got tired of just telling people to sell out and leave. It should be embarrassing for TTCM and it isn’t, that says a lot about the need for real management.
Just like the guy that needs to cuss here In order to make a statement. For some reason this company has attracted some fanatics. I just love to watch this stock go down. Makes them even more crazy.
“It doesn't even make sense when ACTUALLY USING it.”
Agree that’s why I deleted the app.
IMO
Could easily see trip zero again IMO sub .005 soon IMO
Ouch looks ugly
Sure seems you are correct in your assessment IMO
Is it a normal company structure for the company to have to lease the assets from the founders private company?
Can anyone provide a successful example of this business model?
Well it is more apparent why people on the company chat site suggest large shareholders to sell. IMO
What happens if he ends the lease? Seems that would make all investors bag holders IMO
So millions of dollars of shareholders funds and the company only owns a 3d scanner and a lease from DLM’s private company for an app?
Is still going to save small street America from COVID-19?
Did anyone at TTCM vet the former BOD member before he was place on the board? Did they conduct an internet search of the individual by name as part of that process of a process was in place?
Does anyone know why the company loaned the BOD member $150,000.00 dollars and they wrote it off as bad debt just a couple months later? Is this really true?